Study on Hosea, Chapters 1 and 2

A Bible study collaboration between Pastors Elmore and Downey on chapters 1 and 2 of Hosea.

Chapter One:  Pastor Don Elmore

Chapter Two:  Pastor Mark Downey

Hosea Chapter One

Pastor Don Elmore

May 22, 2011

Sermon Notes:

Contemporaries: Joel, Amos (Israel) , Micah (Judah), Jonah, Obadiah and Isaiah (Judah)

Hosea prophesied during the reign of all these kings (59-70 years):

Kings of Judah:

  1. Uzziah (52--God smote him with leprosy—did what was right with the LORD)
  2. Jotham (16 – 2nd year of reign of Pekah—did what was right with the LORD)
  3. Ahaz (16--17th year of Pekah—walk in the way of the kings of Israel—made his son pass through the fire according to the abominations of the nations whom the LORD cast out from before the children of Israel; attacked by Pekah, king of Israel and Syria; become servant to the King of Assyria, copies altar from Damascus and puts it in the House of the LORD)
  4. Hezekiah (29—3rd year of Hoshea—did what was right with the LORD)

Kings of Israel: (…departed not from all the sins of Jeroboam, the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.)

  1. Jeroboam II, the son of Joash (41--+ )
  2. Zechariah (6 months--assassinated—end of the four generations of the reign of Jehu)
  3. Shallum (one month--assassinated after one month)
  4. Menahem (10--bribed the King of Assyria—Pul—by paying him 1,000 talents of silver by taking 50 shekels of silver (mina) from each wealthy man in Israel; 60 minas = 1 talent (60,000 men)
  5. Pekahiah (2 – assassinated in the palace in Samaria)
  6. Pekah (20 – Tiglathpileser, king of Assyria took 7 cities + all the land of Naphtali; joined with King of Syria and fought Jerusalem; Syria captured Elath (on Gulf of Aquaba);

King Ahaz send Tiglathpileser silver and good that was found in the house of the LORD and copied an altar from Damascus and put it in the House of God; went to war against Judah with Syria; killed 120,000 soldiers in one day (USA lost in WWI 116,708 troops); took as prisoners women, sons and daughters: 200,000 and took them to Samaria; Obed the prophet came and said to them: Behold, because the LORD God of your fathers was wroth with Judah, He hath delivered them into your hand, and ye have slain them in a rage that teacheth up unto heaven.

And now ye purpose to keep under the children of Judah and Jerusalem for bondmen and bondwomen unto you, but are there not with you, even with you, sins against the LORD your God?

Now hear me therefore, and deliver the captive again, which ye have taken captive of your brethren: for the fierce wrath of the LORD is upon you.

Then certain of the heads of the children of Ephraim….stood up against them that came from the war,

And said unto them,Ye shall not bring in the captives hither: for whereas we have offended against the LORD already, ye intend to add more to our sins and to our trespass: for our trespass is great, and there is fierce wrath against Israel.

So the armed men left the captives and the spoil before thet princes and all the congregation.”—2 Chronicles 28:6-14

So they clothed them and took them to Jericho, then they returned to Samaria.

Edomites smote Judah and carried away captives.

Philistines also defeated several cities of the Judahites.

Remember Ahaz had made GOD mad, because he sacrificed to the gods of Damascus;

Pekah assassinated.

7. Hoshea (9 – Shalmaneser, king of Assyria was given presents but later he made a league with the king of Egypt and no longer gave him presents; the king of Assyria bound him in prison and them after a three year siege captured Samaria. He captured the remaining House of Israel and the 46 fortified cities of Judah; then the king of Assyria went to Jerusalem where all the remaining people of Judah had fled).

Hosea was a mainly a prophet to the House of Israel—a few prophetic messages about the House of Judah.

He was instructed by GOD to marry a woman of whoredoms: Gomer

  1. Son – God said to name him “Jezreel”—Scatter – the House of Israel will cease to be a kingdom. His was not named “Israel” which implies dominion, but was named “Jezreel” which implies dispersion. Some say that these last two children were illegitimate:
  2. Daughter – God said to name her “Loruhamah” – no more mercy.
  3. Son – God said to name him “Loammi” – no more my people, and I will not be your God.

After the birth of his daughter (the 2nd of 3 children), GOD says that He will have NO more mercy upon the House of Israel, that He will utterly take them away—but God gives Hosea this miraculous prophecy:

“But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD, their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses nor by horsemen.” – verse 7.

The house of Israel is no longer a nation…divorced by GOD. No more mercy; is no longer the people of GOD…

I must make mention how disruptive this is to modern church world theology:

Rapture of Gentile church----Tribulation----Millennial Kingdom

Coming of the Antichrist-----7 years covenant--Satan bound with the Jews--- for 1000 years


Jews rejected their Savior therefore they are put in a ( ) of history until the rapture of the Church

Two Roman Catholic Jesuits started both the Preterism and Futuralistic viewpoints against the Protestant Reformation—Roman Catholic Church was known as the great whore—The Geneva Bible with it notes written by many of the Protestant Reformers proves this point.

It Is Totally false:

It was the House of Israel that was divorced about 700 years before the coming of their sacrifice for sins—all the dead were in the center of the earth on one of two sides—paradise or hell.

What could they do to put themselves back into the covenant that God had made with their fathers—Nothing.

What could they do to put themselves back into the marriage of GOD—Nothing.

They were without hope; without GOD, without Christ; they were far off.

Their only possibility of salvation was the fulfillment of Passover and Pentecost—it was out of their hands—it had to be predestined by our GOD.

House of Israel--Divorce--Crucifixion/Resurrection--back into the covenant

But we are going to talk about Hosea’s miraculous prophecy about Judah:

There are three books of the bible which tell of the fulfillment of this prophecy:

  1. 2 Chronicles
  2. 2 Kings and
  3. 3. Isaiah

Isaiah 36:1; states that in the 14th year of King Hezekiah that Sennacherib, king of Assyria, came up against all the fortified cities of Judah (46) and took them.

10 years previous he came up against Israel—it took 3 years to capture Samaria and to take it; they refused to obey the words that Moses commanded them; they would not hear them nor do them.

This is when Israel suffered being divorced from GOD, cut off from the covenant of marriage…

Assyria’s first invasion of Judah:

Hezekiah, after all the fortified cities of Judah and told them, told the king of Assyria: saying, Withdraw from me; that which thou puttest on me will I bear: 300 talents of silver and thirty talents of gold.

Remember: Haman offer to pay the king of Persia—10,000 Talents of silver (over 33 times more).

“And Hezekiah gave him all the silver that was found in the house of the LORD, and in the treasuries of the king’s house.

At that time did Hezekiah strip the gold from the doors of the temple of the LORD, and from the pillars which Hezekiah, king of Judah, had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Assyria.”—2 Kings 18:15, 16.

King Hezekiah gave a speech to the people:

“Be strong and courageous; be not afraid nor dismayed for the king of Assyria, nor for all the multitude who are with him; for there are more with us than with him.

With him is an arm of flesh; but with us is the LORD, or God, to help us, and to fight our battles. And the people rested themselves upon the words of Hezekiah, king of Judah.”--2 Chronicles 32:7, 8.

Assyria’s second invasion of Judah:

King of Assyria sent a large army to Jerusalem: King Hezekiah sent three men to him. The representative that the king of Assyria sent, Rabshakeh said:

What confidence is this in which thou trustiest? On whom do you trust that thou revel against me?

Don’t trust in Egypt; and don’t trust in the LORD your GOD for what about the altar that was taken away.

The three men replied to the man doing the speaking to not talk in the language that the men on the wall could understand; speak in the Aramaic language.

This made Rabshakeh mad: and Rabshakeh arose and said in a very loud voice:

“Let not Hezekiah deceive you; for he shall not be able to deliver you. Neither let Hezekiah make you trust in the LORD, saying, the LORD will surely deliver us. This city shall not be delivered into the hand of the king of Assyria.” – Isaiah 36:14-15.

Hearken not to Hezekiah, make an agreement with me by a present, and come out to me…eat your own food, until I come and take you away to a land like your own land…beware lest Hezekiah persuade you, saying, the LORD will deliver us. And then he names all the gods who he had defeated.

Who are they among all the gods of these lands, that have delivered their land out of my hand, that the LORD should deliver Jerusalem out of my hand?

The three men answer him not a word, for they obeyed King Hezekiah’s saying.

They came to King Hezekiah with their clothes torn and told him the words of the Rabshakeh. King Hezekiah tore his clothes, and covered himself with sackcloth, and went into the ………….house of the LORD.

Sent the three men to Isaiah; they were clothed in sackcloth. And they tell Isaiah that Hezekiah says: This is a day of trouble, and of rebuke and of blasphemy…

It may be the LORD, thy God, will hear the words of the Rabshakeh, whom the king of Assyria, his master, hath sent to reproach the living God, and will reprove the words which the LORD, thy God, hath heard, wherefore lift up thy prayer for the remnant that is left.

Isaiah tells the three men of King Hezekiah:

Thus saith the LORD, Be not afraid of the words that thou hast heard, with which the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed me. Behold, I will send a wind upon him, and he shall hear a rumor, and return to his own land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land.”—Isaiah 37:6-7.

Sennacherib’s blasphemous letter:

Rabshakeh heard that there was war with Libnath and Ethiopia; he sent messenger to Hezekiah, saying:

Let not thy God, in whom thou trustiest, deceive thee, saying, Jerusalem shall not be given into the hand of the king of Assyria….Have the gods of the nations delivered them that my fathers have destroyed…

Hezekiah received the letter from the hand of the messengers, and read it; and Hezekiah went up unto the house of the LORD, and spread it before the LORD.

And Hezekiah prayer unto the LORD, saying:

“O LORD of hosts, God of Israel, who dwellest between the cherubim, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; thou hast made heaven and earth.

Incline thine ear, O LORD, and hear; open thine eyes, O LORD, and see; and hear all the words of Sennacherib, who hath sent to reproach the living God.

Of a truth, LORD, the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations, and their countries,

And have cast their gods into the fires; for they were no gods, but the work of men’s hands, wood and stone; therefore, they have destroyed them.

Now therefore, O LORD, our God, save us from his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that thou art the LORD, even thou only.”—Isaiah 37:16-20.

Then Isaiah sent unto Hezekiah, saying, “Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, whereas thou hast prayed to me against Sennacherib, king of Assyria, This is the word which the LORD hath spoken concerning him:

He shall not come into this city, nor shoot an arrow there, nor come before it with shields, nor cast a bank against it.

By the way that he came, by the same shall he return, and shall not come into this city, saith the LORD>

For I will defend this city to save it for mind own sake, and for my servant David’s sake. “—Isaiah 37:33-35.

Then the angel of the LORD went forth, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians a hundred and fourscore and five thousand (185,000); and when men arose early in the morning, behold, these were dead.—Isaiah 37:36.

Hosea 1:7: “But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD, their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen.”

And it happened just like Hosea said.


  1. Lost 120,000 soldiers
  2. 200,000 women, sons and daughters take captive and returned
  3. 46 fortified cities taken
  4. Edomites took captive some Judahites
  5. Philistines defeated several town in Judah

Then they were told:

  1. Jerusalem would be saved w/o any fighting on their part
  2. Repented in sackcloth
  3. Prayer in the House of God
  4. Trusted and relied on the GOD of Israel

Do you see anything similar to our situation today?

Hosea Chapter Two

by Pastor Mark Downey

Continued from Hosea Chapter 1 by Pastor Don Elmore

This message also available in Video

Several months ago Pastor Elmore asked me if I’d like to do tag team sermons on the first and second chapters of Hosea for a visit we were making to Pastor Harness’  church in Indiana and a second time for a Bible study farm family and I thought it was a great idea.  This is our third presentation and Don said we could probably expand our talks because we don’t have the time constraints we had before.  So, I have added some new material to elaborate on what Hosea was and is telling us. 

Don and I learned something about each other’s approach to sermons over lunch one Sunday after church, because breaking bread with fellow believers is a great way to fellowship.  Well, Don usually doesn’t come up with a title until he’s finished with the text.  On the other hand, I just can’t get started until I come up with a title.  I was guessing that Don was going to title his sermon ‘Hosea 1’.  I thought long and hard about what I what title my sermon and after much contemplation and deliberation, I finally decided upon ‘Hosea 2’. 

Neither of us had foreknowledge of what the other’s sermon was going to say, and in that manner of presentation, I think it may be more of what the Holy Spirit has to say than us.  I’ve been to many Identity conferences over the years and the good ones are when the speaker’s messages (and I’ll use a biblical phrase) are “fitly framed together”, they’re touching the same theme and convey the influence and beauty of the mind of Christ in His servants.  So let’s now look at how Hosea 1 and 2 match up.  Hosea certainly has enough pieces of the puzzle to show us something that God wants us to know.  The book of Hosea has certain biblical keys that are necessary to unlock the mystery of Israel’s identity.  The overwhelming majority of judeo-Christian churches erroneously teach that the jews are Israel and that blankety little welfare bandit nation that calls itself ‘Israeli’ is the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, regarding the regathered tribes of Israel.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  You better believe that this propaganda is well financed by those who have not figured out how to get a camel through the eye of a needle.  It’s the same den of vipers that financed the Scofield Reference Bible, which has contaminated the minds of millions of our people.  Just last week (5/21/11) there was a false prophet who predicted the Scofield inspired Rapture, which of course proved its apostasy.  It appears the end of the world was greatly exaggerated; after all, this false prophet did not give his $100 million fortune and luxury cars and homes to charities before his predicted fateful day.  Why give away anything if the world is going to end anyway?   Well, to be honest, true prophecy is a bit more positive and hopeful.  I think I’ll stick with prophets like Hosea.  The judeo teaching is entirely ignorant of Hosea and the basic difference between Israel and Judah (between the northern and southern kingdoms).  The common denominator between the first and second chapter of Hosea is that Israel’s identity would be lost and then found; God will say to them which, “Were not My people, Thou art My people” (Hosea 2:23 compared to 1:10). 

God warned us ahead time that there were going to be pretenders (pretending to be Israelites), as we read Isaiah 44:5, “One shall say, I am the Lord’s; and another shall call himself by the name of Jacob; and another shall subscribe with his hand unto the Lord, and surname himself by the name of Israel” in an attempt to be God’s “witnesses” (Is. 43:10) in the earth.  I ask you, what jewish rabbi has been a witness to the work of Christ on the Cross?  Their only witness is even more perverted fantasies about how they could have killed Him.   The crucifiers have surnamed themselves ‘Israel’ and the innocent blood of Christ is a witness against them.  Their murder of our Savior disqualifies them as God’s witnesses in the earth.  

God’s true witness-nation-race would be blind and deaf, fulfilling God’s Word without their knowledge, almost totally ignorant of what they were doing or who they were.  God said to true Israel, “I will pour out My Spirit upon thy seed [race], and My blessing upon thy offspring” (Is. 44:3), letting us know that we’d be known as Christians, but at the same time known by another name besides Israel. 

God addresses the imposters in Isaiah 65:15, “And ye shall leave your name [Jew] for a curse unto My chosen; for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call His servants by another name.”  Jacob-Israel has become the White Christian nations of the world and God said He loved Jacob, but hated Esau who will be slain according to the prophet Obadiah.  Today, Esau falsely calls himself Israel.  Hosea 1:9 said Israel was no longer God’s people.  In other words, they were cut off from the Old Covenant, the marriage covenant God made at Sinai.  Without this covenant, the house of Israel was toast as far as being God’s wife.  They no longer had the right to the birthright name of Israel.  This is confirmed in Hosea 2:2, where God says to the children of Gomer-Israel, “Plead with your mother [Israel], plead; for she is not My wife, neither am I her husband.”  God gave Israel ‘a bill of divorce” (Jer. 3:8).  They were disconnected from God, but as we’ll see, were reconnected at a later time. 

God’s Law of divorce, which the antinomian judeos have nailed to the Cross, tells us that the wife can, “Go and be another man’s wife” (Deut. 24:4) and that she cannot be remarried to her former husband.  So, she was deported to her Assyrian captivity for all the whoredoms she committed.  What was that all about?  How can a race of people commit adultery?  It has to do with other races, non-Israelite strangers who had strange gods, whom Israel “Went a whoring after.”  God’s plan was to establish Israel as a separated race when they went into the Promised Land, but they failed in their ethnic cleansing commanded by God.  God gives the reason why, “They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against Me, for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee” Ex. 23:33.  What is the purpose of a snare?  To capture a prey; to either kill it or put it into captivity.   

I believe Hosea 2:4 is talking about miscegenation, “And I will not have mercy upon her children; for they be children of whoredoms.”  God only created ‘kind after kind’.  God will not have mercy on these half breed mamzers, because they were never meant to be born.  You won’t hear that in the megachurches, who are leading the charge in adopting non-White children at an epidemic rate; it’s like a cancer of anti-racism i.e.   prove you’re not a racist by adopting a pot bellied kid from Somalia.  According to today’s politically correct definitions, God is a racist!  And the modern church has the audacity, the unmitigated gall, in Yiddish they call it chutzpah, to lecture God about love.  God loves everybody right?  Every Indian, every negro, every Eskimo, every mestizo, every oriental, every antichrist jew, ad nauseum.  What kind of White Christian would tolerate and accept their spouse shacking up with their neighbor, let alone a non-White, of another religion to boot, even if they weren’t Identity?  Is our moral barometer so out of whack that sinners are treated, TREATED to counseling and therapy on the Oprah Show?  Oh, and what fanfare for the last show of this colored priestess of a godless New Age of Aquarius, after 25 years of desegregation propaganda.  It’s the same kind of multicultural universalist liberal that Hosea speaks of.  The universalist church is antinomian, which rejects the Law of God, but the oxymoron is that they think that divorce is a sin (sin is the transgression of the Law), and they therefore call God a sinner for insisting that remarriage is a sin also, especially if it only pertains to one race exclusively.  When will the church stop blaspheming the character and integrity of God? 

It doesn’t take too much smarts to figure out why true Israel became the lost sheep whom Christ came for.  Hosea 2:6, “Therefore, behold, I will hedge up thy way with thorns, and make a wall, that she shall not find her paths.”  You can’t find God through race mixing; just the opposite – you will lose sight of God.  So what’s this ‘thorn’ business?  It’s what God poetically calls racial aliens and there are two witnesses to this effect of race mixing in its many social forms.  The first is Numbers 33:55, “If you will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.”  The second witness is Judges 2:3, “Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be as a snare unto you.”  The effect of being lost was caused by whoring after strangers and their strange gods; accepting them and gladly interacting with them socially.  We can witness the same biblical cause and effect today.  The Hindu gods of integration have taken over the churches.  Dharma means tolerance.  Can you smell the stench of snares and traps of White genocide?  Look at how these stinking gods have blessed India with filth and garbage (said sarcastically).  When a baby is born in India, the infant is purposefully wrapped in dirt and soiled rags.  When a White baby is born, they are traditionally embraced with a soft clean blanket.  But what kind of future are we giving the next generation when a hospital-delivered baby is injected with vile vaccines that would make the putrid recipes of a witch proud? 

One would think that the situation Israel was in would be absolutely hopeless; a future of futility, which some of the lost sheep feels to this day.  Once divorced, Israel was cursed with a proximity to the poor and huddled masses of subhuman refuse, obnoxious deities and theological squalor.  God would allow the establishment of worldly religions so that our people could experience the oppression it brought firsthand.  Most people are completely unaware of the Noahide Laws passed by Congress in 1991 and signed into law by Bush Sr., that would impose laws of the antichrist-Talmudic jews.  So much for ‘separation of church and state’ huh?  One of the laws is the execution of idolaters by beheading them.  The worship of Jesus Christ is considered idolatry according to the Noahides.  Several states are now ruminating whether Sharia law, the laws of Islam, should have jurisdiction in the USA.  We’ve already got a Prince Hall witch doctor in the White House, so what’s one more obamanation. 

God will keep the pressure on until our race says, as Hosea 2:7 puts it, “I will go and return to my first husband.”  Why would a divorcee go back to her ex?  “For then it was better with me than now.”  It was better when Israel was with God.  Even so, God said He would not bring her back to the old land of Palestine, but rather He said (in verse 14), “I will allure her” to a new place called “the wilderness”, where He would court her again.  In that new place, God says (in verses 19-20), “I will betroth thee unto Me in righteousness and in judgment, and in lovingkindness, and in mercies.  I will even betroth thee unto Me in faithfulness, and thou shalt know the Lord.”  America was a wilderness when the first Christians came here.  There were two Supreme Court decisions that declared America to be a Christian nation.  However, the negro President has declared, “America is no longer a Christian nation.”  Did God court any of his ancestors in the wilderness or should I say in the jungle?  No.  Did God “allure” the negro to America?  No.  They were kidnapped from Africa by jewish slave merchants and brought to these shores against their will.  You can take the savage out of the jungle, but you can’t take the jungle out of the savage.  They are way out of their element and dangerous to White people.  Our young people should avoid contact with them whenever possible.  I know that by saying such a thing, one is considered a relic of the past, repeating the racism of those old dead White guys, but if we forget the wisdom of antiquity we will surely repeat its shame.  And they shall become the head, and we shall become the smelly tail. 

Then in verse 23 of Hosea chapter 2 we find the climax of this prophecy.  Let’s use the original Hebrew in the text, so that the spirit of its impact is not lost in the translation.  These names of God’s children were used as prophetic statements; Lo-ruhama means “no mercy” and Lo-ammi means “not My people.”  “And I will sow [zera, the root word of Jezreel, ‘to seed or scatter’] her unto Me in the earth; and I will have mercy on Lo-ruhama; and I will say to Lo-ammi, thou art Ammi; and they shall say Elohim.”  In other words, the name Jezreel means ‘to scatter’ as seed in a field, and this is the meaning of the name in Hosea 1:3.  But it has a double meaning.  It also means ‘to sow’.  One must scatter the seed to sow it and bring an increase of grain; “As the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured or numbered.”  God didn’t cast off Israel so that she would stumble and fall forever. 

Israel was being appointed to a new place, to be planted, where they would move no more (II Sam. 7:10).  It’s a fact that we can’t run or hide anywhere anymore; we have taken root right here.  Israel was to multiply as seed in a field, meaning the world.  Let me just say parenthetically, do not lose sight of the parable of the wheat and the tares (Mt. 13:36-43), because there is no communion between light and dark, even though we have become entangled with weeds.  But why all these growing pains?  It’s so that she might fulfill the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  God used Israel’s sin as an occasion to divorce her and send her packing out of His house, not so she would be forever falling, but so that she would be used of God in a mighty way. 

Paul put it this way, “Have they stumbled that they should fall?  God forbid; but rather through their fall, salvation is come unto the nations” Romans 11:11.  Paul understood Hosea’s prophecy that God would again restore our race.  He understood the underlying purpose that all Israelite nations would be saved (not the United Nations).  How?  Jesus tells us by way of parable (Mt. 13:44), that God found a treasure (meaning Israel, Ex. 19:5) in the field (or world, Mt. 13:38, where all the wheat and tares were growing simultaneously).  He then hid it in the field until He had time to sell everything He had (including giving up His life on the Cross) to raise the money to buy the field (world).  The judgment of ‘no mercy’ was to be reversed: “I will have mercy upon her that had not obtained mercy” Hosea 2:23.  The prophet simply restates what was promised in 1:10. 

In Christian Identity, we believe God created the first two White people on earth, Adam and Eve, and empowered them to rule the earth, because that was His plan.  Every calling of God is a divine appointment.  Not all who claim these callings are legitimate of course.  It is up to us to identify who has the Spirit of God to lead us.  History is full of usurpers, who are not truly called of God, but who think they have the right to rule us.  For example, David was called, but Absolom (his third son) was a usurper.  Likewise, king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon had a genuine call of God as Jer. 27:6 says, “I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, My servant, and I have given him also the beast of the field to serve him.”  At the time, most of the prophets in Jerusalem didn’t believe Jeremiah and so they supported king Zedekiah who wanted to remain on the throne in spite of God’s ruling.  So Jeremiah said (in 27:9-10), “Do not listen to these prophets… who tell you not to serve the king of Babylon.  For they lie to you, to remove you from your land; and that I [saith the Lord] should drive you out, and ye should perish.” 

The false prophets were going by the old revelation which promised that the seed of David would rule God’s throne forever (Ps. 89:36).  What they didn’t take into account was sin.  They conveniently forgot verses 30-32 of Psalms 89, which promised that God would judge David’s seed (descendants) if they violated the Covenant under which they received the mandate to rule.  They also underestimated God having other ways of fulfilling His promise to David, because, you see, king Zedekiah had daughters through whom the promises would continue.  Jeremiah was their great uncle and became their guardian after the fall of Jerusalem and the southern kingdom went into bondage to Babylon.  But, history shows that he brought his niece, Tea Tephi, on a voyage to Ireland where she married into the kingly line and thus the promise to David was unbroken.  It was necessary that David’s seed would continue to rule some portion of Israel to the coming of the Messiah. 

But even when Jesus came the first time, He was rejected and His throne usurped by those who were opposed to God.  For this reason, a physical seed or racial family tree of David had to continue to the present day in order to keep the promise to king David.  God has never broken His Word.  So, we see from history that the throne of Ireland moved to Scotland (around 834-840AD) and with it Jacob’s pillar stone, that Jeremiah brought on the trip, for the purpose of crowning the kings of Israel.  From there it was taken to England in 1296AD, where a coronation chair was built to house the stone.  The jews of today have no such history.  This stone was returned to Scotland in 1996 after 700 years in England. 

The point is that in Jeremiah’s day, the people and the king did not want to submit to the divine ruling which transferred authority from Zedekiah to Nebuchadnezzar.  We are a stubborn and stiffnecked race.  Carnal minds do not voluntarily give up power, whereas the spiritually minded surrender their lives to God, being that He created us in the first place.  Jeremiah admitted a truth in 10:23, “That our lives are not our own.  We are not able to plan our own course.”  Do you think life on this earth is our story or His story (history)?  Invariably, our people revolt and so bring the judgment of God upon themselves.  The revolt was supported by the other prophets and politicians, except for Jeremiah and those few who believed the Word of God through him.  Few royal monarchies have ever understood God’s plan for the ages properly, because they seem to think that the old ‘divine right of kings’ was biblical and that it was their right to be served. 

That’s why there’s been so much hoopla on TV about the royal wedding of William and Kate and the extravaganza before with Charles and Diana.  That’s not what it’s about.  The Kingdom of God says that a ruler is a servant and he who has the greatest authority is the greatest servant of all.  In other words, power is to be used to benefit people, rather than flaunting one’s wealth and position.  It can’t get much more corrupt than William marrying a jewess and turning the wedding into a glorification of all religions.  All the more reason to believe in the imminent return of Jesus Christ, the King of kings, to claim His bride Israel and to rightfully sit on the throne of David. 

Adam was the original ‘chosen’ one to rule the earth.  He wasn’t chosen for salvation, but rather to subdue the earth to the principles of righteousness in preparation for putting all things under the feet of Christ.  Adam’s failure brought about a long, long detour, but even so, the birthright continued to be passed down from generation to generation, to Noah, Shem and finally to Isaac.  Abraham died before Shem, so although he was in line to receive the birthright, he did not actually succeed Shem.  Instead, it went to Isaac, who passed it down to us.  “For in Isaac shall thy seed [race] be called” Gen. 21:12.  How would God fulfill this prophecy?  After Israel’s Assyrian captivity, the Persians called Isaac’s sons the Sacae or Sakai.  The simple and logical linguistics of the Sacae sons evolved into the word Saxon.  The Anglo-Saxons of today are the sons of Isaac.

To this day, after 6,000 years, we have yet to establish the birthright, which is the manifestation of the sons of God, because we are still the children of God.  But, as you know, children grow up fast.  This is the calling of Christ in His second appearance: that those children trained up in the way they should go, will not depart from it when they’re older (Prov. 22:6).  They will be the ones qualified to be chosen, because they will be in agreement with God, rather than in rebellion.    

Unfortunately, the Kingdom has been postponed because the Church Age of the last 2,000 years has been in disagreement with God.  The religious institutions that called themselves Christian failed to teach our people how to hear and obey God’s Law.  When God redeemed Israel from Egypt, He formed them into a nation at Mt. Sinai.  He choose them to rule the world, but they failed.  Though the glory of God was in their midst, housed in the Ark of the Covenant that was in Shiloh, the people did what was right in their own eyes and the priesthood followed suit.

You’ve heard ‘like father – like son’; well, Hosea 4:9 says, “Like people, like priest; and I will punish them for their ways”, because the priests reflected the collective heart of the people, the glory of God departed from Israel.  God just runs out of mercy.  The church is fond of quoting the words of Jesus, “Upon this rock will I build My church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”  Well, guess what?  The church has gone to hell.  Hence the message to the seven churches in John’s Revelation is a general message to the different types of churches, but each message ends with “To him that overcomes.”  The clear implication is that not everyone in the church would be an overcomer.  God has not forsaken the White race as she has forsaken him; as Hosea assures us that we will regain His mercy. 

It means He will bring our people back into a marriage covenant relationship again, but it will be through the overcomers, not the church.  You see, when God puts forth his callings at the appointed times and they progressively fail, our Lord knows that the final calling will succeed.  The call has always been to our race; going from our original parents, to the Levitical priesthood, to the nation of Israel, to the church, to those White Christians whose destiny in the last days overcome the world.  And so we see in history that the ex-Israelites moved into Europe, lost their identity, with just about everyone saying they are not God’s chosen people (because of identity theft) and yet they became the Christian nations of the world and were consequently called the ‘sons of the living God’.  The prophetic story is amazing as only God could orchestrate everything with impeccable timing.  Could any man write a novel as exciting as the one God wrote?  It would certainly make for an exciting movie of epic proportions.     

One last loose end, in case you were wondering: when God divorced Israel, how was it possible for Him to ever remarry her again lawfully?  Isaiah 50:6 provides the answer where God says, “I gave My back to the smiters, and My cheeks to them that plucked off the hair; I hid not My face from shame and spitting.”  They treated our Savior like dirt.  The persecution and death of Christ on the Cross was the means by which God would redeem Israel.  Then when He was raised up in newness of life at the resurrection, Jesus was by law a new creature.  Thus, He became eligible, in the eyes of the Law, to remarry Israel.  Paul reveals the secret in I Cor. 7:39 by saying, “The wife is bound by the Law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married.” 

It was God’s plan to do the most inconceivable act in history – to die.  And so, Jesus was born on earth for the purpose of dying to redeem His people, Israel.  But, there is still a work to be done in Israel’s heart before the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, for He has no intention of entering into another bad marriage.  White people must repent of their sins, of whoring after strange gods and, in fact, we must divorce ourselves from every unholy thing we’ve ever worshipped or been married to.  The bride is to make herself ready, “Arrayed in fine linen, clean and white, for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints” (Rev. 19:7-8). 

Meanwhile, on an individual level, you and I can enter into this New Covenant and enter the engagement with Him as His fiancé, for the Law will be written in our hearts and minds (Heb. 10:16).  And you and I know this sounds bigoted, but the New Covenant is only made with the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Heb. 8:8), the very same race of people that each and every other covenant was ever made by God.  In the Gothic language, the word ‘bigot’ means ‘by God’.  By God, we are blessed with the racial message of the prophet Hosea.  May our lost secular brethren discover who they are and may churchianity remove that cursed “judeo” from their Christianity.  And God will say to our kindred, which were not His people, you are My people, and His people shall say, thou art my God.  I pray for that day.  It will be one more prophecy fulfilled and prove that God’s mercy endureth forever. 

Sermons by Pastor Don Elmore 2014

Apartheid America

by Pastor Don Elmore

January 12, 2014

Scripture Reading:  Deuteronomy 17:15

I will spend a few minutes before I begin my sermon on the 9-11 hoax.  I do not want to let this one get away from us as it has changed the world.  The official story: 

Terrorist, while living in deep caves, with laptops and satellite phones penetrated the most heavily defended air space in the world, flying wildly off course for over an hour, hitting 75% of their targets, and not a single fighter was scrambled to intercept. 

They were led by Osama bin Laden who was a leader who had liver problems and required dialysis twice a week who was living in caves and dwellings in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It must have been a long extension cord!  He lived until he was assassinated after ten years.

NORAD and all military agencies, and all government assistance and defense, non-existent until well after the attacks had taken place.  Oh! Sorry victim families & fellow citizens!  We failed to mention, I mean, forgot to mention WTC-7 in the final official report.”

I have put up on the wall the 19 accused Arab terrorists who were the people the FBI accused as the hi-jackers who died in the four airplanes that crashed on September 11.  Notice that none of these nineteen men were from either Iraq or Afghanistan; but that’s not the real issue—nine of them were found to be alive and well

After this huge mistake was found out; the FBI did not add any other faces to replacing the ones who were still living.  So that means that flight #11 that supposedly crashed into North Tower had only one Arab hi-jacker on it:  Satam Suqami; and the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania had only two hi-jackers on it with box cutters.   What a fantastic lie.

And don’t forget the building #7 that the 9-11 Commission forgot to mention; fell in less than seven seconds.     Which story do you believe or do you not believe any of them?  Does it make any difference to you which one is the correct story?

The same is true in the religious area.  Do you know which church is telling you the truth or which one is lying to you?  Does it make any difference to you if you celebrate Christ’s Mass of if you don’t?  Who are the Gentiles?  Are they non-Jews or are they the House of Israel? 

Tracking the 19 Hijackers:  What are they up to now?

At least 9 of them survived 9/11

A former high-level intelligence official told me, "Whatever trail was left
--for the F.B.I. to chase." New Yorker 10/1/01 by Seymour Hersh

American Airlines #11 Boeing 767
7:45 a.m. Departed Boston for Los Angeles
8:45 a.m. Crashed into North Tower of World Trade Center

Satam Suqami 

Satam Suqami

Waleed Alshehri 

Waleed Alshehri

Wail Alshehri 

Wail Alshehri

Mohamed Atta 

Mohamed Atta

Abdulaziz Alomari 

Abdulaziz Alomari

Used Firearm

Still Alive3

Still alive10
BL Video12
Still Alive9
U.S. Military1
Still Alive4
U.S. Military1

American Airlines #77 - Boeing 757
8:10 a.m. Departed Dulles for Los Angeles
9:39 a.m. Crashed into Pentagon

  Khalid Almihdhar

Khalid Almihdhar

 Majed Moqed 

Majed Moqed

 Nawaf Alhazmi 

Nawaf Alhazmi

Salem Alhazmi 

Salem Alhazmi 

Hani Hanjour 

Hani Hanjour 

Still Alive2
Lived w/FBI20

 Lived w/FBI20  Still Alive6
BL Video12
Lacked alleged
flying ability19
United Airlines #175 - Boeing 767
7:58 a.m. Departed Boston for Los Angeles
9:05 a.m. Crashed into South Tower of World Trade Center

Marwan Al-Shehhi 

Marwan Al-Shehhi

Fayez Rashid 

Fayez Rashid

Ahmed Alghamdi

Ahmed Alghamdi

Hamza Alghamdi

Hamza Alghamdi

Mohand Alshehri

Mohand Alshehri

Still Alive11
Alleged Pilot
  U.S. Military1

U.S. Military1

United Airlines #93 - Boeing 757
10:03 a.m. Crashed in Stony Creek Township

Saeed Alghamdi

Saeed Alghamdi

Ahmad Haznawi

Ahmad Haznawi

Ahmed Alnami

Ahmed Alnami

Ziad Samir Jarrah

Ziad Samir Jarrah

Still Alive5
U.S. Military1

Still Alive7
U.S. Military1
Alleged Pilot

The FBI still says these are the terrorists.14 But when they are found alive, the FBI says their identity was stolen, and its not the terrorist.15

Remember that suspicious bin Laden "confession" video?

These aren't the first mistakes. FBI quickly had amended the original list8, as the original "suicide hijackers" came forward!

Flight paths of the four hijacked planes used in the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001:

  1. 7:59 a.m. American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767, departs Logan Airport bound for Los Angeles with 81 passengers and crew of 11.
  2. 8:14 a.m. United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767, also departs Boston for Los Angeles with 56 passengers and crew of nine.
  3. 8:20 a.m. American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, departs Washington's Dulles Airport for Los Angeles with 58 passengers and crew of six.
  4. 8:42 a.m. United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, leaves Newark for San Francisco with 37 passengers and crew of seven.
  5. 8:46 a.m. American Airlines Flight 11 crashes into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
  6. 9:03 a.m. United Airlines Flight 175 slams into the South Tower of the World Trade Center.
  7. 9:37 a.m. American Airlines Flight 77 hits the Pentagon. Hijacked from Dulles, Flight 77 slams into the West side of the Pentagon.
  8. 9:59 a.m. The South Tower collapses.
  9. 10:03 a.m. United Airlines Flight 93 crashes in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.
  10. 10:28 a.m. The North Tower collapses.

The American way of life under the Articles of  Confederation and later the Constitution, during America’s first ninety-three years of existence, had laws and traditions that, in today’s liberal culture, seem to be very strange.  In fact, most present-day Americans would be totally repulsed to live in such a politically incorrect society:  but it was a Christian-based society.  If today’s Christians lived in those beginning days, they would feel very comfortable about how things were.  But now, they would think it very strange, because that is not as it is now.  It is now just the opposite of what it was back then.  Now what would you think about a nation in which only White men, over twenty-one years old, who were landowners and paid taxes, were the only ones who were:

  • Allowed to vote
  • Hold office
  • Be on the jury
  • Be in the militia

Some political offices, like the President, had to be filled by a White man who was over the age of thirty-five.  But it was still true that no women of any race could vote or hold any office until there was a feminist movement which resulted in a Constitutional Amendment that was passed in 1920!   And no non-Whites could vote:  that means no Blacks, no Mexicans, no Asians, no Filipinos, no Mulattos, no Native Americans, and no atheistic White could vote, hold office be on a jury or be in the militia until after the War Between the States had been concluded.

So the United States of America has had this voting law:

  • No one except White men could vote and hold office for the first 93 years of its history (1869 – 1776);
  • Certain Blacks could vote after 1869 and they have voted for 145 years (2014 – 1869);
  • Asian Pacific Americans were considered “aliens ineligible for citizenship” since 1790 and did not vote in large numbers until after 1965 which was 49 years ago (2014 -1965);
  • Compared to only 94 years of allowing women of all races the right to vote (2014 – 1920). 

What a difference this law would have made in the last two Presidential elections if the laws of the nation had not changed from its first 93 years of existence.  Women of all races supported Obama with a high voting percentage, but Barack Obama would not have been the winner anyway.  He would not even have been allowed to run.  He would first have to produce a valid birth certificate.  But then he wouldn’t be allowed to hold the office of a Senator or a President for Barack Obama was a mulatto; a child of a White and a Black parent. 

And he wasn’t a natural born citizen either.  Both Mitt Romney and Obama couldn’t vie for the coveted office, as they were both disqualified from holding the office of President of the United States.  They both were not born in the territory of America and thereby, could not run for the President.   And John McCain also was not a natural born citizen, so he wasn’t qualified under the United States Constitution to be President either.  So both the Republican and Democratic Parties have not had a qualified candidate for President in the last two elections.  With over three hundred million people to choose from, neither political party could find a person who qualified to be President?  What a disgrace!

Who could be a juror?  Only certain citizens, Christian White men, were allowed to be on the jury:  there was only one exception.  Before the War Between the States, only one State – Massachusetts, allowed non-Whites to be a part of their jury system.  No women were allowed of any race to be on the jury until after 1865.  No non-White men were allowed:  No Blacks, no Mexicans, no Asians, no Filipinos, no Native Americans, no atheistic Whites, no mulattos etc. were allowed to be a juror.   

Judges had to be Christian White men, for what law were they judging?   They were judging some of God’s Laws and there was a need to know and understand it.  But later Jewish kabbalah philosophy, disguised as the science of psychology, came into being in the late 1800’s.  This false tenet became very popular, very quickly.  It soon was instructing a person of how he could live his life without God.  It had crept into every area of American society; including almost every church.  These unbiblical psychology courses are also now taught in almost all so-called Christian schools and universities as well as preached from many of its pulpits.

The Supreme Court is the third branch of the American government.  It is part of the checks and balances that was derived from the Constitutional Convention.  This is the last place that you can take a case and get a final decision.  Originally it was composed of all-White Christian men, all Protestants.  But now we have 5 Caucasians, 2 Jews, 1 Puerto Rican and 1 Black; that is 6 Roman Catholics, 3 Jews, and 0 Protestants.  And the United States began as a Protestant Nation!   And now we have lost the highest court of the land into the hands of our enemies.

White men were the ones who ran most companies and corporations after attending post-high school teachings in a college or university.  There were very few White women who were there; except in the colleges of Education and Nursing.  It was expected that the White women would be the ones whose job it were to give birth to children and to biblically guide the home and rear the children.  There were very few non-whites in institutions of higher learning.  Whites had their businesses and Blacks had theirs.  They were basically living separate lives.

The immigration of the United States drastically changed from being mostly Christian White men and White women with their White children coming from Europe to a very different third world non-Christian, uneducated strangers in the last century and a half.  Roman Catholics and Jews, thought to be antichrists, were forbidden to vote and hold office in most of the non-Catholic States, but were allowed to do both on the federal level.  This was because this was a Protestant nation and most of the inhabitants of the land remembered the times of persecution suffered at the hand of the Roman Catholic Church. And many of them read the many Bible verses that taught them to beware of those who hated Jesus Christ.  But our Constitution gave the people that our first settlers were fleeing from in Europe the opportunity that they could opening rejoice over.

In the late 1800’s there was a large majority of both of these two groups of religious people who immigrated to the United States.  The Roman Catholics soon became a major influence in America as well as the Ashkenazi/Sephardic Jew, who has influence a change to the worse for America’s Protestant culture.

Notice that Vice-President Joe Biden offered praise for the Jewish community that raised some eyebrows and seems to have delighted anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists. At the Democratic National Convention event for Jewish American Heritage Month last month, after noting Jewish Americans’ disproportionate representation in Congress, impressive share of Nobel Prizes, and role in the civil-rights and womens’-rights movements, Biden then praised their work in behalf of gay marriage via their control of the media.

“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he explained, “. . . Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.”

Vice-President Biden also cited one of his favorite explanations for the success of gay marriage —

“it wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was Will and Grace, it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” the measure.

In those developments, Biden explained, “the influence [of Jewish people] is immense. The influence is immense.”

They both (Roman Catholic and Jewish) have put Protestant America in a very bad position in regards to their serving their God.  The original Protestant America has traded in their holy days for their holidays; they have traded their gospel for the message of a false hope; they have traded their modest apparel for the modern short skirts and low-cut blouses; they have traded their traditional marriages for the concept of same-sex marriages; and the same is true in feminism, birth control, aborticide, Sabbath keeping,   the change in popular music, drug culture, sodomy, bank usury, miscegenation, change in immigration and many other issues.       

Now we have so many third world people immigrating, legally and illegally, to the United States that the Caucasian race has lost its majority in two States already:  New Mexico and California. By the year 2025 it is projected that the United States will be no longer inhabited by a majority of the White race; it will be a Brown America!

Interracial marriage was illegal and unlawful in the nation and it was considered to be such a horrible sin that it was forbidden by all of the States, the nation and the churches. The penalty for those who were guilty of interracial marriage was either jail time or execution.  The Bible has a partially different punishment for the crime, but it refers to it as being an abomination to God.  Approval of interracial marriages among non-Christians in America began when the marriage licenses came into being in the late 1800’s. 

Most of the partners of mixed-marriages were married by a Justice of the Peace, rather than a Christian church clergy as the vast majority of the churches did not marry racially-mixed couples.  But today the church has changed from being the “most segregated place in America on Sunday morning” to an integrated, apostate church that marries just about anybody. They even marry sodomites.  Many of the clergy are now sodomites themselves!

Many States had laws against interracial marriages until the Supreme Court ruled against them in 1967.  It ruled that interracial marriages were now unconstitutional. So for 178 years of our nation being under the American Constitution it was constitutional.  But for the last 47 years it has been considered unconstitutional!  How nonsensical can you get?

For Christians it is even a bigger issue.  Is race-mixing a sin?  Is miscegenation an abomination against our God?  For the majority of time of our nation the churches said that it was a sin and that God hated it.  The rules are now turned around; evil for good.  And race-mixing isn’t the only change:  There is feminism, birth control, aborticide, same-sex marriages, sodomy, bank usury, Sabbath keeping, and many more that the church taught were sins but now there is agreement or toleration with these sins.

Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Quakers, Presbyterians, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Unitarians, and Congregationalists were some of the major denominations in America in the beginning.   Almost all of these were all-White churches with all-Black churches existing independently.   The Black churches would usually be pastored by a White man until the church could call a qualified Black man to be their pastor.  And then he would leave.

There were also a large number of Mennonites and Amish who came to this country in the 1700’s and 1800’s.  They were true Christians who refused to trade the new inventions which would make their lives more convenient for a few of Satan’s wiles.  Many followed a man who was a former Roman Catholic priests who had never read his Bible; Menno Simons.  When he began to read it, he was shocked at the things that he found out.  He discovered that the Roman Catholic Church was the antichrist Church.  He quit the Church as a priest, and became the leader of the Mennonites.  They were an all-White church that came from Europe.

But there were new restoration churches that sprang into being in the 1800’s:  The Christian Church, Church of Christ, Disciples Church, Church of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Jehovah Witnesses, etc. were a few of these restoration churches which admitted different races and added false doctrines.  These churches considered the present main-line churches to be apostate and taught that there was a need for a new church.  So they replaced the former churches of Christianity.

And today, we have a host of new “Christian” churches, mega-churches: The Vineyard; Cornerstone; Crossroads; Saddleback Church of Lake Front, California; Southeast Christian Church of Louisville, Kentucky; Willow Creek Community Church of Winter Springs, Florida; etc.; Lakewood Church of Houston, Texas;  College Park Church in Indianapolis, Indiana; etc.; churches with multi-cultural congregations with a Judeo-Christian theme.  Most, if not all of them, have rock and roll bands for the worship service.  This music, which came from the beat of the African drums of the slaves from Africa, prompted the entrance of demonic influence in our nation.

Slavery was legal and lawful in many States and was protected by the Constitution and the Bible.  Shortly before the War of Northern Aggression (Civil War) there were movements to pay the slave-holders for their slaves and ship them back to Africa.   Marcus Garvey was a Black leader who was transporting Blacks back to Liberia, Africa.  He was very successful.  Slavery was economically impossible to maintain.  But the jewish-influenced abolitionists saw the opportunity to exploit the situation and do what no other society had ever done—free the slaves with no monetary pay-back given to the slave-holder.  The Jewish Black Boule was formed in order to stop the influence of Marcus Garvey and his movement.

Apartheid was basically the law of the nation. “Separate but equal” were the words used to describe America during this time.  Many elementary, middle and high schools, as well as most colleges and universities were racially segregated.  There were separate drinking fountains and toilets, mainly in the South, in many public facilities. Many went to their own segregated schools.  The Whites lived in one area of town, the Blacks in another; they did not live in the same neighborhood.   

The public schools were targeted after the Supreme Court ruled in the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954.  Massive resistance was staged as the Arkansas National Guard unit blocked the admission of nine Black students to the Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas.  This nearly month-long confrontation ended with President Eisenhower sent in United States troops to protect these students. Thus, the integration of the public schools was soon to begin.

The Armed Forces; Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and National Guard were White and didn’t become integrated to any degree into after World War II.  There were a few non-Whites who fought in the previous wars, but true integration didn’t occur, without difficulty, until the last 60 years.  Now we have the situation where women are allowed to fight in the front lines of the military!  There is also the problem of sexual harassment there has become a great epidemic.

The college and university ball teams and the major and minor professional leagues soon ended their segregation too.  Major league baseball became integrated in 1947 when Jackie Robinson joined the Brooklyn Dodgers.  The National Football League became integrated when four players signed a contract in 1946.  They were Bill Willis and Marion Motley of the Cleveland Browns and Kerry Washington and Woody Strode of the Los Angeles Rams.9   Chuck Cooper was the first black player drafted in the National Basketball Association.  He was drafted in the second round by the Boston Celtics.  There were four other blacks who were drafted in that year.10   Now Blacks have the major number of player on each team, with a token number of Whites and Asians.  That started the integration of the other professional sports.

Now we have practically everything integrated by law—public schools, the Armed Forces, Major and Minor League Ball Teams, businesses, public transportation, neighborhoods, golf country clubs, government offices, juries,  and most former “Christian” churches.  The percentage of people who voted for the approval of interracial marriages has shifted drastically in the last 55 years. Whites in the late 1950’s had a disapproval rate that was over 90% while today the approval rating is over 80%.  Black’s approval of Black-White marriages was 96% which is now nearly universal.  In the United States the approval rate was 87% vs. only 4% in 1958.  Wow, what has caused this dramatic change in such a short time?11

America started out as a White nation; discovered by White people, settled and colonized by White people, governed by White people, with few of any other race or culture living in the land that was given to Joseph.  It was established as a Christian republic nation.  It is no longer; it has been dead for a long time.


How did this all change in the over 200 years of the nation’s existence?  What caused the change in race relations?  What changed it to a multi-cultural democratic country?  It was the Roman Catholic Church and the Talmudic and Kabbalistic Jew with all their front organizations, such as:  Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar, Freemasonry, Roundtable Group, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers, The Golden Dawn, B’nai B’rith, Jesuits, etc.

Exodus 12:43“And the LORD said unto Moses and Aaron, This is the ordinance of the Passover:  There shall no stranger [foreigner:  one of another race] eat of it.”

This verse instructs the Israelites that the Passover meal is not universal; but is limited to only members of their race.  No Blacks, no Asians, no Filipinos, no Asians, no Native Americas, no Mexicans, no mulattos, no stranger [foreigner:  one of another race] shall eat of the Passover meal.  Are we not being consistent to the Holy Scripture if we say that same thing about Communion?

There is the popular and main doctrine of most Christian churches in the present time

“God is the father of each and every person on the earth and all men are brothers; there is only one race—the human race.”  The Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man are foundational teachings of Freemasonry.  Those phrases are often carved in the stonework of Masonic temples.  Almost every town in America and in almost every country of the world you will find a Freemasonic Temple.  Think that is a problem?

The covenant doctrine of the Holy Bible is very seldom even understood by the vast number of so-called Christians.  Why?  Because most Christians do not read and study their Bibles; and the ones that do; read new translations that are full of mistranslations and interpretations.  Christians are so full of chemicals and Pharmacia that these additives no doubt affect the reasoning and apathy of the people. 

America went from the Calvinistic position to the Arminian position—with very few ever even hearing of the covenant position.  The Calvinistic position held that Jesus Christ did not die for all peoples.  They teach that He only died for the elect.

The enemy struck down the main Christian doctrines.  Christianity was being put to sleep.  There can be little doubt that America was established according to prophecy to be the homeland of God’s re-gathered Israel.  We became the “city on a hill,” the light that shone around the world, the mountain of God’s holiness.

We also became the number one target for the enemies of God.  God blessed us with a table in the sight and presence of our enemies and in spite of what they did, they could not take away our joy, our prosperity and our blessing.  The debauched our money, they put us in wars, and they busted our paper fiancés.  They got us to serve other gods thereby making our God punish us.

We have been deceived.  We are under a curse for serving other gods.  Christians in the past have suffered worse things than what we have suffered.  They kept the faith even till their martyrdom.  May our God give us the faith that will keep us serving the God that brought our kinsmen out of slavery in Egypt. 

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Christianity's Rival

by Pastor Don Elmore

February 2, 2014

Scripture Reading: John 8:39-48

What a brutal war of words!  Jesus verses His enemies; the Edomite Jews.  I would say that I have never had a conversation that was as full of hateful statements as is in this one.  Jesus declared to this particular group of people that they were not related to Him at all; for they had a different father than He had.  The proof of this was that they did not act like Abraham:  they didn’t love Him; they didn’t obey His words and they didn’t believe Him.  They were the fruit of a barren tree.  He then declared to them that they were liars and murderers just like their father was; for their father was the entity that committed both of these sins.

Did you notice how the Edomite/Jews answered our Savior in verse 48?  They replied that He was a Samaritan and had a demon!  What did they mean by that statement; calling him a Samaritan?  It wasn’t very complimentary because they also said that he also had a demon. This was blasphemous!  We will try and answer this question in the remainder of this sermon.

Joe Biden's Speech at the Jewish American Heritage

The Vice-President of the United States of America, Joe Biden, offered lofty praise for the Jewish community.  His statements raised some eyebrows and seems to have put anti-Jewish conspiracy theorists and true Bible reading Christians into a complete distrust of government officials.  For when he spoke at the Democratic National Committee event for Jewish American Heritage on May 21, 2013,  the Vice-President said that the Jewish people underestimated the impact of their Jewish heritage; that they underestimated the impact that have had on the development of this nation.  He added that you can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and you can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan. He noted that the Jews in this country had a:

  1. Disproportionate representation in the Senate (11%), 
  2. Impressive share of Nobel Prizes (33% of all Nobel laureates), and
  3. Major role in the civil-rights and womens’-rights movements,
  4. Major role on behalf of gay marriage via their control of the media. 

The Vice-President explained: “I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” He added: “Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.”

Biden also cited one of his favorite explanations for the success of gay marriage — “it wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was Will and Grace, it was the social media.  Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace the measure.”

In those developments, Biden explained, the influence [of Jewish people] is immense.

In an article by Ed Sommerville entitled “Where Does  Chuck Baldwin Stand,” he writes:  “Biden regards the things mentioned above as freedoms, by saying ‘Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us, us, me – as much more than any other factor in the last 223 years.  And that’s a fact.’  He ended his twenty minute speech by saying, ‘We owe you, we owe the generations who came before you.’”

That is what the Vice-President of the United States of America had to say about the Jewish population of this country.  Joe Biden praised them as much as he could; even though our Savior hated them!  Seems to be quite a difference:  Our Vice-President gives praise to the same people that Our Savior gave the utmost criticism.  This is a very strange predicament; for should the Jew be praised or cast out of the nation?

Even though they barely make two percent of the nation's population, they have close to half of all of the United States of America’s billionaires. The Jews have chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios, and are the owners of the nation's largest newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, the New York Times.   The role and influence of Jews in American politics is also equally marked.

Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who was awarded the 1984 Nobel Peace Prize, has candidly identified the reason: "The Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the USA], and to criticize it is to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic," he said. "People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful -- very powerful."

Did you know that February is Black History Month and that since 2006 May is Jewish American Heritage Month?  The announcement was an achievement in the effort of the Jewish Museum of Florida and South Florida Jewish Community leaders for a celebration of Jewish Americans and Jewish American Heritage.

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) and Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) urged the president to proclaim a month that would recognize the more than 350-year history of Jewish contributions to America and the American culture. The resolutions were passed unanimously, first in the United States House of Representatives in December 2005 and later in the United States Senate in February 2006.

The Jewish American Heritage Month Coalition states that, "JAHM also enables the exploration of the meaning of religious pluralism, cultural diversity, and participation in American civic culture."

According to Library of Congress hosted website,, May was chosen as the month of Jewish American Heritage Month because of the successful 350th Anniversary Celebration of Jews in America.

What is there to celebrate for non-Roman Catholics and non-Jewish religious beings?  For the Jews, after they had instituted and taken a major part in the Black slave trade in America, became active in supporting the invisible proponents of these anti-Biblical and anti-Christian movements:

  1. Birth control
  2. Abortion
  3. Abolition
  4. Feminism
  5. Women suffrage
  6. Multi-culturalism
  7. Same-sex marriages
  8. Non-Sabbath (Sunday) keeping
  9. The change in popular music (rock & roll, rap and country)
  10. The change in art (modern art)
  11. The introduction of drugs (sorcery)
  12. The change in medicine (drugs and  surgery instead of diet and herbs)
  13. Promotion of Sodomy
  14. Bank usury
  15. Miscegenation
  16. The “attention-grabbing” sports world, including universities, major and minor leagues and the Olympics
  17. Gambling, lotteries, and other “get rich quick schemes”
  18. Large central government
  19. Pornography
  20. Etc.

They do what they have always done – get the Israelites to change their way of behaving to serve other gods, rather than the God of their covenant.  The Israelites are living now in the “way of Esau” and have no knowledge about the major truth that is dealt with in the Bible.  The lack of knowledge that the Bible speaks so eloquently about is the topic of God making a covenant and oath with their fathers.  Esau has deceived the descendants of Jacob/Israel to forget the covenant that Esau sold to Jacob.  In fact, they have made the descendants of Jacob to believe that Esau has gotten the previously sold birthright back!

Esau's Dominance

There was a massive increase of Ashkenazi Jews that immigrated to the United States beginning after the War Between the States (American Civil War).  This increase of population gave the Jews want they needed to become the parasites of the government.  They began reshaping America away from their Protestant roots

The banking industry got a strangle hold on America when they passed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.  And it has been downhill since 1913, as America has added the income tax, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Education, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, World War I and World War II, the Korean War, Vietnam War, Desert Storm, Afghanistan War, and on and on till the Jew has taken the control of the former Protestant government. 

There are now three Jews and six Roman Catholics on the Supreme Court of the land; and no Protestants!  In fact, the only place of the federal government that Protestants have any place at all is in the Congress.  There are no Protestants in the Executive or Judicial branch.

As Ed Sommerville wrote in his article about Baldwin:  “For over 100 years we have had a tree of evil in America, planted and watered by the Talmudic Zionist Jews.  In my lifetime there have been organizations, both secular and Christian that have tried to fight parts of the tree that they feel is wrong.  They all have one thing in common, as they all take a hatchet to the branches and sometimes they have a few small victories.  One thing however, you will never see one of them taking an axe to the roots, as that would destroy the tree.  They all manage to keep busy with their small hatchets by attacking the branches…

We have well over one hundred thousand pastors today that will stand by the tree at all costs….Jesus said, ‘My sheep know my voice and they follow me.’  It’s really not that hard for the Christians today to realize what people on earth have followed him en mass for the last 2,000 years and have fulfilled over thirty identifying marks of Israel that do not apply to the Jews.”  

After the Jews were expelled in 1290 from England and in 1492 in the Spanish Inquisition, and 1496 in the Portuguese Inquisition, many Jews switched to being outwardly Roman Catholics instead of leaving the country or being tortured or killed.  This was a fatal mistake of the false, counterfeit Catholic Church.  For it added a multitude of murderers of Jesus Christ into their Church.  Their error of universalism, granting the kingdom to the enemies of Jesus Christ, was inexcusable.   It was an attempt to reverse the actions of Esau when he sold his birthright to his twin brother Jacob.  It was a futile attempt to put Esau back into the birthright.

Soon the Jews had control of this counterfeit church and they worked their evil together with them in this false, multi-cultural universal church.  A lot of it was done through their organization called the Jesuits.  Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, was a Jesuit Priest.  In fact the present pope, Pope Francis, is a Jesuit!

How strange; that two groups of people that were not allowed to vote or hold office in the early days of the United States of America; Jews and Roman Catholics, now are in control of the country that forbid them their role to participate in the government.  They greatly influenced America to the place where the Vice-President of the nation gave them an outstanding speech of a rousing amount of praise.  The woman would be riding the beast that was once dead but was now alive.

The Three Provinces of Israel

2 KINGS 17:24, 32-35; 41

(24) “And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Avva, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel; and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in its cities.

(32) So they feared the LORD, and also made unto themselves of the lowest of them priests of the high places, who sacrificed for them in the houses of the high places.

(33) They feared the LORD, and at the same time served their own gods, after the manner of the nations whom they carried away from there.

(34) Unto this day they do after the former manners; they fear not the LORD, neither do they after their statutes, or after their ordinances, or after the law and commandment that the LORD commanded the children of Jacob, whom he named Israel;

(35) With whom the LORD had made a covenant, and charged them, saying; Ye shall not fear other gods, nor bow yourselves to them, nor serve them, nor sacrifice to them.

(41) So these nations feared the LORD, and also served their carved images, both their children, and their children’s children; as did their fathers, so do they unto this day.”

What do these verses have to do with the rival of Christianity, when these verses tell of a historical time that occurred over 500 years before Jesus Christ’s birth?  It tells of what happened to middle portion of the land of Israel:  Samaria.  After the Israelites were taken into captivity by the Assyrians, who took their place?  It was the Babylonians!

Palestine, at the time of Jesus Christ, was divided into three main divisions:

  1.   Galilee
  2.   Samaria (Babylonians)
  3.   Judea

Galilee, which was the northernmost portion, and was where Jesus grew up and was settled by mainly descendants of Benjamin and Levi; with a few of Judah.  It was originally the land of Naphtali, Asher, Zebulun and Issachar of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.  But after they ceased to be a nation, they were taken into captivity in the land of Assyria.  Several hundred years later, Benjamin and Levi eventually settled in the former land of the House of Israel, in the land that was to the far North of ancient Israel.

Samaria, which was in the middle portion of land, was predominately inhabited by Babylonians who were brought there by the King of Assyria to fill the void when the House of Israel was taken captivity.  They occupied the land that was originally the land of Ephraim and the western portion of Manasseh of the Northern Kingdom.  The Babylonians asked the King of Assyria for a priest of the House of Israel to come back and explain to them how to worship their God because of the amount of lions that were plaguing them.  So, the King sent them a former priest, who was an apostate, non-Levi priest of Israel. 

Judea was the territory that laid farthest to the South and included Jerusalem.  It was a mixture of true Israelites: House of Judah; and their enemy: the Edomites (Jews); and the mixtures of other races who were there.  It was originally the Kingdom of Judah that was made up of the tribes of Benjamin, Judah and a large part of the priestly tribe; Levi.

Where did Mary and Joseph Live? 

Map of the provinces of Galilee, Samaria and Judea at the time of Jesus Christ Mary and Joseph (the parents of Jesus) were living in Nazareth in Galilee before the miraculous birth of Jesus.  When Mary was in the last stages of her pregnancy, they traveled to Jerusalem during the Feast of Tabernacles.  They were not able to get an inn in Jerusalem, so they found a stable in the town of Bethlehem.   Bethlehem is located about five miles from Jerusalem. 

While living there, when Jesus was about two years old, they fled to Egypt in order to escape the murderous plan of the King Herod, who was an Edomite/Jew.  Herod, who was full of anger after the wise men did not return to him after they visited with the young child Jesus, murdered every child in Bethlehem that was two years old or younger. 

Joseph and Mary attempted to return to Judea after King Herod’s death, but was warned by an angel to go to Galilee and not Judea (Matthew 2:19-23):

“But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel; for they are dead who sought the young child’s life.  And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel.  But when he hears that Archelaus [Herod’s son] did reign in Judea in the place of his father, Herod, he was afraid to go there, notwithstanding, being warned of God in a dream, he turned aside into the parts of Galilee; And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene.”

The Land of Israel During the Time of Jesus Christ

The city of Nazareth, in Galilee was where Jesus grew up till he was about twelve years old.  After the death of Joseph (His step-father), He went with his uncle [Joseph of Arimathaea] to Britain to help Joseph manage his tin mines.  He made several trips with his uncle there in England and Wales.  But the Bible is completely silent about where Jesus was during this time.  One gets the information from secular and religious writings. When Jesus was thirty years old, He started His ministry in Galilee, not Judea or Samaria.

Notice on the map the cities of Cana (where His ministry began with His turning the water into wine at the wedding ceremony), Nazareth, Capernaum, Chorazin, Mount of Beatitudes,  Bethsaida, Gadara, Gennesaret, Maglala, Nain, Mt. Tabor, Sea of Galilee; they are all in Galilee and were the places where a lot of our Savior’s ministry took place. 

When Jesus began his ministry the Holy Scriptures says in Matthew 4:12-17:

“Now when Jesus had heard that John [the Baptist] was cast into prison, he departed into Galilee;  And leaving Nazareth, he came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is upon the seacoast, in the borders of Zebulun and NaphtaliThat it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah, the prophet, [Isaiah 9:1, 2] saying, The land of Zebulun, and the land of Naphtali, by the way of the sea [of Galilee], beyond the Jordan, Galilee of the nations [House of Israel]; The people who sat in darkness saw great light, and to them who sat in the region and shadow of death, light is sprung up.  From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent; for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

Who was Jesus preaching to?  Who were the people that were living in Galilee?  It was the remnant of Benjamin, Judah and Levi. 

What happened next?  Jesus began to pick his disciples.

Matthew 4:18:  “And Jesus walking by the Sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon, called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea; for they were fishers.” 

Jesus called four of his disciples; two in this verse and James and his brother John in verse 21.  All four left their boats and followed Him.  The home town of Simon and Andrew was Bethsaida, as well James and John, sons of Zebedee.  It was at the nearby city of Capernaum that he performed many of the miraculous deeds reported in the Gospels.  From then on Capernaum was called “his own city” (Matthew 9:1).  Also the miracle of the feeding of the people by the multiplication of loaves and fishes occurred near the town of Bethsaida.

Then in Matthew 4:23, it says, “And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.”

So, Jesus with four of his disciples was preaching the gospel of the kingdom, healing all manner of sickness and disease among the people; did he have any fame?  Was his success limited to the area around the Sea of Galilee?  Matthew 4:24, 25:

And his fame went throughout all Syria; and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with diverse diseases and torments, and those who were possessed with demons, and those who were epileptics, and those who had the palsy; and he healed themAnd there followed him GREAT MULTITUDES of people from Galilee, and from Decapolis, and from Jerusalem, and from Judea, and from beyond the Jordan [River; Perea].

No multitudes from Samaria, why not?   What did Jesus do when He saw the multitudes of people from Galilee, Judea, Decapolis and Perea?

Matthew 5:1 “And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain:  and when he was seated, his disciples came unto him.

The Sermon on the Mount was taught at this time. The mountain was located between Capernaum and Gennesaret.  And when he finished this message there followed him a great multitude (John 8:1).  Then he cleansed a leper. Then where did he go?

Matthew 8:5 “And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him,”  

After dealing with the centurion he came to Simon Peter’s house (Bethsaida) where he healed his mother-in-law and many that were possessed with demons (Matthew 8:14-17).  As a side-note; if the Roman Catholics are correct about Simon Peter being the first Pope of their church, why did he have a mother-in-law?  That meant that Simon Peter was a married man; and no Pope can be married!

Then where did Jesus go?

Matthew 8:18  “Now, when Jesus saw GREAT MULTITUDES about him, he gave commandment to depart unto the other side [of the Sea of Galilee]

It was on this boat trip that Jesus was awakened from His sleep by his disciples telling Him that they were about to perish in the storm.  Jesus awoke and stilled the winds and the waves and there was a great calm.  This certainly amazed his disciples (Matthew 8:23-27).

Jesus was now in an area where he cast out demons at Gadara.  There is much dispute about where this drowning of the Gadarene swine happened; but one location is near the town of Sennabris, the southern portion of the Sea of Galilee.  Other events on the Sea of Galilee is the story of Jesus’ walking on the water; and Peter’s attempt to follow his example and the journeys of Jesus to Magdala, the home town of Mary Magdalene who had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities and provided for him out of her means (Luke 8:2, 3).  

After this he got back in the boat and came to his own city, Nazareth, to his own house.  From there he picked Matthew, who was sitting at the tax office and He called him to be his disciple.  Other healings happened, He even raised a person back from the dead.  It says in Matthew 9:26:  “And the fame of this went abroad into all that land.”

Jesus later said the following to what cities?

Matthew 11:20-24

“Then began he to upbraid the cities in which MOST OF HIS MIGHTY WORKS WERE DONE, BECAUSE THEY REPENTED NOT;  Woe unto thee, CHORAZIN!  Woe unto thee, BETHSAIDA!  For if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.  But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you.  And thou, CAPERNAUM, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hades; for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.  But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.”

Wow!  What a couple of sentences they are! 

That was the location of the ministry of Jesus Christ.  If you look up the cities on the preceeding map, you will find that most of them all in the region of Galilee.

The only time Jesus left the traditional boundaries of the Holy Land proper was during his journey to Tyre and Sidon.  On his way back from this journey, he passed through the region of Decapolis on his return to the Sea of Galilee—possible detouring inland through Gaulanitis to the territories of Abila, Dium, Hippus, and Gadara.  Another shorter journey took Jesus and his disciples to the district of Caesarea Philippi. 

After the return to the Sea of Galilee, the Gospels relate the visit of Jesus, together with the Apostles Peter, James, and John to “a high mountain” – where the Transfiguration is said to have taken place.  The mountain is not named in the sources, but tradition connects the event with Mount Tabor.  After the transfiguration, Matthew tells of a significant incident at Capernaum:  Jesus had Peter pay the half-shekel tax to the Temple for both of them, so as “not to give offense” (Matthew 17:24-27).

Now look at Samaria.  Very little of Jesus’ ministry occurred in this portion.  He mainly was just walking through this portion of the land going either to or from Judea.  One incident was where he met the Samarian woman at the well.

And Judea; Jerusalem was were the Temple was located.  Bethlehem was where He was born.  Jesus died outside of Jerusalem on the Mount of Olives and was also resurrected in the area of Judea.  Not much else happened in regards to the ministry of our kinsmen-redeemer in this portion of Judea, because the enemies of Israel were planning his murder.  In Matthew 17:22-23:

“And while they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto them, The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men, And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again.  And they were exceedingly sorry.”

Notice also what it says is John 7:1 “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him.”

What was the reason that Jesus did not walk in Judea?  It says it was because the Jews sought to assassinate Him.  That is why Jesus lived in Galilee and not Judea.

John 7:9-11  “When he [Jesus Christ] had said these words unto them [His disciples], he abode still in Galilee.  But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast [in Judea, where the feast was held], not openly, but as it were in secret.  Then the Jews sought him at the feast, and said, Where is he?”

At about the middle of the eight day feast, Jesus began to teach in the Temple and many of the people believed on Him (John 7:15-30). 

John 7:32-36  The Pharisees [Edomite/Jews] heard that the people murmured such things concerning him; and the Pharisees and the chief priests sent officers to take him.  Then said Jesus unto them, Yet a little while am I with you, and then I go unto him that sent me.  Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me; and where I am, there ye cannot come.  Then said the Jews among themselves, Where will he go, that we shall not find him?  Will he go unto the dispersed among the Greeks [lost ten tribes of Israel] and teach the Greeks.  What manner of saying is this that he said, Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me; and where I am there ye cannot come?

In the region of Judea, Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, there was the incident at the healing pool at Bethesda, his triumphant entry into the city of Jerusalem from Bethany, the healing of the blind beggar at Jericho, His baptism by John the Baptist near Bethabara, as well as his arrest, trial, crucifixion and resurrection.


Jesus was arrested, tried, crucified, buried and resurrected in Jerusalem and the Mt. of Olives.  After his resurrection, where did Jesus go?   It was forty days until He ascended up to heaven to be with His Father; where was He during this time? 

In Matthew 28:16 it says:  “Then the eleven disciples went away into GALILEE, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.”  The chapter ends by Jesus instructing them the Great Commission. 

In the Gospel of Mark; Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome brought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint Him.  The came to the sepulcher at the rising of the sun but found the stone round away and an entity sitting, clothed in a white garment.  And he said to them that Jesus had gone to GALILEE, and that they were to tell His disciples that they should go there and meet with him there.  They met Him in a mountain in Galilee.   

Besides the Scriptures recording the appearances of the risen Christ in Galilee, it also records appearances in Judea; at Emmaus, Bethany and Jerusalem.  Finally, we are told he ascended to heaven from the Mount of Olives.

To review quickly, the 3½ years ministry of Jesus Christ was centered mainly on the area of the Sea of Galilee.  There were short trips to Tyre and Sidon and a few excursions to the land beyond the Jordan.   Judea was a minor part of His ministry, but was the place of his significant death and resurrection.

In the Hoskins Report Update; February, 2014

“If a pastor does not teach the Law, if he does not teach that we are not to have Edomites in the land, that sodomites are to receive the punishment decreed by Law, that usury is a capital crime, that man is not allowed to raise his hand against man (War Between the States, WWI, WWII) – if he attempts to integrate Jacob with Esau – you have an “Anti-Christ” pastor who is teaching adultery and is helping Esau to destroy Jacob.  One may even find children of Esau in their churches:

‘The stranger (Hebrew:  zwer, racial alien) that cometh nigh the tabernacle shall be put to death’ Number 1:51; Numbers 18:7.

If these things are so, it is certain that God’s curse will come upon us as in the days past.  Our hope lies in the knowledge that our God said:

“Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated” Romans 9:13; “I loved Jacob, And I hated Esau Malachi 1:2-3.”

When the sons of Jacob reject anti-Christ pastors and return to the teachings of God the WORD, God will deliver them from slavery and death at the hands of the sons of Esau and their Judas-Israelite servants.”

On January 26, 2014, France had an anger march of Freeman yelling, “Jews, Jews, Jews, get out of France.”  Sounds like they want the Jews expelled again!

But what was about the middle portion in Palestine:  Samaria.  It was inhabited by Babylonians who were sent there to replace the House of Israel who had been taken into captivity by the Assyrians.  What did this portion of land provide after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?  Do you now understand how blasphemous the Edomites words were when the called Jesus a Samaritan?  We will discuss what role the Samaritans had in Christendom next sermon.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.   

Important History Not Being Taught

by Pastor Don Elmore

Part 1:  What is the relationship of Jacob and Esau as related to today's world?  Who is the most guilty in the black slave trade?

Part 2:  What was the land that Jesus lived like?  In what part of Israel did He live?  What is a fatal flaw of the Jewish agenda?

Part 3:  Who are the enemies of ancient Israel?  Who are the present enemies of modern Israel? 

Part 4:  Palestine was divided into three portions:  1.  Galilee; 2. Samaria; and 3. Judea.  After the captivity of the House of Israel and most of the House of Judah by the Assyrians, who was put in the portion of Samaria?  What important religious leader arose from this area after the resurrection of Jesus Christ?

Important History Not Being Taught Part 1

by Pastor Don Elmore

January 26, 2014

Scripture Reading:  Genesis 27:41-46

This is the story of an incident in the lives of two twin brothers; Jacob and Esau and their father:  Isaac and their mother:  Rebekah.  Each parent loved one of their twins boys the best, “And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison:  But Rebekah loved Jacob” Genesis 25:29.  The twins were not identical:  for Esau was hairy and red at his birth:  “And the first [eldest] came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau” Genesis 25:25. 

There were many important differences between the two twin brothers: 

  1. Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents (Genesis 25:28).
  2. Esau was a hairy man, Jacob was a smooth man (had little hair).
  3. When Esau was forty years old, he married Judith and Bashemath, two Hittite women (Canaanite); Jacob was at this time unmarried (Genesis 26:34). 
  4. Esau, being the eldest son, was the recipient of the birthright and the future blessing which was passed down from Abraham to Isaac his son.  Jacob, the younger, was not the owner of the birthright or blessing.
  5. But one day Esau despised his birthright.  He was faint and thought that he was about to die, and said to his brother:  Feed me with some of this red pottage (lentils) and bread and I will sell you my birthright; for what good is it anyway?  (Genesis 25:29-34).  So Esau sold his birthright to his younger twin brother Jacob.
  6. Later, when Isaac was almost blind, he told his eldest son, Esau to go and kill him some deer and fix some venison and he would give him the blessing.  His wife, Rebekah, overheard the conversation and she told Jacob to disguise himself as Esau and she would fix two goats as venison.  Jacob was to enter his father’s presence as Esau and gain his blessing.  Jacob did so just before his brother returned from the field with his slain deer.
  7.  When the mistake was found out, Esau “cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry” (Genesis 27:34).  He asked his father for one minor blessing as he wept (Genesis 27:38).
  8. Jacob received the blessing:  “Behold, I have made Jacob thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to Jacob for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained Jacob” (Genesis 27:37).  To Esau he granted this one blessing: “Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above;

And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother (Jacob); and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou (Esau) shalt break his (Jacob’s) yoke from off thy (Esau’s) neck” (Genesis 27:39-40).

This is the reason that Esau hated Jacob and wanted to murder him.  It was because of the blessing that his father gave them.  But there was a major difference between the two brothers—Esau was disqualified from the covenant of God because he took as his wife two daughters of the Canaanites (Genesis 28:1).  Isaac told Jacob that if he would marry with his racial kindred that:

  1. God Almighty would bless him and
  2. Make him fruitful and multiply him, that
  3. He would be a multitude of people and
  4. He would have the blessing of Abraham
  5. His future seed would also have the blessing of Abraham and
  6. His seed would inherit the land wherein God gave unto Abraham (Genesis 28:1-4).

When Esau saw what his father had done to Jacob, and that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father, he went and married a daughter of Ishmael (Genesis 28:5-9).  After about twenty years, Jacob returned to the land that he had left, with two wives and eleven sons and one daughter and a host of cattle and sheep and goats and two handmaids and their children.  Jacob pacified the anger of Esau with gifts of animals so that when they met Esau they “ran to meet him, and embraced him, and fell on his neck, and kissed him, and they wept” (Genesis 33:4).  There was peace between the two brothers and their families for a while.   So Jacob journeyed to Succoth and Esau to Seir (Genesis 33:16, 17).

Esau's Domination

In today’s world: Is Esau being dominated by Jacob; or is Jacob being dominated by Esau?  In 2014 the world is under the control of Esau.  When did that change happen?  For in 70 AD the Esauites (Edomites/Jews) were scattered in dispersion by the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman armies.  But Isaac’s one blessing to Esau would come to pass.

But why were the Edomites in Jerusalem when the Romans destroyed the city in 70 AD?  The Edomites/Jews had become the king and the majority of Pharisees of the land.  And just who were the people, the moneychangers that Jesus Christ drove out of the Temple grounds with a whip?  It was the Edomites/Jews.  But how did Esau get in the position of dominance over Jacob?

Look what a Jewish website says:

A decisive change in the relations between the two nations took place in the days of John Hyrcanus (end of second century B.C.E.). Hyrcanus conquered the whole of Idumea” [where the descendants of Esau lived] “and undertook the forced conversion of its inhabitants to Judaism”  [Laws of God given to Israel]; (; Edom).

Let’s look at what Josephus writes in Antiquities, Book XIII, From the Death of Judas Maccabeus to Queen Alexandra’s Death, Chapter IX, 1b: 

“Hycranus” [high priest of the Kingdom of Judah] “took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea,” [descendants of Esau/Edom] “and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews;” [House of Judah] “and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the ways of Jewish living” [House of Judah]; “at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.”

In a footnote at the bottom of the page where this quote is taken from, Josephus, page 279, quotes Dio:  “That country is also called Judea, and the people Jews; and this name is given also to as many as embrace their religion, though of other nations.”  But that is not the Biblical definition; which was a genetic one.  The eleven sons and two grandsons of Jacob/Israel are the Israelites.  They were split into two separate and distinct kingdoms:  The House of Israel and the House of Judah.  “Jews” is the House of Judah; but today it means what Dio says.  It is made of all who “embrace their religion, though they come from other nations.”

“Thenceforth the Idumeans became a section of the Jewish people, Idumea becoming one of the ordinary administrative districts of the Hasmonean state. It appears that the Hasmonean dynasty used some of the respected families of Idumea to establish its dominion in that country”(Ibid.).  So, the Edomites became called for the first time, “Jews.”

Let’s review:  How did the children of Esau/Edom become “Jews.”  It was the result of the House of Judah’s Inquisition.   Hycranus, High Priest of the House of Judah, subdued Edom and put before them this question of forced conversion which had just two choices:

  1. They could be circumcised and accept the laws of God and they could become one of us, or
  2. They will be murdered.

The majority of Edomites chose to circumcise their genitals and follow after the ways of their twin brother.  But did that procedure put them in the covenant that their father had despised and counted as such a light thing?

  1. Esau had sold the birthright to Jacob.  Esau couldn’t ever get the birthright back.
  2. Why did Esau weep bitterly after he lost the blessing of his father?  Esau couldn’t ever get the blessing that he had missed.
  3. What difference had it made that Esau had married the forbidden Canaanites and Ishmaelite wives?  Esau couldn’t reverse this horrible mistake that he had made.

The House of Judah made a terrible, terrible mistake.  They sinned.  They were like the more modern Roman Catholic Church.  They were of the false impression that the covenant was available to other people besides the family of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  It was the beginning of the universal movement; it was at least partly universal, for it included the people of Esau.

Why didn’t the High Priest read the verses that we read at the beginning of this article?  Did Hycranus know these Holy Scriptures?  The Bible is plain when it says that Esau sold his birthright and wept when he was not given the blessing by his father Isaac—Esau despised the birthright.

The following is from Richard Kelly Hoskins in his Hoskin’s Report, February, 2014: 

“Today, certain mixed-breed Edomites falsely call themselves ‘Israel.’  Edomites are mixed-breeds.  God’s WORD is absolute — it says that ‘mixed-breed mongrels shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord’, which makes the claim of certain of Esau’s children being Israel an impossibility…

John Hycranus’ integration of Edomites into Jacob-Israel was an unforgiveable sin:  ‘A bastard (Hebrew:  mamzer — mixed-breed, mongrel) shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord’ Deuteronomy 23:2.

The WORD forbids mixed-breed Edomites to even enter the lands of our people for the following reason:  ‘They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me’ Exodus 23:33.

This Law of our God has been pounded into His Saxon-Israel people for thousands of years: ‘When they heard the Law, they excluded from Israel all the mixed (mongrel) multitude’ Nehemiah 13:3.”

The Roman Catholic Inquisitions

In the year 1290 England expelled the Edomites (Jews) till 1650; in 1492 Spain had its Inquisition; in 1496 Portugal had their Inquisition; and France, Austria, Naples, Prussia, Italy, Bavaria, Hungary, Vienna, expelled the Jews as did many other European cities and nations. The question has to be where did those who did not convert to Catholicism go?  In fact, where did the “New Christians” [Catholics] go?  The three choices were for the Jews to either:

  1. Stay Jewish and leave the country or
  2. Convert to Catholicism and become one of the “New Christians” or
  3. Stay Jewish and refuse to leave the country and then be murdered.

The Roman Catholics added an additional choice to the Edomites than the House of Judah did 1800 years previous.  The Roman Catholics added that the Jews could just leave their nation.  The estimate is that 300,000 Jews left Spain in 1492.  Many went to Turkey where they were warmly received and other places in Northern Africa and the few places in Europe where they were not expelled. 

One place where many Jews went after the expulsion in Spain was Portugal.  The two nations bordered each other.  But in 1496, four years after Spain’s expulsion, Portugal had their own Inquisition.  They gave the Jews the same three choices that their neighbor Spain gave.  Tens of thousands converted to Catholicism while only a few were expelled or murdered.  Where did these Jews go?  They couldn’t go to England, Spain, France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, and parts of Italy; so where did they go?

When the Jews were expelled from Portugal, many went to the same place that many Pilgrims went after they were kicked out of England—the tolerate country of the Netherlands.  But what was happening to the world at this time?  It was a few years before the Protestant Revolution.  The New World was opening up.  In fact it was the very same day that the Jews were expelled from Spain that the expedition by Christopher Columbus left and sailed for India but he found a vast new land on the way—North America, South America, Central America and the West Indies.

As a side note, have you ever wondered why America celebrates Columbus’ voyage as being the voyage that discovered America when Columbus never set foot on any land that is now in the United States?  “In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.”  ChristopherColumbus’ (Cristobal Colon) discovery opened doors of opportunity for Jews expelled from Spain and Portugal.  It caused Edom to gain dominance over Jacob; the blessing that he had received at the hand of his father Isaac finally came to pass.  That is the reason why it is celebrated.

But let us first see where the expelled Jews went:

OFF THE COASTS OF AFRICA IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN:  Islands of Madeira, the Azores, Sao Tome and Principe and the Cape Verde Islands.

Islands of Madeira and the AzoresIslands of Madeira and the Azores

Madeira Island: Madeira Island was rediscovered in 1418 after two Portuguese captains were driven off-course by a storm to a nearby island.  The next year they made an organized expedition and subsequently founded the nearby larger island of Madeira. 

Slowly settlers arrived at the island and by 1455 the expansion of sugar plantations began.  Soon sugar became the island’s primary economy of the island.  Black slaves were soon used during portions of the island’s history to cultivate sugar cane.  After the 17th century, as sugar production shifted to Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe and elsewhere, Madeira’s most important product became its wine. 

Azores Islands:  Jews came to the Azores mainly from Northern Africa where they made their fortune trading agricultural products for manufactured goods with England and trading bills of exchange while transporting emigrants to Brazil.  The Jews changed the nature of the Azorean economy.

They had the trade connections that enabled them to link England, Brazil and Newfoundland with the Azores.   They began a banking business that soon had international interest and also developed a maritime transport industry.  In the 19th century the Azores growing prosperity served as a beacon for North African Jews.  Sao Tome and Principe IslandsSao Tome and Principe Islands


                   Sao Tome and Principe Islands

Sao Tome and Principe Islands:  The two islands of Sao Tome and Principe were uninhabited when they were first discovered by the Portuguese in 1470.  In 1496, to punish the Jews of Portugal who would not pay the head tax of the state; King Manuel deported nearly 2000 Jewish children, from the ages of two to ten, to the islands of Sao Tome and Principe straddling the Equator west of Gabon.  A year later only 600 of the children were found alive.  Other Jews were sent to the islands who found that the islands were suitable for sugar and cocoa.   The cultivation of sugar was a labor intensive process and they began to import large numbers of Black slaves from the African mainland. 

Cape Verde IslandsCape Verde Islands


Cape Verde Islands:  These islands were a Portuguese colony beginning in 1463.  Following the Inquisition in 1496, many Jews who were known as Marronos (New Catholics) escaped to the Cape Verde Islands.  They worked as merchants and as black slave traders to the New World. 

SOUTH AMERICA:  Brazil, Columbia, Suriname and Venezuela.Map of South AmericaMap of South America

Brazil:  Many Jews who escaped the Spanish and Portuguese Inquisitions went to Holland.  While thriving in Amsterdam, they began in the 1500’s and 1600’s to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World:  Curacao, Surinam, Recife (Brazil), New Amsterdam, Barbados, Jamaica, Haiti, Newport and Savannah. 

Portugal was a small country.  In their new found discovery of Brazil, it didn’t have the people to provide the necessary help for sugar plantations.  They first made the native Indians slaves, but soon ½ of them died.  The only people who could stand the heat and do the hard work were the Blacks.  The Jews set up the triangular trade with the Blacks, sugar, molasses and rum and guns.  Brazil was the largest slave country in the world at this time; it had almost 10 times the amount of slaves as did the United States! 

Many Jews went to Brazil where they made their fortune in sugar and tobacco plantations.  A Jewish plantation owner in Madeira brought the first sugar cane to Brazil in 1532.  Sugar cane became the foundation of the Caribbean economy for several centuries because sugar from the Far East was way too expensive.  They brought over 4 million black slaves to work their plantations.

When the Portuguese captured the Dutch city of Recife, there were 24 ships of Jews who left for different places:  Barbados, Curacao, Jamaica, Amsterdam and one ship which was returning to Holland was captured by a French pirate who robbed the 23 Jews of all their possessions and took them to the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam. 

Columbia:  The first Jews who came to Colombia was during the 16th century.  They came as settlers from Spain who practiced Catholicism.  Later practicing Jews came from Jamaica and Curacao. 

Surinam:  Groups of Jews began to arrive in the middle of the seventeenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of Northern Brazil.  By 1694, 27 years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch more Jews arrived.  By 1720 the Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export businesses.  By 1730, this business exported 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to Europeans and New World markets.  The main markets were Columbia and Venezuela. 

Black slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which was a major stopping-off point in the triangular slave trade. 

Venezuela:   Jews came to Venezuela in the middle of the 17th century as New Catholics.  Many of these Jews had live previously in Caracas and Maracaibo. 

Caribbean Islands CARIBBEAN ISLANDS:  Martinique, Barbados, Haiti, Cuba, Curacao, and Jamaica.

Martinique:  In 1654 two hundred fifty Jews fled Brazil following the Portuguese conquest and settled in Martinique, where they engaged in the sugar trade.  This was by far the most sought after product in Europe and the crop soon became Martinique’s biggest export; they used many black slaves.

Barbados:  Originally founded by the English in 1627.  The colony did not start out as a full-fledged race-based plantation societies.  The colony had originally a White majority and relied upon a workforce of English indentured servants to grow cotton, sugar and tobacco.

The Dutch West India Company, which was founded by Jews in 1621, brought race-based plantation slavery from Brazil to Barbados in the 1640’s which became the model for the spread of slavery throughout the whole Caribbean and the American South. 

Haiti:  Haiti was discovered by Columbus and his Jewish (converted to Catholicism) interpreter Luis de Torres.  In fact there were four other converted to Catholicism Jewish people on Columbus’ ships: his navigators and doctors.  Torres spoke Hebrew, because Columbus believed that they would find “the lost ten tribes of Israel” on the other side of the world—near India.  Columbus was also financed by two Jews, Luis de Santangelo and Gabriel Sanchez.  De Torres eventually settled in Haiti and therefore became the first European settler of the New World, except for the ancient Israelites who had come earlier to the New World.  While in Haiti, de Torres named a bird in the Hebrew “Tuki” which we know as “Turkey.” 

Cuba:  Columbus soon went to Cuba.  De Torres led an expedition who were warmly greeted by the natives.  It was there that they discovered the native custom of smoking.  At that meeting they encountered their first contact with tobacco.  When Columbus went back to Spain, Luis de Torres was among the 39 men who stayed behind at the settlement founded on the island of Haiti. 

Curacao:    The  Dutch  West India Company at  first captured Curacao from Spain in 1634.  Shortly after, the migration of Jews to the island began.  In 1651 there were 50 Jewish colonists to Curacao.  Many had recently arrived in Holland after fleeing from Portugal’s or Spain’s Inquisitions.  Between 1654 and 1656, several Jews from Brazil arrived in Curacao.  And there were 70 Jews who came to the island from Amsterdam.  It became the Black slavery center for a multitude of Black slaves that were transported from Africa to many places in the West Indies, South America and North America.

Jamaica:  Jews fled the Inquisition of Spain and Portugal and settled in Jamaica.  Some Jews who went to Recife, Brazil, eventually fled when the Portuguese took Recife from the Dutch and went to Jamaica as well as other islands in the Caribbean. 

In 1494 Christopher Columbus arrived in Jamaica.  Numerous Portuguese Jews first settled in Jamaica during the Spanish colonization and more came in 1530.  Many of the Jews that arrived were New Christians, but practiced Judaism.  In 1662 more Jews arrived from Brazil and Surinam.  

Jamaica in 1660, became the Jews’ principal haven in the New World.  It had a premier location:  in the middle of the shipping lanes. Jamaica was an ideal base from which to strike at Spanish shipping to revenge its expulsion of the Jews, and engage in contraband trade.  Jamaica’s Jews were major players in both activities. 

But this came to a conclusion when the Great Earthquake of 1692 brought a climatic end to the pirate port when the sea swallowed two-thirds of Port Royal.  From an Black Slave Trade MapBlack Slave Trade Mapinfamous pirate capital, Jamaica, by 1698, had become a sugar island worked by 40,000 slaves, and after 1713, the center for slave distribution in the Caribbean and North America.

Jewish slave traders procured Black Africans by the tens of millions and funneled them to the plantations of South America (Brazil, Guianas, Spanish South America: 38% + 6% + 6% = 50%) and throughout the Caribbean (West Indies:  42%). 

Whether the local influence was Portuguese, Dutch or English, the Black man and woman fared the same.  In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade.  In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. 

What percentage of all the Black slaves were in the colonies in what is now known as the United States:  4%.  Were you ever told this is the public high school or college that you went to?

The Spanish and Portuguese Inquisition forced many Jews to flee the two countries.  The most adventurous among the Jews attacked and plundered Spanish fleets while forming alliances with other European powers to ensure the safety of Jews living in hiding in the New World. 

Two examples of these were Abraham Cohen Henriques, an arms dealer, who used his cunning and economic muscle to find safe haven for Jews and Moses Cohen Henriques, Abraham’s brother, who helped plan one of history’s largest heist against Spain.  In 1628, Moses Henriques set sail with Dutch West India Company.  Admiral Piet Hein, whose own hatred of Spain was fueled by four years spent as a galley slave aboard a Spanish ship. 

Henriques and Hein boarded Spanish ships off Cuba and seized shipments of New World gold and silver worth in today’s dollars about $1 billion in today’s money.  It was the biggest theft of money in the world at that time.  It brought the end of the Spanish Empire.  

The booty of Moses Cohen Henriques was used to bank-roll the Jews of Recife, Brazil.  When the Jews fled Recife for the West Indies, the Henriquest fortune bank-rolled their commercial enterprises.  The Jews were the main players involved in trading slaves in the New World.  They owned the ships and they made large profits in this business. 

Listen to what they say about this:  “They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves.  The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale. 

They [the Jews] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise.  The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.”  Marc Lee Raphael, Jews and Judaism in the United States:  A Documentary.

“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade.  In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.  This was no less true on the North American mainland; where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses.  Which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa?

Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the late 1750’s; David Franks of Philadelphia in the late 1760’s; and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760’s and early 1770’s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent”; Arnold Witznitzer, Jews in Colonial Brazil, pages 72, 73.

“The buyers who appeared at the auction were almost always Jews, and because of their lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices.  If it happened that the date of such an action fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed” Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews From the Babylonian Exile To the End of World War II. 


Then why is there a collective White guilt assigned for the black slave trade but no collective Jewish guilt?  Most Blacks and Whites do not know that it was the Jews who owned the ships and were the buyers of most of the slaves taken from Africa.  They were the majority of owners of slaves in South America, the Caribbean Islands and in the United States.  Why do Black Americans and White Americans not know who the primary slave traders and owners were?                 

The Jews were the merchants of the world.  After they were evicted from England, Spain, some Caribbean Islands, Suriname and Brazil; they became the pirates of the sea.  They avenged Spain for their expulsion by stealing billions of dollars of goods and coins from them. 

With the expulsion of the Jews from many European nations, many of them went to the Caribbean Islands and South America.  There they became merchants, owned sugar, cocoa and tobacco plantations and were pirates.  Their main haven was Jamaica.  From there they captured many Spanish ships until they got their revenge—they brought down the power of the Spanish Empire as they captured millions of gold and silver coins that Spain was bringing back to their country from their colonies.

Jacob and Esau are fighting to the death.  Esau has dominion over Jacob, but Jacob shall hold the fire and flame which will burn Esau to death.  But what does the Bible say:  “It was said unto her” [Rebekah], “The elder shall serve the younger,

13)  As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated(Romans 9:12, 13).

The Muslim Black teacher Louis Farrakhan sent a letter to sixteen Jewish organizations asking for reparations for all of the slave trading that the Jews have been responsible for over the ages.  Why?  Since the Jews are receiving reparations from Germany for the Holocaust, they figured that the Blacks are entitled to a lot more of reparations for over 7 times the number of slaves transported from Africa than the supposed Holocaust victims.

Have you ever wondered why Negroes blame White Christians for slavery while the biggest offenders were their fellow Negros, Jews and Muslims?   What is the solution?  Make sure we are obedient to the Laws that our God gave to His covenant people. 

A good start would be what the Icelanders have done (tribe of Benjamin).  They made all their congressmen quit and fired the international bankers.  Most of the Jewish bankers fled the land in fear.  Iceland refused to bow to foreign interests that the small country stated loud and clear that the people are not going along with the mistakes of its former bankers.  Maybe that is why it is not covered in the United States news.  It is at least a good beginning.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Important History Not Being Taught Part 2

by Pastor Don Elmore

What Happened to Judea?

February 23, 2014

Scripture Reading:  John 6:66-71

Before I begin with this sermon; remember I said that I will never forget Sandy Hook!  Mark sent me a great email that told about a Mr. Wolfgang Halbig, a German immigrant who became a Florida State Trooper and a United States Customs Inspector.  He also was a coach and teacher.  He does not believe that anyone was killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School and he’s looking for some answers.  The problem is:  no one is giving him any information.

Mr. Halbig, testified at Columbine High School massacre and his responsibility today is to instruct over 4000 school districts on safety.  But he doesn’t have a clue as to what happened at Sandy Hook. 

His next plan is to sue the National Football League because he can’t even get the names of the Sandy Hook choir that was paid room and transportation to sing at the Super Bowl.  Mr. Halbig said that the only way to get to the truth is to put people on the stand and have them answer some simple questions.  If they lie, then that is a felony.  May God help this brother from Judah to arrange these court cases! 

The interviewer asked him the logical question:  Are you afraid that they will kill you?  This was after two detectives were sent to his home and told him to stop pursuing the question of what happened at Sandy Hook.  He answered:  “I am 67 years old.  I have had a good life.  If they kill me, they will kill me.” 

Another issue with the Sandy Hook mess, is that they are building 26 playgrounds; each one honoring one of the “slain” victims.  In Normandy, New Jersey; 100 miles from Sandy Hook, they have built one for Chase Kowalski.  If you were in charge of a sign honoring Chase, what would you put on it?  Look at what they did, and tell me who is part of this hoax?) 

There was a debate between the “young-earth Creationist” leader Ken Ham verses “the science guy” Bill Nye.  They both were wrong; they both taught that all the people of the earth go back to either:

  • Adam and Eve; Answers in Genesis also adds that all of the human races’ common parent was mid-brown in color.
  • A one cell organism; evolution says that all animals come from this one cell that came from a big-bang theory; but where did the star’s molecules that blew up come from; when asked, Bill Nye said:  “We don’t know.”

Bill Nye said in the debate that there were Christians who did not agree with Ken Ham; they believe that the earth is older than 6,000 years.  We are one of those who definitely disagree with Ken Ham, but we disagree with both debaters.  But what we mostly disagree with is that they both make miscegenation (race-mixing) a valid activity.  They both say that the human race is nothing more than one race.

Bill Nye doesn’t consider the Bible as God’s Word and Ken Ham totally ignores what the Word of God says on this topic.  Bill Nye is not a Christian; but Ken Ham and the Answers in Genesis followers, call themselves Christians, but they would not agree with this sermon.  If they disagree, then what does the Scriptures mean?  They need to address these verses from the Bible.


Palestine was divided into three portions during the life of Jesus Christ.  From North to South, it was:

  • Galilee
  • Samaria and
  • Judea 

While Samaria contained Babylonians sent there to replace the House of Israel after they were taken into captivity by the King of Assyria, Galilee and Judea contained true Israelites from the tribes of the House of Judah:

  • Galilee, was inhabited by the tribes of Benjamin and Levi, with a few Israelites from the tribe of Judah;
  • Judea, was inhabited by a large remnant of the tribe of Judah, with a few Israelites from the other two tribes; Levi and Benjamin.  There were also a large number of their enemy, the Edomite Jews who also lived and ruled there.
  • Samaria, was inhabited mostly by the Babylonians who were sent there after the House of Israel was taken into captivity.  It was almost devoid of any Israelites.

Galilee was the territory where the majority of the ministry of Jesus Christ was held.  He performed many miracles around the area of the Sea of Galilee as well as He gave the “Sermon on the Mount” and the miraculous occurrence that happened on the Mount of Transfiguration; He feed the 5000 with a small amount of fishes and loaves of bread; He walked on the water of the  Sea of Galilee; He healed Peter’s mother-in-law; He drowned the swine who were possessed by demons who had just been expunged from a possessed person; He stilled the storm on the Galilean Sea; and He did many more incidents than the Bible records in the Sea of Galilee area.   Many of the people of the New Testament, who were His disciples and friends, were from this northern territory of Palestine.

Judea also contained a small part of the ministry of Jesus Christ; but it was mainly where His birth, baptism, Temple gathering at Feast Days, and His arrest, trial, crucifixion, resurrection and ascension occurred.  There were a few miracles that He performed in Judea:  the raising of Lazarus from the dead, the healing of the blind man in Jericho; but it was mainly in Galilee that Jesus did most of his work.  Even after His resurrection, His disciples were instructed to go to a specific mountain in Galilee to meet Him there.

It was because in Judea, the enemy of the true Israelites, the older twin brother of Jacob/Israel; Esau, also lived. The descendants of Esau were invited to become a part of the Kingdom of Judah by Hyrcranus, the High Priest of Judah.  This happened a couple of centuries before our Savior was born and was a huge, huge sin.  Many of them moved from Seir to the city of Jerusalem and the surrounding cities. 

By the time our Savior was born, they, the Edomites, gained the control of the land of Judea.  The King (executive) was an Edomite/Jew; and most of the Pharisees and Sadducees (legislative) were Edomites/Jews and many of the judges (judicial) were Edomite/Jews also.  They also became many of the elders, chief priests and scribes of the land. This was against the Mosaic Law; it was forbidden to happen.  But because of Judah’s acceptance of multi-culturalism it had occurred.  Israel was very much an apostate land, with just a few faithful believers.

Judah’s High-Priest, Hycranus, the fore-runner of Pastor Hagee, tried to make the covenant apply to Esau when it was not his position to do so.  For Esau had long ago sealed his own doom; for he despised the covenant.  We read in the Scriptures of how he sold his birthright and how he lost the special blessing of his father, Isaac.  There was nothing anyone could do about this situation; for God hated Esau!  It was God’s decision.

Jesus went to Judea for the Feast days, because in Jerusalem was the only place where the Feast Days could be held; but He knew that the Jews were seeking to kill Him.  He went there at the time of the Passover so He could fulfill the Scriptures that told of the time of His death.  He voluntarily lay down His life for the sheep, for He was the Passover Lamb!   The death of Jesus had to coincide with the death of all the Passover lambs that were being sacrifice by each Israelite household.  He was to die on Passover; not one day before or after.  Jesus Christ could not die on any other day or time.  It had to be at the same time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered.

Something to think about: 

  • Since each Israelite household was to eat the Passover lamb, how could any Israelite be a vegetarian?
  • As a side note, who were the Passover lambs sacrificed for:  in other words, for whom did its blood put away their sins for one year? 

The Israelites under the Old Testament had a different destiny that the Israelite Christians under the New Testament.  Jesus Christ’s death was only a promise, it hadn’t happened as of yet in the Old Testament.  If the Lamb of God hadn’t died and been resurrected; the Old Testament Israelites would still need a Savior; they would never be in the Kingdom on the earth until that happened. 

The Passover first occurred while the Israelites were in Egypt; they were the only ones who had the opportunity to observe it. The lamb saved the life of each Israelite’s family’s first born son.  The Israelite’s first born son lived; the Egyptian’s first born son died.  It was all because of the blood of the lamb!

Samaria's Influence

Samaria, the middle portion, contained mainly Babylonians; put there by the King of Assyria.  So between Galilee, Samaria and Judea, which portion do you think was the safest and more of an Israelite location for a true Israelite to live?  The answer was without a doubt, Galilee!

In Judea, there was the hatred of the Edomites against the Israelites and their laws.  They hated anyone who tried to expose their evil deeds.  If one raised his voice in opposition to the rules of the Edomite/Jews, he would find himself in trouble with the government. 

In Samaria, they had different laws too.  A person who was trying to live by God’s laws would be out of sync with the Babylonians of Samaria.   They had a religion that was a mixture of Babylonian beliefs with Israelite ceremonies and history.  It was an adulterated mixture between paganism and God’s truth.

Galilee was the good soil for the seed of the God’s message.  The youngest tribe member, Benjamin, was the “light” once again for his older brethren.  The message could be proclaimed without fear of the Jews, or the belief of an adulterated version of the truth!

Judea:  a mixture between Talmudic law and the true law of God.  The majority rule was the Talmudic law of the Edomites.  The small remnant of Judah kept the true faith of their covenant fathers:  Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Samaria:  a mixture of Babylonish rituals and beliefs with Israel’s history and rituals.  It was the fore-runner of modern day Roman Catholicism.

Galilee:  a place of where the people could hear God’s Word.  The message could be preached in peace as long as the Edomite/Jews were not there.

A Jewish Problem

That Jesus’ ministry was stationed in Galilee and even after He was resurrected, He instructed His disciples to meet Him in the mountain in Galilee.  This presents a major problem for today’s Jew.  The Jews are descended from Esau, known as Edom.  But to carry out their fraud, they claim to be descended from the tribe of Judah; the tribe that was given the ruling right from Almighty God.   The vast majority of the royalty of Europe are all descended from King David of the tribe of Judah!  And it was to David, that God gave the promise that Israel would be ruled by his descendants.

This hatred is still a part of them.  This is why in both the Jewish-led French Revolution and the Jewish-led Communist’s Revolution, the extermination of the royalty in Europe had been one of their agenda’s goals.  France assassinated its royalty and Russia killed Czar Nicholas and his family.   The Jewish-led revolts killed the royalty of those two nations, both who were descended from King David.

That is one reason why today’s Jews desire to be descended from the tribe of Judah.  They could make this fraud have some validity because that was where they lived for several centuries.  They lived in Judea, which was where the remnant of the tribe of Judah lived also.  The tribe of Judah lived other places too; as they were part of the both the Assyrian and Babylonian captivity, they lived in Greece, Rome, England, Babylon, etc.  But in Judea, the majority of Israelites that lived there were from the tribe of Judah.   

The “lost ten tribes of Israel” had already gone in their captivity before the Edomites were offered to join the separatist’s Kingdom of Israel in Judea by Hycranus.  But adding the Edomites to their Kingdom no longer made Judea a separatist’s kingdom.  It became a counterfeit kingdom—Satan’s kingdom. It came very close to destroying the Kingdom of God forever.  It is what the United States is today; a ZOG controlled government.

This is the main reason that Jesus’ ministry was not in Judea where the Edomite/Jews were living.  The Edomites had taken over the kingdom by force from the tribe of Judah and were enforcing their laws over most of the land of Judea.  Notice in the Scriptures how the Pharisees time and time again accused Jesus of not keeping their Talmudic law. 

Jesus warned his disciples specifically to beware of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees (Matthew 15:6-12).  The Edomite/Jews were the majority in the Pharisees and Sadducees institutions.  Jesus was at war with the doctrine of these Edomites.  He told his disciples to be wary of their teachings and not follow them.   (Still true today!)

Jesus knew that the Edomite/Jew was planning and plotting for a way to murder Him.  They hated Him and believed that He was a fake and a phony; they believe that He was a bastard and His mother a prostitute.  He told his disciples about what was going to happen to Him when He went to Jerusalem.

Matthew 15:21“From that time forth began Jesus to show unto his disciples, how he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.”

He also told them about the plans of the Edomite/Jews to murder Him in a few of the references given in verses in Matthew 17:22, 23; Matthew 19:17-19; Matthew 26:15, John 7:1.  Jesus was not surprised that He was arrested, for He knew ahead of time that He was going to be crucified and three days later resurrected.  He had previously told his disciples about when it would occur.

When He was a young child (under the age of 2) the Edomite King, Herod tried to murder Him.  He failed; but he did murder all the children of Bethlehem (Israelites) who was two years old or younger.  Jesus was taken from Bethlehem to Egypt by His mother and father shortly before the murderous rampage took place.  Jesus’ life was spared.

After King Herod’s death, an angel of God warned Joseph to take his wife and young child to Galilee and to not live in Judea.  And this is what he did.  Jesus lived in Nazareth in Galilee for most of His life. 

The fact that Jesus lived and performed so many miracles in Galilee, and even picked the majority of His twelve disciples from Galilee, puts a major problem for the Jew of today to keep his lie intact.  The only disciple who was not from the tribe of Benjamin was Judas Iscariot, a Jew.  Judas betrayed Jesus Christ for thirty pieces of silver.

For Jesus dealt with mainly Israelites from the tribes of Benjamin and Levi; with a few from the tribe of Judah.  In fact, the Bible states that Jesus lived in Galilee because He knew that He would be murdered by the (Edomite) Jews in Judea.  Who were these Edomite/Jews?  Today’s Jews say it was their ancestors!

Jews are history’s foremost race mixer, hypocrites and promoters of mongrelization [exactly what Esau had done].  Racial tension can best be understood through Jewish incitement and social engineering.  Ultimately, the Jewish machinations for breeding out pure races, not just Whites, and ushering in an era of one homogenized breed is nothing less than genocide.   

The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 Edition, Volume 5, Page 4; states this very fact: Edom is modern Jewry.”

The 1984 Jewish Almanac says:  “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew.’”

It is incorrect and blasphemous for Edomite/Jews to call themselves Israelites.  Jacob remained racially pure while Esau mixed his seed with alien wives.  In rabbinic literature, “Edom” was used as a symbol designating the Roman Empire or, later, the Church!

So, a little more than a hundred years before the birth of Jesus Christ, Judea was inhabited by Edomites (descendants of Esau) and Judah (descendants of Jacob/Israel).  It was probably an attempt to heal the breech between Jacob and Esau but demonstrated the complete lack of faith of God’s Holy Word.  The breech can never be healed!  It brought a discordant element, the Edomites, into the land.  Jerusalem, the capital city of Judea, was predominately inhabited by Edomite/Jews. 

Esau, Isaac’s first-born, despised the birthright, when he traded it for a meal of red lentils.  Esau/Edom is now seeking to steal it back by the same method his father used to spoil Adam’s race – lust.  Esau/Edom has already stolen Jacob’s identity and is intermarrying to try and steal back his birthright.

The Jews are the only race to never have a homeland for over 2000 years.  Henry Ford called them International Jews” because, as Canaanite/vagabonds, they “wander the world” as God foretold (Genesis 4:9-15).  They enjoy the benefits of their host country, while contributing nothing.  And although Jews have appeared in the histories of other nations throughout the centuries, they were never able or willing to establish a nation of their own.   The only way they got Palestine from the Turks and Arabs was to persuade others to steal it for them. 

Since Esau married into the line of Cain, called Canaanites in the Bible, the original vagabond, it is plain to see where the spirit of “globalism”, “internationalism” and “multiculturalism” originated.  Esau became a globalist or internationalist.  Who established the League of Nations and the United Nations?  It was the descendants of Esau!  This is against the faith revealed through Moses and the prophets, which absolutely forbids confederations such as the two organizations just mentioned that the Jews established.

The Jews are parasites in any land that they live.  That is the main reason they have been kicked out of every country and many cities in Europe; some over and over again.  “The genius of the Jew is to live off people; not off the land, nor off the production of commodities from raw material, but off people.  Let the other people till the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller.  Let other people toil at trades and manufacturers; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their world, That is his peculiar genius.” (The International Jew:  The World’s Foremost Problem; 1921, Vol. II, p. 31).

So, if the Jews say in secret that they are Edom and Edom was constantly and consistently trying to murder Jesus Christ, and they cannot hear Jesus’ words, then how could they be His covenant people?  Esau sold his birthright and lost the great blessing of his father.  How could Jesus Christ die for Esau’s descendants?

Jesus and the Jews

“And while they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto them, The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men, And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again.  And they were exceedingly sorry.” Matthew 17:22-23

Jesus knew who was going to kill him, when it was going to happen and where it would occur.

Jesus repeated the information to His disciples on the way to Jerusalem:

“And Jesus, going up to Jerusalem, took the twelve disciples aside along the way, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priest and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death,And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him.  And the third day he shall rise again.” Matthew 20:17-19

The chief priests and scribes (Edomite/Jews) were displeased at the actions of Jesus Christ.

“And when the chief priests and scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying in the temple, and saying, Hosanna to the Son of David! They [chief priests and scribes] were very displeased,…” Matthew 21:15

MATTHEW 21:38, 39, 45, 46;

38) “But when the farmers saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.

39) And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.

45) And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spoke of them

46) But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they regarded him as a prophet.”

Jesus continues this onslaught of complaints against the Canaanites/Jews with all of his woes and hypocrites statements in Chapter 23.  Let’s look at just one of the statements which tells of one group of individuals whose destiny is hell:

“And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore, ye are witnesses against yourselves, that ye are the sons of them who killed the prophets.Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation [offspring] of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” Matthew 23:30-33

The Bible tells of Jewish authorities who plot the murder of Jesus Christ.

“And it came to pass that, when Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said unto his disciples, Ye know that after two days in the feast of the Passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified. Then assembled together the CHIEF PRIEST, AND THE SCRIBES, AND THE ELDERS OF THE PEOPLE, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtlety, and kill him. But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people.” Matthew 26:1-5

Who did Judas made his deal with to betray Jesus Christ?

"Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests, And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you?  And they bargained with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him.” Matthew 26:14-16

Who were the people who tried to find false witnesses to testify against Jesus Christ?

“Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death, B ut found none; yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none.  At the last came two false witnesses, And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days. And the high priest arose and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing?  What is it which these witness against thee? But Jesus held his peace, And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said; nevertheless, I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Then the high priest tore his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy!  What further need have we of witnesses?  Behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. What think yeThey answered and said, He is guilty of death.Then they spat in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands, Saying, Prophesy unto us, thou Christ, Who smote thee?” Matthew 26:59-68

Who were the people that took counsel against Jesus to put him to death?

“When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate, the governor.” Matthew 27:1-2

Who did Judas betray Jesus to?

“Then Judas, who had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed innocent blood.  And they said, What is that to us?  See thou to that.” Matthew 27:3-4

Who accused Jesus to Pilate?

“And when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing. Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee? And he answered him never a word, insomuch that the governor marveled greatly.” Matthew 27:12-14;

Who convinced the people to choose Barabbas and not Jesus?

“But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask for Barabbas, and destroy Jesus.” Matthew 27:20

Who mocked Jesus Christ while He was being crucified?

"Likewise also the chief priests, mocking him, with the scribes and elders, said, He saved others; himself he cannot save.  If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.” Matthew 27:41-42

Who was watching and guarding against Jesus’ resurrection?

“Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate, Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.Command, therefore, that the sepulcher be made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead; for the last error shall be worse than the first.Pilate said unto them, Ye have a watch; go your way, make it as sure as ye can.So they went, and made the sepulcher sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch.’’ Matthew 28:62-66

Who bribed the soldiers who were watching Jesus’ grave?

"Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and showed unto the chief priests all the things that were done. And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave much money unto the soldiers, Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept. And if this come to the governor’s ears, we will persuade him, and secure you. So they took the money, and did as they were taught; and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.” Matthew 28:11-15

What!  Did you read that?  The Jews knew that Jesus Christ, the person who they hated so much that they had crucified; and they placed guards to “prevent” His resurrection, they KNEW THAT HE WAS RESURRECTED! 

They promised the soldiers that “if this come to the governor’s ears, WE will persuade him, and secure you.”  All the soldiers had to do for the money that they gave to them was to lie about what had happened; instead of Jesus being resurrected that were to say that His disciples came and stole Him while they slept.  While they slept?  This was a capital crime. But they trusted that the Jews would bring it to pass that all would be well.

It refers to the judicial hearing of the matter.  If the governor hears what happened in regards to Jesus’ resurrection, we will take effectual means to persuade him; in other words, we will bribe him.  The Jews knowing the covetous, greedy character of the governor, could confidently make this promise.  That is the Jewish method:  It is not the truth, but what they want to happen. 

These verses were just in Matthew; and they were not all of them.  There a lot more in Mark, Luke, John and the rest of the New Testament.  Who do you think tried to murder the Apostle Paul? 

ACTS 14:19: “And there came there certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium, who persuaded the people, and having stoned Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead.”

The Apostles, Barnabas and Paul, had refused the people’s thoughts about what they had done; healing a cripple from birth, as a miraculous deed from the gods.  Barnabas they called Jupiter and Paul they called Mercury.  The Priest of Jupiter came with oxen and garlands to offer a sacrifice for the miraculous healing that they had done.

Paul immediately told the people that they were not gods, but men of like passions as they were.  But so fickly were the multitudes, that they allowed these Jews from the distant cities of Antioch and Iconium to stone Paul, and to cast him out of the city as one dead. 

Probably he lay insensible for some time before the disciples would be able to gather around his supposed corpse, and his rising in their midst, apparently uninjured, was doubtless miraculous.  It is probable that young Timothy was one of those disciples who witnessed the apostle’s suffering for the truth’s sake, and that the close bonds which afterwards bound together the father and his son in the faith, were first knit in the hour of peril and persecution.     

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Important History Not Being Taught Part 3

by Pastor Don Elmore

March 9, 2014

Scripture Reading: Acts 8:5-11

This is the story of two men with different views that are still in effect today, 2000 years later; two men with the same first name; Simon Peter and Simon Magus.  It started in the capital city of Samaria, whose name was identical with its state; Samaria.

Simon Magus was a Babylonian priest.  He was a part of the Babylonian community that had been living in the former land of Northern Israel.  When the Israelites had been defeated and taken into captivity by the Assyrians, they were replaced by five tribes of the Babylonians. They eventually claimed fraudulently to be the true people of God while at the same time practicing many of their previous heathen rites which came directly from Babylon.   

Simon Magus swayed the whole of the Samaritan nation that all gave heed to him for a very long time.  But when Simon saw the potential of Christianity, he endeavored to buy an apostleship in the Church.  But Peter knew what he was attempting to do and rebuked him sternly.

After his rejection, Simon Magus began to fashion his own “Christian” church.  His plan was to design a church, of which he was the head, to overthrow the true Church of God.  His idea was to adulterate Babylonian teachings with some of the teachings of Christ and thus create ONE LARGE FALSE UNIVERSAL CHURCH.  It was to go against the SMALL TRUE ISRAELITE-ONLY CHURCH.  The Israelite church allowed members from the House of Judah and the formerly divorced House of Israel—Adamic stock only.

Adolph von Harnack, the famous church historian, wrote an extensive seven-volume work titled The History of Dogma. He writes this about the area of Samaria where Simon got his start: 

“Long before the appearance of Christianity, combinations of religion had taken place in Syria and Palestine, especially in Samaria, in so far as the Assyrian and Babylonian religious philosophy…with its manifold interpretations, had penetrated as far as the eastern shore of the Mediterranean” Volume 1, pp. 243, 244. 

The people who lived in this area believed the Babylonian religion, for they were Babylonians.  These Samaritans had amalgamated their Babylonian religious beliefs with some of the teachings from the Old Testament.  But they never departed basically from their own Babylonian-Chaldean religious teachings.

This happened after living in the land of the former Northern Kingdom of Israel for a short time; they were plagued by a number of lions.  They asked the King of Assyria to send them a former priest from the former occupants: the House of Israel.  The priests of the House of Israel were not priests from the tribe of Levi, who God had ordained to be the tribe where only the priests could come.  Jeroboam, the first king of the House of Israel, had forced the priestly Levites to flee back to Jerusalem and Judea when he did away with his people going to the temple in Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 11:14-15):

“For the Levites left their suburban lands; and their possession, and came to Judah and Jerusalem; for Jeroboam and his sons had cast them off from executing the priest’s office unto the LORD. And he appointed for himself priests for the high places, and for the he-goats, and for the calves which he had made.”

Jeroboam had instituted a religion that was devoid of God’s laws of worship.  He set up calves in Dan and Bethel; he moved the feast days from the seventh to the eighth month; and he made priests of the lowest of the people, those who were not of Levi. 

The false priest who the King of Assyria sent was a former priest of the House of Israel.  He taught the Babylonians the false universal religion of the House of Israel.   He taught the Samaritans (Babylonians) to believe what the former Northern Israelites had worshipped.

Notice what the Bible says in 2 Kings 17:41:

“So these nations [the five tribes of Babylonia:  Samaritans] feared the Lord and served their graven images, both their children, and their children’s children:  as did their fathers [the Babylonians], so do they unto this day.”   

Simon Magus grew up in this religion.  And when Christianity began Simon just appropriated Christ’s name, but continued the pagan abominations! He incorporated a few of the teachings of Jesus and mixed them up with the pagan practices, rituals and beliefs of the Babylonians.   Simon used great demonic powers to do miracles and wonders.  So, whereas, the Samaritans used to worship the adulterated Hebrew/Babylonian religion they now were worshipping the adulterated Christian/Babylonian religion.

The book of Acts tells us Simon became nominally a Christian.  He physically and outwardly “entered” the Christian Church; by saying that he believed and he was baptized.  Simon recognized that Christ’s power was greater than his but he wanted to be associated with that great name.  Simon, seeing the potential of the Christian religion waited until the authorities, Peter and John, came to Samaria from Jerusalem and then offered to pay them money in order to obtain an apostleship in the Christian church.  Peter rebuked Simon and told him that he couldn’t buy an apostleship.  They actually didn’t accept his money?  What!  They turned down his money?  Does this happen in today’s churches?  Very, very seldom!

Simon Magus is called “the father of heresy.”  In the old Christian Dictionaries and Encyclopedias and books on Christian and Church history, there is an unbelievable amount of literature devoted to him and his activities.   In one of these; Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Volume 2, and p. 496; it says:

“But it need not be supposed that when Simon broke with the Christians he renounced all he had learned.  It is more probable that he carried some of the Christian ideas with him and that he wove these into a system of his own.  This system did contain some of the later germs of Gnosticism.  Thus he became a leader of a retrograde sect, perhaps nominally Christian and certainly using some of the Christian terminology but in reality anti-Christian and exalting Simon himself to the central position which Christianity was giving to Jesus Christ.”

What Simon did was to bring in the Babylonian religious beliefs into a form of Christianity in order to bring about a UNIVERSAL religion:

“The amalgam of pagans, and Christianity which was characteristic of Gnosticism, and which was especially obvious in the Simonian system, is readily explicable in the teaching of Simon Magus, who, according to the story in Acts, was brought into intimate contact with Christian teaching without becoming a genuine member.”

Simon only used the name of Christianity to bring about his own desired ends.  The Dictionary of Religion and Ethics says that Simon was “A false Messiah, who practiced magical arts and subsequently attempted, by the aid and the sanction of Christianity, to set up a rival universal religionVolume II, p. 514.

When Justin Martyr wrote in 152 AD in his Apology, he states that Simon Magus ...

“was a Samaritan, adding that his birthplace was a village called Gitta; he describes him as a formidable magician, and tells that he came to Rome in the days of Claudius Caesar (45 AD), and made such an impression by his magical powers, that he was honored as a god, a statue being erected to him on the Tiber, between the two bridges, bearing the inscription ‘Simoni den Sancto’ (i.e. the holy god Simon)”; Dictionary of Christian Biography, Volume 4, p. 682.


Now let us look at Samaria in the days of Jesus Christ.  As we have said before, very little of Jesus’ ministry occurred in this portion of the land of Israel.  So let me ask you a question:  In which of the three portions of ancient Israel; (1) Galilee, (2) Samaria or (3) Judea, would you have the largest following of a false minister, a deceiver that combined elements of Christianity and mixed them with paganism.  Would it be in Galilee?  Or would it be in Samaria?  Or would it be in Judea?

When did it begin?  Would it surprise you that the Bible indicates that it began right after Jesus Christ had ascended back to His father?  The Babylonians were not considered to be a part of the covenant that God made with Israel.  They were not a part of the Kingdom of Judah.

Who does the Bible identify as being the false teacher who led many away from true Christian-Israelite churches—it was no other than Simon Magus.  The Bible gives practically the whole chapter eight in the Book of Acts, to tell about this very infamous Babylonian.

Acts, chapter 8, verse 9, tells us that “there was a certain man, called Simon, who previously in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one.”  The rest of chapter 8 tells of what happened to this Simon. 

When Simon Magus saw that Peter and John laid their hands on the believers and they received the Holy Spirit, he offered them money if they would tell him how to do this.  Peter then rebuked Simon Magus and gave this evil, but very true prophesy against him in Acts 8:20-23:

“But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. Thou hast neither part not lot in this matter; for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. Repent, therefore, of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart is not right in the sight of God. For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.” 

Simon Magus did not become a Christian.  And did you notice that the Apostle of God didn’t accept his money?  What!  They turned down his money?  Does this happen in today’s churches?  Very, very seldom!

Simon was prophesied to being a gall of bitterness, which comes from the Old Testament scripture: 

“(For ye know how we have dwelt in the land of Egypt, and how we came through the nations which ye passed by; And ye have seen their abominations, and their idols, wood and stone, silver and gold, which were among them); Lest there should be among you man, or woman, or family, or tribe, whose heart turneth away this day from the LORD our God, to go and serve the gods of these nations; lest there should be among you a root that beareth gall and wormwood. Deuteronomy 29:16-18;

It was too hard for Simon Magus to keep the laws of God, for he loved the predominance and the magic that he was able to practice.  He was the first major false preacher who taught the universal doctrine; “All races are equal; for they are all descended from the same person!”  He eventually went to Rome in 45 AD under the reign of Claudius Caesar where a statue was made of him calling him “god.” 

He mixed Babylonian with Christian principles to form his own universal religion.  Does his religion sound familiar?  The book of Acts was written by Luke in the year 62 AD.  Acts does not tell of many of the activities of the disciples of the LORD, where they went and what they did; but it does tell of Simon Magus.  Why?  Because Luke knew that this powerful, false preacher would affect Christianity all the way to the end of the age.  

Luke didn’t tell of some of the Apostles who started churches in the Alps, northern Africa, England, Greece, France, and elsewhere, but he did tell of Simon Magus.  Simon Magus eventually went to Rome where he developed the mysterious religion that eventually sprang forth several centuries later under Emperor Constantine.

Luke was clearly showing that Simon was never a part of the Christian Church even though many of the people were being taught that Simon was a Christian and that he was appointed as an Apostle to bring the gospel to all the countries of the world (universal).

In “The History of Dogma” by Adolf von Harnack, it says:

“Long before the appearance of Christianity combinations of religions had been taken place in Syria and Palestine, especially in Samaria; in so far as the Assyrian and Babylonian religious philosophies.” 

Simon Magus’ plan was to blend Babylonian and Christian philosophies into a universal counterfeit church: 

“Proclaims a doctrine in which the Jewish [Hebrew] faith was strangely and grotesquely mixed with Babylonian myths, together with some Greek addition.  This wild syncretism, or the melding of religions, was a universal religion which gained adherents for Simon.”

Simon Magus is called the “father of heresy.”  He brought the Babylonian and Christian ideas and practices together:  “The author, or first representative of this baptized heathenism, according to the uniform testimony of Christian antiquity, is Simon Magus, who unquestionably adulterated Christianity with pagan ideas and practices.” 

The Catholics [Universalists] claim that Simon Peter, the Apostle of Jesus Christ, was the first Pope of the Catholic Church; but Simon Peter was never in Rome.  The Bible says that he spent a lot of time in Babylon.  But there was another who was a Babylonian, who lived in Samaria, who was an enemy of what Simon Peter believed.  They were two leaders of movements that opposed each other:  Simon Peter and Simon Magus.  When one understands that “Peter” also means “interpreter”; then the understanding is that Simon Magus was also known as Simon Peter or Simon the Interpreter. 

Here are six of the many Biblical reasons why Peter was not the Pope of Rome.  Any one of these six would by themselves disprove the Roman Catholic Churches form of power:

  1. Simon Peter’s commission was to become chief minister to the CIRCUMCISED, not to the uncircumcised Gentiles.  The circumcised were the descendants of the House of Judah, while the uncircumcised Gentiles (nations) were the House of Israel of which Rome was a part of.  They were the two kingdoms of ancient Israel.

    Although, Peter was used to help start the conversion of the House of Israel, Peter was given the job of working with those of the House of Judah.  This is very embarrassing to the Roman Catholics who teach the differently.

    “But, on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me [Paul], as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles)— And when James, Cephas [Peter], and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship, that we should go unto the nations [House of Israel], and they unto the circumcision [House of Judah].” Galatians 2:7-9

    The Apostle Paul is said in the Bible (2 Timothy 1:11) to be the “preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles” [House of Israel].  Peter is nowhere mentioned as being the Apostle to the Gentiles.  This would negate him from going to Rome to become the head of a Gentile community. 

  2. The teaching of Catholic historians tells us that Simon Peter went to Rome at the same time as Simon Magus in order to thwart his evils.  This was during the reign of Claudius Caesar in 45 AD.  After successfully combating the Magus, the historians continue with the story that Peter ruled as the Roman bishopric until 68 AD.  Peter was then supposed to have been crucified upside down on Vatican hill and buried in a pagan cemetery.

    It is just like the story of Sandy Hook.  Do you believe the government’s story; that has changed over 50 times; or do you believe that is was a hoax?  The Apostle Paul helped to establish the church at Rome.  The Church was made up of many captured British royalty, and was not established until close to 60 AD. 

    The Roman Catholic historians would have us believe that Peter had established their church in 45 AD.  But the truth is that neither Peter nor Paul established the Catholic Church.  But it is utterly impossible for Peter to have been in any way associated with any Church at Rome.  It is important for Christians to know that there was a huge difference between the Roman Catholics [founded by Simon Magus] and the Biblical Church at Rome [established by the Apostle Paul].  They were two different churches; one a large universal [catholic] church and the other a small inclusive church. 

  3. When Paul spent two years in his own prison-house in Rome, he wrote the Epistles to the Ephesians, the Philippians, the Colossians, Philemon, and the Hebrews.  And while Paul mentions others as being in Rome during that period, he nowhere mentions Peter.  But according to Roman Catholic historians, Paul had been in Rome for over 20 years, but Paul does not mention Peter!  He didn’t mention the Pope?

  4. After Paul’s two years imprisonment was over, he was released.  But about four years later (65 AD), he was returned to Rome to be a prisoner again.  This time he had to appear before the throne of Caesar and was sentenced to death: “At my first defense no man stood with me, but all men [not as the universal’s say:  but all the men in Rome] forsook me:  I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge.” 2 Timothy 4:16

    The Roman Catholics don’t read this verse in their churches; for it would mean that Peter forsook Paul.  For they believe that Peter was very much present at Rome during this time of Paul’s trial.

  5. Where does the Bible say that Peter was?  Here are a few of his Biblical highlights that tell of Peter’s location:

    • About 35 AD Peter’s visit in Caesarea with Cornelius, the man who was a member of the former divorced House of Israel.
    • In 45 AD Peter was cast into prison at Jerusalem (Acts 12:3, 4).
    • In 49 AD Peter was still in Jerusalem, this time attending the Jerusalem council (Acts 15). 
    • About 51 AD Peter was in Antioch of Syria where he got into an argument with Paul because he wouldn’t sit or eat with the Gentiles.  Very strange that the “Roman Pope” would have nothing to do with the Gentiles! (Galatians 2:11-14).
    • About 66 AD Peter is in the city of Babylon among the House of Judah [the circumcised]! (1 Peter 5:13).
  6. This is the Roman Catholic Church’s main belief:  Since Jesus Christ ascended into Heaven, then the Pope is the successor of Jesus Christ on the earth today.  If Simon Peter, the recipient of the “keys of the kingdom” was not in Rome, then the Pope as being the successor of Jesus Christ is false.  He is not the Vicar of Christ!  And the Roman Catholic Church is exposed as the big fraud that it is!  But Jesus sent to His covenant people the Holy Spirit and said nothing about a human Vicar of Himself!

    The New York Catechism says:  “The Popes take the place of Jesus Christ on earth.  By divine right, the Pope has supreme and full power in faith and morals over each and every pastor and his flock.  He is the true Vicar of Christ, the Head of the entire Church, the father and teacher of all Christians.  He is the infallible ruler, the founder of dogmas, the author of and the judge of councils, the universal ruler of truth, the arbiter of the world, the supreme judge of heaven and earth, the judge of all, being judged by no one, God Himself on earth.” 

    This is based on the fact that “The Catholic Church teaches that our Lord conferred on St. Peter the first place of honor and jurisdiction in the government of His whole Church and that the same spiritual supremacy has always resided in the Popes or Bishops of Rome as being the successors of St. Peter.  Consequently, to be true followers of Christ all Christians, both among the clergy and laity, must be in communion with the See of Rome where Peter rules in the person of his successors;” “Faith of Our Fathers”, Cardinal Gibbons.

  7. The Catholic Church claims Peter gave to it the keys of the gates of heaven and that no one will enter into God’s presence unless that Church opens the gates.  The very word “Cardinal” means “hinge.”  The Cardinals of the Roman Church are the hinges upon which the gate—the Pope—is able to turn.

    But the words “Cardinal” and “Pope” are missing from the Bible.  Where did the Roman Church get this mixture of religion in order to have Peter giving the keys to the Church?  Rome became the home of all the gods of Asia.  By Imperial times, Rome became the headquarters of pagan religion.  It was the chief oracle of the world.   

    One of these gods in Rome was called Janus or Pater or Peter.  Originally Janus was an ancient prince who reigned in the infancy of the world.  He brought men from a rude and savage life to a mild and rational system.  He was the first to build cities and the first to establish government over men.  After his death, he was deified.  This was Cain before and also Nimrod after Noah’s flood.

    Janus is pictured as being double-faced.  This was a symbol of his endeavor to change men from barbarism to civilization.  One of Janus’ roles, after his deification as a god, was the continuation of his sacred task of “civilizing” men.

    Janus was to the ancient Romans the “keeper of the gates of heaven and earth.”  He is represented with a key in one hand as emblematic of his presiding over gates and highways.  Janus’ face is double to denote his equal empire over the heavens and the earth.  And that all things are open and shut to him at his will.  That he governs the universe and alone possesses the power of making the world revolve on its axis; that he presides over the gates of heaven. 

    The Popes’ claim the same exact power today.  He is said to be infallible and answers to no one for his actions, for he has the key given to him by Peter.  In fact, Janus also controlled the calendar by his priests.  The first month of the year was named after him to show his control over the years.  So today, we still have JANU[S]ARY as the first month.  The Catholic Church, like the priests of Janus, feels it has this same authority over the calendar today. 

This mixture of paganism with Christianity goes on and on in the Roman Catholic Church.  The Catholic Church had accepted the pagan festivals of Christ’s Mass (Saturnalia), Easter and a host of other rituals and beliefs.  They claim to sit in Peter’s Chair and that the chief temple of the world is today called Saint Peter’s.  The Church has accepted the practices and symbols of the oldest pagan religion on earth:  Peter-worship—the religion of Cain and Nimrod with all of its symbols of obelisks and sun rays. 

This was Satan’s attempt to smother God’s true religion with a counterfeit that to the untrained eye looks genuine.  He did this principally through Simon Magus who amalgamated all the pagan religions in to this false UNIVERSAL religion and called the system “Christianity.”

This is the Roman Catholic Church’s main belief:  Since Jesus Christ ascended into Heaven, then the Pope is the successor of Jesus Christ on the earth today.  If Simon Peter, the recipient of the “keys of the kingdom” was not in Rome, then the Pope as being the successor of Jesus Christ is false.  He is not the Vicar of Christ!  And the Roman Catholic Church is exposed as the big fraud that it is!  But Jesus sent to His covenant people the Holy Spirit and said nothing about a human Vicar of Himself!

There has always been the true churches of God and practically at the same time: the counterfeit Churches of God.  The counterfeit arrangement is known as the political, economic and religious structure known as the beast system.  It came into formal view during the reign of Emperor Constantine.  It controlled most of Europe for over a thousand years.  And then it suffered a death.  The Roman Catholic Church died.  When did that happen?  It occurred in 1805, when Napoleon armies invaded Italy and kidnapped the Pope to France.


This all started when the Jesuits were born to counter the Protestant Revolution.  The Protestant Revolution began around 1517.  The Jesuit Order was founded under the invention of Ignatius Loyola, who was a witch and a member of the Alumbrados, was born in 1534.  The main purpose of the Order was for the Pope to rule again as the sovereign leader.

The Council of Trent (1545-1563) ruled that anyone who doesn’t adhere to the teaching of the Catholic Church is worthy of death.  The Jesuits began infiltrating missionaries and churches as well as gaining powerful positions as confessor to kings – they sought to use their confessions as blackmail to aristocracy, and this is how they gradually took power of leaders.

The French, under King Louie XIV, kicked the Jesuits out; Portugal under Joseph III expelled them in 1759; Spain expelled them in 1767 under Charles III.  The most powerful Catholic monarchs in the world expelled them and demanded that the Pope suppress them.  So in 1773 Pope Clement XIV suppressed the Jesuits forever with a Papal bull, and so Maria Teresa, the Hapsburg Queen, expelled them from Austria.  Over 83 countries, city-states, and cities expelled the power-hungry Jesuits.  Only Russia, where orthodox Christianity existed, opposed the Vatican jurisdiction. 

In 1743, we have the beginning of the Rothschild (Bauer) banking interests.  They learned that loaning money to governments and monarchy’s was much more profitable than loaning money to individuals or businesses.  The head of the Illuminati is the Rothschild. 

Several years before their expulsion, the Jesuits revived freemasonry.  They wrote the different degrees of freemasonry and they were protected by Frederick the Great of Prussia.  In 1776, Jesuits professor, Adam Weishaupt, organized the Illuminati in Bavaria. The Jesuits and masonry, including the illuminati, working together produced the French Revolution.

During the French Revolution, the Jesuits organized the killing of Louie XIV by the guillotine, for the revenge of the Jesuits being thrown out of France by the French monarch.  The Jesuits then beheaded Marie Antoinette, the daughter of Maria Theresa; this was revenge for Maria Theresa for expelling the Jesuit Order from Austria. 

They used Napoleon to drive out the people of the former King of France out of both Portugal and Spain.  They drove the Knights of Malta off the island because they had expelled the Jesuits in 1768.  And they marched into Italy and kidnapped the Pope.  They imprison him for five years, humiliating him.  This was revenge for the Pope for suppressing them forever.

The Pope, Pope Pius VII, was jailed at Avignon until he agreed, as the price for his release, to establish the Jesuit Order.  This Jesuit war on the Vatican was terminated by the Congress of Vienna and by the secret, 1822 Treaty of Verona.  Ever since, the Rothschilds have been the fiscal agents of the Vatican.

“It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country (USA) are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty.  The have instigated most of the wars of Europe.”  Marquis de LaFayette.

On February 9, 1929, Fascist Mussolini signed a Concordat (Lateran Pact) between he Italian Government and the Vatican – reestablishing the political power and diplomatic standing of the Catholic Church.  Mussolini declares the Vatican an independent state. 

The Catholic’s now have two Popes, one who is retired and the other is a Jesuit Pope.  A Jesuit Pope?  What does that mean?

When Jesus was alive, he came face-to-face with the Edom/Canaanite/Jew and the Samarian adulterated religion which has become the Catholic religion.  The two enemies of our people were defeated by Jesus Christ and His ministry.  They murdered Him, but He rose from the dead.  That is why we will win the battle today.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Important History Not Being Taught Part 4

by Pastor Don Elmore

March 23, 2014

Scripture Reading: II Kings 17:29-35

The opening scripture reading tells of the history of the portion of land in Palestine known as “Samaria.”  It was the homeland of the tribes of Ephraim and Western Manasseh of the kingdom of Israel [northern kingdom].   But after the tribes of the Kingdom of Israel and most of the tribes of the Kingdom of Judah was captured and put into captivity by the Assyrians; it was repopulated by the five tribes of Babylonians and Lebanon/Syrians.

You will notice that I added Lebanon/Syrians.  That is because when I read my March edition of the Virginia Christian Israelite, written by L. E. Ernst, I was taken by surprise.  How encouraging is it that two different writers are writing about similar issues at the same time?  Let me quote from this article:

“…Today’s Jews may be accurately grouped under two categories:  The Ashkenazim and the Sephardim.  The former grouping comprises some 90% of all modern Jews.  Ashkenaz was the grandson of Japheth.  Japheth was a brother of Shem.  This means that 90% of all Jews are not descended from Shem, hence they are not ‘Semitic.’” 

Let’s review:  Noah had three sons; (1) Ham, (2) Shem and (3) Japheth.   All those descended from Ham are known as Hamites; all those descended from Shem are called Shemites; and all those descended from Japheth are called Japhethites.  Over 90 % of all Jews today are descended from Japheth; less than 10% are descended from Shem:  so how can anyone who is against the Canaanite/Jews honestly be called an “anti-Semite?”  I continue from the Virginia Christian Israelite:

Jacob/Israel descended from Shem.  Inasmuch as the Ashkenazim are not descended from Shem, the overwhelming preponderance of today’s Jews cannot be Israelites.  The Ashkenazim are the prime movers of the Zionist movement and the main occupiers of the modern Jewish state in Palestine.  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to discern that this group has taken Palestine and supplanted many descendants of Jacob and Ishmael under false pretenses.

The second group of Jews are the Sephardim.  These people do have a legitimate claim to assert that their forebears lived in Judea, BUT only as residents of Judea, or Judeans, and not as Judahites, let alone Israelites.  The Sephardim takes their name from the Sepharvaim or Sephardaim.  These were an Assyrian [Lebanon/Syrian] people who were placed into depopulated lands of Israel and Judah after the Assyrian invasion, which carried away not only ten-tribed northern Israel, but many of the House of Judah as well, who were also departed (see 2nd Kings 17:24, 31; 18:34; 19:13; Isaiah 36:19; 37:13).  The city of Jerusalem was not taken, and only a contemptible remnant of Judah and Benjamin residing there were not deported.” 

Repopulation Map of Samaria

The king of Assyria sent people from Cuthan, Babylon, Hamath, Avva and Sepharvaim to repopulate Samaria after they had taken into captivity the House of Israel and most of the House of Judah.  Babylon and Cuthah were from the nation of Babylon; while Hamath, Avva and Sepharvaim are from the nations of Lebanon/Syria.  Both nations had been conquered by the Assyrians at the time of their deportation to Samaria. 

Edomites, Canaanites & Jews

Moloch was a Canaanite deity associated with human sacrifices.  Mainly, it was child sacrifices. A bronze statue with the head of an ox and body of a man was erected, and infants would be placed in it to burn.  His name means "the lord of the altar of incense."  He was usually shown as an old man with ram's horns, holding a scythe. Moloch was also thought to be Adrammelech. An idol form of the sun-god worshipped by the inhabitants of Sepharvaim (2 Kings 17:31), and brought by their colonists into Samaria. Adrammelech was turned into one of the ten arch-demons, who appeared in animal forms such as a peacock, mule, horse, or lion. 

Adramelech was originally a sun god in the Sepharvite and Assyrian pantheons. Over the centuries he became demonized in Judeo-Christian belief. By the middle ages he had been made Chancellor of Hell.Adrammelech, god of the Sapharvaim.

2 Kings 17:31: “And the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burned their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim.”

Ham was persuaded by his consort Naamah, to practice ritual murder and cannibalism. The word "cannibalism" comes from the words “Canaan” and their demon god “Baal;” Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 12.

By eating fair-skinned persons, they were told, their descendants would regain their superior qualities; Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 11.

Cain, "who was of that wicked one" (I John 3:12) was the first to use his inherent ability to do evil by killing his half-brother Abel, who was a servant of God.  Likewise, the synagogue of Satan uses all manner of evil to harm the people of God, in their quest to take from Israel their God-given birthright. Why do they want this birthright? Because one of their Adamic forefathers sold his birthright to Jacob/Israel for a bowl of soup.  

Malachi 1:2-3 and Romans 9:13 tell us, "Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated."  

We read how Esau grieved his parents by marrying into the Canaanite (3 wives) and Ishmaelite (1 wife) family lines:

"Esau was forty years old when he took to wife:

  1.  Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and
  2.  Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: which were a grief of mind to Isaac and to Rebekah . . . and
  3.  Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite; and
  4.  Bashemath Ishmael's daughter, sister of Nebajoth" (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2-3).

Esau was quite the mongrelizer. Though he was of the Adamic race and had the blood of Abraham, “A little leaven leavens the whole lump;” and he committed genocide by marrying into the bloodline of Canaan, “leavening” his progeny, the Edomites. Genesis 36:8 says that “Esau is Edom.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia tells us that Edom is in modern Jewry.”  This witness from the 1905 edition records the connection between modern day Jews and the race of Canaanites/Edomites:  

"Some anthropologists are inclined to associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with the Semites, whose language they adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad skulls and curved noses they appear to have inherited (Volume X, p. 284).  

Thus Esau/Edom was now absorbed into the Canaanite people by means of his Hittite and Hivite wives. According to Strong's Concordance the word Canaan means “trader or merchant.”

But there was a dastardly sin committed by the Israelites:  Owing to the intermarriage of their forefathers with Canaanites, there were a large number of Israelites with the blood of this evil seed in their veins.

Judges 3:5-7: “The children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, Hittites, and Amorites, and Perizzites, and Hivites, and Jebusites:  And they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters to their sons, and served their gods. And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and forgat the LORD their God, and served Baalim and the groves.”

These mixed-seed partial Israelites claimed to be the children of Abraham however that they were not true children of Abraham is certain when they say that they were never in bondage:

John 8:33: “They answered Him, We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man:  how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?”

Canaanite, Khazar and Edomite are all names that accurately refer to the majority of people who call themselves "Jews."  The name Jew originally meant a resident of Judea regardless of religion or race, and has long since lost any association with a true Judahite.  

Jesus made this clear in Revelation 2:9: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [Judeans], and are not but are a synagogue of Satan."

And Revelation 3:9: "I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews [Judeans] and are not, but lie; indeed I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you".  

Still the fact remains, that King of Israel, King Solomon, who did so much for establishing the doctrine of one God, died himself a practical polytheist.  And if this was the case with him, polytheism in other sovereigns of inferior excellence can excite no surprise.  With such an example before him, it is no wonder that the King of the House of Israel, King Ahab, an essentially bad man, should after his marriage with a Sidonian princess not only openly tolerate, but encourage, the worship of Baal.

His Queen, Jezebel, built a great temple with three altars, one for each of the unholy Trinity; Nimrod, Tammuz, Semiramis or Baal, Moloch and Astarte.  And although, before the reformation of King Josiah (II Kings 23), polytheism prevailed in Judah as well as Israel, yet it seems to have been more intense and universal in Israel, as might have been expected from outwardly great apostasy; and Israel is sometimes spoken of as if it had set the bad example to Judah (II Kings 17:19; Jeremiah 3:8).

2 Kings 17:19: “Also Judah kept not the commandments of the LORD their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.”

Jeremiah 3:8: “And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and give her a bill of divorce, yet her treacherous sister, Judah, feared not, but went and played the harlot also.”

Jesuit symbol IHSThe same religion is followed today.  My own Community Baptist Church that I went to while I was growing up followed the same principles of the apostate House of Israel.  They had a banner on the pulpit that said “IHS.”  When I asked what the letters stood for, I was told by the pastor that it was the abbreviation for “In His Service.”  The Roman Catholics have a different answer:  They say that they are the first three letters of the word “Jesus.”  

IHS - Egyptian Trinity

"IHS" stands for "Isis, Horus, Set" - the Egyptian trinity


What a shock!  My boyhood church carried the insignia for worshipping these three Egyptian/Babylonian/World gods: Isis, Horus, and Set.  But, after all, they did celebrate Horus’ birthday; December 25th.  These three really are Semiramis, Tammuz, and Nimrod.  Different people had different names for the same people at different times; as they had different languages:

Semiramis Tammuz Chart 

“The Canaanites also originated the practices of demon-worship, occult rites, child sacrifice and cannibalism”; Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 8.  

“They sacrificed children to Molech;” Mike Warnke, Schemes of Satan, p. 29.

In Palestine numerous bodies of children were discovered in the foundations of buildings proving without doubt that oblations of this character were common among Canaanites to strengthen the walls of homes and cities; Edwin O. James, Sacrifice and Sacrament, p. 94.

The priests of the Canaanites, to control the populace, claimed that the first-born children were to be sacrificed to their demon gods;

Isaiah 57:3-5: “But draw near here, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the harlot. Against whom do ye sport yourselves?  Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue?  Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Inflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks?”

They practiced their horrible rites in “groves” or “shrines” where they could “murder children without being seen and punished by the descendants of Shem;” Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 24.

Because Judah also followed the corrupted ways of the Edomites/Canaanites, Judah was also taken.  This left only a remnant of Israelites in Jerusalem by 700 B.C.; Sheldon Emry, Heirs of the Promise, p. 8.

“The Canaanite political parties included the Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots, Essenes, Assassins, Herodians, [Bankers (money changers)] and Scribes.  They were also divided into the Amorites, Hittites, Moabites, Midianites, Philistines, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, Sepharvaims, Perizzites, Hivites and affiliated tribes.  Later the Edomites (descended from Esau) intermarried with the Turks and became known as the Chazars who eventually occupied [present-day] Israel; Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 22.

The Babylonian Talmud says:  “Five things did Canaan charge his sons: love one another, love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters, and do not speak the truth”; The Last Will of Canaan, Babylonian Talmud, Peshachim 113b.

These five points have been the modus operadi of the Canaanites for three thousand years. “The Will of Canaan today remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order.  At the same time, it remains unknown to the peoples whom the Canaanites continue to rob, enslave, and massacre.”  The instructions are a command to commit genocide against the people of Shem.

Genesis 27:39-41: “And Isaac, his father, answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of thy earth, and of the dew of heaven from above; And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck. And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing with which his father blessed him:  and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother, Jacob.”

By the time of John Hycranus, 125 B.C., the Kingdom of Judah saw the hostility of the Idumeans.  He reduced their chief cities and incorporated the seed of Esau in the Kingdom, so that from that time onward the Idumeans became known as the same as the Judahites. 

Josephus, Antiquities, XIII, ix, 1:

“Hycranus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals and make use of the laws of the Jews [Hebrews]; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Hebrew’s ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews [Judeans].”

But true Judahites were reluctant to admit the Idumeans to their community, for the latter were know were not to be really converted.  In Antiquities, XIII, ix, 3: It says Map of Herod's Kingdom 5 BCthat about 105 B.C. Aritobulus made war against Iturea.  Iturea was to the northeast of the Sea of Galilee.  He added this to Judea by compelling the inhabitants if they would be circumcised and live according to the Hebrew laws.  The same strategy that Hycranus used against the Idumeans.  

Notice where Iturea is located.

This was directly opposite of what God told His covenant people to do when they came out of bondage in Egypt.  He gave to them the Promised Land that was lived in by the seven nations of the Canaanites.  God told Israel to kill every man, women, child and infant.  Let none of them live.  God was to take from the Canaanites their very lives, homes, vineyards, orchards, and farms and instead gave them to the Israelites. He did this because the Canaanites were evil (people who later intermarried with the descendants of Cain and other non-Adamic people) and because they were squatters on the land God had planned for His people to inhabit.

Land of Canaan in Joshua's Time

Further, had the Canaanites obeyed God more fully at the tower of Babel when God commanded all peoples to disperse, they would not have spent a millennium developing land and homes only for it to be taken away from them and given to His people—the Israelites. 

There is nothing said that is of any good about the Canaanites in any Scripture.  Nothing!  Anyone who marries into their line, their children are all evil.   They will serve other gods.  It is genetic.  God hated Esau because he married into their line and his children became evil.  Of one of his grandsons, Amalek,

Genesis 36:12: “And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz, Esau’s son; and she bore to Eliphaz Amalek:  there were the sons of Adah, Esau’s wife.”

God said that he would have war with him forever:

Exodus 17:16: “For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.”

Many Bible commentaries wrongly state that Rahab was a Canaanite.  But God had said that if Israel failed to utterly destroy all the Canaanites, they would be thorns in their flesh and pricks in their eyes all their days.  If Ruth was a Canaanite, God would have ordered Rahab and her family to be perpetual slaves, or thanked them for their help and then sent them far, far away.  But nothing like this is mentioned in the Bible.

It was a member of the Edomite progeny who first sought to kill our Lord.

Matthew 2:16: “Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceedingly angry, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all its borders, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men” .... records how Herod the Idumean (Edomite) had all the Israelite children two years and younger slain that in so doing he might also kill the baby Messiah.

Jesus would not live in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him:

John 7:1: "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him.”

Grolier's Academic American Encyclopedia tells us that the Mongols were a people who “For nearly two centuries . . . raided, invaded, conquered, and destroyed many more highly developed countries and peoples.”

Of the Khazars we read: “The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the kagan (king) were converted to Judaism . . . The Khazars controlled many of the trade routes to the Orient.”  The synagogue of Satan has perpetuated the traits of their forebears by maintaining control of trade which is one of the methods they use to continue in their quest to overthrow “more highly developed countries and peoples.”

That this group of people is genetically linked to the Khazars and Mongols is well-proven and even admitted by Jews themselves. Ashkenazim Jew Arthur Koestler’s book, The Thirteenth Tribe gives abundant proof of this.

The 1925 edition of The Jewish Encyclopedia (Volume 15, p. 292) has this to say about the Khazars: “CHAZARS: a people of Turkish origin whose life and history is interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews in Russia.”

Before it became politically incorrect to discuss such things, the 1952 edition of the American People's Encyclopedia says of the Khazar/Mongol/Turk connection to the Jews:

“In the year 740 the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism.  A century later they were cursed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.”

The very word which has come to mean someone with vast wealth and power originally meant someone of the Mongol tribes of Asia. Interestingly enough, those people today who possess the wealth and power are direct descendants of the Mongolian peoples, who later mixed with the Khazars, a branch of the Turks.

What country is today the homeland of the Khazars?  The Ukraine!  Russia stopped America from interfering in Syria.  Now, the Zionist/Jesuites want the Ukraine to be Land of the Khazarsseparate from Russia.  We are close to World War III again.  This is the region where World War I began.

The Khazars are the Turkish/Canaanite/Edomite’s seed who converted to Judaism in AD 740.  Today it is the country of Ukraine.

The Maccabean leadership was replaced by the descendants of traditional enemies of the Hebrew people, namely the converted Edomites, Herod and his family. The Ashkenazim developed the idea of Political Zionism.

The Sephardim were forced out of Spain after the inauguration of the inquisition in 1492.   Many escaped to Holland and by 1600, the Dutch manned 1,000 ships, and were the world's leading power in maritime commerce.  In 1609 the great Bank of Amsterdam was established.

The second great European bank, the Bank of England, was thus formed in 1694.  In both banks, Sephardic investments were significant, but not exclusive. Above all, the Banks were obviously sponsored by national regimes and “Christian” upper-classes, which benefitted greatly. Land of Canaan 

The Hivi - There were two (2) tribes of Hivites who were both Canaanite. One tribe of the mountains of Lebanon -- JUDGES 3: 3; and the other tribe of the cities Gibeon, Chephirah, Bee-roth, and Kirjath-jearim of central Canaan. These four (4) cities were possessed by the Israelitic tribe of Benjamin. They were descendants of Hiv the sixth (6th) son of Canaan.

Judges 3:3: “Namely, five lords of the Philistines, and all the Canaanites, and the Sidonians, and the Hivites who dwelt in Mount Lebanon, from Mount Baal-hermon as far as the entrance of Hamath.”

The Sephardim were part of one of the seven Canaanites nations; the Hivites.  Esau took one of their women to be one of his four wives.  He also married two Canaanite women from the Hittite nation and one from the Ishmaelite’s (present-day Arab). 

The Hivites were located in two different areas.  One was located in the tribe of Benjamin the other to the North of Galilee.  The Hivites were closely situated where the Sephardim lived before they were sent to Samaria. 

Is it possible that all of the immigrated Samaritans remained in the same location for 3 times as long as we have been a nation (over 600 years)?  Do you think that it is possible for them to move from less than a mile to 40 miles to the South?  Do you think that they could have influenced Hycrancus to commit the horrible sin with their brethren, the Idumeans?   They could have married Edomites and settled in Jerusalem?   Remember Esau married three of the Canaanite women!

During the life of our Savior there could have been a large concentration of Sephardim in Judea!  People have moved around the world.  Slowly, until the invention of the airplane.  Now it is quickly, as all kinds of diverse population live in all parts of the earth.

But as the latest issue of the Virginia Christian Israelite also pointed out:  Many Christian Identity believers are aware of the identity of the Jews as a mixed multitude, dominated by Esau/Edom.  They are less culpable for contributing to the current disasters, but not entirely innocent, because some of them are also partially deceived, owing to the “trickle down” effects of some “British Israel” teachings.

There is a large belief among Christian Identity believers that Britain and America (Ephraim and Manasseh) constituted “Israel.”  They also believe that Jewry constitutes only the remnants of the Southern Kingdom of Judah.  In other words, there are the ten tribes of Israel, which each tribe settled a country in Europe and the Jews.  For example:  Iceland was settled mainly by the tribe of Benjamin.  But they wrongly call Germany “Assyria.”  An evil nation which would lead an end of the age empire called the “United States of Europe.” 

They know about who the ten-tribes are and who they have become, but they don’t know about who the Kingdom of Judah is.  They believe what the Chief Rabbi wrote:  “The people know at present as Jews are descendants of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin with a certain number of descendants of the tribe of Levi.”  Does he disagree with the Jewish Almanac that says that “Edom is modern Jewry.”

He also says that “the ten tribes have been absorbed among the nations of the world.”  If that is true, then who has the “birthright?”   In fact, history indicates that literal modern Jewry has no claim to be Abraham’s heirs, and their claims to Palestine are groundless. 

Who, nationally, is Judah?  Scripture gives us a clue.  It is in Genesis 49:10: “The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from his descendants, until the coming of the one to whom it belongs, the one whom all nations will obey.”

All Christian European monarchies were of Saxon-Germanic stock.  Louie XIV of France was beheaded by the Jesuits during the French Revolution as well as Marie Antoinette of Austria.  Most people are not aware that Germany did not become a country until the late 1800’s. 

The British Crown derives its Scriptural legitimacy from Germanic stock too.  Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Russia, Wales, Scotland, Iceland, France, Spain, Portugal, Austria-Hungary all have or had Germanic royalty.  The scepter was given to the tribe of Judah by Jacob.  Germany is the modern country where the majority of Judah dwells today.

Psalms 114:2 says that when Israel went out of Egypt that Judah became the Father’s sanctuary and Israel became His dominion. 

1 Peter 4:17 says that judgment will begin at the house of God.  Could that mean the same as God’s sanctuary?  Virginia Christian Israelite thinks that the answer is yes.

Germany had sinned by being the country where Jewish refugees could enter after a failed revolution in Russia.  They were treated intolerantly by the Germans.  The Jews were able to prosper and become a large part of their country.  But they then became traitorous to Germany; they secretly schemed against them.

World War 1 began by “Christian” England and “Christian” France fighting against “Christian” Germany and “Christian” Russia. “Christian” America was duped into joining in the War after Germany had completely won it.  The Zionists/Jesuits duped America to fight against Germany after Germany had been duped into assisting the Zionist/Jesuits to overthrow Russia, setting the stage for the initial rule of Jewish communism.

Judgment continued against Germany at Versailles, who stripped Germany of virtually everything.  Then World War II began.  It was instigated by the Canaanite/Jesuits who was facilitated by England and funded by the United States.  The War wrought horrors of unspeakable dimension.  Literal mass murder of tens of millions of civilians by aerial bombardment, a devastating loss of life for American and British soldiers and airmen, and a post war death-by-exposure-and starvation for more than nine million German civilians in Eisenhower’s open air concentration camps. 

If this is true, then the question at the end of 1 Peter 4:17 asked:  “What shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?”  

I believe that Germany is Judah, who was given the scepter by God.  America helped the Canaanite/Jesuits and we did not believe the gospel of God.  We fought against our brother.  What will be our end?  I don’t think that it will be very good.  I think that we will suffer fearsome judgment and real terror.  What do we need to do?  Repent!

We need to recognize that there are peoples who are not the same.  Who is the Canaanite?  Who is the Samaritan? Who is the Edomite?  Who is a Philistinian?  Who is an Israelite?  Who is a Judahite?  Who is of Joseph?  Who is an Arab?

The book of Judges gives us the solution:  “And when the children of Israel cried unto the LORD, the LORD raised up a deliverer to the children of Israel, who delivered them….”

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

The Greatest Passover

by Pastor Don Elmore

Part 1:  The day of our Roman calendar starts at midnight.  Why?  The New Year beginnings at the beginning of winter/summer?  Why does the Judeo-Christian church celebrate Easter? 

The Greatest Passover Part 1

by Pastor Don Elmore

April 13, 2014

Scripture Reading:  II Chronicles 34:1-7

Josiah was King of Judah in the latter days of the kingdom, before it was taken into captivity by the Babylonians.  His grandfather, King Manasseh, was one of the worse, if not the worse King in the history of Judah and maybe in all of Israel.  Manasseh began his reign when he was twelve years old and he reigned for 55 years.  He did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, like unto the abominations of the nations whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.

He built the high places which his father, King Hezekiah, had broken down. He reared up altars for Baalim, and made idols, and worshipped all the host of heaven, and served them.  Also he built altars in the house of the LORD.  He caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom; also he observed times, and used enchantment, and practiced sorcery, and dealt with a medium, and with wizards.  He made and set an idol in the House of God.  So, Manasseh made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to err, and to do worse than the nations, whom the LORD had destroyed before the children of Israel

Think about that last sentence for a moment.  How bad were the Israelites?  It says that they were worse than the Canaanites.  The nations of the Canaanites had been so bad that God ordered His covenant people to completely annihilate them; and here His people were acting worse than they did.

The United States worships wizards (Harry Potter multi-book series and movies); have altars to Baalim (abortion clinics); practiced sorcery (drug addiction); made idols (Catholic Church, Mormons, Episcopal, etc.); reads the influence of the stars (horoscopes); deals with mediums (talks with dead people); keeps pagan holidays (instead of God’s holydays); it seems like America is a lot like unfaithful Judah.

God was so mad at Manasseh that he had him taken captive by the Assyrians.  They took him and bound him in chains and fetters, and carried him to Babylon.  He was actually a prisoner of Assyria.  And when he was in affliction, he besought the LORD, his God, and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers.

And then he prayed unto Him; and he was entreated by him, and heard his supplication, and brought him again to Jerusalem into his kingdom.  Then Manasseh knew the LORD, and that He was his God.  Manasseh repented. 

King Manasseh then made repairs to the House of God and tore down many of the idols and altars that he had built in the mount of the House of the LORD in Jerusalem.  He attempted to redo all of the evil that he had done.  He started, but he couldn’t come close to finishing.  He didn’t have enough time.  And in a couple of years he died.

His son Amon reigned for only two years.  He was also an evil king and his servants conspired against him and slew him in his own house.  The people then made his son king in his stead—young Josiah. 

As we said before, Josiah began his reign when he was just eight years old.  During his young days, they found in the House of God while they were repairing it, a book.  It was part of the Scriptures that they had lost.  That they had lost?  How long had they been without these Scriptures?  They had lost the Scriptures and hadn’t look for them?  Had they completely forgotten who they were?  It certainly implies that they didn’t keep the Feast Days that God had commanded them to keep.  And for how long?

The king told them to inquire of the LORD for great is the wrath of the LORD that is poured out upon us, because our fathers have not kept the Word of the LORD, to do all that is written in this book. 

When Josiah was 26 years old he had his people, including himself, keep the PASSOVER.  They hadn’t kept Passover and Unleavened Bread for a long time.  There was no Passover like this one since the days of Samuel the prophet.  It was the greatest Passover that was kept in almost 450 years!  That is almost twice as long as the United States has been a nation!

The House of Israel had been an apostate nation for its whole existence:  over two hundred years.  They wound up as a nation that promoted Baalism.  They made their own laws and did not keep God’s laws at all.  They refused their people the right to go to Jerusalem to the Temple; they kicked out all of the priests of God; they changed the dates of the Feast days to another month; and they choose priests from another tribe (non-Levitical) who were the lowest of the people.

So we can conclude that the House of Israel kept Passover very little or they never kept it according to God’s law in all of their history of being a nation.  They certainly did not keep it when they were in a state of divorcement (over 700 years); for many of them completely forgot who they were.  

The House of Judah did a little bit better.  But from what we learn in the life story of Josiah; they were not keeping the Feast days either.  Until they found the lost Scriptures in the Temple, they were completely unaware of the Feast Day of Passover.  How long was this going on in the House of Judah?  They certainly never kept Passover for a longer period of time than they didn’t celebrate it.

Jesus went to Judea for the Feast days, because in Jerusalem was the appropriate place where the Feast Days could be held; but He knew that the Edomite/Canaanite/Jews were seeking to kill Him.  He went there at the time of the Passover so He could fulfill the Scriptures that told of the time of His death.  He voluntarily lay down His life for the sheep, for He was the Passover Lamb!   The death of Jesus had to coincide with the death of all the Passover lambs that were being sacrifice by each Israelite household.  He was to die on Passover; not one day before or after.  Jesus Christ could not die on any other day or time.  It had to be during the same time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered.  He was the first of the lambs to die, as He died at the beginning of the time for them to be killed—3 PM.  His death was preeminent. 

Imagine the scene, if you can.  Immediately after Jesus Christ had poured out His holy blood for our sins, by hanging on the tree, paying the penalty for our sins, as our Passover Lamb of God, multiple thousands of Judahites (true Israelites) and Jews (false Israelites) throughout Judea were also slaying their Passover lambs!  What a perfect fulfillment!  What a perfect anti-type!  What a marvelous picture!  Jesus fulfilled the anti-type of the Passover PERFECTLY!   Josephus tells us that during that time about 256,000 Passover lambs were being slain, one for every ten people.  Thus the population in Judea was about 2,500,000 during the time of Jesus.  All those Passover lambs pointed to HIM -- the true Passover Lamb of God!

Why are there controversies?  There are beliefs on just about every issue!  Today, the vast majority of churches don’t even pretend to recognize Passover, they celebrate Easter.  They say that Jesus was crucified on Friday afternoon (Good Friday) and rose Sunday morning (Easter Sunday).  The “Last Supper” was held on Thursday evening.  That is totally unbiblical!  There is no way that you can get 72 hours from burial to resurrection.  It is a struggle to get 36 hours!  And that isn’t all.  They have Fat Tuesday, Mardi Gras,   Lent, no meat-eating Fridays (only fish), and Palm Sunday, etc.

A few churches even eat a Jewish Passover Seder meal.  Why would they eat such a meal, when the death of our Savior has already occurred? 

But wait, we are using a Roman Catholic calendar, not the calendar that our ancient fathers used.  The Roman calendar is a false religious one which is based on Christmas, Lent and Easter and we are not using, in fact we, the modern day Israelites, don’t even know the calendar that was used by our ancestors.

Exodus 12:1-2:

  1. “And the LORD spoke unto Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, saying,
  2. This month shall be unto you the beginning of months:  it shall be the first month of the year to you.” 

This month was named “Abib” in Exodus 13:4; “Nisan” elsewhere in the Bible.  The Roman calendar begins each New Year a week and a half after the winter solstice.  God said about 4000 years ago for His people to begin each New Year in the spring.  Near March 20th would begin the New Year in God’s calendar that He gave to His covenant people. 

The Roman calendar begins each day at a moment past 12 o’clock midnight.  Have you ever thought:  “Why midnight?”  A lot of the movies with evil themes have midnight as a prominent time in their pictures.  But weren’t the firstborn sons of all the Egyptians killed at that time?  So the Roman calendar is a death calendar.  Each day begins in the middle of the night; each New Year begins near the beginning of winter.  God’s calendar is the opposite.  Each New Year begins in the rebirth of nature; the springtime.  Each new day begins at sunset.

In God’s calendar there is a two-day Sabbath each year; 48 hours.  It is the 49th and 50th day after the resurrection.   It is also the time of the Feast of Pentecost.  So, in the Roman calendar it doesn’t make any difference what day you keep for the weekly Sabbath; Saturday or Sunday.  They are both wrong the majority of time on Israel’s calendar.   For the day would change each year.  And they are both correct for a short while!  It is like a stopped broken watch; it gives the correct time twice a day.  Israel’s calendar doesn’t have the days of the week that the Roman calendar has; it just has numbers.  The months are different names too.

God then told the Israelites that on the tenth day of the first month (He didn’t say Sunday, or Monday, or Tuesday, or Wednesday, or Thursday, or Friday, or a Saturday) they were to take an unblemished lamb or a goat, a male of the first year and they were to keep it until the fourteenth day of the same month.  Then they kept it and killed it in the evening of the fourteen day.

Let’s think for a moment.  This calendar was for Israel only.  They lived in the Northern Hemisphere.  The month of March in the Southern Hemisphere is the reverse season of March in the Northern Hemisphere.  March in the Southern Hemisphere is the beginning of the fall season.  December in the Southern Hemisphere is the beginning of summer!  What, Christmas is in the summer?

And if you go close to either of the poles, a day could last as long as six months.   If you get close to the either the North or South poles it is always very cold.  What would that do to the Sabbath restrictions? 

The Roman calendar in the Southern Hemisphere begins each New Year in the summer and not the winter.  The Roman 24 hour day, begins at midnight to sunrise; from sunrise to sunset; and from sunset to midnight.  Very confusing. And when we read in the Scriptures that something happened about “the sixth hour” it means about twelve o’clock noon.  The Israelite night began at sunset; its day began at sunrise.  The Israelite 24 hour day began at sunset and ended at sunset.

The “LORD’s Supper” occurred on the evening, the beginning portion of Abib or Nisan 13.  Jesus was arrested that very night and taken into captivity.  The next morning, still Nisan 13, he appeared before Pilate, then Herod, and finally again before Pilate, when he was judged and condemned.  

After being condemned, Jesus was flogged, scourged, and beaten, and thrown into the dungeon where He was left until the following morning, Nisan 14.  Also on the latter part of Nisan 14th, He was led up to the spot of the crucifixion, on the Mount of Olives, overlooking the Temple, where the Red Heifer sacrifices were made.  There He was nailed to the stake at “the third hour” of the day -- nine AM in the morning (Mark 15:25).   This means the final supper Jesus had with His disciples occurred TWO nights before the regular Passover meal, which would be observed throughout Jerusalem on the night of Nisan 15, after all the lambs had been sacrificed and roasted. 

Therefore, this final meal -- similar to the traditional Passover in certain respects -- was a special, unique, final “going away” meal -- which many have referred to as “the Lord’s Supper.”  It was like a normal Passover in some respects, but it was different in other respects -- it was actually two nights BEFORE the actual Passover, there was no “lamb” eaten with it, as the Passover lambs would not be killed at the Temple till the afternoon of Nisan 14, as the Law prescribed (Exodus12:6).  The bread eaten at it was regular leavened bread as the days of unleavened bread hadn’t started as yet.

However, since Jesus knew He would be dead at the time of the traditional Passover meal, this particular year, He chose to hold a special, unique “going away” dinner with His disciples the last available night He had with them before the regular Passover that year.  At this meal, or supper, He introduced the new symbols of bread representing His body and wine representing His blood.  What was this all about, and how did it relate to the Passover?

Paul says this ceremony was to be done “as often as” -- in other words, OFTEN, throughout the year!  This was not instituted as an ANNUAL observance, which would be added to the Passover, but as a SPECIAL OBSERVANCE to be celebrated OFTEN throughout the year! 

Why, then, do some want to observe the night before (Maundy Thursday) the Passover?  It is almost as if there is a “lust” to do this -- and yet Jesus never once commanded it, or recommended it, or “approved” it!  But, as Solomon wrote:  “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death” (Proverbs14:12).  Even though entire churches do this, they do so out of sheer ignorance of the truth!

Easter is supposed to represent the resurrection of Jesus Christ.  They say that it happened on Sunday morning.  Then the churches have their annual Easter Service; followed by the Easter meal.  Let’s see:  The main course is not lamb, but Easter ham; an abomination to our God.  And this all occurs near the unlawful, income tax deadline.

Let us summarize:

Nisan 10 The unblemished lamb chosen from the herd.  Israel is cleaning out of their homes all the yeasts.

Nisan 11 The lamb is kept near the home.  Israel is cleaning out of their homes all the yeasts.

Nisan 12 The lamb is kept near the home.  Israel is cleaning out of their homes all the yeasts.

Nisan 13 The lamb is kept near the home.  Israel is cleaning out of their homes all the yeasts.  Jesus meets with his apostles and has a final meal with them before Passover.  The meal would have leaven in the bread and the drink would be wine.  This was held after the supper. 

Jesus only gave the bread and wine to his apostles.  None of the women were there.  There were only men who took the elements that represented Jesus’ blood and sinful body. 

Today, both true and false churches, have a multitude of differences on what they refer to as the “Lord’s Supper.” Some keep it only once a year; others once a month; others every week and the Catholic Church every day. 

Some use just one cup, while others use many cups.  The Roman Catholics believe that the elements turn into the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ, while Protestants and others believe that it only represents both the body and the blood.  Some churches offer it to anyone who comes; while others have a closed communion—which means that they only give it to members of their own church.  Some use wine only.  Others use grape juice only.  And others use a mixture of both:  wine and grape juice. 

And there is no doubt other differences that I don’t know about.  Which way is correct?

Nisan 14 Passover Day.  The lamb is killed between the hours of 3-5 PM.  It was kind of bitter/sweet for the Israelites for the lamb was kept close to the home for four days.  On the original Passover, the Israelites struck the blood of the lamb over their doorposts; on the top and the two sides.  It formed a cross. 

Nisan 15 The fifteenth is the first day of Unleavened Bread. The Israelites ate the Passover meal at the beginning (night) of this day at their homes;   one lamb per 10 people.  If a family only had two children, for example, they could join with another family (six or fewer members) for their supper of roasted lamb. 

At midnight (Nisan 15) the LORD smote the firstborn sons in the land of Egypt; boys, men and animals.  There was not an Egyptian house where there was not at least one dead.  All the Egyptians were urgent upon Moses and Aaron to depart immediately.  As an enticement for them to leave, they gave them all their jewels and silver and gold and beautiful things.  The Passover by the death angel over the Israelites’ homes happened on the 15th of Nisan.

All the firstborn sons of the children of Israel are “passed over” by the death angel when he sees the blood of the lamb on the doors.  The firstborn sons of Israel were spared.  The firstborn sons were the recipients of the covenant blessings.   The sons of Joseph were the birthright recipients, while the sons of Levi were the priests and the firstborn sons of Judah were the royalty.   It is not as in the movie, “Noah,” where it says at the end of the production that all men are recipients of the birthright covenant, even before Abraham was born.  This was the movie that had Tubalcain sneak onto the Ark! 

The account goes on and tells how the children of Israel journeyed to Succoth and baked UNLEAVENED cakes of the dough which they brought forth out of Egypt.  It was not leavened, because they could not tarry, neither had they prepared for themselves any victuals (Exodus 12:37-39).

They left the very next morning, early, after the horrendous Passover Night when the Egyptians were destroyed!  They had eaten the Passover meal fully clothed, and with their staffs in their hands, ready to depart (Exodus 12:11).  The next morning they did not wait around, or tarry; they were on their way out of Egypt.

And they departed from Ramses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month, on the morrow after the Passover, the children of Israel went out in the sight of all the Egyptians (Number 33:3). 

The Israelites were in such a hurry that their dough did not even have time to become leavened, from sitting out in the air.  The yeast did not even have time to work.  If they had sat around on their hands and knees for a whole day, there would have been plenty of leaven in their dough by the following evening.  It only requires bread dough with leaven from one to two hours to rise, and double in bulk. 

Many assume that Jesus referred to the final meal He had with His disciples as the “Passover.” Actually, that is a matter of dispute.  How could it have been the “Passover,” since the following day would still be the “preparation” of the Passover?  So in what sense was this final meal a “Passover” since the traditional Passover would not be until some days later?  He plainly said to the disciples, “With desire I have desired to eat THIS PASSOVER with you BEFORE I SUFFER:  For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God” (Luke 22:15-16).   So, what did He really mean?

Why did Jesus that night, at supper with the disciples, speak of “THIS Passover”?  Was He referring to that evening meal?  Or was He not referring to the upcoming Passover which He would be unable to eat with them since He would be dead at that time? 

Nisan 16 Second day of Unleavened Bread.

Nisan 17 Third day of Unleavened Bread.  Priests also waved the barley sheaves.  Resurrection of Jesus Christ occurred as the priests were waving the barley sheaves.  Jesus arose 72 hours after he was placed in the grave just before sunset on Wednesday afternoon.  He arose just before sunset on Saturday.  Remember that Nisan 18 began after sunset.

Isn’t the resurrection the most important day in the Christian year?  If the resurrection would not have happened, then no one would live in the future kingdom.  Maybe that is why our LORD told his disciples that the church should keep the Communion.  They should use unleavened bread because at His Resurrection all of the sins that Jesus had on his body was put away and paid for. 

Nisan 18 Fourth day of Unleavened Bread.  This would be Saturday till midnight, then Sunday on the Roman calendar; this was the days of this particular Passover.  It would change each year.

Nisan 19 Fifth day of Unleavened Bread

Nisan 20 Sixth day of Unleavened Bread

Nisan 21 Seventh day of Unleavened Bread

II Chronicles 35

1) “MOREOVER, Josiah kept a Passover unto the LORD in Jerusalem; and they killed the Passover on the fourteenth day of the first month.

13) And they roasted the Passover with fire according to the ordinance; but the other holy offerings boiled they in pots, and in caldrons, and in pans, and divided them speedily among all the people.

14) And afterward they made ready for themselves, and for the priests.  Because the priests, the sons of Aaron, were busied in offering of burnt offerings and the fat until night, therefore the Levites prepared for themselves, and for the priests, the sons of Aaron.

15) And the singers, the sons of Asaph, were in their place, according to the commandment of David, and Asaph, and Heman, and Jeduthun, the king’s seer.  And the porters waited at every gate; they might not depart from their service; for their brethren the Levites prepared for them.

16) So all the service of the LORD was prepared the same day, to keep the Passover, and to offer burnt offering upon the altar of the LORD, according to the commandment of King Josiah.

17) And the children of Israel who were present kept the Passover at that time, and the feast of unleavened bread, seven days.

18) And there was no Passover like that kept in Israel from the days of Samuel, the prophet; neither did all the kings of Israel keep such a Passover as Josiah kept, and the priests, and the Levites, and all Judah and Israel who were present, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

19) In the eighteenth year of the reign of Josiah was this Passover kept.

Are we to keep Passover and Unleavened Bread today?  And what about the waving of the barley sheaves?  These three days were all combined into an eight day feast.  And then do you go and pick out an unblemished lamb on the tenth day; making it a twelve day event?  Do you kill the lamb yourself and then roast it on the fire or do you go to Kroger’s and pick out a package of lamb?

And if you celebrate Passover, do you also killed two lambs each day at the Temple?  Wait there is no Temple in Jerusalem to sacrifice them.  And what about all the other animal sacrifices?  There was the scapegoat sacrifice and the turtle doves sacrifice and others? 

The Israelites were taken in captivity and scattered all over the world.  They weren’t in every country but you could find them all over the world.  For many Israelites in Australia and South Africa, for example, Passover would not be in the spring, but in the fall. 

Passover was to be kept in Jerusalem; once Israel had settled in the land and occupied Jerusalem and had built the House of God.  But the whole nation only worshipped at the Temple a couple of decades and then they split into two separate kingdoms!  The Northern kingdom even forbade its people from worshipping at Jerusalem for fear that they would eventually side with the Judahites.

The Passover meal was to be eaten in the homes of the Israelite families.  It was not to be served in the synagogue or church.  Could you expect all the Israelites in Australia to go to Jerusalem at one time to celebrate Passover and Unleavened Bread?  They would be there with all the Israelites from all over the world?  Israelites from the United States, Great Britain, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada, South Africa, Iceland, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, France, Germany, Russia, etc. could not all fit in Jerusalem even if they had a Temple.

But isn’t all of this fulfilled!  Passover first happened in Egypt, but it was fulfilled in Jerusalem at the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.  “Christ” is our Passover.  Why would we keep this Feast and kill all of the lambs.  The animal sacrifices ceased with the killing of the “lamb of God.”  What need would there be for killing as a sacrifice for any of the animals.  Our Savior did not have to die again, only one time.  His resurrection proved that His sacrifice was accepted by His father.  No more sacrifice is needed.

Do we throw all of the leaven out of our houses each spring?  Or is it better not to have the leaven of malice and wickedness but to have the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth (1 Corinthians 5:8)?  Have you noticed the need for our people to “spring clean?


We should remember our history; the Passover, the waving of the barley sheaves and the days of Unleavened Bread are an important part of this.  But we do not keep it the way that our fathers did in the Old Testament.  We are New Testament Christian/Israelites.   Christ is our Passover, who took away our sins with His one offering; not an unblemished, one-year old lamb which could only put away our sins for a year.  

It seems that Jesus was showing His disciples what the church should do in the future.  We can’t celebrate Passover and Unleavened Bread the way that Josiah did, even if we wanted to.  We are now living all over the world.  Israelites are living in the Southern Hemisphere as well as the Northern Hemisphere.  And there is no one Temple in Jerusalem or anywhere else in the world.

We use unleavened bread and wine in our Communion service.  At the original “Lord’s Supper” was leavened bread and wine.  It was leavened bread because Jesus was in two days going to represent His people with all of their sins on His body.  The only people who participated in the original Lord’s Supper was His disciples—all men.  The Scriptures doesn’t even mention if any women were present, let alone any children.

The church at Corinth was criticized by Paul for the way that they practiced their love feasts.  The rich brought an elegant amount of food and ate by themselves; while the poor brought a limited amount of food and also ate by themselves.  There was no common table.   They ate at the church.

Their whole altitude was wrong.  Their actions at the love feast caused much divisions and hardships.  And then after the meal they were going to celebrate Communion?

And do you know what famous Israelite was born in this time of the last reform of Judah’s worse time in history?  Who grew up in this terrible environment that was at last replaced by good king Josiah?

Jeremiah 1:1, 2    

  1. “THE words of Jeremiah, the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth, in the land of Benjamin,
  2. To whom the word of the LORD came in the days of Josiah, the son of Amon, king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign.”

It was Jeremiah!  The book begins five years before the greatest Passover celebration in almost 500 years!  Jeremiah, no doubt, was a participant. Remember Josiah when he was sixteen sought after the God of his father, David, and when he was twenty years old he began cleaning up Judah from all of the false practice they had been doing.

When Josiah was twenty-one years old, Jeremiah was called to preach. So, Jeremiah must have participated in the greatest Passover since Israel rejected God as being their King.

To be continued.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Sermons by Pastor Mark Downey 2014

Repentance You Can Count On

by Pastor Mark Downey

March 30, 2014

Scripture Reading:  Matthew 4:12-17

When Jesus launched His ministry, in what would become a three year exhortation to our race exclusively, the first thing He declared was repentance.  Of all the things He could have said as the opening salvo (because it was spiritual warfare), He choose something the people really didn't want to hear, even though it had a lot to do with deliverance.  They envisioned a Deliverer who would come to destroy the Romans.  Their Great White Hope would have said, “Come follow me, and we shall slice the Legions to ribbons.”  I hope you got the gist of the title i.e. the similarity between repentance and change.  When America's first black dictator made the campaign promise for “change you can count on,” the voters didn't think he meant a Marxist change agent who was seriously going to instigate the redistribution of wealth by changing the very concept of American law to a plethora of executive orders and a pathway to antichrist totalitarianism.  Obama cares?  Since 2009 there has been a trance formation of America violating Deut. 17:15.  It's a negro world (an Obamanation) brought to you courtesy of the White man's sins.  The success of multicultural hegemony has literally put the mutts in charge; they have become the head, and we have become the tail.  This major invasive surgery on the body politic has been an exquisite operation.  Almost insurmountable in correcting the capsized ship of state; a ship that only leaks from the top.  If you think black churches preach repentance, you're dreaming the same dream as M.L. King, which has become the White man's nightmare.  If you think catholics are going to repent of their Pope shaking hands with Obama this week (3-27-14), then we'll have to reinvent the meaning of repentance. 

But, there is a glimmer of hope.  And I mean more than just a cliché of the darkest hour  just before the dawn.  “The peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus” Phil. 4:7.  Our predicament in life depends on our perspective.  Is the glass half full or half empty?  If you don't understand how something can rise from the lowest ebb of despair to the highest pinnacle of optimism permeating reality, then you need to change.  We've been hearing this megaphone for several decades announcing that in so many years the White race will be outnumbered by non-Whites.  Every year the ratio gets closer to a 50:50 mix and our people get this uneasy feeling, maybe even a cringing fear where your world is now infested with flared nostrils, nappy craniums and sticky fingers.  The browning of America is White genocide and it's so affordable (said sarcastically); “after all, Whites don't have it too bad.”

Why should we count on repentance?  Why repent; what's it going to do for us?  Repentance, like salvation, has been catered to a pampered, deracinated church as a personalized individual doctrine, rather than a nation-race.  The Obama soundbyte: “change you can count on” was a collective promise for black supremacy and White oppression.  A green light for 'let the knockout games begin!'  And sure enough, they're drunk with power and getting away with murder.   That's the judaized god of secular humanism changing good to evil and evil to good.  They serve their own interests.  Likewise, White Christian America can promote “repentance you can count on,” but from a Christian Identity perspective; it is a call for divine intervention to save true Israel.

It is not changing things to suit one's self, but changing self to suit God.  We oftentimes change things thinking it's God's will, when in reality it's just self righteousness.  To say personal repentance must come before national repentance is as silly as arguing which came first the chicken or the egg.  What good is an unrepentant national government with repentant sinners?  Or what good is a repentant national government with unrepentant sinners.  Both must function for a Christian body politic to operate.  “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn” Prov. 29:2.  As we'll see, there's a connection between repentance and mourning.  You can count on repentance to remove wickedness in high places, to remove the alien stranger from our land.

I was reading an article in the America's Promise newsletter (for March 2014) with the title 'Israel has Changed the World' predicated on Acts 1:8, “and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.”  'Uttermost' was in bold letters as if to suggest it meant every mud hut village on the planet.  If we investigate beyond the inept rendering of the Masoretic KJV text, a better translation is found in the Christogenea N.T. to wit, “unto the end of the earth.”  The context of this word 'end' or phrase 'end of the earth' was often used to denote the other end, the western extremity of the Greco-Roman world.  In fact, William Finck translates Romans 10:18 where Paul wrote, “But I say, have they not heard?  Yea, rather. 'into all the land went out their voice, and to the western extremities of the habitable world their words.'”  He [Paul] goes on to say, “The children of Israel were to be scattered and removed unto “all the ends of the earth” is a matter of Biblical prophecy.  That the Gospel was to be brought to “the end of the earth” is only an indication that all of scattered Israel would be brought the Gospel from abroad.”

To the universalist mindset, it is utterly amazing how missionaries effected the world.  To my mind it was and is tragic.  The AP newsletter found “a significant statistical link between democracy and Protestantism” and turned to this guy who spent 14 years researching it with a half million dollar grant.  Three things produce a disagreeable odor here: 1. democracy is rule of the mob and unchristian, 2. Protestantism is not Christian Identity and resembles Baal worship more than Christianity, and 3. who would finance something like this other than jewish interests?  The article then goes on gushing about how White missionaries helped birth modern day India and makes this astounding statement: “The missionaries actually Christianized Hinduism... They fulfilled the admonition to go to the uttermost parts of the earth... We have to become the light of the world.”  And then to add insult to injury, the AP newsletter asserts that “instead of sending missionaries, we will see the fulfillment of Isaiah 2:2, “And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the Lord's house  shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.”  Mountains and hills are symbolic of governments, kingdoms and countries.  I guess there's no repentance for the goddess in New York harbor beseeching the poor and huddled riff-raff, the wretched refuse of third world countries to flood into our Promised Land.

Well, I think Isaiah would disagree with that assessment (of mud hut villagers flowing into the all-White demographics of Iowa, Maine and North Dakota, thanks to bleeding heart jews and catholics), “But thou, Israel, art My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham My friend.  Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, Thou art My servant; I have chosen thee, and not cast thee away.  Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God; I will strengthened thee; yea I will help thee, I will uphold thee with the right hand of My righteousness” Isaiah 41:8-10.  I don't read anything there that would include other races or nations.  In fact, if we keep reading, we find out what the real prophetic fulfillment for the other races are, starting in verse 15, “Behold, I will make thee a new sharp threshing instrument having teeth: thou shalt thresh the mountains, and beat them small, and shalt make the hills as chaff. 16 Thou shalt fan them, and the wind shall carry them away, and the whirlwind shall scatter them: and thou shalt rejoice in the Lord, and shalt glory in the Holy One of Israel.”  Again, there is no sense of non-Israelites flowing unto the Lord's house; on the contrary, they are purged from the Kingdom of God.  This begs the question: if the alien strangers have no business in God's plan for the ages, then why would they need to repent?  The only change the enemy wants you to believe in is that repentance is universal and that repentance is not the exclusive command to Israel.  That's why I get hate mail charging me with racism, and that I should repent of my teachings.  Just the opposite is what our people should be repenting of and that is bowing down before the gods of integration i.e. Baal worship.  There is no scriptural support for Israel to change the world, the third world.  That's the “world” we are not to be conformed to (Romans 12:2), that Christ said He was not a part of (John 8:23), that our friendship of (the world) was enmity (hatred) towards God (James 4:4). 

Let's understand the word 'repentance,' which 'change' is merely the visible tip of the iceberg.  A concordance will give us a general sense of the word 'repent', but the Bible gives us specifics.  Strong's defines 'repent,' the Hebrew word 'nacham', #5162, as “to sigh, i.e. to breath strongly; by implication, to be sorry; defines the Greek word 'metanoia', #3340, as “to think differently or afterwards, i.e. reconsider (morally, feel compunction)”; and the word 'repentance,' “#3341, a compunction (for guilt, including reformation); by implication, reversal (of [another's] decision).”  I don't think that last part is talking about another person, but rather our former ways, for we are “new creatures.”  “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature; old things pass away; behold, all things are become new” II Cor. 5:17.  In other words, when you repent, you can count on your life being brand new, a clean slate, your sins are erased.  The exhilaration, evidently, is so life changing that it affects our breathing.  The breath of life or Spirit of God given to Adam was this experience of physical inhaling/exhaling and on a spiritual level, the adrenaline is pumping your heart and you're breathing strongly.  The repentance is not a normal function of the body and mind, because we are creatures of habit and we don't just change something spontaneously.  There's a definite cause and effect.  There's something stimulating and exciting about repentance, but it has been mocked and cheapened by unbelievers and believers alike.  Repentance is White Power.  And we're going to see how that works in the Bible and how we can count on it working for us, through us and in us. 

Matthew Henry makes this comment on Mt. 3:2, “Repent ye. The word here used, implies a total alteration in the mind, a change in the judgment, disposition, and affections, another and a better bias of the soul. Consider your ways, change your minds: you have thought amiss; think again, and think aright. True penitents have other thoughts of God and Christ, sin and holiness, of this world and the other, than they had. The change of the mind produces a change of the way. That is gospel repentance, which flows from a sight of Christ, from a sense of his love, and from hopes of pardon and forgiveness through him. It is a great encouragement to us to repent; repent, for your sins shall be pardoned upon your repentance. Return to God in a way of duty, and he will, through Christ, return unto you in the way of mercy. It is still as necessary to repent and humble ourselves, to prepare the way of the Lord, as it then was. There is a great deal to be done, to make way for Christ into a soul, and nothing is more needful than the discovery of sin, and a conviction that we cannot be saved by our own righteousness.” 

An impediment to repentance may be the misunderstanding of the word 'conviction,' which the church world holds as firmly held beliefs, a feeling of being sure that what you believe is true.  But, if you believe in something that is false, you will never be convicted biblically unto repentance.  A biblical conviction is the determination of guilt, of a sin determined by the Law, and a person subsequently confessing their transgression.  The belief that the Law of God has been abolished and all one need do is adhere to the convictions of their heart is itself a sin, for “the heart is deceitful above all things” (Jer. 17:9) and is not qualified to play God.  Paul asked the question in Galatians 2:17, “Now if seeking to be deemed righteous in Christ we ourselves are also found to be [convicted of being] wrongdoers, then is Christ a minister of failure?  Certainly not!”  What's this talking about?  It's the old argument of grace vs. the Law. 

The real ministers of failure have made an 'either or' debate when there is none.  We are reckoned sinners by the judaizers for leaving the law of the temple and going to Christ directly for righteousness, and therefore the sarcastic accusation of “Christ the minister of sin.”  But, the whole of the rest of the Law is what defined the realm of what needed to be repented of.  So they throw out all of the Law so as not to accuse Christ of being an accomplice of sin.  But, God forbid any Christian would have the nerve to say such a thing of Him.  And yet that is the thinking of churchianity, that if we are still sinners, and unjustified, we seek Christ to be justified by Him, and need the Law [Levitical] and the works or rituals and sacrifices of it to justify us (full body immersion seems to be the most popular); then Christ, instead of being a minister of righteousness, is a minister of the law, the strength of sin, which accuses for it, and is the ministration of condemnation and death on account of it, which God forbid should ever be.  OR this is an objection of the adversary to the doctrine of free justification by the righteousness of Christ, as if it made void the Law, discouraged the performance of good works, opened a door to licentiousness that men might continue to sin, and live as they wish, being under no restraints of the Law, or under any obligation to obey it.  However, under the New Covenant we have the Law written in our heart and mind to the exclusion of all other races (Jer. 31:33).   Romans 9:4, “Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth... the giving of the law.”  The thing is: if there's no Law, there's no repentance.  There's just the convictions of your heart, which is in competition with what God has placed there... the Law!  How New Testament Christians can so terribly convolute the clear teaching of Christ makes one wonder whether they are that stupid or are purposely stupefying. Either way, you can count on the first command of Christ to repent being made of none effect.  Indeed, these are the ones who voted for the law of the jungle; who rationalize this one last beast empire, preferring Babylon to the Kingdom. 

Let me illustrate with a short movie review.  Have you seen the post apocalyptic movie 'After Earth'?  It's a negro movie written, directed and starring Will Smith, who of course is a high ranking general.  It's about a negro world in outer space.  They're on a mission in their space ship and go through an asteroid belt, which damages the ship causing it to crash onto a planet, which is quarantined from humans, because everything on the planet has evolved to kill humans and they're nasty hybrids of bestiality.  Oh, did I mention the planet is earth and so we can surmise that it has become uninhabitable through some kind of catastrophe.  The movie doesn't tell you that darkness was back again from the likes of jewish Monsanto producing mutations of academy award winning science fiction; life imitating the dark arts.  The black general is stranded and for a minute between monsters is pontificating philosophically.  This is the epitome of not only the movie, but a defining moment for the stranger and his strange gods upon the earth today and the absurdity of repentance for any of them.   He says, “Fear is not real.  The only place that fear can exist is in our thoughts of the future.  It is a product of our imagination, causing us to fear things that do not at present and may not ever exist.  That is near insanity.  Do not misunderstand me, danger is very real, but fear is a choice.”  What's wrong with this picture?  Well, a lot!

According to I Cor. 10:26, “The earth is the Lord's and all that it contains.”  In fact, God says in Job 41:11, “Everything under heaven belongs to Me,” which could be any point in the universe.  Can a non-White mentality comprehend an omnipresent God?  I don't think they can and here's why.  In II Kings 17:24-34 the king of Assyria brought in alien strangers to repopulate Samaria, because Israel was deported.  The aliens were not a God fearing people, because they didn't think the God of Israel was real.  Even if they were shown the omnipotence of Israel's God, the best they could do was feign submission, and pretend to be converted.  And they, “Know not the manner of God” (v. 26).  Such people will form unworthy thoughts of God, and expect to please Him by outward forms, and will vainly try to reconcile His service with the love of the world and the indulgence of their lusts (does Christianized Hinduism ring a bell?).  They even brought back some Israelite priests to teach them how to fear the Lord (v. 28).  “Howbeit every nation made gods of their own” (v.29).   They maintained a mixed hybrid religion.  They may have gone through the motions, but they really didn't fear Him in their hearts.  Had they done so, they would have inquired about God's Laws and charted a future to obey them.  But a broken cistern (a mamzer) cannot hold the water of the Word (Jer. 2:13).  Non-Whites and especially negros are easily frightened even if they make movies trying to dispel their fears with mind over matter.  Ultimately, they cannot fear that which they cannot understand.  “Unto this day they do after the former manners; they fear not the Lord” (II Kings 17:34).  They always revert back to the jungle no matter how many millions of dollars worth of missionaries there are.  If fear is a choice, then “Choose ye this day whom ye will serve” Joshua 24:15.  “Elijah came near to all the people and said, "How long will you hesitate between two opinions? If the Lord is God, follow Him; but if Baal, follow him.  But the people were completely silent” I Kings 18:21.  If you recall, it took a little demonstration of divine firepower to convince the people that the Baal priests maintained the status quo by changing the Word of truth.  To repent of their sins, the people were highly motivated to drown 400 priests of Baal by the brook Kishon.  You might say they were breathing strongly.  They then could count on what?  They could count on the God that answers by fire; they could count on their not wavering on the judgments of God to bring order to their society; they could count on not fearing the face of adversaries.  Elijah sought not his own glory, but that of God, for the good of the people. Elijah's focus was to bring repentance.  The people all agreed, convinced, and satisfied; the God of Israel delivers His people.  Some had their hearts turned, but most of them were only convinced, not convicted.  Same thing happened in the wilderness under Moses; fantastic miracles and yet they murmured.  Cause and effect of who went into the Promised Land.  Do you think cause and effect or repentance will have anything to do with how you enter the Kingdom of God? 

Psalms 55:19 says, “Because they do not repent, they do not fear God.”  How can the stranger fear God if they don't believe fear is part of their emotional makeup?  It's an ambiguous world-view that has no sense of divine prophecy or predestination.  I read a survey a couple of years ago conducted by two very different magazines, Country Living and Ebony, polling their readership as to what they feared most in life.  I googled it and found it in Snopes saying that it was a myth.  Nevertheless, like the alleged Protocols, deemed an antisemitic hoax, there's a grain of truth to the so called manufactured survey.  The most feared things by blacks were: ghosts, dogs, registered mail, law enforcement and Father's Day.  The most feared things by Whites were: nuclear war, a child or spouse dying, having a terminal illness, unemployment and an economic meltdown.  When I was an illustrator in Vietnam, we would make PSYOP posters showing a tiger in the jungle lurching on the VC, so the best thing they could do was surrender and get a free bowl of rice.  Amazingly, this fear tactic was a huge success, even though we lost the no-win war.  Here's the Good News for Christian Israelites: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction” Prov. 1:7.  “Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; and the knowledge of the holy is understanding” Prov. 9:10.  Remember II Kings 17, in verse 25 it says, “And at the beginning of their dwelling there, they did not fear the Lord.  Therefore the Lord sent lions among them, which killed some of them.”  They didn't fear the Lord, because they didn't fear the Israelites; look at them White people going into captivity; hah ha, where's their God?  Our God was in the cause and effect.  One of the blessings of Israel was, “All the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid of thee” Deut. 28:10. 

Fear is what you think.  Hope is what you know.   I know that if we don't repent, the Kingdom is not nigh.  I know God reveals the future. If we do not repent, all the non-White people of the earth will think we are a cursed people, and they will be right.  We will be accounted as sheep for the slaughter, easy pickings.  The Prince of Peace did not come to bring peace among the races, communion with light and darkness, righteousness and unrighteousness; He said, “Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword” Mt. 10:34.  It was not yet time for the Lamb to be playing the part of the Lion or the expected warrior priest of the jews.  Instead, it was the sword of the Gospels that would bring violence from the jews, not peace and tranquility.  He came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, not the goats of Edom.  He spoke in parables because the mysteries of the Gospel were not given to them (Mt.13:11, 15) who would kill Him; so that the mongrel could not see or hear or understand or be converted or be healed.  He came to be Israel's peacemaker and mediator between God and sinners, through the blood of His Cross, to bring the Gospel  to His Disciples and imbue them with power to preach it, to produce peace in the consciences of men, and to cultivate peace among the saints.  The Gospel was and is the means of dividing the people of Christ from the people of the world, and from their principles and practices.  It provoked associations and disassociations, keeping company and disfellowshipping.  We have the same challenge in the Christian Identity community, to discern the spirit, to see if it is from God.  Although it was not the design of Christ to instigate discord, it was through the malice and wickedness of satanic men that was eventually the effect and consequence of His coming.  We can emulate His racial message as well and anti-racists “shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely” (Mt. 5:11).  You can repent of a timid racial consciousness and you can count on routing a den of vipers; you can count on God blessing you with courage.  Christian Identity is not for the faint of heart, it's for the repentant.      

Let's look at the rest of that iceberg.  All sin is debt.  Jesus' death on the Cross paid our sin debt.  “Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.”  No fear – no wisdom.  Wisdom is justified by actual performance.  Justification is defined in Romans 8:1, “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but the spirit.”  Jesus was not speaking of the philosophical wisdom of the
Greeks, but rather the wisdom of God defined in Deut. 4:6, “So keep and do them [the laws, statutes and judgments], for that is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who will hear all these statutes and say, Surely this great nation [race] is a wise and understanding people.”  In other words, the wisdom as set forth in the Law is manifested by those who actually live according to its principles.  You can count on repentance releasing you from condemnation and with all the things you get in life, you finally get understanding (Prov. 4:7).  Ahhh, now I get it; God Himself has revealed it.  There's no other way to get the truth in life.  Jesus said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father, but by Me” John 14:6. 

Let me throw out this question: are we supposed to cry when we repent?  Do crocodile tears count?  No, when we repent, there can be no insincerity, no dishonor, no hypocrisy.  Actors can cry on cue, but Christians cannot put on an act.  The third beatitude of Jesus is rendered differently by the Gospel writers; Luke 6:21 says, “Blessed are you who weep now, for you shall laugh.”  Whereas Matthew 5:4 says, “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.”  How can it be that those who weep or mourn are considered “blessed?”  Our natural instincts avoid pain and sorrow.  Perhaps wise old Solomon understood the meaning of this when he wrote, “It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting... Sorrow is better than laughter; for when a face is sad a heart may be happy.  The mind of the wise is in the house of mourning, while the mind of fools is in the house of pleasure” Eccl. 7:2-4. 

Those who never experience pain in life never truly mature in Christ.  Sin is a temporary pleasure.  True repentance is a permanent wisdom.  If the truth sometimes hurts, then repentance also sometimes hurts, it grieves the pleasure centers to change from the flesh to the spirit.  You can count on repentance to overcome the world.  By facing hardships and the sorrows of life, we intensify our relationship with Christ.  Matthew's word for 'mourn' is pentheo, #3996, “to grieve or wail.”  Luke's word for 'weep' is klaio, #2799, “to mourn or lament.”  The word pentheo is often used in connection to death and funerals, but also when men repent and lament for their sins.  The beatitude includes not only mourning and weeping on account of pain and suffering, but also repentance for sin or a sinful condition.  We weep now to enjoy true joy and laughter in the end (not artificial euphoria that is only transient).  We repent now so that the Holy Spirit may conform our lives to the example of Jesus.  When we repent, we can count on being more Christ-like.  The mourning and repentance are not ends in themselves, but are the means to an end.  Crucify the old man, and see  the  new man in Christ.

On the Oprah channel there's a show called 'The Have's and Have Nots,' a PSYOP for the redistribution of wealth.  Don't ya know it's White people who are the “Haves” and po' black people who are the “Have Nots?”  How's that working out for the murder capital of the world in South Africa?  I don't watch trash TV, but I researched it online and found out the name of the White family in this soap opera was the “Cryers.”  These actors have sold their souls to the devil, as Jim Cryer, is running for political office and gets a negress pregnant.  Oprah was instrumental in getting Obama elected, because of her wealth and media and influence.  But, the Bible is colorblind when it comes to “the rich” who have the means to avoid most pain and the luxury of pursuing pleasure.  “The love of money is the root of all evil; which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows” I Tim. 6:10.  Our people, the White race, the true Israel of the Bible, have learned the way of the heathen (Jer. 10:2).  “Woe to you who laugh now, for you shall mourn and weep” Luke 6:25.  Jesus was not chastising those who crack jokes, He was talking about “All that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” I John 2:16.  The godless society of multicultural diversity and race mixing may enjoy a season of political correctness, but the “Kings of the earth who have committed fornication [miscegenation] and lived deliciously with her [modern Babylon], shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning...  And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise [made in China] any more” Rev. 18:9, 11.  'After earth' or after the negro world implodes, only repentant Israel will “rejoice over her... for God hath avenged you on her” Rev. 18:20.  By that prophetic time in the future, the race mixers and the rich “shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing” (Rev. 18:15).  By that time, the rewards of repentance will be too late to be in good standing with God, “For in one hour she is made desolate.”  God predicts the future and the future is ours. 

White people can have their place in the Kingdom if they repent.  We can count on the God who answers by fire.  The baptism of fire will burn the universalist from the New Jerusalem.  Repent of your comfort zone, fearing the race card and darkness.  Fear God and the wrath of His judgments to come for those who forsook His Law and grace.  “And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble” Obadiah 1:18.  We are the Bride of Christ and we make ourselves ready for the marriage supper of the Lamb by repentance.  We are arrayed in white robes made clean by the blood of Christ.  “Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honor to Him.”  Repentance you can count on.  For it is a blessed assurance, not insurance (which is gambling).  As we sang the hymn, “Blessed assurance, Jesus is mine!  O what a foretaste of glory divine!  Heir of salvation, purchase of God, Born of His Spirit, washed in His blood.”  If you still don't know how to repent, pray for it and it shall be given unto thee.

The Inspired Word

by Mark Downey

A general review of what makes the Bible inspired.

Part 1: A look at the mystery and miracle of God processing His thoughts and ways through the Holy Spirit to 40 chosen White men; granting them the unique insight to convey the Lord's revelation to the rest of our race.

Part 2: Going further into the racial aspects of canonical Scriptures, which has been historically interrupted by the apocryphal writings, the Gnostic gospels and secular science.

Part 3: In this presentation, the Word of God is proven to be amazingly accurate through prophecy and validating factual persons, places and things through archaeology.

Part 4: Concludes with an important history of the Septuagint and the Masoretic text; helpful recommendations for biblical interpretation.

The Inspired Word Part 1

by Mark Downey

January 19, 2014

Scripture Reading:  2 Timothy 3:14-17

The Bible is different than every book that has ever been written because it is through the auspices of Almighty God.  Think about that for a moment.  Most religions of the world have their own so called holy book, but our Holy Bible is the only one that claims to be the actual words of God.  More than 3000 times we read “thus saith the Lord” or “God said,” followed by a direct quotation.  No one knows exactly how many books have been published throughout history, but according to Google’s advanced algorithms, the answer is close to 130 million books.  And there is only one book that can qualify as being inspired or more succinctly, the Word of God.  In Christianity we hear the word ‘inspiration’ all the time coupled with the word ‘infallible.’  This prompts the inquiry: why would the “Author of our Faith” (Heb. 12:2) use fallible men to write Scripture?  Well, think about it; we don’t have any of the original documents or autographs from which copies were made and survived as our only resource. 

One of the Bible's most outstanding proclamations is that it plainly claims to be the inspired word of Almighty God.  This is what Paul, a highly educated Israelite proclaimed, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God" (II Tim. 3:16).  Peter wrote that the content of Scripture "never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" (II Peter 1:21). To early church leaders, inspiration was not an ecstatic overpowering of the writer's consciousness, as described in the occult as “automatic handwriting,” but rather a high degree of elucidation and divine awareness of God's revelation.  Scripture indicates, and the early church recognized, that God inspired the biblical writers to use their own minds and their own styles to write what God wanted them to write.  Likewise, we are all unique in the eyes of God, not just robotic disciples.  God said of our race that we were “chosen… as His peculiar treasure” (Ps.135:4).  Our race would not only write the Bible (Is. 43:10. 59:21), but we would be the only race able to hear (obey) the Lord (John 10:27).  

The Bible describes the process of divine inspiration in the way God worked with Moses, "And God spoke all these words… And Moses wrote all the words of the Lord… when Moses had completed writing the words of this law in a book… Moses commanded the Levites… Take this Book of the Law, and put it beside the ark of the covenant" (Ex. 20:1; 24:4; Deut. 31:24–26).  Centuries later, Ezra and Nehemiah read to the people of Israel from the "Book of the Law of Moses," (Nehemiah 8:1, 18).  Jesus acknowledged its divine inspiration when He said, "Have you not read in the book of Moses… how God spoke to him" (Mark 12:26).  The prophet Jeremiah recorded a similar experience: "The word that came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying, 'Thus speaks the Lord God of Israel, saying: Write in a book for yourself all the words that I have spoken to you" (Jer. 30:1-2).  

Not only does the Bible claim to be divinely inspired, it claims to be the ultimate source of truth, revealed by the one true God. The Apostle John wrote, "Thy word is truth" (John 17:17).  David wrote, "Your law is truth… all Your commandments are truth... The entirety of Your word is truth" (Ps. 119:142, 151, 160).  The prophet Isaiah declared, "To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isaiah 8:20).  Isaiah meant that if statements and ideas do not agree with Scripture, they can be identified as false.  Paul also calls Scripture "The word of truth" (2 Tim. 2:15).  The Bible repeatedly emphasizes, "The Lord is the true God." Scripture records that when the ancient Egyptian priests saw the miracles performed by Moses, and saw their own gods powerless, they concluded: "This is the finger of God" (Ex. 8:16–19).  Daniel records that Nebuchadnezzar, the pagan king of Babylon, came to the same conclusion after encountering the God of the Bible: "Truly, your God is the God of gods, the Lord of kings, and a revealer of mysteries" (Daniel 2:47).  The Bible records that Paul, distraught at seeing Athens "given over to idols," taught these superstitious philosophers about the true God (Acts 17:16–34).  This is difficult for many today to believe; because we live in an age of apostasy where even seminaries and schools of theology doubt that the Bible really is God's word.

Scripture boldly asserts that "The word of our God stands forever" and "The word of the Lord endures forever" (Isaiah 40:8; I Peter 1:25).  King David wrote, "His truth endures to all generations" (Ps. 100:5).  Yet, down through the centuries, malevolent adversaries have tried to undermine and destroy Scripture.  The Bible warns, "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked" (Gal. 6:7). The Old Testament records that during the Assyrian invasion of Judah (ca. 700bc), Sennacherib, a pagan Assyrian king, mockedthe God of Israel before King Hezekiah and the people of Jerusalem (2 Chron. 32:9–19).  Shortly thereafter, "The Lord sent an angel who destroyed every mighty man of valor… in the camp of the king of Assyria. So he [Sennacherib] returned disgraced to his own land. And when he had gone into the temple of his god, some of his own children killed him there with the sword" (II Chron. 32:21–22).  The Bible reveals that dire consequences will arise when adversaries mockthe realGod!  I’ve seen this from personal experience, when my ministry was under attack and God dealt His vengeance on the attackers. 

In the century after the apostles, historical sources confirm that Celsus, an articulate pagan philosopher, created a major stir when he wrote a blistering attack against the Bible and Christianity.  Celsus wrote that biblical teachings were absurd, that the gospel accounts were a deception and that anyone who believed in one God was deluded.  The Bible survived, and Christianity spread around the world, but few people today have ever heard of Celsus!  At the beginning of the 4th century, the Roman emperor Diocletian sought to wipe out the Christian religion. He unleashed a terrible persecution of Christians, and commanded that all Bibles be burned. However, within a few short years a new emperor (Constantine) actually ordered the production of 50 Bibles!  Secular scholars in the 18th century became enamored by the apparent power of human reason and the new discoveries of science. The Age of Enlightenment assumed an ultimate authority, armed with a bias against the supernatural and began to offer speculative theories about the Bible's alleged origins, contradictions and errors. However, the assumptions of these critics have not stood the test of time. In fact, some of their bold pronouncements now appear extremely presumptuous and naïve. Toward the end of the 18th century, the French philosopher Voltaire predicted that Christianity would be swept from existence within a century. Yet, 50 years after he died, the Geneva Bible Society produced stacks of Bibles in Voltaire's house on his own press.  God is not without irony for divine justice.

Much like the Ten Commandments written on stone tablets and having disappeared; suppose God published an opulently gold bound edition bedazzled with jewels in His own handwriting on the finest of parchments and it survived.  What would man do with it?  Who would be in charge of it?  People would put it in a shrine under bulletproof glass, surrounded by security guards, under the control of a priestcraft and away from the people; it would become a worthless object venerated as most other religious relics and its contents sequestered.  How can I make such a conjecture?  Well, it’s the very thing the RCC did up to the invention of the Gutenberg Press.  The Word was always meant for His people.  Copies would insure that it got into as many hands as could receive it, not to be chained to a pulpit under lock and key.  As our race populated the earth, it would necessitate divine distribution. 

The fact that the Bible has survived the ages proves, as no other book can, that God can author an infallible book written by fallible man.  God spoke and man wrote it down.  “This is the word that came to Jeremiah saying, Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel: Write in a book all the words that I have spoken to you” Jer. 30:2.  Not all of Scripture was written by way of dictation per se.  A lot of the Pentateuch (first five books of the OT) was a historic chronicle of the White race written by Moses.  The books of the prophets read like personal journals.  Each writer was guided by the Spirit of God so that there were no doctrinal errors.  II Peter 1:21 tells us, “no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.”  This indicates how God inspired His word processors.  The verb ‘moved’ (#5342) also speaks of a sail filled with wind and going forward, which dovetails with the Greek word for ‘spirit’ (#4151) also used for ‘wind.’  The word ‘spirit’ operates on several levels.  When God breathed into man the “breath of life”, he came alive.  Therefore, on a physical level it is simply air moving in and out of our nose.   On a mental level, it is the motivation(s) from God that animates our Christian character.  

In II Tim. 3:16, instead of “inspiration of God,” some versions render the verse “All Scripture is God breathed” (NIV, ESV, YLT) where we get the same meaning from Genesis 2:7, “God… breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”  The ‘breath of life’ is synonymous with the Spirit of God.  God put the life into the words of His writers and we know it as the living word of God.  The Holy Spirit or Spirit of God is the exclusive agency and property of God and means the purity or divine perfection of His will.  Those White men who wrote the Bible (not jews) were motivated to carry the will of God to the rest of Adamkind (mankind) in the world.  We, in turn (from generation to generation) carry the message of the faith of our fathers to our children. 

As a side note, it is likely Paul coined the term for “God-breathed” using the Greek word ‘theopneustos’ (theh-op'-nyoo-stos; #2315) and is better rendered 'breathed out by God' as the emphasis is upon the divine origin of the inscripturated revelation itself.  Inscripturation refers to the committing to writing of truths revealed by God to inspired men. ‘Inspiration’ is the process by which God through His Spirit illuminated chosen men and granted them unique insight, conveying His revelation to them.  What it says of Scripture is, not that it is "breathed into by God" or is the product of the Divine "inbreathing" into its authors, but that it is breathed out by God, "God-breathed,” the product of the creative breath of God.  What is declared by this fundamental passage is simply that the Scriptures are a Divine product, without any indication of how God has operated in producing them.  It’s both a mystery and a miracle.  God's breath is the irresistible outflow of His power.

In each book of the Bible, the personality of each writer is distinguished from the others.  This is clearly seen comparing the works of Paul or John or Peter, while all of them contain the words that proceed from the mouth of God.  It’s not just the thoughts and ideas that are inspired, but every single word.  We should not confuse the inspiration of Scripture with the inspiration of an artistic or musical masterpiece.  Scripture is deservedly in a category independent of all other inspirations.  The prophets of old and the apostles of the New Covenant were not inspired by worldly principles, but by what God revealed to them, and they declared them in unambiguous and unpretentious language.  “Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.  Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches; comparing spiritual things with spiritual” I Cor. 2:12-13. 

God could not use someone who received the spirit of the world i.e. the adversaries of God or the White race, the heathen gods of the world or the sinful carnal disposition of worldly men.  The spirit of the world can be regarded as the racial alien under the power of making false accusations and slander.  God cannot use someone today who preaches the leaven of universalism for their words are no longer inspired.  Because the Word is inspired by God, the Scriptures are the final authority so far as doctrines and teaching us how to have the right relationship with God.  Most people don’t think of the Bible as having the supernatural ability to make us repent and to be perfect/complete, but it does.  Otherwise we would not have the command to “Be ye perfect.”  Jesus reinforced the accuracy of Scripture down to the smallest detail and slightest punctuation marks. “Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.  For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the law until all is accomplished” Mt. 5:17-18.  How does that sit with New Testament judeo-Christians who nail all of the law to the Cross?  It doesn’t sit very well at all with their double-minded religion of love and lawlessness.  “This is love: that we walk according to His commands” II John 1:6.

Because God is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent, His Word, by its very nature, will have the same characteristics.  Without hesitation, the Bible is what it claims to be: the undeniable, the authoritative, the absolute Word of the Creator of the universe to His chosen custodians, to preserve and administrate the sacred oracles.  Besides all the knowledge man needs to live by, it also possesses priceless wisdom.  “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; a good understanding have all they that do His commandments” Ps. 111:10.  If a handful of writers, living at the same time and in the same country, wrote a book together such as the Bible, critics could possibly make a case of conspiracy and premeditation.  By contrast however, over 40 different authors having diverse vocations (from blue collar shepherds, farmers, tent-makers, fishermen to white collar physicians, priests, philosophers and kings), living far away from each other, speaking different languages, writing over the expanse of time from 1450BC to about 100AD i.e. some 1500 years, incredibly produced an extremely unparalleled cohesive and unified book.  Surely there would be some major flaws and contradictions, but there isn’t.  There are no contradictions in the Bible.  The wide gamut of armchair quarterbacks claim to have found contradictions, but they have to take verses out of context or redefine words to do so.  Sometimes it’s just a ‘Hail Mary’ pass, hoping somebody will catch their assumption and run with it.  To understand the Bible, it is imperative that it be taken as a whole.  Nothing can be swept under the rug for a convenient argument.  An inconvenient truth usually blocks the goal of God’s adversaries. 

God is not the author of confusion” I Cor. 14:33.  The Christian who is inspired by the Word will observe order and decency when receiving and delivering the revealed Word.  The Word never teaches man to be negligent of their responsibilities or to be unaccountable for their deeds.  “Hate the evil, and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate [government]” Amos 5:15.  A common ‘out of context’ refrain argues ‘judge not lest thou also be judged.’  This mindless drivel nullifies virtually all references throughout the inspired Word of God to observe the Law by executing the specified judgments; it would quickly neutralize the government of Christ.  Most people are unaware that violations of the Ten Commandments are punishable by death (except for the tenth). 

There’s some confusion about what canon is i.e. what the inspired books of the Bible are?  Should some be excluded and others included?  ‘Canon’ comes from the Greek word ‘kanon,’ meaning a measuring rod.  Thus, to have the Bible ‘canonized’ meant that it had been measured by the standard or test of divine inspiration and authority.  It became the collection of books or writings accepted by the Apostles and leadership of the early Christian church as their basis of worship and fellowship.  It is the standard by which all White Christians throughout their generations have lived and served the God of Israel.  The entire New Testament as we know it today was canonized before the year 375AD.  The Old Testament had previously been canonized long before the advent of Christ.  The books of the canon of the New Testament were written mostly in the 1st century and finished by the year 150 AD.  Writings attributed to the Apostles circulated among the earliest Christian communities. The Pauline epistles were circulating, perhaps in collected forms, by the end of the 1st century AD.  The Biblical canon began with the officially accepted books of the Koine Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint, which was used by Jesus and His Disciples.  By the early 200's, Origen of Alexandria may have been using the same 27 books as in the modern New Testament. 

Contrary to popular opinion and propaganda, neither jews nor catholics had a hand in either the Old or New Testament’s canonicity.  The reality is that judaism, born in the Babylonian captivities, was a bastardized version of pre-Christian Israelite Scriptures, circumventing the Mosaic Law.  On the other hand, the RCC rode in on the shirt tails of the early persecuted church, morphing Christianity with paganism.  The RCC has never been an authentic ecclesia of Christ nor an authority for canonization, but rather the prophetic great whore of Babylon.  Only Christian Identity pays close attention to the history of where the inspired Word of God went after the death of Christ.  Of particular interest is Joseph of Arimathea, the uncle of Jesus, arriving in Glastonbury, England, in 60AD; going to the lost sheep of the house of Israel and with him the good news of the Gospel message.  Historical sources also indicate that Paul, Peter, Mary and others traveled to Western Europe and Britain carrying the exclusive racial message from God to their Israelite kinsmen.  Tribal names of Israel appear in the records of ancient Ireland. 

In my research, I discovered something that could have been partly innocuous or more likely highly suspicious.  It has to do with how many books of the Old Testament were considered divinely inspired and how they were categorized and numbered.    In the 1st century ad, both Jesus (Luke 24:44) and the teacher Philo referred to three major divisions of the Old Testament canon: the Law, the Prophets and the Writings. Josephus, a 1st century historian, acknowledged that the Hebrew Bible consisted of 22 books, essentially the same text which, divided differently, forms the 39 books of our modern Old Testament; and that these books "have all been accepted as canonical from time immemorial.”

The fact that 22 books of the Old Testament and 27 books of the New Testament comprise the 49 books of the complete Bible indicates that a divine mind was guiding this process. The Bible is not just a haphazard collection of books!  Everything in the Bible has a reason for being there; even a cursory count of its contents gives us a specific number.  Everyone knows that the modern Bible has 66 books, but originally there were only 49. 

Most Bible scholars agree that the number 49 is critically significant because it means completion or perfection.  After 49 years (Lev. 25:8) what was Israel to declare?  A Jubilee! A complete realignment of the economy; the forgiveness of debts!  I bet the jewish scam of usury would love that one, especially when their creed is ‘never forgive – never forget.’  It must be hard for them to keep track of all their lies.  49 is 7X7 and 7 is associated with God and His perfection.  In Mt. 18:21-22 Peter came to Christ and asked Him how often we should forgive a brother for wrong doing and the Lord said 70X7 (being 490) times.  In other words, “be ye perfect” and don’t attempt to define by law the measure of grace.  Grace itself is the Law of Jubilee.  The 49 books of the Bible are His story and His story is history

Indubitably, there were political and religious reasons why jews would want to do a chop job changing the tally to one six shy (66) of the mark of the beast (666).  49 was a powerful indication that the world now had the complete revelation from God with the inclusion of those New Testament books. Since jewish officials were powerless to do anything with the New Testament (the Testimony of Jesus Christ), the only recourse they saw possible was to alter the traditional numbering.  I think this connotation of #6, which is the number of man (Rev. 13:18), would suggest that the Bible was the work of man and not God and therefore a post hypnotic suggestion to manipulate the good intentions of Christians to change the count.  And what better way to do that than adding to or taking away from what was widely recognized in ancient times as a listing of 49 inspired books/canon.  This may have given rise to the demand of some denominations to remove the epistles of Paul, the books of Esther and Solomon and/or an inclusion of the Apocrypha and other obscure pseudepigraphas.  Apocrypha means hidden or concealed; pseudepigrapha means false writing, written by nebulous authors stealing famous names of the apostles for credibility; these books are without much credibility (so far as canon is concerned) other than historical oddities.  The very last admonition of the New Testament is John’s Revelation giving us this warning, “I testify to everyone who hears the prophetic words of this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book.  And if anyone takes away from the words of this prophetic book, God will take away his share of the tree of life and the holy city” Rev. 22:18-19. 

I’ve wanted to write about this subject for years, because I am constantly asked by newcomers to the Christian Identity message: what is the best Bible I should be reading and studying?  Of course, there is no one Bible that will supply our every need for spiritual edification and the mechanical wherewithal to attain the character of Christ in our lives.  And I think that’s probably by God’s design that we absorb what He has given us through inspiration of whatever Bible version that occupies our attention.  Some versions are better than others and some versions should be avoided for taking too much latitude for their pet doctrines and questionable agendas.  But paying attention to what God has so carefully orchestrated for a given people should be enough incentive for us to have it revealed to us.  The key to unlock the inspired word is what has been a captivity of spiritual blindness for the White race: that we are the true Israel.  “Where there is no vision, the people perish” Prov. 29:18.  This precious truth makes the Bible come alive and gives new meaning to your life.  Pray when you read the Word and the Lord shall direct thy paths.  There is much more to say about this subject and Lord willing we will pry open more Light and the world will make more sense.

The Inspired Word Part 2

by Pastor Mark Downey

February 9, 2014

Scripture Reading:  Psalms 119:169-176

Christians, like the Psalmist David, want to know more about God in Christ the Messiah, to know more about the teachings of the Word, and the duties of our faith.  When we understand that we are the true Israel, we also realize what our newfound responsibilities are.  David had a foreboding sense that he and his prayers were not worthy before such a benevolent God who bequeathed so much promise.  Likewise, we are heirs of the promise and yet every waking moment is not dedicated to the praise of God.  We should make the Word of God our rule in everyday conversation, rather than the exception.  We should look up to God as a lump of clay to be shaped in perfect form by the Potter; to help this honorable vessel glorify Him.  When we glory in the Lord, we are spreading His reputation.  It was by His design that His repute would be through His people; even the enemies of His people would stand in awe of such a fearsome and jealous God.  And it was all because we have His Word; an owner’s manual, if you will, for having communion with Him, not just for today, but for eternity. 

The earliest scribes, from 400BC to 200 AD, worked with Ezra and were regarded as the custodians of the Bible until the time of Christ.  At that point in time, they were under the employ of the Pharisees and received equal animus from Christ declaring unto them (always in the same order with the scribes first), “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!” Mt. 23:14.  They were woefully the enemies to the gospel of Christ.  They were very much the control freaks, micro-managing the trivial matters of the Law, but aloof and negligent towards the importance of justice.  It was more like ‘just us.’  They were likened to whited sepulchers.  Christ was making the point that He could see through the superficial exterior and discern the spirit of man by what we are inwardly.  Outward motives may keep the outside clean, while the inside is filthy; but if the heart and spirit be made new, there will be newness of life; here the Christian must begin with what is inside their heart and mind. The righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees was like the ornaments of a grave, or dressing up a dead body, only for show. 

However, revival is the Spirit of God working through the Word of God, in the lives of the people of God.  Ezra was a great example of this when the people got together and asked him to read God’s Word.  “All the people gathered together as one man in the open square … and they told Ezra the scribe to bring the Book of the Law of Moses, which the Lord had commanded Israel. So Ezra the priest brought the Law before the assembly of men and women and all who could hear with understanding … Then he read from it… from morning until midday, before the men and women and those who could understand; and the ears of all the people were attentive to the Book of the Law” Nehemiah 8:1-3.  People who give their full attention to a book for 6 hours are moved by the Holy Spirit to do so.  You might say that instinctually we know that by hearing the Word read to us that it will somehow help us.  Ministers behind a pulpit are nothing if they don’t present the Bible before the congregation.  They must speak from the Scriptures, whereby God is glorified and the fellowship is edified.  Those who hear the message should understand it; otherwise it’s just the empty sound of words.  Therefore it is incumbent upon teachers to explain the Word and give the sense of it.  Reading is good, and preaching is good, but expounding makes reading the better understood, and preaching the more convincing. It has pleased God in almost every age of the church to raise up, not only those who have preached the gospel, but also those who have given their views of Divine truth in writing.

Because of such careful attention to detail in the preparation and transmission of the Old Testament manuscripts, modern scholars acknowledge that the Hebrew Bible has been transmitted with the most minute accuracy… it may be safe to say that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted; it is little short of miraculous.  The Dead Sea Scrolls prove just how accurate the text has been preserved.  The oldest copy of the Hebrew text, before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947, was dated from around 1000 AD.  The newly discovered scrolls were dated to the 1st century BC, about 1000 years earlier.  The scrolls contained two nearly complete copies of the book of Isaiah, which proved to be word for word identical with our standard Hebrew Bible in more than 95 percent of the text.  The 5 percent of the variations consisted of obvious slips of the pen and variations in spelling.  The Dead Sea Scrolls provide solid evidence that the text of the Old Testament has not changed in more than 2,000 years! 

The reliability of the New Testament rests on a preponderance of witnesses that are now available to scholars.  There are earlier and more manuscripts of the New Testament than any other book in the ancient world.  More than 24,000 manuscript copies of the New Testament in Greek, Latin and other languages provide evidence about the text.  The earliest New Testament manuscripts date within a few decades or a few centuries of the apostolic writers; compared to 643 manuscripts of Homer’s ‘The Iliad’ and only 10-120 copies of the writings of Julius Caesar, the Roman historian Tacitus and the Greek historian Herodotus exist today.  Compared against the New Testament, no other document from the ancient world has left such a wealth of material documenting the reliable transmission of its text.  In addition to the many available manuscripts, early Christian writers quoted the New Testament so extensively that almost the entire New Testament could be reconstructed from other sources. 

Skeptics have carelessly speculated that unknown anonymous authors composed and pieced together the New Testament centuries after Jesus and the Apostles.  Yet the earliest fragment of John’s gospel is dated 130AD, about 30 years after his death.  This supports the traditional view that John wrote his book near the latter part of the 1st century.  There is absolutely no evidence from the first 200 years of Christianity that the Gospels circulated without the names of the authors properly identified.  Such late compositions would allow time for myths and pagan spin to creep into the text, which it indeed did with jewish and catholic interlopers.  Some apostate authors, like Dan Brown’s ‘The DaVinci Code,’ assert that the New Testament books were deliberately omitted and hence compromising the integrity of the inspired Word.  But, the internal evidence, the facts of history and the weight of modern scholarship all refute these ideas.  The New Testament canon with the Gospels and Paul’s Epistles were formed by the end of the 1st century.  Neither of the books of Luke (Luke and Acts) mentions the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70AD, which for Judeans was the biggest news story of the century.  In fact, no NT author makes mention of it, suggesting an early authorship of the canon. 

The NT itself reveals that the authors identified which writings were inspired and belonged in the canon.  In no uncertain terms, Paul wrote, “The things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord” I Cor. 14:37.  Paul said the teachings of the Apostles were divinely inspired and were to be read in the churches, “Because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God” (I Thes. 2:13, 5:27).  Peter gave a warning about the unlearned and unstable (James 1:8) who were twisting Paul’s writings, were twisting Scripture itself (II Peter 3:15-16).  The early church fathers and scholars, who wrote after the NT canon was written, drew a clear distinction between their own works and the inspired apostolic writings, which means that canon was recognized very early in church history. 

Tertullian, a church historian who wrote in the early 200’s, was the first to call Christian Scripture the “New Testament.”  The importance of this is that it placed the NT on a level of inspiration and authority with the OT.  There are records from the 300’s showing that the NT canon comprised 27 books, the same as we have today.  A letter written in 367AD by Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, provides the earliest documentation of the 27 books as inspired canon.  His letter, which was designed to eliminate once and for all the use of certain apocryphal books, warned, “Let no one add to these; let nothing be taken away.”  Later, in 397AD, a church council in Carthage decreed that, “Aside from the canonical Scripture [which the council designated as 27 books], nothing is to be read in church under the name of Divine Scriptures.”  The clear intent and purpose was to identify the inspired Word of God and to eliminate the use of apocryphal literature. 

The Apocryphal books were not written by any of the Disciples or Apostles of Christ, but by unscrupulous authors exploiting a name or place mentioned in Scripture.  These books don’t claim to be inspired nor do they have any predictive prophesies.  They are riddled with historical and geographical errors and promote fanciful ideas and false doctrines that contradict canonical Scripture.  Some people favor their inclusion because a passage may correspond to one of their own pet doctrine(s); however that is not the criteria of divine inspiration.  The Apocryphal books became a major issue during the Reformation, when Protestants rejected the Apocrypha as uninspired. However, at the Council of Trent in 1546, Roman Catholic leaders declared those books part of the New Testament canon.  This was an attempt by the Roman church to counter the influence of Martin Luther and other reformers who were teaching against celibacy, prayers for the dead, and purgatory, ideas that do not come from canonical Scripture but are found in some apocryphalbooks. 

In 1945, a group of books commonly called "Gnostic gospels" were found near Nag Hammadi, an Egyptian town north of Luxor, on the Nile.  Gnosticism encompassed a collection of heretical ideas that early Church leaders attributed to Simon the Sorcerer, aka Simon Magus (see my article ‘The Catholic Menace’; Acts 8:9–25).  Gnostic writings contain purported "secret sayings" of Christ that differ dramatically from His New Testament teachings.  In the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus flies into a fit of rage and causes a child who has offended Him to wither.  In another work, Jesus makes clay birds on the Sabbath; when His parents correct Him, He claps His hands and the birds fly away.  The Gospel of Philip suggests that Christ had a romantic relationship with Mary Magdalene.  The Gospel of Mary asserts that Mary was the real leader of Christ's Disciples.  Early Church leaders denounced the Gnostic writings as spurious and heretical.  Yet modern biblical critics, along with revisionist theologians, creative writers and mystical New Agers, have resurrectedthese alternative gospels and present them as equally credible as canonical Scripture.

Dan Brown, author of the widely read fictional novel ‘The DaVinci Code,’ draws heavily on the heretical ideas of Gnostic writings, as well as on occult, pagan goddess worship and mysticism.  These themes have become mainstream at Harvard's divinity school and other intellectual centers.  Though the plot of ‘The DaVinci Code’appears to advocate a courageous search for truth at any price, its real goal is to undermine one of the fundamental characteristics of the Christian faith, the belief that the original message of the Gospel, enshrined in the Bible, is the unique, inspired word of God.  The real danger of books like ‘The DaVinci Code’ comes from doubts planted in the minds of people who lack historical and biblical knowledge. For such people, the fiction of apocryphal writings can appear to be fact, which leads to deception about the true nature of inspired Scripture. One of the primary reasons for public declarations about what books comprised the canons of the Old and New Testaments was to clearly distinguish between inspired books and the false and misleading writings of the Gnostics. 

Those who take time to look beyond themselves soon notice the tremendous inequities in our modern world and wonder why so much corruption, so many no-win wars, the depleted quality of air, water and food, manipulated terrorism, the encroaching police state and totalitarianism.  Millions of our people want a better world to live in, but don’t know how to get there.  Religious leaders and politicians offer disingenuous sound bytes.  Many in this class are the blind leading the blind in an ever increasing society of intolerable trousered apes.  Most people have been kept ignorant of the real solutions found in the Word.  Because of the religious establishment planting the seeds of doubt regarding the supernatural, they have fostered a type of mind control to be skeptical of whatever the Scripture says; simply because the clergy itself cannot embrace an all-powerful God of the White race exclusively.  They have to water it down for the multicultural masses.  Unlike God creating us in His own image, meaning one race, the secular mind of egalitarian values has all races evolving from a primordial slime pit with ape-like ancestors; and even that concept is spiritualized with all races coming from the same origin, which is contrary to the Bible.  The point of the inspired word of God is for one race to qualify spiritually in understanding God’s will for the earth, to reign with Christ in the Kingdom of Heaven; not in outer space, but right here.  That’s always been articulated throughout the entire Scripture.  The Bible, when clearly understood, reveals that we do not ascend to the stars, but establish the land to the glory of God.  The inspired Word will guide you out of mainstream churchianity and lead you to your meaningful calling in life.  People wonder why there is so much evil and suffering and persecution today.  Maybe it’s because they don’t question their own unbelief in the existence of God, and even fewer who believe in real life adversaries to God such as the jews.  However, Scripture reveals quite a bit about these evil bipeds, in which there will always be enmity between them and us (Gen. 3:15).  They are not in God’s plan for the Kingdom Age, but rather, historically, are violent and take the Kingdom by force (Mt. 11:12).  Prophetically speaking, they will be destroyed.  They deserve such a destiny, because they work to deceive the whole world.  There are even some theologians who misplace these wicked adversaries as the “god of this world.”  The false god of this world is the illusion of man’s will superimposed upon the sovereign will of God Almighty.  There is nothing more reprehensible to the Creator of mankind than the wickedness of his heart; “that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually” (Gen. 6:5).  The Bible reveals that when Christ returns, the cause of death i.e. the wages of sin, will be put out of commission.  This is how God will eliminate evil and prepare White Christians to be the problem solvers.  It’s true that you’re either part of the problem or part of the solution.  The return of Christ does not dismiss Judgment; it brings it to the Divine Court.  You are either washed in the blood of Christ and justified or you never claimed your racial inheritance, because the truth of the inspired Word was robbed of your attention.  You weren’t paying attention to the messengers God brought forth in Christian Identity, and therefore you never knew who or what you were in God’s plan; you were a lost sheep of the house of Israel caught in the thorns and snares of ravenous wolves.  The so called Rapture is one such fanciful fiction of uninspired hogwash that abrogates the inspiration of God in His Word. 

So what is our real hope for the future?  Why do we need to concern ourselves with the trials and tribulations of the world?  Why should we obey God’s Law and all the admonitions throughout the Word?  Is it because it’s inspired?  Yes, and it’s really looking out for your best interest.  The solutions emerge when the truth is revealed to us by the Gospel, when it strikes a chord in your heart.  Or one can avoid it and be heartless for the rest of their miserable lives.   The word ‘gospel’ means good news and you should be excited that it pertains to you, not as something warm and fuzzy, but as the coming government of Jesus Christ… that has been prophesied since the beginning of Creation.  It will bring true justice and peace in perpetuity to this planet (Is.2:2-4; Ps. 119:165).   Christ will be assisted by His saints, who were inspired by the inspiration of God; they will serve as kings and priests (Rev. 5:10).  They will teach their kinsmen (who rejected the Cross), “the way, the truth and the life” (Is. 30:20-21; John 14:5). 

The big question that White people face today and challenge their inner voice of right and wrong, is: will they believe the inspired Word of God or go along to get along with the scoffers.  No other book in the world offers such remarkable material distinguishing light from darkness.  There is no comparison to its scope and accuracy of predicting the future.  Why are Nostradamus and three little catholic girls from Fatima given so much attention and credence?  Well, maybe somebody has an agenda to outdo the Bible.  There is a preponderance of evidence that proves the divine origin of the Bible, whereas all others are frauds and liars.  The Bible wisely retorts to charlatans, “Let God be true and every man a liar” (Romans 3:4).  After thousands of years of being suppressed, distorted, burned and ignored, the Bible has been accurately preserved, even to the present day adversity and deception of modern Babylon, it becomes self-evident and fulfilling that “the word of the Lord endures forever” (I Peter 1:25) and “My counsel shall stand” Isaiah 46:10.  But let’s be clear about Scripture; we’re not talking about the translations, giving us hundreds of Bible versions, rather it’s the original Greek manuscripts.  Not everybody can be an expert in Koine Greek, but we can be biblical detectives searching for the Truth that the inspired Word promises.  Do we take the word of God or the word of man?

Why do universities and media and even some churches churn out the seeds of doubt as the Bible being something untrustworthy historically, theologically or scientifically, resting on mere platitudes?   It’s important to observe that they have influenced millions of people and that there are consequences.  The Bible is not passive about condemning mockers.  “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap” Gal. 6:7.  Paul warns that they will reap serious consequences, "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all… who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them… so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God… but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:18–22). 

What impresses me about the Bible is the fact that it contains scientific knowledge that couldn't have been known at the time it was written.  There is no conflict between the Bible and thefactsof science.  There may be many conflicts between the Bible and the theoriesof so-called scientists, and between the factsof science and the theories of so-called Bible scholars.   Americans are taught that Christopher Columbus discovered the earth was round. However, did someone know that fact thousands of years before Columbus sailed?  A literal translation of Job 26:10 is “He described a circle upon the face of the waters, until the day and night come to an end.”  A spherical earth is also described in Isaiah 40:21-22, “the circle of the earth.”  Note, the Hebrew word for “circle” (chuwg, #2329) can also mean round or sphere.  The earth must be freely suspended in space, and so the Book of Job describes it: “He stretcheth out the north over empty space, and hangeth the earth upon nothing” (Job 26:7).  If you are overlooking the ocean, the horizon appears as a circle.  This circle on the horizon is described in Job 26:10. The circle on the face of the waters is one of the proofs that the Greeks used for a spherical earth. Yet here it is recorded in Job, ages before the Greeks discovered it. Job 26:10 indicates that where light terminates, darkness begins. This suggests day and night on a spherical globe. The Hebrew record is the oldest, because Job is one of the oldest books in the Bible.

These verses which relate facts that man in all his wisdom only discovered many years later, lend credence that the Scriptures are truly the inspired words of God. That is, the Bible contains facts which mankind only discovered thousands of years after they were written.  Since men did not even scientifically discover these facts until hundreds or thousands of years later, these facts written down in the Scriptures could not have come from the minds of men at the time they were written! Therefore, men had to have been inspired by God to write these facts since they did not know them as facts at the time.  There are also many Scriptures which refer to God stretching out the heavens (Ps. 104:2; Is. 44:24) as modern astronomers confirm that the universe is rapidly expanding.  When the Bible relates to scientific matters, it is always accurate.  “Paths of the sea” mentioned in Psalms 8:8 was the inspiration for Matthew Maury (an inspired Christian), nicknamed ‘Pathfinder of the Seas’ who was the father of modern oceanography, mapping out the world’s underwater currents circa 1830’s, which are still used to this day. 

There were several secular historians who wrote about the events of the New Testament at the same time the Bible was being written. Josephus is the most well-known of them. He was a historian and Judahite.  Tacitus was a Roman historian who would have no benefit from not telling the truth. Both these men, as well as others, can be used to back up the historical accuracy of the Bible.  There are historical discoveries regularly coming to light that continue to support the accuracy of the Bible. Merrill Unger, who compiled a Bible dictionary wrote, “Old Testament archeology has rediscovered whole nations, resurrected important peoples, and in a most astonishing manner filled in historical gaps, adding immeasurably to the knowledge of biblical backgrounds.” 

The Bible is the most translated book in the world.  It has been translated into more different languages and dialects than any other book that has ever been written.  The Bible continues to be the best seller in the world, probably because it is the best book in the world.  It is the only book that reveals the racial origin, mission and destiny of Adamkind, which is synonymous with mankind.  It was never meant for the “human race” – a Masonic euphemism for the ultimate mongrel mix for the New World Order.  It takes the earth 365 days to rotate around the sun and the words “do not be afraid” are in the Bible 365 times.  The Zodiac is the prophetic glory of the stars going full circle from the beginning of the Lord’s Nativity to the end of the Age and His triumphant return, which is further elaborated upon in the prophetic Word.  Both modes of prophecy describe a future destiny of God’s people being delivered.  We pray “Deliver us from evil” and we have, we are and we will.  “Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?” I John 5:5.  “You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world means enmity against God? Therefore, anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God” James 4:4. 

The Bible touches the heart of every single White person ever born, even if they are stiff-necked and have a hardened heart.  The other races cannot be touched by the Word of God, because the Bible has quite a different message for non-Israelites.  “Learn not the way of the heathen… they are altogether brutish and foolish… and there is no breath [of life i.e. spirit] in them” Jer. 10.10:2, 8, 14.  When God called His Creation “good,” there was this snag called race i.e. kind after kind, which would culminate between two seedlines upon the earth having enmity between their peoples (Gen. 3:15).  This enmity is called racism by the world and frowned upon as evil ‘exclusivity,’ whereas God’s Creation of one race through Adam was again deemed “good” by God (the contraction of ‘by God’ is bigot; that’s where the word comes from).  However, the evil is in what God has not created; specifically, God had no part in mixing the races and, in fact, warned against multicultural diversity.  “They shall not dwell in thy land” Ex. 23:33.  This can be further proven through the inspired Word. 

What we have today in the world is the uninspired word of mongrels calling good evil and evil good.  For example, Hinduism and black Muslims consider White people… devils!!!  In the next few installments of this series, we’re going to show how the mongrelized church is wrong and why Christian Identity is right.  Believing in God is good, but if you don’t believe what He has to say, then it is only lip service and you don’t serve your Creator; it is serving other gods that rotten shepherds profess.  The inspired Word is what the God of the Covenants has to say to you and our race, not the alien stranger, who can only spoil Scripture with a predisposition towards strange gods.  The alien has no business being about our Father’s business as the Word forbids it: “Go, get thee unto the house of Israel, and speak with My [inspired] words unto them” Ezek. 3:5.  The business of Babylon has quite a different agenda i.e. the merchants of religion lavishing pearls upon swine.  Likewise, we are “begotten from above” to do the will of our Father, as Jesus commanded His Disciples to “Go not into the way of the heathen, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Mt. 10:5). 

So if you have anything to do with a church that promotes the communion of light and darkness (and that includes communing with other races), then you’re a friend of the world and an enemy of God (James 4:4).  If you have been cheated of hearing, not just some private interpretations of what somebody thinks God has spoken, but the inspired living Word of God, then I implore you to be freed by the unadulterated Truth.  They will call you a racist, but you will overcome their evil, because you believed in what Jesus had to say.  “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for My sake” Mt. 5:11.  If you’re an Israelite, you’ll hear His voice, and you will be a new creature in Christ.  If Scripture is given by inspiration, it stands to reason that when we receive it, we will be inspired.  And that is why our race has excelled in everything in order to bring forth the fruits of the Kingdom.

The Inspired Word Part 3

by Pastor Mark Downey

February 16, 2014

Scripture Reading: Jeremiah 23:18-27

A friend of mine recently said, “Politics is completely corrupt and will not save us” and I would agree and add that it would not have been possible for the political morass to reach such depths of depravity unless first the religious leaders of the land polluted the very Word of God and the people loved to have it so (Isaiah 5:31).  The prophet Jeremiah leveled stinging reproofs at his contemporaries and aptly applies to the modern pulpit as well, which will not save us.  It’s a serious thing to mess with the inspired word of God, as the Word itself warns, “Is not My word like as a fire?  Saith the Lord; and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?  Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal My words every one from his neighbor” Jer. 23:29-30.  God inspired Jeremiah to write to His people because, “They have forsaken My law… and have not obeyed My voice…But have walked after the imagination of their own hearts… I will scatter them among the heathen… I will send a sword after them” Jer. 9:13-16.  Should we think that history will not repeat itself?  Today, the heathen are scattered among us and their weapons are directed at Whitey.

‘Answers in Genesis’ and its master debater and carni rat entrepreneur Ken Ham, have forsaken the Law of God and prophesy a Noah’s Ark theme park right here in northern Kentucky.  If we are to believe Jeremiah, these local Hamites will build a multi-million dollar extravaganza to the carnival glory of evolutionary mongrelization, which you will never find in the Bible; and they will wallow in the pig sty of multicultural diversity with a knife in their throat.  They are not Creationists, they are destructionists of the worst sort who steal God’s words for their own self aggrandizement.   Christian Identity has a book that they must not have read, that clearly reveals serious consequences will befall those who forsake the Laws of God and promote their own evolutionary theories of race and race mixing contrary to the Word, given by inspiration of God.  

Conversely, beautiful blessings come to those who prove and believe that the Bible is God’s inspired word and obey it.  King David wrote: "Blessed are [they]… Who walk in the law of the Lord… Your commandments make me wiser than my enemies… Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path… Great peace have those who love Your law, and nothing causes them to stumble… All Your commandments are truth… The entirety of Your word is truth" Psalms 119:98, 105, 151, 160, 165.  “I have made all these things; that is why all these things have come into being, declares the Lord; but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembles at My word” Isaiah 66:2.  When you weigh things in the balance between the inspired word of God and its armchair theologians, you are left with a clear choice, if you are intellectually honest with yourself.  You can go with the secular and religious evolutionists who theorize until the next revision or you can trust the evidence from archaeology, history and fulfilled prophecy that proves the Bible is fact, not fiction.  And that it’s a book with a racial message from a God of discrimination, not integration; and is exclusionary, not inclusionary; and is absolute, not transient. 

The majority of the OT prophets probably look like failures in the eyes of man.  Jeremiah was branded a traitor (Jer. 38:4-5).  Elijah was a fugitive (1 Kings 18:10; 19:2-3).  Some may not have understood their own prophecies (Daniel 8:26; 12:8-9, 1 Peter 1:10-12).  But in reality they were not failures, they were simply the mouthpieces of God. It was not their responsibility to get results, only that they follow God and obey His instructions.  The Bible recounts the past with amazing accuracy and it predicts the future like no other book.  Most of our people have been misled by the pied pipers of Babylon i.e. both jews and catholics; and we can show you how both were predestinated in the inspired word of God.  Some so called educated people think the Bible is a fairy tale, but this is an assumption based on what they don’t know.  If they were knowledgeable they would be aware of discoveries that continue to confirm the verity of the Word.  The enemy encourages people to believe that all religions are equally credible without ever scrutinizing the source of those religions.  As a result, tens of millions of White people are ignorant of how supernaturally unique the Bible really is and how it can make you free from ignorance.  “The truth shall make you free” John 8:32.  The scope of freedom is exponential in its ramifications and distinguishes it from all other religious literature. 

The more you read it, the more you’ll realize that believing it is not drudgery, but an exhilaration of living, because it has been inspired and preserved by a real God-Creator who is alive and well today, who alone knows the day and hour that He will call upon you to open your eyes and ears to see and hear the Good News.  There may be some whohave not receivedtheircallingfromGodyet,andreinventways to harmonizethe Bible with the preferential wisdom of man to sing “we are the world” and “kumbuya” and they violently violate the wisdom of God in doing so.  Still others who have no profession of faith become twice the child of confusion by conforming to the world.  There is no blessing to an interracial society.  They say racism is a sin and yet they’ve never provided any citation of Divine Law to prove such a suicidal thought as proven by history and the collapse of White civilizations.  The real sin is race mixing.  “A bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord” Deut. 23:2.  A superficial reading of this verse, of God’s Law, would render it a child born out of wedlock.  However, a good and faithful student of the inspired Word would know that the Hebrew word for bastard is mamzer and means mongrel or mixed blood.  Oh my God, this is racist!  Yes, the plain teachings of Scripture stand in striking contrast to politically correct universalism and the antichrist matrix of godless communism, which now goes under the name of democracy.  Even a so called White Nationalist is bankrupt of being free from secular humanism and situational ethics of the individual deciding what’s right or wrong. 

The Apostle Paul did not encourage Identity Christians of the 1st century to just believe in Jesus and take his word for it with blind faith.  No, he told his audiences “Prove all things, hold on to what is good” I Thes. 5:21. Peter emphasized the credibility of Scripture and the message of Christ when he wrote, “For we did not follow cleverly contrived myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ; instead, we were eyewitnesses of His majesty” II Peter 1:16.  Peter also warned his readers to "be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets" because "scoffers will come in the last days" questioning and ridiculing Scripture, "saying, Where is the promise of His coming?" (II Peter 3:1–9).  How many people believe His return is imminent right now?  Is it time?  According to the Bible, faith should rest on solid evidence, not just warm and fuzzy emotions. You should never believe something in spite of the facts, and that includes believing in the authenticity and authority of any given Bible!  Always consider the source.  The Bible provides a dimension of knowledge that is simply not available from any other source.  Millions cling to the Scofield Reference Bible and yet it has one of the most sordid histories of twisted and tortured Scripture.  We have to start with a foundational understanding of the Law and the prophets, which Christ said He did not come to abolish (Mt. 5:17).  We have enough Scripture so that every generation can have a hope that lies within them that Christ could come at any time.  No man knows the day or hour, but we can discern the sign of the times.   

One of the strongest evidences that the Bible is inspired by God is its predictive qualities (prophecy). Unlike any other book, the Bible offers a multitude of specific predictions, some hundreds or even thousands of years in advance, that have been literally fulfilled or else point to a definite future time when they will come true.  Old Testament professor Milton Fisher recognizes a "sharp distinction between prophetism in Israel and the outwardly similar phenomenon in surrounding cultures… [however] both the type of message and the writings of Israel's prophets is without parallel" (The Origin of the Bible, Bruce, pp. 105–106).  Being able to predict the future accurately and consistently is simply not a human trait. Even the best strategic think tanks acknowledge that detailed prediction of future events, especially geopolitical events, is difficult in the short term, and practically impossible in the long term, at least at any level of detail. Yet the Bible repeatedlypredicts the rise and fall of prominent individuals, nations and empires with amazing accuracy and in remarkable detail!  Bible scholars have determined that more than one quarter of the Bible, about 27% is devoted to prophecy, and that the Bible contains more than 1,800 predictions (from over 8,300 verses), many of which are very specific.  Hundreds of specific prophecies, given centuries before their exact fulfillment, are undeniable evidence that an all-powerful God is alive and in control of future events.  Depending on how many verses are combined, the number of prophesies varies as to how many have already come to pass. 

This unique capacity to predict the future accurately sets the Bible apart from any other piece of literature.  Other books claim divine inspiration, such as the Koran, the Book of Mormon, and parts of the Hindu Veda. But none of these books contains predictive prophecy. As a result, fulfilled prophecy is a strong indication of the unique, divine authority of the Bible.  Bible prophecy stands in marked contrast to human attempts to predict the future.  A study of 25 top-rated psychics discovered that 92% of their predictions were totally wrong, and that chance or general knowledge of circumstances could explain the remaining 8% that were somewhat accurate.  Anyone familiar with the so-called prophecies of the jew Nostradamus (the preeminent prophet of the History Channel), the 16th century French psychic who dabbled in astrology, alchemy and other occult practices, is aware that his vague and nebulous verses simply do not compare to biblical prophecies. Specific prophecies, given centuries before they were accuratelyand consistently fulfilled, are some of the most stunning proofs that the Bible is the inspired word of God.  Of course, we have no shortage of false prophets setting dates.

Well, what is the context of biblical prophecy?  What is the common denominator?  It’s race; the Chosen People.  The only prophesy concerning other races is their disappearance from the earth as if they never existed (Obadiah 1:16).  “Some of the Bible's most amazing and surprising prophecies deal with the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; the twelve tribes of Israel, whom God chose to use for a special purpose.  “Ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me above all people… And you shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and a holy nation.  These are the words which thou shall speak to the children of Israel” (Ex. 19:5–6). God promised Abraham that in return for obedience; his descendants would become great and be a blessing to the rest of their kindred throughout the earth (Gen. 12:1–3).  Later prophecies stated that Jacob's descendants through Manasseh and Ephraim would ultimately become a "great nation,” and a great "multitude [company, commonwealth] of nations," which, along with the other descendants of Jacob, (in Bible prophecy) are called Israelites (Gen. 48:14–22).  In the Bible, the terms Israel and Israelite generally apply to the descendants of all twelve of Jacob's sons. The modern jews are not the descendants of Judah, but rather Esau-Edom and a later admixture of Ashkenaz (through Japheth); they were Khazars who adopted the religion of judaism from rabbinic Edomites in about the 8th century AD. Therefore, as you can well imagine, a great hoax has been perpetrated against mankind and millions of our kindred have died at the instigation of jewish world wars.  In a more specific sense, Israel applies to the descendants of the tentribes that made up the nation of Israel (with its capital in Samaria), which broke away from the nation of Judah (with its capital in Jerusalem) when the kingdom of Solomon was divided (see 1 Kings 12). This biblical distinction between the jews, Judah and Israel and other nations is an important key to understanding Bible prophecy, which has been greatly exacerbated by antichrist deceivers and religious stooges working for the state as ministers of propaganda. 

If White Christians have any respect for the inspired word of God, they will cease and desist respecting the word of those who murdered Jesus Christ.  They will find out very quickly that the United States and Great Britain are major players in Bible prophecy.  When God divorced Israel, did His ex wife have any further role in His plan for the ages?  Well, of course she did and went into two separate captivities i.e. the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities.  And get this, at the time of Christ, the mongrel jews who claimed ancestry from Abraham admitted, “We… were never in bondage to any man [and they asked Christ] What do you mean, ye shall be made free?” (John 8:33).  The jews cannot be Israelites if they were never in any captivity.  I think the jews call this a ‘Freudian slip.’  It’s not easy keeping up with a mountain of lies unless you stupefy a society that would otherwise put a noose around your neck for such deadly treachery.  And what better way to do that, than to add and take away from the inspired word of God.  And if one dares to question the precious jew, they can be ostracized with the ad hominine of “anti-Semitic.”  If you know the truth, the hilarity is only equaled by the frustration of knowing they have no roots that can be traced back to Shem/Semites and the joke then is that it’s impossible for them to be Hebrews either.  Jesus told these despicable jews that, “If you were of Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham.  But now you seek to kill Me, a man that hath told you the truth” (John 8:39-40).  The eternal jew can never know the truth, not at the time of Christ nor in the present age, because Jesus proclaimed to them, “You can’t hear My Word” (John 8:43).  The messianic jew is still a jew and continues to believe that collectively, jews are the Messiah.  They’re not waiting for His Second Coming like Christians are, but they have always had contingencies to deal with the redemption of White Christians.  Jews are like the STD’s of any White Christian nation, by indulging the people with their vices and temptations.  If we are to believe the inspired word of God, we can’t believe the pack of lies emanating from the jew.  Judaism is the only religion in the world dedicating an annual rite, called the Kol Nidre, to annul all vows, promises, oaths and obligations in the forthcoming year as null and void.  Therefore, they can lie about being Israel or even converting to Christianity.    

Israel is the White race and if we stop looking at the pernicious jew, we will see ourselves fulfilling prophecy as only true Israel could do.  We will see later on how the Masoretic text, manipulated by jewish rabbis (the Masoretes), cannot be trusted; and that’s because of the selective methodology of translation.  The book of Genesis portrays Joseph and his brothers as a prophetic type of Israel.  His kindred thought he was lost or dead in Egypt, but in reality Joseph became a political force in the Egyptian government.  So Jacob, Joseph’s father and grandfather to his two sons Ephraim and Manasseh, adopted the two boys as sons and heirs; and thus there were 13 sons or tribes of Israel.  Consequently, Jacob divided the birthright that was passed down to him from the time of Adam, giving Levi the priesthood, Judah the scepter and Joseph the remainder of the birthright, which included the land (estate) and its assets.  This family configuration would play an important role in God’s plan for the ages and bringing forth the Kingdom, albeit changes from tribes to nations over the centuries; nothing was lost or will be lost other than their proper identity.  The Levitical priesthood, through corruption, would be replaced by Christ, who, as a Judahite, became King and High Priest of Israel through the order of Melchizedek.  Jesus also possessed the scepter, although others have contended for the throne for the last 2000 years.  It makes little sense to believe that anybody other than Christ has the right to rule the earth.  Christ declared “All power is given unto Me in heaven and in earth” Mt. 28:18.  This did not nullify the royal house of David, which Christ delegated to the dispersed Christian Israel nations of Europe.  As a side note, we can better understand why the jews declared war on Germany in 1933.  It was because the nation of Germany represented the tribe of Judah, not jews. 

The jews especially wanted Christ dead, because their power base in Jerusalem was threatened.  But, because of their especially wicked religion of judaism, Jesus made a prophecy of their destruction and in 70AD, Jerusalem was destroyed by the Roman armies and over 1 million jews were killed.  They have always hated Christ and His inspired Word of prophecy, which squarely had a bead on the false Israel and their machinations to rule the world without the truth and justice of God.  Esau has always schemed to take back the birthright, which he so callously sold to his brother Jacob for a bowl of red soup; and in 1948 the scheming brought forth leaves on that fig tree (the one Christ cursed) and founded the misnamed country of “IsraeLIE” in Palestine, but they will never bring forth fruit.  Prophetically speaking, international jewry will be destroyed once and for all, for all of their lies and murders.  This is why jewry is frantic in its last ditch effort to circumvent the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, when the Savior will receive the assets and territories of the birthright in order to rule the world. 

Understanding the true identity of the Israelite nations is not only a key for understanding Bible prophecy; this knowledge is also essential for God's church, which must fulfill the commission that Jesus gave. Jesus commissioned His disciples to "go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" to preach about the coming Kingdom of God, and warn the Israelites about terrible trials they would face in the last days because of their disobedience to God's Laws (see Jer. 30:7–24).  Jesus' disciples took this commission seriously.  In their day, the tribes of Israel were not "lost."  The Apostle James addressed his epistle "to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad" (James 1:1). Josephus revealed that in the days of the apostles, "ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates… and are an immense multitude" (Antiquities of the Jews, Book XI, 5, 2). This explains why several of the apostles, including Peter and Andrew, traveled in that direction.  The rest is history; Christianity moved into Europe.  It wasn’t until modern times that the good intentions of missionaries would carry the Great Commission down the road to hell; an utter and dismal failure to convert non-Whites to a covenantal relationship with God that did not apply to them. 

The Assyrians deported the Israelites to the cities of the Medes around the Caspian Sea.  A hundred years later when Assyria fell, the Israelites moved out of that area and began migrating according to prophecy.  “Behold, My people will return from far away, from lands to the north and west, and others from the land of Egypt” Isaiah 49:12.  The Israelite dispersion from Assyria went through the Caucasus Mountains and north and west into Europe and became known by anthropologists as Caucasians.  The European nations were formed primarily out of these former Israelites, who had lost their identity and were known by other names.  Even though Paul, speaking to the Corinthians, mentions their ancestors had been in the Exodus out of Egypt, “Now I do not wish you to be ignorant, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all had passed through the sea” (I Cor. 10:1); there were also Danaans, from the tribe of Dan, who came to Greece directly from Egypt before the 40 year experience in the wilderness. 

At the time of Christ, the Gospel began to spread into Europe.  Christians were persecuted for two centuries after the Crucifixion.  The catholic church did not really develop until after Constantine in the 4th century.  From this time onward, Christianity suffered from a degenerate leadership based on a top-down structure of popes and a priestcraft, rather than the grassroots of bottom-up authority as advocated in the inspired word with captains of tens to hundreds.  While the 1st century Christians focused on setting men free by the power of Christ, the later stage of Christians were captive to an institutional corporation authorized by the state.  True Christianity evolved into churchianity.  Even the definition of ‘Christian’ changed from one who had a covenantal relationship with Christ to one who had contractual obligations with the state sanctioned church. 

The church even degenerated to the point where they began to persecute and torture those who had different ideas from the established norms of orthodoxy. Their zeal to unify the church under a single creed brought the people under increasing slavery to the church, whose example was followed by the Christian monarchs and the ‘divine right of kings,’ a creed alien to the Bible.  Prophecy identified four beast empires (in the book of Daniel): Babylon, Greece, Rome and lastly a culmination of these in Mystery Babylon.  The church, too, acted like the “little horn” that it was, a mere extension of the iron beast empire of Rome.  Instead of preaching freedom in Christ, they came in search of church slaves, converting the people to a religious system, rather than pointing them to Jesus Christ. Instead of coming to set the world free, they came looking to steal wealth that other people had earned through honest work.  This same stiffnecked hardness of heart, seen in the Israelites under Moses, was seen in the church among the ex-Israelites of Europe.  Once again they had an opportunity to bring freedom through Christ and by the Holy Spirit to expand the glory of the Kingdom of God.  However, by this time the Holy Spirit had been lost and long forgotten by the Roman church and even by many churches of the Reformation, and too few knew how to use anything other than physical threats and intimidation.  The same PSYOP is in operation today.  The actions of God’s people worked adversely towards the cause of Christ just as they do today.  But the Remnant who actually put on the nature and character of Christ, were still able to minister by way of the inspired word.  We can see how tribulation produces patience; and patience experience; and experience hope; and hope does not make us ashamed, because the love of God floods into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which is given unto us (Romans 5:3-5).  I think one of the best descriptions of prophecy is in Rev. 19:10, “For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”  And didn’t Jesus testify that He didn’t come to destroy the law and the prophets?  When you understand the identities of modern Israelite nations, you begin to understand from Bible prophecy what lies ahead for these nations and for non-Israelite nations. 

Another corroboration of a divine awareness working with God’s revelation is archaeology.  If we look at this amazing drama of unearthing verification of the inspired Word, we can see not only vindication of the holy writ, but reproof and correction.  Over the last 200 years there has been a rise of biblical criticism from the ivory towers of academia.  These uninspired scholars have boldly asserted that various people and places mentioned in the Bible must have been invented by the writers of the Bible.  This cancer found its way into progressive, liberal schools of theology.  They would proudly announce a new finding that would erode the integrity of Scripture and the mainstream media was more than happy to promulgate these ideas to society, furthering the dubious notions about biblical credibility.  This pervasive doubt and skepticism continues to infect our body politic, in spite of archaeological discoveries that continue to validate the Bible’s accuracy as well as discrediting the presumptions of professors and their echoes behind the pulpits. 

As recently as 1992, some scholars were confidently asserting, "There are no literary criteria for believing David to be more historical than Joshua, Joshua more historical than Abraham, and Abraham more historical than Adam."  Yet, just one year later, archaeologists digging in upper Galilee discovered a 9th century bc inscription about the "house of David."  Jeffrey Sheler, an award-winning journalist and a religion writer for U.S. News & World Report, wrote: "The fragmentary reference to David was a historical bombshell. Never before had the familiar name of Judah's ancient warrior king… been found in the records of antiquity outside the pages of the Bible.” 

Scholars skeptical of the Bible have noted the similarity between the Genesis creation account and Babylonian clay tablets describing the creation of the world. These scholars have glossed over major differences in the accounts, and suggested that biblical writers simply borrowed their material from other sources. However, the discovery of more than 17,000 clay tablets at Ebla (in modern Syria), dating from 2500bc, has overturned the critics' theories. The Ebla tablets (which predate the Babylonian creation epic by some 600 years) contain "the oldest known creation accounts outside the Bible… The creation tablet is strikingly close to that of Genesis, speaking of “one being” who created the heavens, moon, stars and earth. Parallels show that the Bible contains the older, less embellished version… They [the Ebla tablets] destroy the critical belief in the evolution of monotheism from supposed earlier polytheism.”

There have been dozens of other remarkable discoveries.  The Merneptah Stele describes an Egyptian pharaoh conquering Israel (circa 1200BC), representing the first documented instance of the name Israel in the historical record.  The Black Obelisk from Nimrud pictures Israelite king Jehu bowing before Assyrian king Shalmaneser III, the earliest ancient depiction of a biblical figure.  An inscription near Jerusalem refers to "Joseph, son of Caiaphas" (Caiaphas was the high priest in Jerusalem at the time of Christ's crucifixion; see Mt. 26:57).  An inscribed stone from 1st century Caesarea reads, "Pontius Pilate, the Prefect of Judea" (Pilate was the Roman governor at the time of Jesus' crucifixion; see Mt. 27:2).  Such evidence, carved in stone, supports the conclusion that the Bible writers were recording facts and not fiction.

The manner in which archaeology has verified the historical accuracy of the Bible has been nothing short of remarkable!  As noted archaeologist Nelson Glueck has written, "It may be clearly stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a single biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible." Glueck's comments echo the words of another prominent archaeologist, William F. Albright, who stated, "There can be no doubt that archaeology has confirmed the substantial historicity of Old Testament tradition… The excessive skepticism shown toward the Bible by important historical schools of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries… has been progressively discredited."  The evidence of history and archaeology defies the critics, and supports Scripture

Christian Identity is blessed to have its own certified (M.A. degree) biblical archaeologist and expositor, the late E. Raymond Capt, who wrote over a dozen books confirming what we believe.  We contend that the Anglo Saxon, Celtic, Scandinavian, Germanic and kindred peoples, to whom the inspired Word is exclusively about, are indeed the direct genetic descendants of ancient Israel; and to whom the Apostle Paul taught, “Pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God and the promises” Romans 9:4.  That specifically excludes all other people.  We can easily identify our race with ancient Israel through archaeology.  Ray’s best and most convincing book is ‘Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets’ in which the Assyrians recorded their interactions with Israel and were called by many different names.  Some of these clay cuneiform tablets reveal the fate of the Israelites as they escaped from the land of their captivity (contrary to modern theologians who say they integrated with their captors and eventually disappeared from history).  These tablets helped us identify the modern day descendants of “the lost tribes of Israel.”  And let’s face it, if Jesus said He came only for these people (Mt. 15:24) and they evaporated from the earth, His mission was a failure. 

Mr. Capt writes, “No better evidence can be desired to establish a fact or to settle a date, than that of a monument created by a public authority… The old caravan road from Babylon… runs a limestone mountain rising out of the plain to 1,700 feet.  About 300 feet above the base… is a rock face containing an inscription made by the order of Darius the Great, about 515BC…  [it] provides some interesting references to the so called “Lost Tribes of Israel.”  The memorial measures about 150 feet long by 100 feet high… The inscriptions were in three languages… on what today is known as the “Behistun Rock” providing the ‘key’ [to translate them]… [there is also artwork on the panels depicting ten figures] They are evidently the head chiefs of the ten tribes of Israel… named among these are the “Saakas,” but in the Babylonian version, the same people are called “Gimiri”… it is evident that the “Iskuza,” the “Sakka,” the “Scythians,” the “Cimmerians,” and the”Gimiri” are all Israelites.”

Capt’s book then goes into their subsequent migrations north and west and additional name changes, which we recognize as early European identities such as Celts, Gauls, Goths, Jutes, Lombards and Saxons.  This last name is no coincidence in being related to the Sakka.  The descendants of Biblical Israel are of Isaac's covenant line (“for in Isaac shall thy seed be called” Gen.21:12) namely "son's of Isaac," "Isaac's Sons," "Saac Sons" today called Anglo "Saxons".  Some people claim to have studied the Bible for years or their whole lives, yet have never heard these simple truths.  It should be cause for great joy, although some receive it with the utmost disdain and antipathy.  We’ve only had archaeology for a short duration considering the expanse of time from the patriarchs of Israel to the present day.  This only proves, once again, that the inspired Word of God is true.  In the last chapter of Daniel, God told him, “Go thy way Daniel; for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end” Daniel 12:9. 

I don’t know about you, but I get the impression that this baby boomer generation of which I am a part, has the privilege and honor of witnessing the end of Israel’s identity being lost and hidden for so long.  “It is the glory of God to conceal a thing; but the honor of kings is to search out a matter” Prov. 25:2.  Our homes are our castles, and every castle should have a copy of the Bible.  It’s the best home defense manual around.  “The Lord is my… fortress” Ps. 18:2.  Don’t leave home without it.  Next time we will look at the tools of our faith and Christian profession and answer the often asked question: what is the best Christian Identity Bible?

The Inspired Word Part 4

by Pastor Mark Downey

March 2, 2014

Scripture Reading: Isaiah  55:7-11

We’ve covered quite a bit of territory concerning the writing of Scripture from men who were inspired by God to convey the Lord’s unadulterated thoughts as to which way we should go in this life.  It’s been referred to as an owner’s manual, which is appropriate for ‘heirs of the promise.’  The will of God is bequeathed to certain beneficiaries, but they must follow the instructions of the will in order to inherit the Kingdom of God.  I have a bookshelf and a corner of it occupies a stack of owner manuals.  If I were to confuse my chainsaw manual for my horizontal freezer manual, it might be a cold day in hell before I ever find the pull chord, between the frozen chicken thighs and lamb chops.  Well, isn’t that just silly? 

One of the last things that we are warned about in the Bible is Rev. 22:18-19, “I testify to everyone who hears the prophetic words of this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book.  And if anyone takes away from the words of this prophetic book, God will take away his share of the tree of life and the holy city, written in this book.”  If God hadn’t anticipated that our owner’s manual would be convoluted with the uninspired thoughts of other gods and mortals, this passage wouldn’t have been necessary.  The wicked have changed the will of God to include other beneficiaries.  And the true heirs have been obscured from knowing that the owner’s manual pertains to them exclusively.  The Bible text itself is a living document that is self aware of contamination from outside sources.  We read, “This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours!” Mark 12:7.  This dovetails with, “The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and violent men take it by force” Mt. 11:12.  We have to understand that “The people against whom the Lord has indignation forever” (Mal. 1:5) killed Christ and they account White Christians “as sheep for the slaughter” (Romans 8:36).  Does anybody in their right mind put it past these antichrist jews to add to and take away from the Word of God for their own ulterior motives?  Besides being Murder Incorporated and masters of the Big Lie and the preeminence of the Holocaust eclipsing the suffering of Christ on the Cross, the jewish trump card is their greasy rubbing fingers smearing the Old and New Testaments. 

The Bible is a love story between God and His people.  This love is so great, that the wicked are afforded the opportunity to forsake their ways and unrighteous thoughts.  If you think jews are God’s chosen people and that God loves everybody, your thoughts are wickedly perverse.  Isaiah specifically wrote about “our God,” not the God of all races and cultures.  The perversions of Scripture attempt to water down whom God will have mercy upon and will abundantly pardon.  I have recently entertained the thought that there is really only one race, the Adamic or White race; because God said His Creation was “good.”  Therefore, God did not create the black or yellow so called races, because throughout the inspired Word of God, the alien stranger is always associated with evil and in the end they will perish altogether.  What communion hath light with darkness?  To the colorblind and spiritually blind church world, races are an integral component of God’s will and the owner’s manual is open to anyone who believes.  Their thought is that the Bible is about believers and unbelievers.  However, God’s thought on the subject is in context to the believers and unbelievers within the one race that God loves more than any other people.  When Noah was found perfect in his generations (racially pure in his genetics), it was only one race that was spared from the Flood.  This flood didn’t have to be worldwide, because our race was still confined within a local region.  Within these parameters, the mongrel hoards drowned by God’s will.  This was a type and shadow for a much more momentous prophecy that would be worldwide.

The Disciples asked Jesus, “What shall be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?”  And He told them it would be as in the days of Noah (Mt. 24:3, 37).  What was going on in the days of Noah that would warrant such devastation to the inhabitants of the land?  Well, it was rampant with race mixing and homosexuality.  These two abominations have been crafted into modern Bibles from another owner’s manual called the talmud, which gives these blasphemies carte blanche tolerance, which comes from the owner’s manual of Hinduism.  The Holy Bible has been under attack for a long time; a gradual erosion of Christian values reversing good for evil, and evil for good.  Who can seriously address negro Al Sharpton as “Reverend”?  There’s absolutely nothing there to revere.  It’s only because the inspired Word of God has been turned into uninspired nonsense, that wolves and dogs ingratiate themselves with the sheep.  Musician/hunter Ted Nugent recently referred to Obama as a “subhuman mongrel” on CNN, which caused untold horror, even though Obama at one time called himself a “mutt.”  Shortly before Gen. Patton was murdered, he wrote, “The jewish type is… a subhuman species without any of the cultural or social refinements of our time.” 

In this last segment I’d like to show you how to use the owner’s manual, which is not always easy to decipher.  Thank God they’re not being published in China… yet.  A very common misperception is that Christianity and hence the Bible is jewish.  That’s not to say that the jews got their filthy hands into certain translations.  The peripheral spin-off is that all biblical figures were jews.  That idiotic contention has extinguished the spirit of more White people than you could imagine, because they know that jews have had a historical reputation that follows them everywhere.  Or they have experienced the jew firsthand, defeating the propaganda that they are somehow God’s chosen people.  The wages of sin is death, and the jewish bet is gambling that they can entice enough of true Israel to incur God’s wrath for disobedience, that we will destroy ourselves.  II Chron. 19:2 tells us what prompts the wrath of God: it’s helping the ungodly and loving them that hate the Lord.  Bless the jew?  It can be shown quite demonstrably that jews hate God in their talmud.  It can be shown by anthropology and cultural pathology that the God of true Israel is repugnant to aliens.  To them, it is like fingernails on a chalkboard. 

One thing we can discern from the inspired Word is that God must have created language as well as man in order to communicate with him.  What was the very first thing God said to the first White man on earth (that is recorded in the Bible)?  “God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.  God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth" Gen. 1:28.  The first five books of the Bible (also known as the Pentateuch or the Book of the Law or the Torah) were “allegedly” written by Moses.  The history of the Bible is a complicated book, interwoven with variant languages, mistakes and opinionated commentaries.  But remember, Moses started out as a basket case.  The story of Moses comes about 1,300 years before Jesus Christ and about 2,300 years after Adam.  The question arises: how did Moses know what to write?  Well, there may have been written texts or oral traditions, which through divine providence survived the millennia’s.  What happened to these first White inhabitants of the earth must have provoked continuous dialogue and speech among themselves.  The stories were still miraculously fresh at the time of Moses, when he codified what already existed i.e. the Ten Commandments.  Naturally then, the books of Genesis through Deuteronomy were an orderly compilation, which God inspired Moses to write.  Regardless of any criticism as to the origin and veracity of the inspired Word, we are reminded of this fact from II Peter 1:20-21, “First of all, you must know this, that any prophecy of Scripture must not be of any private interpretation.  because no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” 

Let me interject a clarification here.  The so called torah is another one of those words that obfuscate the Christian Bible.  Torah is usually synonymous with the word tanakh, which is touted as the “Jewish Bible” as it was written in Hebrew.  The fly in the ointment is that the jews are not Hebrews or Semites or Israelites or even Judahites.  Moses was not a jew.  The great hoax that has been perpetrated on White Christians is that the jews wrote the Bible and that we owe them a debt of gratitude for giving us the Word of God.  However, if we look deeper into the history of the most attacked book in the Bible, the book of Genesis, and in particular the authorship of Moses, we discover the attacks coming from a particular quarter.  The New American Bible said in its Introduction: “Despite its unity of plan and purpose, the book is a complex work, not to be attributed to a single original author.  Several sources, or literary traditions, that the final redactor used in his composition are discernible. These are the Yahwist (J), Elohist (E), and Priestly (P) sources which in turn reflect older oral traditions.”  The J, E, D and P documents are purely speculative, supposing that they were written between 900 and 586BC (long after the time of Moses and before the Septuagint, which we’ll get to in a moment). What I want you to know is who is responsible for what is called the ‘documentary hypothesis’ that assigns these letters to authors other than Moses from sections cherry picked from the Pentateuch.  I found this admission from the ‘Answers in Genesis’ website: “As this hypothesis was developed by a number of Jewish and theologically liberal Christian scholars in the late seventeenth to the late nineteenth centuries, there were a number of different proposals of who wrote what and when. But by the end of the nineteenth century liberal scholars had reached general agreement… [this] unlocked the door for the skepticism of later scholars… They assumed that the Bible is not a supernatural revelation from God and then manipulated the biblical text to arrive at that conclusion… They assumed that Israel's religion was simply the invention of man, a product of evolution, as all other religions are.”  What Ken Ham doesn’t fully disclose is the true nature of jews and what they’ve done to our Bible; what they’ve done to the minds of our people.  The jewish bible i.e. the talmud, which was an oral tradition at the time of Christ, which He called the traditions of the elders, originated in Babylon at the time of captivity for the house of Judah.  Now these Judahites were Israelites, but they race mixed and 70 years later returned to Jerusalem with the religion of judaism, the antithesis of Christianity.  Some of these mongrels became the power structure of the Pharisees (and recall their association with the scribes).  Judaism was modeled on the personality of Moses i.e. name dropping, not what Moses wrote, and put forth the notion that God gave Moses another set of instructions at Mount Sinai that were circumventions or loopholes of the Law.  And to this day, we witness heinous practices of jewry such as homosexuality, pedophilia, drunkenness, ritual murder, bearing false witness etc as sanctioned and vindications for jewishness found in their talmud.  In a moment, we will see how they further contaminated the Christian Bible through the Masoretic text, which was used as the basis for the King James Version and the majority of other popular versions.  Moses did write the first five books of the Bible during the wilderness experience and before Israel entered the Promised Land.  The attack on Moses is an attack on the inspired Word.  There never were any secret words from God given to the jews.  And contrary to jewish propaganda, it was never written after the house of Judah returned from their exile in Babylon, now replete with the prophesied good figs and evil figs i.e. the racially intact seedline that would bring forth the Messiah and the seedline of antichrist mongrel jews. 

The language of our race from the time of Adam to the time of Moses is still somewhat unresolved, although we know that Moses, the prophets and the psalms were written in Hebrew.  Some scholars think Adam spoke Adamic, but by the time of the Tower of Babel there were many languages and God saw to it to confound their speech.  I used to think that the Tower of Babel was a lesson about multicultural diversity or race mixing that led to a multi-lingual society.  But, I have since learned that the story was strictly those of our own race.  Perhaps our ancestors borrowed words and dialects from non-Adamic peoples and their original speech became corrupted.  We see the same thing today with White youngsters mimicking negro drawls and polluted English.  Language has been called the hardest problem in science, because there is a lack of empirical evidence.  There were no ancient tape recorders.  It’s been suggested that language might have evolved partly to block communication, to set one’s own tribe or race apart from contamination by aliens.  That’s one reason why I’m opposed to ‘English only’ laws; I don’t want them to assimilate.  By the same token, the Bible can be tampered with to accommodate non-Israelites, but the inspiration from God will have been removed for the White man.  Christian Identity is putting back the inspired Word to stimulate our access to the Holy Spirit; to restore the racial context of God’s will.  We are accused of deliberately misinterpreting the Word of God, but our accusers are basing that opinion on the deliberate mistranslations that promote universalism.  The late addition of the word “jew” to the Bible was a classic shell game, by sleight of hand.   

Jewish historian, researcher and scholar Benjamin Freedman wrote in his ‘Etymology of the Word “Jew”’: “When the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was "Judean." However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world.  This so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word "Jew."  It is a misrepresentation…  There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a "Jew" as a "Judean" in the literal sense of the Word.  That was the correct and only meaning of the word in the 18th century.  The meaning of the word "Jew" in our Bible is not the same as the colloquial idiom.”  It is not an understatement to say that the word ‘jew’ is the most confusing word in the Bible and the only reason it’s there is because of the jews.  It was a deliberate mistranslation to purposely be misinterpreted and the results have been disastrous. 

The Hebrew language seems to be the key in understanding the inspired Word and how it arrived back to the rightful heirs and Hebrew descendants in the form of English.  To understand the finished product today, we have to trace its movement from Hebrew to Greek to English.  And running parallel to the divinely inspired model is an imitation, a jewish substitute comprising pseudo-Hebrew, Yiddish and English.  It takes years to walk through this verbal minefield where one word can trigger an explosive meltdown of doctrine.  But rest assured, many walk with Christ through the valley of the shadow of death and come out of Babylon unscathed.  How?  “Study to show yourself approved by God, a worker who doesn’t need to be ashamed, correctly dissecting the word of truth” II Tim. 2:15.  We divide the multiplicity of meanings of words in their God given context, while the enemy butchers literal from figurative speech without rhyme or reason.  If you have the time and patience (and if you don’t, find some) to read God’s Word for yourself.  There are no sissies who consult the owner’s manual of a muscle car, so if you want some strength and power for your own life, then take command of The Book of instructions.  The only shame is in not doing it sooner or God forbid… never.  I’ll give you some rules for exegesis (interpretation) as we conclude the message.  But first let us turn our attention to two major events that were critical to the development of the Bible; one positive and the other negative.  It goes without saying that there is not one single Bible version or translation that is 100% perfect, but by comparative analysis of all available resources we can come pretty darn close to what God wants us to know.  In fact, He will supernaturally guide you as you open the pages.  The two things we need to examine are the Septuagint and Masoretic texts. 

Most modern day Christians, who are for the most part judaized, are terribly ignorant of what Jesus and His followers relied upon for Scripture.  At the time of Christ the Hebrew language of the Patriarchs had faded from use.  That area of the world had become Hellenized and therefore spoke Greek.  The problem of preserving Scripture presented itself around the 3rd century BC when 70 translators began their work; the legend of 70 was thus named the Septuagint (in Latin) and represented by the Roman numerals LXX.  The fact that Jesus and writers of the New Testament quoted from the LXX gives the credibility of inspiration for the Old Testament rendered in Greek rather than Hebrew.  Thank God, because there are no known manuscripts of the OT uncials in Hebrew.  The God of Israel has guaranteed that every attempt to destroy the canon of Scripture will fail.  “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away” Mt. 24:35.  During this time, the house of Judah (the southern house of Israel) was returning from their Babylonian captivity and the Levitical priests were still the custodians of canon as they rebuilt the Temple in Jerusalem with the LXX in hand. 

The LXX also played an important role in reaching lost Israelites (the northern house of Israel) from their captivity and dispersion from Assyria; much like John the Baptist paved the way for the Gospels in Judea.  The LXX reminded both houses of Israel about their transgressions and were able to read and study for themselves the Law and the Prophets and therefore the prophetic fulfillment of a Messiah that would redeem them.  They were being prepared to enter a New Covenantal relationship with God; to repent of their sins.  For several hundred years our race was somewhat isolated from the leavening influence of mongrel jews, because the Greek OT was the only Bible they had.  By the time of Christ however, Scripture was being leavened by the scribes and Pharisees.  The Apostle Paul, one of the most vehement opponents to the mongrel jews of his day (following the lead of Jesus), was the missionary to the ‘gentiles’ (the second most confusing word in the Bible) or actually the White race Israelites of the dispersion, who had in their possession the LXX.  Paul exhorted them in Galatians 5:1 to, “Stand firm in the freedom which Christ has made us free, and do not again be entangled in a yoke of bondage.”  In other words, separate yourselves from the race of people who cannot hear the inspired Word and cannot believe in Christ and will fill your thinking with darkness.  The jew is the eternal enemy of Jesus Christ and the White race. 

Apart from its being the oldest translation of considerable extent that has ever been written, the LXX was the first step towards that fusion of ancient Hebrew with the Greek that has issued in the hearts and minds of modern Christendom to procure the inspired Word.  It is a key to understanding the NT and the revelation of Christ.  The difficulties in getting behind the confusion of versions and revisions and weighing things in the balance are very formidable.  The LXX translators made some mistakes; their knowledge of Hebrew was sometimes inadequate; they occasionally interpreted as well as translated; and they sometimes introduced local color.  And yet there is no doubt that much may be learned from the LXX.  A word of caution for any text considered official canon is that they mirrored the religious authority of that era and shouldn’t be treated with blind faith or cavalierly dismissed, but looked at objectively and wholistically.  We can be confident in the integrity of the language of the LXX, when at the turn of the last century, non-literary papyri was discovered in Egypt and gives us greater insight into the actual Koine Greek that was employed with the LXX.  It was not an artificial language, it was not jewish slang and it was not the language of elitists, but of the common White man.  The same cannot be said of the Masoretic text, which was artificial. 

Most White Christians today do not understand the gravity of attacks leveled against our faith and heritage.  Race mixing and homosexuality are but symptoms of Noah’s great flood and ours.  It is not difficult to ascertain from history that there have been enemies of our race who have a singleness of unity to destroy our families, our eccelesias, our governments, our history and our books… our inspired books.  It’s never been more exemplified than witnessing the administration of negro Obama and running America into the ground.  But, he’s just an effect also and not the cause.  The cause can be detected from the uninspired writings pretending to be Scripture that remove the deity of Christ and the exclusionary intent of race, hence a Kinsman Redeemer. 

When people say we owe the jews for our Bible, that’s true if they mean the false Bibles that adds to and takes away from the original manuscripts.  If the jews had never been allowed to touch our sacred oracles, it would be a much different world in which we live.  The original Hebrew OT and the subsequent translation into Greek were not written by jews.  They were written by racially pure White scholars from the tribes of Israel.  Jews have never been Judahites or Israelites.  Christian Identity explains this enigma in hundreds of scholarly papers.  The “jews” as they’re called now; at the time of Christ, the ones who killed Him, were mongrels that returned from Babylon; as well as mongrel offspring of Esau, who were Edomites that were absorbed into the Maccabean society, and like all other residents, were lumped together with the Judahites and called jews.  This is the convoluted mischief that has been conveyed by the authors of confusion in what is known as the Masoretic text.  The Masoretes are descendants of the jews; they are the children that still have the blood of Christ upon them and gleefully so.  We owe them a Holocaust; “For they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet” Mal. 4:3.    

At the time of Christ the majority of people spoke Greek, not Hebrew.  The NT writers showed their favor of the LXX by using it when quoting the OT.  Because of the increasing use and acceptance of the LXX among Christians, the jews began to renounce it and moved towards a number of other Greek versions.  A new translation was produced around 130AD by Aquila, a disciple of Rabbi Akiba.  Aquila was the son of Emperor Hadrian’s sister, born a pagan, converted to Christianity, but was excommunicated for astrology and magic, and wound up converting to judaism and thus under their employ as a translator; in every sense he was a two-faced janissary.  It was an extremely literal translation (that communicated poorly), that gained wide acceptance among the jews.  The jews were so upset at this new Christian heresy that they no longer endorsed the LXX that they had accepted for the past 400 years.  It was a major step for rabbinic judaism to take. This same Rabbi Akiba, at the last jewish rebellion against Rome, was touted as the fulfillment of Messianic prophecies; and is still held in high esteem by jews today.  It was at this time that textual subversion predated the Masoretic.  One of the most blatant acts of sabotage was how the jews attacked the LXX with their vicarious corruption of Isaiah 7:14, changing the LXX from “Behold, a virgin will conceive in the womb, and will bring forth a son, and you will call his name Emmanuel” to the jewish rendering of “Behold, a young woman...”  This same young woman (Mary) is slandered as a “prostitute” in the talmud.  The jews rejected Jesus as the true Messiah and attacked the LXX.  Should you love those who hate the Lord, then wrath is upon thee (II Chron. 19:2).  This is the spirit of the ungodly: the complete rejection of “the Word made flesh.”  And they were by no means finished; they needed your help.  Anyone who regurgitates the lie that Jesus Christ was a jew is a useful idiot.

With the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD ancient Hebrew became a dead language, original copies of the Hebraic OT became a part of the ash heap of history and the scribes and Pharisees who might have kept the language alive perished.  The Levitical order was replaced with the order of Melchisidec.  500 years after the jews killed Christ, unregenerate Edomite mongrel jews claimed succession to the Levites in spite of the new order proclaimed by Christ.  It is unthinkable that custodianship of the canon should ever pass outside of Israel.  “This is My covenant with them [Israel], saith the Lord, My spirit that is upon thee, and My words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed [offspring], nor out of the mouth from thy seed’s seed [race], saith the Lord, from henceforth and forever” Isaiah 59:21.  The jews began working to revive the defunct ancient Hebrew language and to spin new twists into Scriptures as they abhored the growing White Christian movement.  These jews were known as Masoretes and their activities… no, wait, it should be called their conspiracy; these jewish rabbis conspired from about 450 to 1000AD, reaching their apex between the 7th and 9th centuries.  The oldest known copy of the Masoretic text is from 925AD.  The oldest known copy of the LXX is from 325AD and was considered by most Judeans (not jews) to be the inspired Word of God.  A difference of some 600 years and a difference between White and jewish translators. 

The Masoretes followed in the footsteps of their mongrel ancestors practicing the filth of the talmud and retained the hypocrisy that Christ had accused them of.  During this thousand year project, the jews methodically bought and collected any Hebrew manuscripts, whatever the price, under the guise of being Hebraic scholars; even though they had no right to claim an Israelite identity.  They undertook this grand work under the pretext of streamlining the variant copies of the OT.  Of course, it was under their own rules and supervision of editing according to their agenda, not the Christians.  When this massive reconstruction was completed, all Hebrew copies not in conformity with the Masoretic text (and had more credibility) were destroyed or mysteriously disappeared.  Their primary protocol for the next thousand years was to be the preservation of their text being recognized as sacred or received.  The RCC played this same game of tampering, with their Textus Receptus i.e. the received text; received meaning what “they” agreed upon.  In both cases of jewish and catholic word smithing, the commoners of White Christianity were never consulted, but rather targeted.  Does it make any difference who receives the inspired Word of God and who receives the uninspired word of mongrels?  You bet it does. 

It is commonly presumed that the Masoretes innocently worked on annotations (adding notes), called ‘pointing,’ to clarify Hebrew grammar in a Greek speaking world.  From a 1999 publication called ‘The Faith Once Delivered’ by Russell Harris, more light is shed on this jewish collusion: “However, it turns out that the undertaking involved alterations of a much more fundamental nature.  Indeed, upon the rubble of Ancient Hebrew, the Masorete erected a significantly different language of much greater complexity; a language which appears to have been created for the express purpose of facilitating wholesale alteration of the manuscripts of Old Covenant Scripture.  The Masorete then translated the Ancient Hebrew manuscripts of Scripture into the new language, in the process taking great liberties.

“Adam Clarke, an 18th Century Anglican scholar, makes it clear that the work of the Masoretes is, in reality, a commentary which has been integrated into the body of Scripture.  Moreover, Clarke points out that the Hebrew of the Masoretic Text (Masoretic Hebrew) is quite different from the Hebrew of the patriarchs (Ancient Hebrew) in which Old Covenant Scripture was originally written.  In the General Preface of his commentary on the Scriptures, published in 1810, Clarke writes:

“The Masoretes were the most extensive Jewish commentators which that nation could ever boast. The system of punctuation, probably invented by them, is a continual gloss [In classical Greek ‘gloss’ meant a tongue or language. In the course of time it was used to designate first a word of the text which needed some explanation, and later the explanation or addition itself; Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines ‘gloss’ as: A specious appearance of representation; external show that may mislead opinion.  In other words, an expanded interpretation by a scribe which finds permanence in the Greek text.]  The vowel points alone add whole conjugations [a class of verbs having similar inflected forms] to the language. This system is one of the most artificial, particular, and extensive comments ever written on the word of God; for there is not one word in the Bible that is not the subject of a particular gloss through its influence.

Even without adding to, deleting from, or changing a single letter of Scripture, pointing gave the Masorete power to dramatically change the meaning of almost any given passage of Scripture, for the prerogative of selecting vowels is, to a large extent, the prerogative of selecting words. As a crude example, consider how the meaning of an English sentence might be changed by substitution of the word poor for the word pure; a substitution which may be effected by a simple change of vowels."

Clarke appears to be one of the few commentators who have seen fully the significance of the Masoretic Text; namely, that it is a new version of the Scripture, written in a new language. Obviously, Hebrew scholars have been aware of this fact. They should have called attention to the difference between Ancient Hebrew and the language of the Masoretes, and should have differentiated the two, by use of names such as Ancient Hebrew and Masoretic Hebrew. However, the majority of Hebrew scholars are Jewish, and thus cannot be expected to be objective and candid regarding such a matter.

Unless the Masoretic Text is a complete fabrication; i.e., a translation from the Septuagint into Masoretic Hebrew, one must assume that the Masorete based his work on Ancient Hebrew manuscripts.  Inasmuch as the Masorete worked in the Christian era; apparently starting about the 5th century, and did not complete his Masoretic Text until the 9th or 10th  century, it would appear that Ancient Hebrew manuscripts were in existence as late as the 5th century, and likely until the 10th century. How, then, can it be that no specimens of the Ancient Hebrew manuscripts survived to the present day?

The disappearance of Ancient Hebrew manuscripts makes it impossible to determine precisely the extent of the alterations made by the Masoretes.  Unquestionably, the Septuagint preserves the sense of the Ancient Hebrew text; however, being a translation, the Septuagint cannot be used to effect a precise, word‑for‑word reconstruction of the vanished Ancient Hebrew text.

The seeming complete disappearance of Ancient Hebrew manuscripts of Scripture raises the question of whether the Jew; ever engaged in attempts to subvert and overthrow Christianity, made a deliberate and determined effort to destroy all Ancient Hebrew manuscripts.

… it appears that the Masoretes made substantial alterations in the Ancient Hebrew text, as well as omitting material which legitimately is part of the canon of Scripture… The Masoretic Text appears not merely to have been corrupted, but to have been purposely corrupted, as an attack upon the Christian faith… With the aid of the LXX, we may expect at long last to penetrate to the heart of matters which, by their very nature, cannot be resolved through study of the Masoretic Text.  Of such matters, one of considerable importance is that of ascertaining the categories of "stranger" (i.e., non‑Israelite) which are to be tolerated within the land of Israel, and the categories which are to be evicted. The Masoretes themselves being largely (if not entirely) strangers, it behooves the Christian to view with the greatest of skepticism any conclusions regarding the stranger based upon study of the Masoretic Text.

It may be impossible to establish with precision the epoch at which the Church first came into possession of the Masoretic Text.  However, in all probability, this did not occur until the 15th century, when the entire Masoretic Text first became available in printed form, being published in 1488 A.D., by Jews in Soncino, Italy.  Indeed, the argument that the Church adopted the Masoretic Text prior to its publication in the 15th century appears untenable.  One is forced to the conclusion that, until the advent of the printing press, the services of the Masorete were indispensable to preservation of the Masoretic Text.  In view of these facts, it seems evident that, prior to the era of mechanized printing, the Church could not possibly have used and preserved the Masoretic Text.

Undoubtedly, the "official" reason for the transition from the Septuagint to the Masoretic Text was a return to the "authentic" and "original" Hebrew manuscripts of Scripture. However, it appears more likely that the transition came about as a consequence of Talmudic influence within the realm of Roman catholicism (the Protestant Reformation did not occur until the 16th century).  Neither can one rule out the possibility of bribery, threats, or blackmail, for much was at stake.  Of course, the switch of canon meant that the Jew had to be brought in to provide instruction in the Hebrew language, for, as previously noted, there were no known surviving Ancient Hebrew manuscripts to motivate study of the language.

Thus did the Jew gain privileged access into the very heart of Christendom, from which realm he had so long by the providence of God been excluded. Through embrace of the Masoretic Text, the Church ensured the Jew a permanent role in Christendom, namely, that of ultimate authority regarding the Masoretic Hebrew language, and final arbiter regarding interpretation of the Masoretic Text.”

I hope through the above expose’ that the chicanery and contempt of jewry towards the foundations of Christianity can be seen as the most egregious assault against our faith and race that one can imagine.  As they say, ‘you can’t make this stuff up.’  The gravity of this spiritual warfare should not discourage the believer nor dissuade those who have not yet stepped into the Light.  There are still a number of things that can give us hope for discerning the inspired Word of God as opposed to the machinations of the wicked.  If we put the chronology of history in perspective, we can see the hand of God in everything.    During the thousand years the jews tried to delay their inevitable demise, they invariably made more and more mistakes, not able to recount one generation’s lies from the next and have left a trail of word corruptions, having no similitude of real Hebrew.  An honest concern is, if all that I’ve related (which is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg) is true, can we ever find the Truth when we’ve been so overwhelmed with lies?  Yes, the Bible says, “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened” Mt. 7:7-8. Pray before reading any Bible.

We have a far greater advantage than those who had hand-copied Bibles before the Guttenberg Press; than Erasmus and the politics of the Textus Receptus, who either included or left out readings from older manuscripts that either coincided with his own personal theology or the dictates of the RCC; than the politics that influenced the translation of King James Version, another “official” government Bible with its fledgling Anglican Church.  Those and a dozen other circumstances did not make it as possible as it is today to ascertain the inspired intent of the New Testament or the Septuagint.  This is because of the incredible number of manuscripts and different witnesses that have been discovered in recent times, approximately 5600.  I don’t think most Christians appreciate the magnitude of how God has preserved His Word in spite of the incessant adversaries who toil in treachery to usurp every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. A lukewarm Christian does not know how to reconcile diverse translations and interpretation, but a zealot will “Search the Scriptures” (John 5:39) when there is a seeming contradiction by the Law of two witnesses to establish the matter (Mt. 18:16).   

What is the best Christian Identity Bible?  It’s a stack of books; it’s file cabinets full of articles, newsletters, pamphlets and more books.  I don’t think it’s a healthy attitude to cling to one Bible as the inerrant Word of God as it is incumbent upon the Christian to consider the source from whence things come.  I Thes. 5:21 says, “Prove all things” (KJV); while other versions say, “Examine things carefully.”  We have an obligation to investigate and scrutinize all available material.  That means that although there are errors in any given Bible, there are also treasures to be mined and processed.  I have at least half a dozen Bibles in my library, but you may be surprised to know that the most used one is what I call the Duct Tape version of the Scofield King James (a product of the Masoretic text), because it’s the first one I bought and the binding has fallen apart so many times that it has layers of glue and tape.  In order to know what makes millions of Christians tick with this particular version, with thousands of errors and atrocious margin notes, I want to know where the Word has been adulterated and what the real inspired intent actually was.  I can do that in a comparative strategy with other versions and with the help of concordances, dictionaries and lexicons. 

A good starting point for the beginner is the KJV of 1611 (although it certainly is not the only Bible which we should inspect) of which you can buy an updated rendition without the Old English of “thee” and “thou” called the ‘American KJV.’  Along with this Bible comes Strong’s Concordance, a dictionary for every Hebrew and Greek word in it; however, the Hebrew letters are not the ancient variety, but the invented alphabet of the Masorete jews; there is no connection to the language of ancient Israelites and the hybrid Yiddish language of jews.  A more advanced helper is the Liddle and Scott Greek-English Lexicon.  You should read the Bible from beginning to end, from Genesis to Revelation, even if you don’t understand a lot of it.  However, there will be some verses that pop out with unmistakable clarity.  This is the Lord’s doing, giving what you need.  Babies are given “milk of the Word”; advanced students are given “strong meat.”  It is imperative that you have the key to unlock a lot of passages that otherwise cannot be understood; that key is Christian Identity; the people of the book, or race if you will, are White, not jews.  “This is the book of the generations of Adam” Gen. 5:1.  I have other Bibles that are also derived from the Masoretic text, which God, not the translators, have enlightened us in better understanding specific passages despite the Masoretes.  After all, they had to remain somewhat true to the canon or their translation would have been quickly discredited.  We have to be wise as a serpent to know when we’re being lied to and when the truth gets through.  We can do that with textual criticism on a comparative system of study.  Some Bibles have the unmatchable prose and cadence of literary music to the ears, while others maintain a high standard of formal academic training.  God inspires both, just as He motivated the Gospel writers.

The so called Companion Bible is basically the KJV, but is known for its commentaries.  It should be called the ‘Proceed With Caution Bible’ because its notes are based heavily on the comments of Masoretic jews, disguised as Christian rhetoric.  The Geneva Bible of 1560, on the other hand, became popular because of its margin notes concerning government and was highly esteemed by the American colonists; it was the first edition divided into verses (which were developed by Robertus Stephanus in 1551).  Chapters were introduced to the Bible in 1238 by Cardinal Hugo Caro.  I also have the New American Standard Bible (NASB), which attempts to update grammar and terminology in contemporary English.  The New International Version was finished in 1978 by a committee of jews, catholics and Protestants; need I say more? 

A favorite among Identity Christians is the Ferrar Fenton Bible, first published in 1903, who was an advocate of British Israelism and dedicated his work to “all those nations who have sprung from the race of the British Isles.”  Although sourcing from the Masoretic, Fenton accurately incorporated the word ‘race’ when it was properly required in the translation.  The most popular Septuagint is the Breton LXX, offering two columns on each page with English and Greek.  Although it is commonly available, its integrity is found wanting by selectively omitting racial connotations.  Luckily, those proficient in Greek will be able to detect where Breton has gone astray.  In our movement, we are fortunate to have such an expert in the ancient Greek language.  William Finck has translated the New Testament in the Christogenea NT without any dependence upon Masoretic sources.  In his Introduction he states, “My sole purpose for publishing of these translations is solely that the Christian Israel Identity community may have a scholarly translation to refer to that is free of the universalist interpretations and innovations which are found in nearly all other translations of the New Testament.” 

Although this is the sad reality of most Bibles being influenced by anti-Christian jews, it does not dispel the reality of the inspired Word of God reserved exclusively for the White race.  James, the stepbrother of Jesus, greeted no one other than the “twelve tribes scattered abroad” and then gave us the most positive exhortation to “count it all joy.”  The state of affairs in the world could be depressing if it were not for the promises made to Israel (Romans 9:4).  If we observe the rules of interpretation, the inspired Word will grant unto us the inspiration to complete our mission on earth to glorify our Creator and be “thoroughly furnished unto all good works” II Tim. 3:16-17.  Our main premise is that all books of the NT are considered divinely inspired and were written before 70AD and that no two passages can be contradictory.  The apostate church has with its thousands of denominations, denied the unity of I Cor. 1:10, “that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind.”  They have incorrectly interpreted Scripture, pandering to jews.  The OT cannot contradict the NT or vice versa.   The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed, the New Testament is the Old Testament revealedScripture is not the KJV or any other translation.  It is the manuscript evidence that establishes Scripture by Christian scholars.  The earlier the manuscript, the more reliable it is.  In some cases, interpolations (additions) appear which simply did not exist in earlier manuscripts.  To sort out these variations, we have to date the preponderance of witnesses.  This is the art of textual criticism. 

A few weeks ago (2-14-14) a stupid Kentucky preacher died, but would be alive today if he knew the difference between being wise as a serpent and knowing that Mark 16:9-20 is an interpolation and therefore there is no biblical permission for handling serpents.  If there’s any serpents to be handled it’s the jew, not rattlesnakes.  Another key is to know who the jew really is in Scripture as there are numerous appellations.  We started this series with II Tim. 3:16 that every Scripture is God-breathed or inspired and II Peter 1:20-21 saying that every prophecy, which is not necessarily future predictions, but an intelligible message of God, did not come into being on its own, for the teaching lesson was not carried by the will of man, but rather having been carried along by the Holy Spirit.  God speaks through White men.  Nowhere does the Word say we are perfect, but it encourages us to strive for perfection.  Scripture is a record of inspired men and there is only one race who received the breath of life from God.  Whenever there’s a variation of words used in different texts, the important thing is the meaning of what is expressed.  Mistakes have been made and they must be corrected.  Apathy will leave us with a meaningless direction.  Our people have been lost spiritually for a long time, but that will all change when the Lord’s sheep enter the narrow gate of hearing His inspired Word.  Then we will be on the right Way.  May you find it now. 

The Reason for Miracles

by Pastor Mark Downey

January 5, 2014

Scripture Reading: Luke 4:14-24

When Jesus began His ministry, at the age of 30, after 40 days of fasting, He returned “to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about Him spread throughout the whole surrounding region.  And He began teaching in their assembly halls and was praised by all” Luke 4:14-16.  His popularity was spreading like wildfire, because they were excited about somebody fasting that long; surely there would be a significant revelation.  He went to His home town of Nazareth, which was similar to today’s White Nationalists (who give lip service to the Creator of our race, but do not serve Him), and had the expectation of a warlike Messiah delivering them from Rome.  Some of the locals remembered the birth of Christ as something scandalous; as Mary claimed to have been miraculously impregnated by the Holy Spirit. 

On one of these occasions where Jesus spoke to the assembled, we read the account in Luke 4 where He stood up to read from Isaiah 61:1-2, “The Spirit of the Lord is on Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor.  He has sent Me to proclaim freedom to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to set free the oppressed, To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.  He then rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down. And the eyes of everyone in the assembly were fixed on Him” Luke 4:16-20.  A miracle, to give sight to the blind, is it not?  Or hearing to the deaf?  But that’s not what they wanted to hear.  Although the clause “He hath sent Me to heal the brokenhearted” in Isaiah 61:1 is inspired, all of the Greek texts omit this passage in Luke (even though the KJV has added it).   

Christ was reading about Himself; He not only came to heal the blind, but to open the eyes of those who were spiritually blind as well.  God told Moses, Who has made man’s mouth? Who makes him mute, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the Lord” Ex. 4:11.  Israel has always had this blind side.  The prophet Isaiah wrote, “Who is blind, but My servant? or deaf, as My messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the Lord’s servant? You have seen many things, but you do not obey.  Though his ears are open, he does not listen” Is. 42:19.  What the residents of Nazareth wanted to hear is what Jesus omitted from reading in Isaiah.  He left out the part about “the day of vengeance of our God” (Is. 61:2).  This is connected to “proclaiming liberty to the captives”; not only those who still had the residue of Babylonian thinking in Judea, but the future Babylon of John’s Revelation; what we are living in now!  Our own Liberty Bell proclaims Leviticus 25:10.  The day of vengeance is a time when our Kinsman Redeemer, who is an “avenger of blood,” will come and remove the lawlessness from the land.  Which is why Paul gives us the advice to, “avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is Mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.  Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.  Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good” Romans 12:19-21. 

This, of course, is talking about our kindred, not the enemies of God like jews or racial aliens.  It gets a little complicated with tares and those who say they’re Israel, but are not.  I used to think that being nice to adversarial brethren would incinerate their mentality, but I discovered that in ancient times, coals were essential for cooking their food and sometimes it would go out; so the neighborly thing to do would be to give them some coals to restart it; they would carry things in ceramic pots on their head, hence heaping coals on his head.  I was not thinking as a Christian or as Christ, by having the wrong motive.  God’s wrath towards us is His remedial passion for correction, not anger or retaliation as man exhibits.  God’s idea of vengeance is to send the Holy Spirit in order to comfort us and He does that, strangely enough, with the baptism of fire.  “Whose fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly purge His floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with fire that is not extinguished” Mt. 3:12.  Our chaff, that is.  The wheat and the chaff are an analogy of righteousness and unrighteousness.  The parable of the wheat and the tares, on the other hand, is the difference between Israel and non-Israel; all of the noxious weeds will be gathered and burned in a furnace; “then shall the righteous shine forth” Mt. 13:43.  After 9/11 we saw all these bumper stickers that said, “God bless America.”  Really?  In order for God to bless us, He first has to do that by burning all the impurities from our body, mind and spirit.  Consequently, we have been under divine judgment for the last 12 years.

What a miracle it is to be baptized by the fire or judgment of God to consume all that is carnal in us.  Therefore, to “comfort all who mourn” (Isaiah 61:2) is to “bind up the brokenhearted.”  That is the great work of the Holy Spirit which Jesus sent after His ascension, sometimes known as ‘the Comforter.’  In fact, He said, “If I do not go away, the Comforter will not come to you” John 16:7.  During His mission on earth, He was preparing us for the second work as depicted (if you recall) in the 12th sign of the Zodiac, the Lion of Judah trodding under foot the serpent, the great adversary of our race.  The fearful think there is nothing to bring down Babylon, because their hearts fail them (Luke 21:26), but the miracle will be that it does fall and it will all the greater of a miracle for those who think it impossible.  The main work in the first advent of Christ was to open the blind eyes of our people in preparation for His second advent.  Therefore, do we believe that God will deliver the White race from the antichrists?  I do.

The mission of Jesus was prophesied in Isaiah 61:1-2, but interpreted Isaiah’s “to proclaim liberty to captives and freedom to prisoners,” to mean a “release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind.”  Blindness is likened to a prison.  Jesus saw us imprisoned in our hearts.  We are released from our captivity when we have eyes to see the truth.  Jesus had a shocker for the Nazarenes when He began to teach them about their own blindness and they didn’t like that one bit.  Just like today where people don’t want to know the error of their ways.  I sometimes have to laugh when I get irate emails from self-righteous judeos telling me I’m a racist and that I’m leading people away from Christ; not a single one of them has ever proven that racism is a sin let alone unbiblical.   The Good News of the Gospels was that He did not come to destroy all of the perceived enemies of the tribe of Judah or their plans to enslave anyone outside their land, including people who were of the same race as them.  Christ came to deliver all White people from the power of sin and the resulting beast systems of government.  “And Jesus said to them, "No doubt you will quote this proverb to Me, 'Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we heard was done at Capernaum, do here in your hometown as well'" Luke 4:23.  Evidently, somebody asked Jesus if He could do any miracles of healing, as He had done outside of Galilee, to prove His teachings.  But Jesus knew He would be rejected in His home town, not because of His growing reputation or notoriety, but because they could not accept the racial message that challenged their hyper-nationalism.  “But I have other sheep which were not from this fold; I must also bring them. They also will hear My voice, and the entire fold shall be one, and One Shepherd” John 10:16.

Conversely, today’s White Nationalism accepts just about any belief system except the one that will deliver them; to be “unequally yoked together” with pagans, cosmotheists, catholics and atheists.  More blindness that refuses a Kinsman Redeemer.  David Duke won’t advocate Christian Identity, because it interferes with his bottom line.  Ignorance is bliss.  Do you think this lends itself to a prolonged captivity in ZOG?  “Jesus said, ‘I assure you, no prophet is accepted in His own country” Luke 4:24.  The mission of the prophet was not only foretelling the future, but correcting the wrong ideas about God and His plan for the ages, that usually went against the local teachings of the priestcraft; today it is the state-sanctioned 501c3 religious establishment.   Christian Identity faces a similar dilemma bringing the racial message to a spiritually deaf and blind kin; we no longer predict the future, but we identify the nature and business of God.  When you think about turning the hearts of the fathers to the children and the hearts of the children to their fathers, it’s going to take a miracle.  If we do not seek that miracle, the Lord said He would, “Come and smite the earth with a curse” Malachi 4:6.  That’s the last sentence in the Old Testament.  A curse is something that is going in the opposite direction of a miracle.  If we are to reverse the current trend, what shall we do? 

The message of Christ was clear:  He saw all of His kinsmen as victims of injustice, laboring as slaves to a beast system.  It is our race that is in need of a Savior.  And then He proposed the dynamics of a simple promise: “The truth shall make you free” John 8:32.  This was also the dynamics of a simple miracle: that salvation is by Him alone.  Paul was afraid the Corinthians might be corrupted “just as the serpent deceived Eve by its subtlety, so that your minds also may be led astray from the simplicity that is in Christ” II Cor. 11:3.  Paul contemplated the possibility of future defections much like those who left Jesus, but for reasons of crafty wickedness from false prophets who would load up salvation with jewish fables and lies. 

Jesus was not merely a Messiah, but “the God of all the earth” (Isaiah 54:5).  The day of vengeance, then, was not fire coming down from heaven to destroy the Romans, but rather the baptism of fire to reconcile our sins and the injustice of the world.  The town folks got pretty riled up over that one.  “And they in the assembly hall had all become filled with anger hearing these things.  And rising up, they cast Him out of the city and brought Him unto a brow of the mountain upon which their city was built so as to throw Him down” Luke 4:28-29 CNT.  They came close to killing Him for blasphemy (allegedly), for identifying their problem that God’s Law was to be impartially applied to all White people, not just Nazarenes.  Jesus miraculously walked right through them escaping execution and never returned to Nazareth.  We can walk through the mob also.  Democracy was first called mobocracy i.e. rule of the mob.  The world is not safe from democracy.  We are not conformed to the world; we are transformed by renewing our mind to the miracles of Christ.

He moved to Capernaum where He was well received.  His ministry began at about the same time of John’s arrest.  Even though His 3 year ministry had not yet commenced prior to the arrest of John, saying, “Mine hour is not yet come” (John 2:4) on the occasion of being invited to the marriage at Cana, nevertheless performed His first miracle of turning water into wine (John 2:11).  If we reconstruct the time between His fast and the execution of John in April, then it’s likely that John was arrested right after the fast, but not before Cana.  Some speculate that the wedding was in December which would put John’s arrest around January or February.  We can glean from Luke that He was ministering in Galilee before teaching in Nazareth and had done some miracles.  Most likely the Nazarenes had heard about the miracle in Cana, so He may have been teaching right after the wedding.  But, He was restrained; for John was still preparing the way for Him; although prison prevented John from preaching the Kingdom; so Jesus picked up the slack and at about the same time started to gather His Disciples.  John was executed at the time of Passover, the same time that Jesus would be crucified three years later.  The Disciples buried John and reported his death to Christ.  “Now when Jesus heard it, He withdrew from there in a boat” (Mt. 14:13) crossing the Sea of Galilee.  A multitude of people followed Him and this is when the miracle event of feeding the 5000 with 5 barley loaves and 2 fish happened.  This dates the execution of John, who was the high priest in those days and marks the transition of Jesus, his nearest relative (cousin), to the office, which enabled Him to do the work of the high priest on the Cross, as well as establishing the new priestly order of Melchisedec, replacing the old Levitical order.  

Then Jesus went down to Capernaum, a city in Galilee, and began teaching the people on Sabbath days.  The people were amazed at His teachings because He spoke with authority” Luke 4:31-32.  He spoke with authority because He communicated with the power of the Spirit.  When He healed people and got rid of disease (the archaic expression was ‘casting out demons,’ because they had no medical terms in those days and sick people were thus labeled by superstitions), they were healed immediately.  It wasn’t like the modern junk theatrics of televangelists playing smoke and mirrors and being coached from behind the scenes.  “And amazement came upon them all, and they began talking with one another saying, "What is this message? For with authority and power He commands the unclean spirits and they come out" Luke 4:36.  They wanted to know what kind of doctrine attends such powerful miracles.  Well, Jesus received witness from heaven at His baptism, whereby “The Holy Spirit descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, You are My beloved Son; in you I am well pleased” Luke 3:22.  This must have sealed the deal for John the Baptist and others witnessing the spirit of purity and innocence as symbolized in the dove. “And the fame of Him went out into every place of the country round about” Luke 4:37. 

When Jesus healed Simon Peter’s mother-in-law, who was suffering from a terrible fever, He came to her bedside as a doctor might visit a patient and most translations say “He rebuked the fever, and it left her” Luke 4:39 KJV; other versions say He commanded, He ordered or He censored the fever, and she immediately got up perfectly restored to health.  Jesus had authority over sickness.  His miracles were the talk of the town; it was very exciting and the people wanted Him to stay, but Jesus withdrew, probably to pray and meditate upon the will of the Father and so He told the people that He had to move on to other cities to teach the Kingdom of God.  “After these things Jesus was walking in Galilee, for He was unwilling to walk in Judea because the Jews were seeking to kill Him” John 7:1.  As time passed, many became more hostile towards Him.  Maybe for the same reasons as the Nazarenes; they didn’t like the truth He was espousing.  Even His followers were falling by the wayside.  “Because of what Jesus said, many from among His disciples [students] quit following Him and no longer walked with Him” John 6:66.  I think that’s very similar to the parable of the sower; some of the seeds were devoured by fowls (i.e. the wicked), some fell on stony ground (i.e. hardened hearts), some fell among thorns and were choked (i.e. mongrelization or universalism); but some of the seed fell on fertile ground and became fruitful (i.e. our people being convicted of their sins and repenting and thus following Christ.  The 12 Disciples remained loyal; albeit one was to be a betrayer.  The unfruitful seed left Him because of His explanation about the miracle of feeding the 5000 in the last half of John 6.  Most people are unaware of miracles having meaning and being more than just supernatural acts, but acting as signs, giving us a spiritual and prophetic understanding of the nature of God and His plan for the ages.  Every miracle has an underlying lesson. 

Put yourself in that mountainous ‘desert place’ with 5000 other people being fed by way of miracle; it was not a catered event.  You’re seeing people healed of sickness.  As you’re chewing on this tasty fish sandwich, it is suggested that Jesus is the true bread from heaven (John 6:50) and that we were to eat His flesh and drink His blood (John 6:53-57).  Are you chewing on that one carnally or spiritually?  If you’re thinking with the carnal mind, you would completely miss the point in seeing that He was the Passover Lamb; you would not digest the Law in Exodus 12:8-11, in which Israel was to eat the lamb and leave nothing left over in the morning.  If you’re thinking spiritually and patiently, you would digest the marvelous sign as He was crucified as your Passover Lamb and you would accept the communion meal of the Last Supper.  The carnally minded refused or were unable to receive His teaching and was a sign of things to come.  The great whore of Babylon, the RCC, still doesn’t get it, turning the sacraments into a pious carnival of cannibalism.  “Jesus was aware that His disciples were grumbling about this, and asked them, Does this offend you?” John 6:61.  Paul suggests that they just couldn’t sink their teeth into the idea: “But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Judeans a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; but to those who are called, both Judeans and Greeks, The Messiah is the power of God and the wisdom of God” I Cor. 1:23-24. 

As we continue reading in Luke chapter 5, the story of His ministry unfolds with another miracle-sign.  Jesus gets into a boat, owned by Peter (who made his living as a fisherman) and pushes adrift from the shore and begins to preach to the crowd.  Peter no doubt was handling the oars to keep the boat steady and had a front row seat to hear the sermon.  Now Peter was one of those who thought Jesus should stay in Capernaum, being that he lived there and had to provide for his family.  After Jesus was finished with His message to the people on shore, He told Peter to head out for deeper waters to go fishing.  Peter was discouraged by the catch the previous night, but went ahead and dropped the nets as Jesus instructed.  “After the men had done this, they caught so many fish that the nets began to tear” Luke 5:6.  They had so much fish that the boats began to sink.  The catch was so abundant that Peter had enough money to go on the road with Jesus to Judea.  Peter received a sign from God, that whatever he was called to do, the Lord provides.  This miracle had far greater ramifications though. 

It was time for Jesus and His Disciples to launch the good news of the Kingdom in the deep waters of Judea.  They would be in water that was over their heads, but didn’t Jesus walk on water… Peter too, momentarily.  They would be in waters full of unclean Edomite dogfish and Pharisee sharks.  The Word of God itself is compared to water, which cleanses and gives life.  After the temple rituals were nailed to the Cross, they no longer baptized in water, but immersed themselves in the Gospels.  What better way to train the Disciples for their Great Commission to the lost sheep of the house of Israel than by miracles?  They would become fishers of men.  Their lifestyles were about to take a profound change.  The miracles confirmed their mission in life.  They had a whole new purpose in life.  “All things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to His purpose” Romans 8:28.  Fast forward 2000 years to the present and we see the signs of miracles as relevant as ever.  The revealed Word has a great impact on how we apply it to the Second Coming of Christ, dare I say it: in our own time as we live and breathe in this new year of our Lord 2014. 

There may be the uncertainties of life, but that’s why we have faith to intervene, to pray intercession and to fight the good fight of spiritual warfare.  Contend for the faith that was passed down to God’s holy nation; the faith of our fathers – from generation to generation.  “This is what the ancients were commended for” Heb. 11:2 NIV.  We devote our lives to God, but what does ‘devote’ mean?  The Hebrew word is chawram (haw-rahm; Strong’s #2763) and it’s not the easiest word to translate (having a double meaning), but it meant something like “set aside” or a “devoted thing” and it could also mean “a net.”  Now when Jesus gave the parable of the dragnet (in Mt. 13:47-48), they went fishing and kept the good fish and threw away the bad fish, which spoke of the wicked from the just.  Just what are we to “set aside” then? 

‘Chawram’ means to exterminate, to devote to destruction or set aside for destruction.  These were strong words commonly used to designate people and things set aside for a religious reason.  God ordered everything connected to the inhabitants of Canaan to be a divinely ordained destruction, because their contagious evil would corrupt His people Israel.  Babylon, the bane of Israel, is devoted to an ultimate annihilation (Jer. 51:8).  Wait a minute! If we devote our lives to God, what are we destroying?  We destroy “the old man” (Romans 6:6), our carnal nature, the flesh and we become good fish caught by fishers of men.  The reason for miracles is the assurance from God that the threat of destruction can be removed if we profess that Jesus Christ who came in the flesh is from God.  We then become fishers of men, separating the good from the bad.  And this is the progression of belief that will prepare the hearts of His people for life in the Kingdom.  Not just life in the flesh, but eternal life in glorified bodies; as Adam before the Fall, as Christ after the Resurrection. 

In Luke 5 the nets broke because they weren’t yet prepared for the future work, anymore than we would if we did not set aside this stupid wrestling match of flesh and blood between White Nationalists and Christian Identity (the two primary movements representing a concern for the survival of the White race), and commence to fighting spiritually the governments of man with the government of Christ.  After the Disciples completed their basic training, Jesus was raised from the dead and beckoned them to again cast their nets and they did and hauled in 153 big ones and the net was not broken.  They were ready to go out into the world and spread the Good News of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, giving the reason for miracles and performing miracles.  After the Lord had risen from the dead, He confronted Peter one last time, who Christ prophesied would deny Him three times, but now after dining with him asked if he loved the Lord; He asked Him three times and each time Peter said yes and three times the Lord said “Feed My sheep” John 21:15-17.  In other words, feed His covenant people Israel with the laws, statutes and judgments. 

Matthew Henry made this commentary: “Believers may be chastened of the Lord, but will not be condemned with the world.  By their union with Christ through faith, they are thus secured.  What is the principle of their walk; the flesh or the Spirit, the old or the new nature, corruption or grace?... And the law, besides outward duties, requires inward obedience… By the Spirit the law of love is written upon the heart, and though the righteousness of the law is not fulfilled by us, yet, blessed be God, it is fulfilled in us; there is that in all true believers, which answers the intention of the law.”  “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law” Galatians 5:22-23.  Are we prepared to do this work of the Holy Spirit?  Having the Spirit of Christ means having the readiness to repent and be like Christ. 

Jesus said, “He that believes in Me, the works that I do he shall do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father” John 14:12.  How many miracles will it take to lift the blindness from Israel?  How many thousands will we feed with crumbs?  How many will witness these miracles and still walk away from Christ?  What will happen to Obamacare when the blind see, the deaf hear, the mute speak in the name and authority of Jesus Christ; when the lame are healed immediately, not by the hucksters and schemers, but by the disciples of Christ?  Will they come to arrest us for curing victims of terminal cancer… of all the known diseases?  Jesus didn’t have to deal with Big Pharma.  Revelation 18:24, “For by thy sorceries [pharmaceuticals, drugs] were all nations deceived.”  It’s been said that reality is for people who can’t handle drugs.  Is it safe to say then that altered states of mind have a great deal of difficulty comprehending supernatural acts of God?  And that it’s in the best interest of the cartels to keep it that way?  Or verse 24 could also imply, as Marx put it, that ‘religion is the opiate of the masses.’  Wolves in sheep’s clothing pandering theological martinis. 

Bringing our race out of Mystery Babylon, the matrix of the world,  which is churchianity in part, is itself a miracle, considering the heavy mind control inflicted from cradle to grave.  The apostate churches breed contempt for the reasons miracles happen; the stage acts are only entertainment and artificial at best.  Real miracles still happen, but not like they’re going to be as we get closer to the second advent of Christ.  We will not only be fishers of men, but hunters.  We’ve heard of the former, but how many have heard of the latter?  It’s in Jeremiah 16:16, “Behold, I will send for many fishermen, says the Lord, and they shall catch them; and afterward will I send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the holes of the rocks.” Keeping in mind that ‘devotion’ has a double meaning in not only destroying our flesh, but destroying the purveyors of flesh also. 

In Christian Identity it’s not enough to simply throw out the line, hook and sinker and hope that you get a nibble.  We are compelled to hunt down the facts to “prove all things” (I Thes. 5:21).  Only hunters of our race have pursued archaeology to unearth ancient cities and artifacts to confirm the Word of God as true and faithful.  Hunters have to go the extra mile to find their prey.  Mystery Babylon does not make it easy to fish for Christian converts, let alone hunt.  Hunters are needed to track and discern the spirit of potential believers and to waste no bullets on frivolity.  It’s a very tall order indeed to bring White people back into a covenantal relationship with God, when so many are mongrelized with universalism.  The hunters will need supernatural bullets to bring down the high and mighty, to slay the modern Nimrods, who was himself known as ‘the mighty hunter.’  Christian Identity is the only missionary and therefore hunter to find every lost sheep of the White race and also the hunter who will find and uproot every tare of Edom.  If I could run a parallel to “ask and it shall be given,” it would be “hunt and it shall fall.” 

Finally, if I may close on another note from Matthew Henry commenting on Jer. 16:16, he said, “The restoration from the Babylonish captivity would be remembered in place of the deliverance from Egypt; it also typified spiritual redemption, and the future deliverance of the church from antichristian oppression. But none of the sins of sinners can be hidden from God, or shall be overlooked by him. He will find out and raise up instruments of his wrath, that shall destroy the Jews, by fraud like fishers, by force like hunters. The prophet, rejoicing at the hope of mercy to come, addressed the Lord as his strength and refuge. The deliverance out of captivity shall be a figure of the great salvation to be wrought by the Messiah. The nations have often known the power of Jehovah in his wrath; but they shall know him as the strength of his people, and their refuge in time of trouble.”  Our present day captivity is so deeply entrenched in the same kind of depravities as ancient Babylon (probably more so), that we need a miracle as great as the fire and brimstone at Sodom and Gomorrah.  I saw a social commentary the other day that had a picture of two people.  On the left was Paris Hilton and it said: talentless celebrity, has a net worth of $100 million dollars.  And on the right was Nicola Tesla and it said: one of the most important inventors in history, died impoverished and in debt.  The caption below said: because capitalism makes sure only the best and the brightest become rich and successful.  Aint that the ugly truth? 

Well, only miracles come from God and the rich are not high on His list for what constitutes success.  From the subtle Disney refrain, “Fairy tales can come true, it can happen to you, if you’re young at heart,” we see unquestionably the largest media-entertainment conglomerate in the world.  Their CEO’s must believe it.  Some people call the Bible a fairy tale and accuse Jesus Christ of being a myth.  However, seeing is believing for most people who have no faith, and require temporal evidence that God exists.  It’s easy for me to say God exists, because I’ve seen miracles.  In fact, I’ve seen thousands of things that witness to God’s handiwork and it touches my heart.  Behind each and every one of them is a reason.  Miracles are not benign accidents or just being lucky.  By the same token, the lack of miracles, the supernatural unfulfilled in some people’s opinion, is not without reason either.  I believe that we are on the precipice of great and momentous events, which some misconstrue as doom and gloom; and it may be for the merchants of the earth where weeping and wailing await them.  But, things will get very dark for the faithless, and things will get much brighter for the children of Light.  The largest miracle you can imagine is coming and it’s called the Second Coming.  That message should leave every Christian on a positive note.  The reason is because He loves you. 

Who Am I?

by Pastor Mark Downey

March 16, 2014

Scripture Reading: Matthew 16:13-17

A patient is in a hospital bed coming out of a coma from a head injury; as his vision begins to focus, seeing doctors and nurses he says, “Who am I?”  As soon as I decided on this sermon title, I read a description of a movie in the TV guide that said, “An amnesiac struggles to remember who he is while getting experimental therapy at a facility for the terminally ill.”  This is a fascinating question, because there are so many answers.  One could say their name, their religious affiliation, their nation of birth etc.  We very rarely bump into other Identity Christians, but it happened to me once when I walked into a little T-shirt shop and the proprietor asked me, “Do you know who you are?”  And I said without hesitation, “I’m an Israelite” and he just about fell off his chair.  Nobody identifies themselves racially these days, because it’s not politically correct.  In fact, to announce yourself as a Christian Israelite, hardly anybody would know what you’re talking about.  And if you don’t eat pork, surely you’re some sort of converted jew.  Oh, if our people only knew who we really are.  Our race has sustained a traumatic head injury and collectively we suffer from spiritual amnesia.  Thousands of denominations experiment on your mortal soul; their dead churches even plaster the words ‘life’ and ‘living’ on the front edifice.  But, it is our faith that restores the focus to clearly remember who we are while we’re alive.  We are “the children of God” who hath been quickened, becoming the mature “sons of God” and “heirs of the promise.” 

You might be wondering what inspired me to write about this subject, which we are yet to dive into.  I got the latest ‘The Living Way’ (3-4-14) newsletter from my friend Mary in Maine and she said, “Spring is coming, and it is historically the time of resurrection, so let your new life begin!  Celebrate the season by renewing your health the natural way.  Take advantage of the goodness of the land by eating living foods every day!  Prove to the world that there is a way to live without sickness, pain and disease.”   The common cliché is: you are what you eat; I’ve adjusted the perspective on that in another message called ‘You Eat What You Are.’  In other words, our identity is not necessarily predicated on what we eat, although that certainly helps, but because of who we are, we are careful as to what we put into the temple of God.  Just before Mary’s passion for the vegan lifestyle was a link, a living inspirational link that said, “Who am I?”  So I clicked on it and went to a YouTube and it was a song with lyrics (written by Rusty Goodman), which I’d like to share with you now.  It went like this:

When I think of how He came so far from glory
Came to dwell among the lowly such as I
To suffer shame and such disgrace
On Mount Calvary take my place
Then I ask myself this question
Who am I?

Who am I that The King would bleed and die for
Who am I that He would pray not my will, Thy Lord
The answer I may never know
Why He ever loved me so
But to that old rugged cross He'd go
For who am I?

When I'm reminded of His words
I'll leave Him never
If you'll be true I'll give to you life forever
Oh I wonder what I could have done
To deserve God's only Son
To fight my battles until they're won
For who am I?

Who am I that The King would bleed and die for
Who am I that He would pray not my will, Thy Lord
The answer I may never know
Why He ever loved me so
But to that old rugged cross He'd go
For who am I?
But to an old rugged cross He'd go for, who am I?

Every White Christian American and Israelites spread among the nations should ask themselves, Who Am I?“who am I?” because there is a move afoot and has been for some time to not only steal our identity, but to destroy us once and for all.  Jesse Jackson made a career out of the afrocentric jingoism of “I am somebody,” which gave rise and impetus to the next generation of black hip hop and rap music, making street thugs and violent nobody’s into somebody of importance, overnight millionaires and flunkies in positions of power; a hyper Affirmative Action that takes revenge and jealousy to stratospheric levels of depravity and corruption.  Eric Holder and Barack Obama are perfect examples of giving more value to someone who falls light-years short of their abilities.  They are neither ‘the sons of liberty’ nor the ‘sons of God.’  To them, the concept of liberty is taking the liberties of a flash mob and looting and terrorizing whoever gets in their way.  That’s who they are.  They are the primitive herd mentality of lawlessness that is more adept to the laws of the jungle, than the Divine Law.  The Law of God was never given to nor intended for the savage beasts; God does not deal with other races and they don’t know any other law than their own primitive traditions (Ps. 147:19-20). 

And if they so happen to live in our society, their legal plunder will resonate with an integrated brainwashed society; their gods of self indulgence and loud noise will be a snare to White children to learn the ways of the heathen.  Who am I to declare the mongrel being an inferior creature?  I’ll answer that with another question from Psalms 2:1, “Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing?”  In other words, other races, having a form of lawlessness in their blood, riot and go wild when White people foolishly think the mongrel can answer the question “who am I?” in the same circumspect manner that we do.  I say we know who we are.  We sure aren’t the ones who are living luxuriously in a systematic universalism, rewarding parasites that permeate the fabric of society like an indelible stain.  The Bible calls the mongrel by many lowly appellations, to wit: locust, caterpillar, gnawing and swarming worms, dogs, swine, goats, snakes etc.  I didn’t write it, but I know I’m not one of them and they’re not one of us.  I know that if our nation-race forsakes the Divine Law, these two-legged bipeds become an occupational army; they are, in essence, God’s rod of correction.    

Who am I?  I am ashamed and also proud of my race.  I am sad and also happy for what we have done.  A am anxious and also patient for what we will do to make things right.  “Then the Lord became jealous for His land and spared His people.  Yes, the Lord will answer and say to His people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and you shall be satisfied… and I will no more make you a disgrace among the heathen… And you sons of Zion, rejoice and be glad in the Lord your God, For He hath given to you the Teacher for righteousness… The Lord says, I will give you back what you lost to the swarming locusts, the hopping locusts, the stripping locusts, and the cutting locusts. It was I who sent this great destroying army against you.  Once again you will have all the food you want, and you will praise the Lord your God, who does these miracles for you. Never again will My people be ashamed” Joel 2:18-19, 23, 25-27. 

Who am I?  I am not God, but I am of the Great I am.  We can distinguish the creature from the Creator when the latter declares “who I am,” in contrast to “who am I.”  We ask the question, and God is the answer.  Probably the most revealing thing about God in the entire Bible and about us is found in Exodus 3:13-14, “And Moses said to God, Behold, when I come to the children of Israel, and shall say to them, The God of your fathers hath sent me to you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? What shall I say to them? And God said to Moses, I AM THAT I AM: And he said, Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me to you.”  God doesn’t have to ask Himself, “Who am I?” but rather tells us, “This is who I am.”  In my humble opinion, I think it is rather absurd and limiting to pigeonhole God with a name as if He were a man.  “I AM” is telling us that He is self-existent, unchangeable and incomprehensible.  We will not comprehend God by arbitrarily attaching a proper noun to “I AM.”  Who am I?  I’m Mark Downey.  Who is God?  He’s the Great I AM.  Are we going to know God better if we arbitrarily name Him like we name ourselves?  Or do our little brains accept the fundamental message of God describing Himself in a simple yet dynamic economy of words?  What is more sacred: the ritual of so called “name” repetition or acknowledging the reality of His Divine Character?  Speaking with our mouths or reverencing with our minds?  Who am I to name God when He told Moses it’s “I AM.” 

The next important thing to understand is that our race has a special relationship with God and this helps us know who we are when we look up at the night sky and ask ourselves, “who am I in this grand cosmos?”  We are told that we are made in His image (Gen. 1:26).  We were not made as a replica or clone of God, but in His likeness.  Adam was immortal, but lost that likeness of eternity.  But through the resurrection of the dead, we will once again inherit immortality.  The Word of God spoken to Moses was made flesh.  Jesus Christ is the incarnation of the Great I AM.  In the Gospel of John, Jesus proclaims Himself to be the Great I AM seven times (4:26; 6:20; 8:24, 28, 58; 13:19; 18:5).  The context of each citation is reinforcing the deity of the Messiah.  He said in John 8:58, “Before Abraham was born, I am.”  And the jews knew exactly what He meant and picked up stones to kill Him.  Likewise, the enemies of God are intent to kill His followers as well, being that we are like Him.

The word "image" in Gen. 1:26-27 is the Hebrew word tselem #6754 and means 'to shade', as being a resemblance; hence a representative figure; often used to mean similar, as in the phrase 'shades of the past'.  Adam was the shades of God, in other words, resembling God's image and having the moral dispositions of God by His Spirit that He placed in Adam.  Adam was of the White race because God's color scheme in Scripture portrays godly things only as white or light, never dark or colored

Some have claimed that Genesis 1:27 refers to the creation of the other races, however Genesis 5 is a parallel account and clearly refers only to Adam.  The good intentions of pious churchianity is bankrupt in understanding the Bible as a racial book written in regards to one race only.  The other races or sub-species are so insignificant that they are not worth mentioning, albeit the caveat to avoid them.  A Ford owner's manual does not discuss Chevrolets.  God has decided the exclusions and people have no say in the matter. "This is the book of the generations of Adam" Gen. 5:1.  Paul explains in Romans 8:29 "For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren" and tells us in the next chapter, Romans 9:3, who his brethren are "my kinsmen according to the flesh: v4 who are Israelites." The theme of a pure racial lineage runs throughout Old and New Testaments so that the identity of the recipients of God’s Word is not lost.  However, Israel lost their identity and didn’t know who they were.  Christ knew who the lost sheep of the house of Israel were and that’s who He came for (Mt. 15:24).  Wolves in sheep’s clothing, on the other hand, will say something quite different and identify modern Israel as either jews or anybody who believes, both of which robs the White race of their divine destiny and distorts God’s will.   The point is that Christ did not fail and that it is still possible for the lost to be found. 

Christian Identity understands Christ as our Kinsman Redeemer; our brethren who reject this are unbelievers.  When the Lord walked the earth, He asked His followers if they knew who He was, which goes directly to the heart of today’s message.  “Who do men say I the Son of Man am?”  It was time to announce to His followers in plain terms His claim to be the Messiah: He would not do this in Judea, where it might cause commotion, and embroil Him with the authorities, but preferred to teach this great truth where He might speak freely without fear of immediate consequences, out of the reach of His persistent adversaries.  His public work in Judea and Galilee had reached its end.  He had no chance of a hearing if He had made further attempts at teaching.  The calumnies of the rabbis had affected the fickle populace, who would willingly have followed a military pretender, but had no heart to follow One whom they were persuaded to regard as a dangerous innovator. 

Determined to reveal Himself for such a momentous occasion, He first wanted them to express the mistaken views and scuttlebutt that permeated the region, and then elicit their personal testimony to His straightforward question, ‘who am I?’  Thereupon hung the foundation of the Christian Church.  Their knowledge of the real nature of Jesus was now being tested.  They knew He was more than a man; nor was His appearance an embarrassment to them; they had believed in Him, became His disciples, and were followers of Him; but it was not enough to believe in Him, they must confess Him; both are necessary.  Therefore, He does not say, who believes your report, but rather who do you say that I am?  You who have been with Me so long from the beginning; you who have heard so many discourses from Me, and have seen so many miracles wrought by Me; and who are to be the teachers of others, to preach My Gospel, and publish My salvation.  It was expected of them, that they should know more about Christ than others; and should come to a point of understanding His person and office, and be ready to make a confession of their faith, and give a reason of their hope in Him; and especially such who were to be preachers of Christ to others.  They were so well acquainted with Him, as to who and what He is, that they should have no doubt in their minds, ready to declare what they knew and believed of Him with all confidence.  Just as we should today, because we can be like Him. 

I can imagine Christ thinking, ‘after three years and all the fruits of My labor, they think I’m John the Baptist, Elijah, Jeremiah… what made these idiots believe in reincarnation?’  We should not tolerate any religion that does not make us fruitful.  In Christianity we have the fruits of the Holy Spirit.  A week before the crucifixion, Jesus was walking along and hungered and saw a fig tree to pick some fruit, but as He got closer the tree was barren and so he cursed that fig tree and it withered.  The fig tree represented Israel and more specifically to this parable, the good and evil figs of the tribe of Judah.  In Christian Identity we know exactly who the evil figs represented then and now.  His curse was a symbol of divine judgment against those who would kill Him; it represented the jews in the temple who had made God’s Word of none effect by their traditions.  Today, it’s people who profess to be Christian, but spiritually barren because they embrace the lies of the jew more than Christ; they are the whited sepulcher of judeo-Christianity, the bastard reincarnation of judaism. 

The fruit of being a Christian is the expression of Jesus Christ.  Who am I? I’m an Israelite that Who Am I in Christ?confesses Christ, the Anointed Son of the living God; the substance and incarnation of the Everlasting I AM; the perfect God and the perfect man.  The only begotten of the Father, of the same nature with Him, being one with Him, and equal to Him.  No flesh and blood mortal can reveal who the deity of Christ was and is nor can any man tell me who I am, because it comes from God.  Jesus said, “I AM the way, the truth and the life” John 14:6.  He also said, “A thief comes only to steal and to kill and to destroy. I have come so that they may have life and have it in abundance” John 10:10.  Who am I?   I am abundantly full of life by the grace of God.  It’s disconcerting that so many of our people today not only cannot answer who they are correctly, but don’t care.  “A natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him and he is not able to know, because they are spiritually discerned” I Cor. 2:14.  A “natural man” is also translated as “unbeliever,” “a selfish man,” “unspiritual” and “sensual.”  If we are but mere animals with five senses, it is impossible to perceive that God has some truth for you, to teach you something more than mere survival, to accept a higher power than yourself.  If we were created by God in His likeness for a special purpose, we then have an innate supernatural property that all other life forms do not have.  This is Spirit.  "God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth."  Only the spirit of man can commune with the Spirit of spirits. 

Our supremacy and status upon the earth (to put it in the enemy’s vernacular: White Supremacist) is nothing to boast about, because it is not of our own making, it’s of God.  If anything, the idea of an elevated race above all the people of the earth (Deut. 7:6) should be a humbling attitude to serve the One who had planned it this way all along.  Who am I to shirk and cower from a divine duty?  Everything is perfectly on time as scheduled, because God is the Master of time.  He alone knows the beginning from the end.  I would love nothing more than if our prayers anointed with oil were answered expeditiously, but I’m not in charge of timing.  Here’s a promise for you: “I tell you a truth, he who believes in Me [Christ], the works that I do, he will do also.  [it doesn’t stop there, it gets better] And he will do even greater works than these, because I go to the Father” John 14:12.  This is something that has yet to materialize and it may have to do with a spark that ignites the answer to ‘who am I?’ 

Who am I that the King of kings would bleed and die for me?  Put into perspective, isn’t it a small matter “When men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for My sake” Mt. 5:11.  It’s prefaced with “blessed are ye.”  It’s not easy being Christian Identity.  In my prison ministry, the brethren tell me that their Bibles are sometimes lost accidently on purpose when in transit or simply denied.  They can’t have hard bound Bibles because it can be used as a weapon… allegedly.  My innocentt- pamphlets have been deemed by some mailroom clerks to be so dangerous that it might cause violence, while jewish, Satanist, voodoo and Islamic jihad materials get a free pass.  But, there’s one thing that they can’t take away from any of us and that’s the blood of the Lamb, our Passover sacrifice.  And if we go beyond our five senses (our sense of spirit), we can tap into that supernatural healing.  Our race has exclusive rights to the New Covenant, whereby the Law is written in our heart and mind.  What does that mean?  It means we are a vessel of honor, thee vessels of honor.  It means we are babes in the loving hands of our Father given the provisions of His Spirit to do His will.  What an amazing grace for such spoiled brats and ingrates. 

The precursor to Christian Identity was British Israelism and one of their teachings was that America was represented by the tribe of Manasseh, which ironically means ‘forgetful.’  We should be called the United States of Amnesia, as we are treated like lab rats by our captors and every precaution is taken to maintain the illusion of those who say they are Israel, but are the synagogue of satan.  Likewise, we live in a multicultural country, because we are no longer a nation-race, where social engineers inculcate a death wish in a non-stop culture war.  Who are we?  We are dumb and blind.  I attended a symposium in which the speakers were warning the audience about radical White groups.  During the Q&A we made our presence known that we were White and radical.  Afterwards, this big black buck comes up to me and asks, “Are you a White Supremacist?”  And I said, “Yes, we are supremely stupid for losing our Beulah Land.”  He seemed a bit stunned and just walked away.  I don’t think our people are stupid, but I think they’ve been stupefied.   What do you expect when our water is fluoridated, our air is chem-trailed, and our food is Frankensteined?  The schools, media and churches work in concert to opiate the White race, to experiment with our progeny and to marginalize life and death itself without God.  Jewish communism didn’t work too well in the old Soviet Union and one can almost see Russia today being more Christian than America.  That’s because The Bolshevik Revolution was financed by jews right here in America and the closest they came to being exposed was with Joe McCarthy… over 60 years ago!  Esau-Edom is still here like maggots on a skeleton.  Who are we?  We’re the dry bones of Israel.  Jacob is going through a time of trouble as never before. 

It’s hard to keep up with the daily wars and rumors of war.  We’ve settled in our Beulah Land where we can move no more (II Sam. 7:10), but that doesn’t seem to prevent others from moving in on us.  And there shall be enmity between us and them (Gen. 3:15).  “For I would not, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in” Romans 11:25.  You and I know that the KJV continues to keep people ignorant of what this verse is really saying.  The mystery is the racial identity of who we are, because we’re both Israel and the “Gentiles” (which just means nations, not non-jews).  The mystery of the gentiles (in this verse) begs the question: which nations?  It’s the nations of non-Israelites or non-Whites, again not non-jews, because jews may look White, but they are mongrels and they’re behind the alien invasion of America.  Our people cannot see this prophecy, because they don’t know who they are.  However, the fulfillment is that the blindness will go into remission (along with our sins) when we are thoroughly overwhelmed by mongrelization.  The eye-opener, being ‘better late than never’, shows the love and mercy of the God of segregation.  Unfortunately, it has to get worse before it gets better to convince even the most hardened egalitarian heart, that only through divine intervention will we be released from the final captivity of Babylon.  To many it will seem impossible to reverse the insanity of racial reconciliation: the browning of America has won and the White race is doomed for extinction.  But hold on, right after verse 25 it says, “And so all [believers? no…] Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from [believers? no…] Jacob: For this is My covenant to them, when I shall take away their sins.”  And one of those sins was the “believer” who thought race mixing was Christian; who warred against God and their own people.   

You know, the Word of God is likened unto water and Ezekiel had this vision of our people being dry as a bone, the kind you see in a scorching dessert with not a strand of flesh, dehydrated to the marrow, not even a speck of meat left for bugs to pick at.  It’s really quite a graphic depiction of Israel in prophecy.  And the Lord said to him, “Can these bones live?  And I replied, O Lord only you know.  Again He said to me, Preach to these bones, and say to them, Dry bones listen to the message of the Living Life.  This is what the Mighty Lord proclaims to these bones, I will bring a wind [Spirit, breath, CPR] to you and you shall revive!  I will also put sinews [tendons] on you, and cause flesh [muscle] to cover you, and cover you with skin, and put breath into you, when you will revive, and learn that I AM the Life… So I proclaimed as He ordered me, and the wind came to them and they revived, and stood on their feet, a very, very great army!”    (Ezek. 37:3-7, 10 FF).  Do you think Yale’s ‘Skull & Bones’ Club would want any of that muscle?  No, they’re a death cult and their bonesmen, like crypto-jew John Kerry, go around making war and rumor of wars.  Be afraid, be very afraid of the darkness in high places?  No.  “Do not fear them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the life.  But rather fear the One who is able to destroy both the life and the body in Gehenna!” Mt. 10:28.  Who am I?  I’m a God fearing White man standing in the grace of God.  No human power can restore the bones of man, buried in the ground, to life.  God alone can cause a dead man’s bones to revitalize and become whole again.  If you’re despondent about all of the doom and gloom brought to you courtesy of media whores and pulpit pimps, then “look up, and lift up your heads; because your redemption draweth nigh” Luke 21:28.  This vision of Ezekiel was given to encourage us in the latter days, which predicts both the restoration after captivity/slavery to the final Babylon, and recovery from the Edomite occupation of our land.  It was also a clear intimation of the resurrection and conversion of the most hopeless sinners to Christ.  Let us look to Him who will at last open our graves, and bring us forth to judgment, that He may now deliver us from sin, and put his Spirit within us, and keep us by His power, through faith, unto salvation.  “For if we have hope in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most miserable” I Cor. 15:19.  Who am I?  I’m the recipient of and believer in the Word made flesh, who is my Kinsman Redeemer, who created Adam in His likeness and promises me and you eternal friendship.  

Jesus lives in us.  Time and time again Scriptures say, “I will be their God, and they will be My people.”  Who is He talking about?  Everybody upon the earth?  Jeremiah 31:1 says, “I will be the God of all the families of [the earth? no…] Israel, and they will be My people."  “What agreement does the temple of God have with idols?  For we are a temple of the Living God, as God has said, I will dwell in them, and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be My people.  Therefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you” II Cor. 6:16-17. This aint talking about pigs or dirty dishes, but rather race mixing.  The stranger and his strange gods have no place in Israel.  But, if you believe the mongrel is to be included in the Kingdom, you have not yet separated yourself from the unclean; you’re not a true believer. 

Who am I to think I’m sovereign; to think I can contradict Scripture and decide for myself what is right or wrong?  My life is not my own; I’d like to have a T-shirt that says: property of God. Property of God I don’t put unclean food into my body and I don’t allow unclean persons into our home.  Why?  It’s the Law.  “What? You don’t know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit which is in you, which you have from God and you are not your own?  For you have been bought with a price; therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's” I Cor. 6:19-20.  “You, however, are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, since the Spirit of God lives in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him” Romans 8:9.  That’s the difference between our race and all others.  “That which is born from flesh is flesh, and that which is born from The Spirit is spirit” John 3:6.  Only Adam was given the ‘breath of life’ otherwise known as the Spirit of God, meaning that we were not only born on earth, but begotten of God.  Our thoughts are affected by the world, but that is the object of our overcoming the flesh in the likeness of Christ.  Is it time for you to know who you are and walk into your destiny and to think and to live like “the royal priesthood,” “ambassadors of Christ,” “a chosen race,” and “God’s covenant people.” 

From the lyrics of today’s hymn we sang: “Once far from God and dead to sin, No light my heart could see, But in God’s Word the light I found, Now Christ liveth in me.”  The phrase “light of the world” is applied not only to Jesus Christ, but to Israel also.  The Lord said, “I am the light of the world: he that followeth Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life” John 8:12.  In Mt. 5:14, the Lord proclaims, “You are the light of the world” and in verse 16, “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.”  We Identity Christians have the key to unlock the renewing of our minds with a vast, untapped potential to advance the Kingdom with the gifts of our calling.  We are Christians who must detoxify from the sorceries of churchianity and be disciplined in the supernatural mind of Christ. 

It’s kind of a funny thing doing what I do: I have this compelling magnetism to impart something beyond my own wisdom, which automatically flows from my brain to you.  I don’t have voices in my head, but I hear a non-audible type of spiritual GPS that takes the lead, which I follow.  I have confidence that it is God who liveth in me.  The funny thing is that this Christian Identity Truth is milk and honey for some people, whereas with others it just does not compute.  “The wicked mock God and say, "Hurry up and do something! We want to see what you can do. And let the purpose of the Holy One of Israel draw near and come, that we may know it!" Isaiah 5:19.  They want the truth and they want it now.  A couple of weeks ago I was too busy to delve deep into my head to even ask “who am I?”  So how hard do you think it is to get into somebody else’s head?  We’re not anything special other than what God has specialized us in at any given moment.  I Peter 2:9 says we are a chosen race and a peculiar people; and the NIV goes so far as to say: “God's special possession, that you may declare the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His wonderful light.”  “For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith” Romans 12:3.  There’s a difference between messengers and a message.  We wouldn’t have Christianity today if it weren’t for the messengers willing to die for the message.  They cared about who we are.  Our adversaries substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. 

I used to watch this preacher on TV, Dr. Gene Scott, who taught a brand of Identity, but he was very charismatic (not Pentecostal, but personally) and very abrasive, sometimes smoking a cigar and yelling at the “dummies.”  He taught truth in a fascinating way and sometimes he would just stop and say, “Am I boring you?”  and a cadre of young men in his audience would chime back enthusiastically in unison, “No sir!”  Most of the time, the truth is not what people want to hear.  You won’t hear it in the judeo-Christian churches, because there’s no money in it and the preachers might have to find a real job.  They should be asking themselves, “who am I?”  “For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known” I Cor. 13:12. We see things imperfectly, like puzzling reflections in a mirror, but eventually we will see everything with perfect clarity. True Israel’s knowledge of itself is partially blind and incomplete.  Our people are processed like cattle through the filters of political correctness.  But our destiny is to be complete Christians, just as God knows us completely.  After all, He knows us better than we do. 

You want the truth?  You can handle the truth!  The truth will literally make you free; it will separate the wheat from the chaff, the dross from the gold.  It’s time to take the trash out.  Why is it that one of the hardest things for a White person to believe is that they are Israel and not the jews?  I don’t have an easy answer, but I think it has something to do with avoiding the question “who am I?”  If you love those who hate the Lord, then you don’t know yourself, and if you promote this misguided notion, you are the “blind leading the blind into a ditch.”  These same people accuse me of leading the flocks astray.  But, it’s just the same old garbage of cognitive dissonance where their beliefs are set in concrete.  Well, no matter how set in their beliefs, there’s a divine shakedown on the way.  When God spoke from Mount Sinai His voice shook the earth, but now He makes another promise: "Once again I will shake not only the earth but the heavens also" Heb. 12:26.  The ultimate reference is what is seen dimly afar off in so many of the prophetic visions i.e. the final dissolution of the whole present order of things, to be succeeded by the Kingdom of eternal righteousness.  It’s not talking about God’s abode in the heavens, but rather man’s elevated authority in law and government.  “This expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain” Heb. 12:27.  God is a racist.  I am a racist.  Let true Israel be warned of forgetting or denying or worse… hating the covenants of the Lord their God.  Who am I?  I am loved of Jesus Christ.  “We are more than conquerors through Him that loved us” Romans 8:37.

Sermons by Pastor Don Elmore 2013

The Curse of Canaan

by Pastor Don Elmore

January 20, 2013

Scripture Reading: Genesis 4:8-12

Cain was the first person born of Eve and the Bible says that he was cursed of GOD.  Eve, at first, had twin boys, Cain and Abel; two sons but each had different fathers. 

We just read of God’s punishment to Cain of his murder of his brother.  He was cursed; can’t farm so he has to be a fugitive and a vagabond.  So, the first two children born to Eve—one was cursed and the other was dead.  It wasn’t a very good start.

The Bible gives the partial genealogy of Cain in chapter 4:17-24 of the book of Genesis.  The son of Cain was Enoch; Enoch’s son was Irad; Irad’s son was Mehujael; Mehujael’s son was Methusael; and Methusael’s son was Lamech.  Lamech had two wives.  With his wife Adah his sons were Jabal and Jubal; with his other wife Zullah his son was Tubal-cain and his sister was Naamah.  Jabal lived in tents and had cattle.  Jubal was a musician:  a player of the harp and organ.  Tubal-cain was an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron; a metal smith.

None of Cain’s children were farmers; they had to invent other jobs for themselves.  They were dependent on others for their food.

In Genesis 4:25 it records that “…Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth:  For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.”  So, Adam and Eve had a replacement seed.

Lineage of Cain's Seedline
1. Cain
2. Enoch
3. Irad
4. Mehujael
5. Methusael


6. Lamech
< 2 wives >


Jubal   Naamah

Freemasonry traces its origins all the back to here.  Freemasons use the name of Tubal-cain as their secret password.  He is known as the father of witchcraft and sorcery, hence his importance to Freemasonry and their use of his name as their password. 

They also name their plan, “Plan Naamah” after Tubal-cain’s sister.  Plan Naamah is a documented plan for the systematic extermination of all the people of Shem in the United States.  Naamah was responsible for bringing human sacrifice and cannibalism into the world.

Manly P. Hall in his book, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, wrote on page 566: 

“A Masonic Constitution dated 1701 gives the following naïve account of the origin of the sciences, arts and crafts from which the major part of Masonic symbolism is derived: 

How this worthy Science was first begunne, I shall tell.  Before Noah’s Flood, there was a man called Lameck as it is written in the 4 Chap. of Gen.:  and this Lameck had two Wives.  The one was called Adah, and the other Zillah; by the first wife Adah he gott two Sons, the one called Jaball, and the other Juball, and by the other wife Zillah he got a Son and Daughter, and the four children found the beginning of all Crafts in the world.

This Jaball was the elder Son, and he found the Craft of Geometrie, and he parted flocks, as of Sheep and Lambs in the fields, and first wrought Houses of Stone and Tree, as it is noted in the  Chap. aforesaid, and his Brother Juball found the crafte of Musick, of Songs, Organs and Harp.

The Third Brother [Tubal-cain] found out Smith’s craft to work Iron and steel, and their sister Naamah found out the art of Weaving.

These children did know thatt God would take Vengeance for Sinne, either by fire or water, wherefor they wrote these Sciences which they had found in Two Pillars of stone, that they might be found after the Flood. 

The one stone was called Marbell—cannott burn with Fire, and the other was called Laturus [brass?], that cannot drown in the Water.  The author of this Constitution thereupon declares that one of these pillars was later discovered by Hermes, who communicated to mankind the secrets thereon inscribed.”

Hall finishes his chapter on Freemasonic Symbolism by stating the following on page 578: 

“In its symbolism, which and its spirit of brotherhood are its essence, Freemasonry is more ancient than any of the world’s living religions…Though Zoroaster, Hermes, Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle are now but dim memories is a world once rocked by the transcendency of their intellectual genius, still in the mystic temple of Freemasonry these god-men live again in their words and symbols; and the candidate, passing through the initiations, feels himself face-to-face with these illumined hierophants of days long past.”

Whoa!   Are there any descendants of Shem in the world today?  Are there any descendants of Cain in the world today?  The answer is yes!

The Bible very quickly takes us from the time of Cain to the time of Noah and the Flood.  People in this era (pre-flood) lived almost 1,000 years.  Noah, his three sons and wives, were the only ones descended from Adam that were perfect in their generations when the Flood began.  But shortly after the Flood this was to change suddenly.

Noah had three sons who were with him while he was on the ark:  Shem, Ham and Japheth.  In chapter 9 of Genesis, verses 18-27, it tells of an earth shattering situation.

One day, after the Flood, Noah got drunk from the grapes of the vineyard that he had planted.  Ham slept [sexually] with his mother and when Noah awoke from his drunkenness, he said:  “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.”  Canaan was one of the four sons of Ham.

Canaan was the result of this incestuous affair.  Canaan would marry into the cursed lineage of Cain.  Canaan was cursed with a charge that he would be a slave to his brethren:  Shem and Japheth.

I saw the movie, “Lincoln” Friday night and it disapproved of slavery; it took the side of the abolitionists.  Let me ask you a question:  Is slavery approved by God?  If not, how could Canaan be a slave to Shem and Japheth?  I think it is how and who is to be a slave and for how long.  Most of us are slaves today and don’t even know it. 

In Genesis 10:6-19 is the beginning of the genealogy of Ham.  He had four sons.

Ham's Lineage - 4 Sons and their sons





Countries settled: Babylon, Egypt, Ethiopia, Palestine, Assyria, Philistines, Shinar

Nimrod established a major part of the story of Freemasonry.  He was responsible for building the legendary Tower of Babel, in defiance of God’s will.  But it is the cursed Canaanites who hold secular humanism as one of their major foundational beliefs. 

In Genesis 38 we find that Judah, one of the sons of Israel, had 5 sons.  Three of his sons were with a Canaanite woman by the name of Shuah.  His other two children were (twins) by an Israelite woman who was his daughter-in-law.  Judah thought she was a prostitute; but she wasn’t, and he only had relations with her one time.   The woman, Tamar, tricked Judah into having relations with her and when she was brought to Judah for her punishment (unwed with children); Judah had to acknowledge that she was more righteous than him and let her go without any punishment.   (Additional reading on this subject:  Perception of Reality

Only one of Judah’s three bastard sons married a Canaanite woman; the other two died being childless.  Shuah’s relatives referred to Judah’s sons’ with Tamar as being bastards because they had been born out of wedlock; while the twins claimed to be the rightful heirs of Judah because they were of pure-blooded stock, the Adamite stain.  The twins were correct.

From the Shelanites (that is, the one son of Judah who married a Canaanite) descended thirty-one cursed tribes of Canaanites of Judea and Samaria, including the Sepharvaims, a name which the Canaanites had adopted for deceptive purposes.  All of these Canaanite grandchildren of Jacob were evil and bad. 

Esau married two daughters of Hittite [Canaanite] men.  This was a “grief of mind unto” his parents:  Isaac and Rebekah.  In Genesis 28 it says that when Esau saw that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father, that Esau married a daughter of Ishmael.  In Genesis 36:2 we find another wife for Esau:  the daughter of a Hivite (another Canaanite).

The Bible says that three of Esau’s children were of the evil seed of the cursed Canaanites.

In Genesis 46:10 it says that 1/7 of Simeon’s offspring were hybrid Canaanites:  “And the sons of Simeon; Jemuel, and Jamin, and Ohad, and Jachin, and Zohar, and Shaul the son of a Canaanitish woman.

Secular humanism is the bottom plank of the Freemasonic pyramid; with the top being the “All-seeing eye” of their god.  But they have also mysteriously hidden the Will of Canaan throughout all their teachings; until one gets to the highest degrees.  This remarkable document is found in only one place in all the world’s theological literature, the Babylonian Talmud; Pres. 113b.

There are five things that Canaan charged his sons; and they are listed in Canaan’s Will:

  • Love one another (Canaanites)
  • Love robbery
  • Love lewdness
  • Hate your masters (Shem and Japheth)
  • Do not speak the truth.

The Will of Canaan has been the Canaanites prescription for all of their operations during the ensuing three thousand years.  Meanwhile, the people of Shem, knowing nothing of this document, in the last three hundred years vainly tried to “convert” the cursed Canaanites, and turn them from their evil ways.  If the descendants of Shem had been warned of the percepts imparted by this document, the history of these last three hundred years (America’s history) could have been very different.    

The Will of Canaan today remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order.  At the same time, it remains unknown to the peoples whom the Canaanites continue to rob, enslave, and massacre.  The Will of Canaan contains the instructions necessary to resist the results of the curse of Canaan, which condemn them to slavery.  The instructions to "hate your masters," that is, Shem and Japheth and their descendants, is a commandment to commit genocide against the people of Shem.

For this reason, all subsequent Canaanite rites are based upon these exhortations to struggle and commit acts of violence against the people of Shem.  It is not only the basis for all of the revolutions and "liberation movements" since that time; it is also a basic incitement to commit genocide and to carry on racial wars.

Because of the three-thousand-year historical blackout, the people of Shem have never understood their peril, and they have frequently been subject to massacre because their essential goodness made it impossible for them to believe the vileness of the Canaanites.  The Will of Canaan has always been concealed from them because it is the basic program of conspiracy and secret rites which enable the Canaanites to wreak their hatred upon the descendants of Shem.

But it wasn’t that way in the beginning.  In Moses’ song in Exodus 15:15 it says, “Then the dukes of Edom shall be amazed; the mighty men of Moab, trembling shall take hold upon them; all the inhabitants of Canaan shall melt away.”

When Israel was getting ready to divide up the Promised Land, formerly known as the Land of Canaan, they were given the following warning:

Number 33:51-55 “Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan;

Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places;

And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land [Canaanites], and dwell therein:  for I have given you the land to possess it.

And ye shall divide the land by lot for an inheritance among your families:  and to the more ye shall give the more inheritance, and to the fewer ye shall give the less inheritance:  every man’s inheritance shall be in the place where his lot falleth; according to the tribes of your fathers ye shall inherit. 

But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.”

God warned Israel that if they didn’t get rid of all the Canaanites they would be a pain to them and would vex them.  Israel was only partially successful.  Have any of us suffered by the vexation of the Canaanite in our lifetimes?

Deuteronomy 7:1-5 “When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites [two wives of Esau], and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites [one wife of Judah, one wife of Simeon], and the Perizzites, and the Hivites [one wife of Esau], and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;

And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shall make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them.

Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto this son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods:  so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.

But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.”

God told his covenant people that they were forbidden to marry them.  To do so would cause them [the Israelites] to break the first Commandment by serving other gods and their offspring would not be the right seed; the inheritance would be ruined forever.  Both Ezra and Nehemiah suffered greatly over this sin of the people of the remnant of Judah when they returned from their captivity.  Both leaders of Israel made them get rid of their strange wives and children.

Joshua 17:13 “Yet it came to pass, when the children of Israel were waxen strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute; but did not utterly drive them out.

Judges 1:1-5 “Now after the death of Joshua it came to pass, that the children of Israel asked the LORD, saying, Who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first, to fight against them?

And the LORD said, Judah shall go up:  behold, I have delivered the land into his hand.

And Judah said unto Simeon his brother, Come up with me into my lot, that we may fight against the Canaanites; and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot.  So Simeon went with him.

And Judah went up; and the LORD delivered the Canaanites and the Perizzites into their hand:  and they slew of them in Bezek ten thousand men. 

And they found Adonibezek in Bezek:  and thy fought against him, and they slew the Canaanites and the Perizzites.” 

Judges 1:17 “And Judah went with Simeon, his brother, and they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephath, and utterly destroyed it.  And the name of the city was called Hormah.”

Judges 4:1-2 “And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, when Ehud was dead.

And the LORD sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan, that reigned in Hazor; the captain of whose host was Sisera, which dwelt in Harosheth of the Gentiles.”

There are about eighty more references of Canaanites in the Scriptures.  Considering the frequency of references of Canaanites in the Bible, it is surprising that religious leaders rarely make any mention of them.  If fact, many of the wealthier religious leaders today are actively in league with the Canaanites, enabling them to garner millions of dollars in contributions from gullible Christians. 

The infiltration of the Christian churches by Canaanites who are carrying out the Will of their father—Canaan is demonstrated below.  Some of these churches are called:

  • The Fundamentalists.  They are directly descended from the New England Abolitionists and their ties to the Transcendentalists and the Unitarians, who basically rely on the Cabala and other occult influences for their ministry.  It descends in an unbroken line from the demon worship of Baal to the present day.
  • The Dispensationalists.  They believe that the time is approaching when man will be tested for his obedience to some specific relation of the will of God; and they teach that there are seven distinct dispensations:
  • The innocence of Eden
  • Conscience, the expulsion to avoid evil
  • Human Guilt, including capital punishment by government
  • Promise and blessing to the seed of  Abraham
  • Law – the disciplinary system
  • Church belief in the Gospel of Jesus Christ—gentiles “non jews” church
  • Jesus’ Kingdom, the Millennium, with God’s promise to the Jews fulfilled; Satan’s final rebellion when he is cast into the fire; Christ delivers the Kingdom to His Father.
  • The Premillenarians.  They teach that Christ will suddenly return.  They also teach that Christ will return and reign for one thousand years; during this period, the Jews will be converted.

The real message of Christ is not understood by these propaganda groups.

  • It is the Resurrection; not reincarnation or no afterlife at all.
  • It is the Promise and New Covenant that was “made with the House of Israel and the House of Judah”; Jeremiah 31:31, Hebrews 8:8; not with everyone in the world.

This promise was not made to the Canaanites, who God despised and hated, and to whom even Jesus denied His compassion while He was on the earth.  We find the true heirs of the Promise positively identified in Galatians 3:16;  “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made.  He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one.  AND TO THY SEED, which is Christ [anointed].” 

The one anointed seed of Abraham was the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  The Promise, then, is quite clear, “If ye be [the anointed]” obviously this excludes the Canaanites, who are not the anointed, who have invaded and illegally seized Israel. 

In every nation, the people of Shem have been persecuted and massacred by the Canaanites, the true anti-Semites; in the last hundred years it has been over 60,000,000 Russians and others in Eastern Europe, Southern Africa, Australia and America and Canada.

Think about this for a moment.  Was the curse given to the Canaanites to last forever or did it end sometime after it was given?  Remember the Bible declares that even one of the offspring of Esau, Amelek, that God would have war with him forever.   Would God put the people that He had cursed into His New Covenant?  Many Christians say that he would without given this position much thought! 

Often the people of Shem have been helpless before these attacks because they did not know how to identify their enemies, the true enemies of God.  The Canaanites attacked and seized the Land of Israel.  The Bible says, “If ye be Christ’s [the anointed]” then you are the true heirs of Israel.  The Canaanite invaders now occupying Israel are not the anointed; they are the revilers and mockers of Christ. 

Thus God’s anger is not only against the Canaanites but also against His Covenant People, the people of Israel, who have allowed this blasphemy of God.  Now God waits for the people of Israel to rally to their mission; to expose the Masonic Canaanites.  The sordid conspirators and their multimillion dollar propagandists must be challenged. 

To whom did God make the Promise:  To Abraham’s, Isaac’s and Jacob’s seed, those of the anointed?  That is one reason God calls Himself the “God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.”  Not one of the million dollar publicist for the Canaanites will mention this in their highly-paid television ministries.  They must be exposed as mockers of Christ.  They must be challenged with the truth.

Only the discovery of the Curse of Canaan, and subsequently the Will of Canaan, will force Christians to the reluctant conclusion that behind every financial conspiracy was the demonic attachment to a Satanic cult, with manifested itself through the operations of Freemasonry.


Should the descendants of Shem fail to carry out their GOD’s instructions, God specifically described what would happen and in so doing, He accurately described the world of today.

Deuteronomy 28:15, 43-44But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee:…

The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.

He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him; he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.”

America has borrowed trillions of dollars and is the tail.  Who has the USA borrowed its money from?  A vast majority of the money owed is from the Federal Reserve Bank, Canaanite owned. 

The Cabala claims that Adam throws the entire stream of life out of balance, and that the Church, or Christianity, by formalizing the physical existence of the Adamite people on earth has become a problem which must be resolved.  This is the essence of the basic anti-life principle underling all Cabala and its heir, Freemasonry. 

These precepts declare that Satanism will achieve its final triumph over the Church and Christianity, thus ending the “dualism” of this world, the struggle between good and evil.  In short, the problem of good and evil will be ended with evil triumphs and good is eliminated from the earth.  This program may sound somewhat simplistic, but it is the basic premise of the Cabala and Freemasonry. 

September 11, 2001 is a perfect event for the man who eyes are open can see how the Canaanites operate.  Remember what they were told in their father’s Will:  Love yourself, love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters and don’t tell the truth. 

The curse of Canaan was the enslavement to Shem and Japheth.  The will was an attempt to undo the curse that Noah made to Canaan.  On September 11, 2001 there were four hijacked airplanes.  Two of some sort of planes hit the twin towers, a missile hit the Pentagon Building and the fourth was shot down in Pennsylvania.

And then what the 9/11 Commission Report left out is that Building #7 was brought down in less than 7 seconds; 47 stories at few hours after the twin-towers fell.  They totally left it out!

The day before, September 10th, Donald Rumsfeld told the world by television that the Pentagon had lost $2 Trillion dollars.  So what part of the Pentagon got hit?  The part that was working on where the money disappeared to!  And where was the back-up to this operation?  Building 7!

Let’s see.  The Canaanites lie and murder.  Isn’t that what our Savior said about them too:  “You are of your father, the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own, for he is a liar, and the father of it” John 8:44.

This infuriated the Canaanites that Jesus was speaking to in Jerusalem.  Jesus’ next three sentences really agitated them:

“And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

Which of you convinceth me of sin?  And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?

He that is of God heareth God’s words:  ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

The Canaanites were NOT OF GOD.  You mean to tell me that these cursed people are in the New Covenant?  They eventually got so angry at Jesus that they “then took they up stones to cast at him” (John 8:59a) in an attempt to murder him, but Jesus escaped from them. 

What about Newtown, Connecticut; and the slaughter of 20 students and 7 adults?  Do you know where the Church of Satan has it eastern United States headquarters located; it’s about five minutes from Sandy Hook Elementary School.  Or how many people were slain in the shooting?  There were no pictures taken in the school?  Who was the murderer?  There was no picture of him either!

But there is a picture of Emily Parker after she was supposedly murdered posing with President Obama a couple of days after the shooting.  There is another parent who was also involved in the previous mass shooting at the movie theater.  Then there was the person who took into his home six children who appeared on his driveway.  These were some of the children who fled Mrs. Soto’s class when she distracted the shooter and then was killed.

There are security cameras which could end all conspiracy theories if they would just let the public see them.  They would show the person or people who got out of the car(s) and went to the entrance of the elementary school.  There would be a video of how he/they got into the school.  And there are security cameras that would show all of the shootings in the hallways of the school.  It would show how many shooters there were and how many weapons were used.  It is like the all of the dozens of security cameras that cover the pentagon building.  If they would just release those videos we would know what exactly happened.

But, don’t tell the truth; hate your master!  It is just like what George Herbert Walker Bush said in his speech given on September 11, 1990:

“A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment.  The crisis in the Persian gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation.  Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge:  A new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace.  An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.” 

The Canaanites have followed their Inheritance and Will a lot better than we have followed ours.  For the vast majority of our people don’t even know of their inheritance and what it is!

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Are All Men Descended from One Blood?

by Pastor Don Elmore

July 7, 2013

Scripture Reading:  Psalms 105:6-11

In the Answers in Genesis’ book, “One Race, One Blood,” written by Ken Ham, a white, and Charles Ware, a black man in 2010, it makes the statement:  “Marriage is a litmus test for racism, usually revealing what we really believe about those from other people groups—and there are a significant number of Christians (particularly in America) who would claim that such ‘interracial’ marriages directly violate God’s principles in the Bible, and should not be allowedpage 124. 

This book says that if you are against interracial dating and interracial marriage then you are a racist and fail the litmus test of the bible.

Universal theologians and churches have been spouting this similar lie for decades:  All men are descended from the same person.  They repeatedly teach that all people of today are descended from Noah; and since the entire world was supposedly destroyed by a world flood, they say that all people of today are also descended from Adam; for that was who Noah was descended from. If this is true then that means that all people are related; and if all are related there is no restriction against miscegenation.  There is no miscegenation—for there is only one race in the world.

It has happened in the current news with the head chef, Paula Deen.  She went on the Today Show Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 and basically apologized to Matt Lauer for saying the word “Nigger” in the year 1986 at a bank robbery after a person put a gun to her head.  Are you aware that Trevon Martin called the Hispanic Zimmerman right before his murder a “Nigger” and his last words referred to him as “A crazy ass cracker?” 

But Paula Deen has lost many of her sponsors at this date; Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Walgreens, Ballantine Books, Target, Sears, Kmart, shopping network QVC, Novo Nordisk, Caesars Entertainment, Smithfield Foods and the Food Network but she maintains that she believes now and has always believed that “All people are created equal.”    She added: “I have never hurt any person with the purpose of harming them.” And sobbing: “I am heart-broken.”  And she added: “I’ve had wonderful support from Reverend (Jesse) Jackson.” 

But the Metropolitan Cooking and Entertaining Show have accepted her apology.  They said that the Show does not condone or believe in the use of derogatory slurs by anyone.  I wonder if they would make an exception towards our views.

She is saying exactly what Answers in Genesis say in their heretical book, “ONE BLOOD, The Biblical Answer to Racism” written in 1999. This book is at the forefront of the lie that “We are all of one blood.”  Why do the theologians of Answers in Genesis, it should be Answers in Genesis 1-11; and the vast majority of Bible scholars so want this “one blood” lie to be perpetuated? 

Why do they emphasize the first eleven chapters of Genesis only; it is because chapter 12 begins the story of who received the covenants made by God.  That is why!  They don’t mention it all at. The most important part of the Bible, they ignore. For doesn’t it mean for whom God made a covenant that these people were His choice. Doesn’t this completely destroy their basic point of equality?  God did not make a covenant with all “people groups.”

They ignore scriptures like Psalms 105:6-11:

“O ye seed [descendants] of Abraham his servant, ye children of Jacob his chosen [elect].

He is the LORD our [not everyone’s] God:  his judgments are in all the earth.

He hath remembered his covenant for ever, the word which he commanded to a thousand generations.

Which covenant he made with Abraham, and his oath unto Isaac;

And confirmed the same unto Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant.”

He concludes this psalm with the following two verses that destroys their equality viewpoint:

“And gave them the lands of the heathen:  and they inherited the labour of the people;

That they might observe his statutes, and keep his laws.  Praise ye the LORD.

Who does it say were given the lands of the heathen?  Who does it say might observe his statutes and His Law?  If the covenant people of God are equal with the heathen and they are treated equal, then what is this all about?  God takes from the seven nations of the Canaanites their lives, homes, vineyards, orchards, farms and many of their businesses and gave them to the Israelites, His people.

And who does it say were to observe His statutes and keep His laws:  The heathen or Israel, His covenant people; or both? 

And what instructions did he give His people before they entered the land that He had given them? 

Deuteronomy 7:1“When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites (many of these were giants), and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites (many of these were giants), and the Jebusites (many of these were giants), seven nations greater and mightier than thou.

Who was LORD the God of:  The Israelites or the heathen?  Notice the word “thy” in this verse. 

Deuteronomy 7:2“And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shall make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:…”

The LORD thy God told Israel that they were to destroy the seven nations; they should show them no mercy.  This is equal?

Deuteronomy 7:3“Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.”

They are not to marry them!  I will tell you what Answers in Genesis says about this after the next verse.

Deuteronomy 7:4“For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods:  so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.”

If you marry them, the married couple will serve other gods and the anger of the LORD will be kindled against whom?  The person of the covenant seed!  Not the heathen.

Answers in Genesis in One Blood, say on Page 91: “Rahab was a Canaanite. She came from an ungodly culture – descendants of Canaan, the son of Ham.  Remember that Canaan was cursed because of his obvious rebellious nature.”

But Canaan wasn’t cursed because of what he had done—it was the result of what his father, Ham, had done.  What his father did was have sexual relations with his own mother, which resulted in his son, Canaan, eventually marrying a descendant of Cain.

But Universalist Christians (?) don’t tell us why Rahab is a Canaanite.  It is probably because she is living in a Canaanite city:  Jericho.  But her activities in the city indicate that she is not a traitor to her own people.

But then they continue with the following false statement:  “Thus Rahab, a descendant of Ham [no scriptural proof], must have married an Israelite (descended from Shem)” One Race, One Blood, page 130; One Blood, page 91. 

Answers in Genesis make this statement with no proof at all.  This is important because it teaches interracial marriage is approved by God, if it is true.  Plus it is incorrect for them to say that all Israelites are descended from Shem; for there are a lot of other people that are descended from Shem too.  It is much more accurate to say that all Israelites are descendants from Jacob.

Genesis 11:10-32 gives the genealogy of Shem.  He had five sons: 

  •   Elam
  •   Asshur
  •   Arphaxad
  •   Lud
  •   Aram

Arphaxad was one of five sons of Shem.

Salah was grandson of Shem.

Eber [Hebrews] was great-grandson of Shem.

Peleg was great-great-grandson of Shem.

Reu was great-great-great-great-grandson of Shem.

Serug was gggggrandson of Shem.

Nahor was ggggggrandson of Shem.

Terah was gggggggrandson of Shem.

Abram (Abraham) was ggggggggrandson of Shem.

Isaac was gggggggggrandson of Shem.

Jacob was ggggggggggrandson of Shem.

Israelites were the great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great- grandson of Shem.  

Not all descendants from Shem are Israelites; in fact, very few.  Muslins from Ishmael are descendants of Shem.  Jews from Esau are descendants of Shem.  Israelites are 11 great-grandsons of Shem.  So who is anti-Semitic?

“Since this was clearly a union approved by God, it underlines the fact that the particular ‘people group’ she came from was irrelevant—what mattered was that she trusted in the true God of the Israelites” One Blood, page 91. 

This is changed slightly in One Race, One Blood, page 130 (added words are highlighted and underlined):  “Since this was clearly a union approved by God, it underlines the fact that the particular biological people group she came from was irrelevant—what mattered was that at a certain point in her life, she changed her spiritual race when she trusted in the true God of the Israelites.”

They (Answers in Genesis) added that she (Rahab) “changed her spiritual race at a certain point in her life,” but give no Scripture for this.  For there isn’t any that tell of Rahab’s repenting.  Plus they say that there are no races in the Bible, and then they say she changed her spiritual race!”   No physical race, but a spiritual race?  Are they saying that she changed to the spiritual seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob before the New Testament? 

But that is the point; she couldn’t trust in the true God of the Israelites if she were a Canaanite.  But they are saying that there are exemptions to what the LORD, the God of the Israelites, said.  He didn’t say that they could marry any Canaanite who believed and trusted in Him, but he said not to marry ANY of them. Notice that He didn’t tell them to send missionaries to them and instruct them that if any Canaanite became saved, then they had His approval to marry them.  Instead, He instructed that any who did marry a Canaanite was that their offspring were forever cursed.  For this makes Him the God of the Israelites only.   

At issue is their statement that Rahab, who lived in Jericho, was a Canaanite.  This is an absolutely lie!  This is the basis of their argument; if this is proven false, then their whole doctrine is proven false. The reasons that Answers in Genesis omitted:

  1. Rahab is mentioned in the “Hall of Fame Chapter of Faith.” It is found in Hebrews chapter 11By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace” (verse 31).  No one can have faith unless the Holy Spirit gives them the faith.  And faith is given only to His people, Israel. 

    If you look at Hebrews chapter 11, every other person mentioned was of the elected line of God’s people; from Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Sara, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthae, David, Samuel, and the prophets; who subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, waxed valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies of the aliens, women received their dead raised to life again:  and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection:  and others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea more-over of bond and imprisonment:  They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword:  they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented;  and then is added, according to our enemies, Rahab the forbidden evil seed of a Canaanite?   There is not any record of Rahab repenting. So, Rahab was an Israelite.

  2. Rahab represents the first fruits of God’s deliverance and God’s faithfulness in leading the two Israelite spies directly to her, a woman who would choose allegiance to Israel rather than the people of Jericho, though it was her home. The spies went to the only Canaanites in their whole history that would betray their people and be in favor of the God of the Israelites?  So Rahab was an Israelite.

  3. Even as Lot (a pure Hebrew) dwelled among the peoples of various mixed origins, when he lived in Sodom; even as Abraham sojourned among the Canaanites; even as Ruth lived in the former land of the Moabites; and the men of David and his small band of men became a part of the Philistine army; in almost any city of the Old Testament, there were pure Hebrews or Israelites dwelling in such towns. Do you believe that in each city there were no other people of a different race? So Rahab was an Israelite.

  4. Rahab knew the Holy Name of Yahweh:  She states that name four times in Joshua 2:9-12

    “And she said unto the men, I know that the (1) LORD hath given you the land, and that your terror is fallen upon us, and that all the inhabitants of  the land faint because of you. For we have heard how the (2) LORD dried up the water of the Red sea for you, when ye came out of Egypt; and what ye did unto the two kings of the Amorites, that were on the other side Jordan, Sihon and Og, whom ye utterly destroyed.  And as soon as we had heard these things, our hearts did melt, neither did there remain any more courage in any man, because of you:  for the (3) LORD your God, he is God in heaven above, and in earth beneath. Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the (4) LORD, since I have shewed you kindness, that ye will also shew kindness unto my father’s house, and give me a true token:….”

    The word “LORD”, the word in all capitals means “Yahweh” in the Hebrew.  So Rahab was an Israelite.

  5. Rahab knew that God had given the Land of Canaan to the Israelites.  The land of Canaan, not just the city of Jericho of which she was an inhabitant.  How did she have this knowledge unless she was an Israelite? And how could she have guaranteed her whole family:  her father and mother, and siblings would keep the vow of silence when she told them to come to her house. The only Canaanites who were traitors to their race where the people of Rahab’s family; about 7 out of 100,000 (?) in the city of Jericho or about 7 out of 10,000,000 (?) Canaanites.   No, Rahab was an Israelite.

  6. Rahab would not have been given a place to dwell within Israel if she were a Canaanite.  That would have been a violation of the very command of God at the very beginning of the time in which He commanded them to utterly destroy them all.    So Rahab was an Israelite.

  7. Rahab and her house were spared for a reason (they were Israelites).  Preferential treatment of one family even as God saved only one adamic family from Sodom and preserved only one adamic family on the ark is certainly being a “respecter of persons.”  Not all people are equal.  So Rahab was an Israelite.

  8. Rahab was not a whore or a prostitute or a harlot.  A brief discussion of this point is that when she “…brought them [the spies] up to the roof of the house, and hid them with the stalks of flax, which she had laid in order upon the roof” Joshua 2:6.

    What would a harlot have been doing with “stalks of flax” on the roof?  Prostitutes did not plant and reap and engage in industry; but innkeepers did:  for they often served as supply centers like a general store, providing things travelers and people in the community needed.  Rahab was an innkeeper.  So, Rahab was an Israelite.

  9. Rahab was the recipient of the spies that were sent to her only.  They knew that she was an Israelite before they left their camp.  We are told that the two spies were to spy out the land; not interrogate some “harlot” inside Jericho’s walls and share with her their secret plans. 

    The Canaanites in general and the town of Jericho were in fear of the Israelites due to God’s mighty power that was with them.  This was the report that the spies wanted to hear.  Forty years earlier 10 of the 12 spies came back with disheartening news:  “The giants are too big; we are like grasshoppers by comparison; let’s give up on this suicide mission and go back to Egypt.” This time the two spies had received the message that they wanted to hear. Joshua sent, had the encouraging, positive report that they needed to convince any weak-hearted Israelites:  the Canaanites (including the giants) were already trembling in fear of Israel.  So Rahab was an Israelite.

  10. Have you ever said “I hate the sin, but not the sinner” thinking that you were quoting a Bible verse?  But this is a quote from the Hindu revolutionary Gandhi, who found that he could achieve with cunning propaganda what he could not accomplish with force.  Scripture reveals the opposite:  God hates the sinner and the sin

    • “…Thou hatest all workers of iniquity” Psalm 5:5.
    • “…God is angry with the wicked every day” Psalm 7:11.
    • “…but the wicked and him that loveth violence His soul hateth” Psalm 11:5.

    God hated the Canaanites then; God hates the Canaanites now.  The Canaanites were tares and pigs.  Tares never turn into wheat; pigs never turn into sheep; so Rahab would not turn into the covenant seed of God. 

    Misplaced human emotions and corrupt, canal “logic” are what gives rise to just about every false doctrine.  Those who take the false doctrine of “loving the Canaanites instead of hating them” will eventually give way to even greater heresies, such as Ultimate Reconciliation.  They falsely say that God loves everybody and will eventually reconcile everyone to Him.  So, Rahab was an Israelite

  11. Rahab had a scarlet cord to let the two spies down the wall of Jericho.  This was the symbol of salvation and the possible symbol of Zerah’s red ribbon that was put on his hand during his birth of the tribe of Judah.  So, Rahab was an Israelite.

  12. It makes a great deal of difference, whether Rahab was an Israelite or a Canaanite; because the two peoples are different. Which seed-line do you want to be from?  The covenant seed or the seed which hates Jesus Christ, God the Father and God the Spirit?  So Rahab was an Israelite.

  13. Was Rahab a Canaanite, as Answers in Genesis say, who was a traitor to her people; or was Rahab an Israelite; and spared from the destruction of Jericho.  Rahab and her entire family were the only inhabitants from an innumerable number of Canaanites that Answers in Genesis can site as being in a state of faithfulness to Israel’s God.  Rahab and her family were the only Canaanites given who Answers in Genesis shows were converted.  Seven people out of an estimated 10,000,000?
  14. What a confusing manner of logic would it be if Rahab and her immediate family was Canaanite?   God said to destroy every one of them.  A couple of weeks later the Gibeonites told Joshua that they were from a great distance away, and Joshua made a treaty with them.  God made Israel keep this covenant with this branch of Canaanites although the Gibeonites were to be slaves to the Israelites.  So Rahab was an Israelite.  

Are All From One Blood?

Let’s look at what the Answer in Genesis’book says?  On page 49 we find the following (with my emphases):

The Bible does not even use the word ‘race’ in reference to people, but does describe all human beings as being of ‘one blood’ (Acts 17:26).  This, of course, emphasizes that we are all related, for all humans are descendants of the first man Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45).”

Their basic thesis is that, as they say in their book, “There is only one race – the human race”, page 55. If this statement can be proven false, then the entire belief system built around it comes crumbling down.

Whom did Cain marry?  Did he marry someone from his immediate family (his sister) or did he marry someone who was not related to him (from another race)?

So, they make the argument in page 19 that “There could not have been other women who were not her (Eve’s) descendants.

Thus, if Christians cannot defend that all humans (including Cain’s wife) can trace their ancestry ultimately to Adam and Eve, then how can they understand and explain the gospel?  How can they justify sending missionaries to every tribe and nation?  One needs to be able to answer the question of Cain’s wife to illustrate that Christians can defend the gospel and all that it teaches.”

They teach that Cain and his wife (from the land of Nod) built a large city.  They argue the technological advances needed to build the city were there by quoting from Genesis 4 about the advances made by the descendants of Cain but ignore the number of people needed to live in the city, page 27. 

They ignore the fact that who would marry Cain of Adam’s family; for they knew that he was guilty of the murder of Abel and that their God had put a punishment upon him.   Who would be the wife of the murderer of their brother or close relative?

They also ignore Genesis 3:15 that instructs us about the enmity that would be between “her seed” (seed of the woman; Eve) and “thy seed” (seed of the serpent).  They also ignore the argument that Cain is not descended from Adam. There are many Christians who believe that Cain was descended from the serpent, not Adam.

The biblical text used to “support” Answer in Genesis’ “theory” that we’re all related is found in Acts 17:26 where Paul says:  “And hath made of one blood v all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.” KJV (King James Version).

Let’s look in our Bibles.  Does anyone have a footnote next to the word “blood?”  Mine, a King James Bible, has the footnote “v.”  In the margin it says that “Some mss. [manuscripts] omit blood.”  Most biblical scholars agree that the word “blood” does not appear in the original Greek

Look at the translations from other Bibles:

  • “And He made from one every nation of men to live on all the face of the earth…” The word “blood” is omitted. (Revised Standard Version)
  • “From one man He made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth…” The word “blood” is omitted. (New International Version)
  • “And He made from one every nation of men to dwell upon all the face of the earth, appointing the times ordained and the boundaries of their settlements.…”  The word “blood” is omitted.  (Christogenea New Testament)
  • “And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation.”  The word “blood” is omitted.  (Revised Standard Version, One Race, One Blood, page 125)

So, how can you build a doctrine from a scripture which most scholars, including now the Answers in Genesis scholars, say is missing the main word of your doctrine?  In the majority of Bible manuscripts texts (over 400), the word “blood” is not there. 

Did Answers in Genesis accept the meaning of what they quoted?  That Acts 17:26 does not contain the word “blood?”  Look at what they have in the same book on page 87: 

“How different things might have been had these men simply believed the only source for all truth and that our common origin is from a wise and powerful Creator.  They would have adopted a different, biblical philosophy for living together as one kind – just as we can, when we embrace the scientific and biblical reality that we are all ‘one blood.’”

“One Race, One Blood,” page 126; “When Christians legalistically impose non-biblical ideas as no ‘interracial’ marriage, they are helping to perpetuate prejudices that have often arisen from evolutionary influences.  If we are really honest, in countries like America, the main reason some Christians forbid ‘interracial’ marriage’ is not scriptural. They forbid ‘interracial marriage’ because of preconceived prejudices.”    They don’t give any of the preconceived prejudices that they base their beliefs on.

What Doctrine Does Answers in Genesis and the Others Ignore from the Holy Scriptures?

Answers in Genesis and the  Judeo-Christian universal churches are completely ignorant or deliberately mistranslate Ephesians 2 and Ezekiel 37.  They basically ignore Ezekiel 37 and completely mistranslate Ephesians 2.  They both teach the same doctrine.

In Ephesians 2, who are the two that are made into one new man (verse 15)?  Answers in Genesis, along with the Judeo-Christian world say that two groups of people are:

  1. the gentiles and
  2. the Jews

They are the two that means that the whole world is now made near by the blood of Christ (verse 13).  For the gentiles were uncircumcised, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, strangers form the covenants of promise, had no hope and were without God in the world (verse 12). The gentiles that were far off are now made near by the blood of Christ (verse 13).  The gentiles are all people who are not jews. 

The second group of people is the jews, who they say are the covenant people of God.  The two, gentiles and jews, are now joined together by the death of Jesus Christ.

But this interpretation does not agree with Ezekiel 37.  In this chapter in Ezekiel it tells of the joining of the two separate sticks of the Kingdom of Israel:

  1. The stick of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel and
  2. The stick of Judah. 

The joining of the two parts of Israel!

Israel was divided into two parts?  When did this occur?  Shortly after the completion of the Temple of God that was built in Jerusalem.  The ten tribes separated into a new northern kingdom of Israel from the tribes of Judah in the southern part of Israel.  The northern kingdom became very similar to the United States of today.  They refused to follow the laws of their God and went and served other gods.  All of their kings, their laws, their priests were apostate and unqualified. 

Eventually they were divorced by our God.  They married other gods.  So they were “without Christ (the anointed seed), being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world” (Ephesians 2:12).  So, what happen to these ten tribes of Israel?

They and the House of Judah were reconciled together into one body by the cross, the two made into one once again.  By the death of our Savior and brother—Jesus Christ, this was the gospel message.

The Jews claim to be from the tribe of Judah only; but they are really from the tribe of Esau.  That leaves 12 other tribes of Israel!  But that is only 7% of the modern jews today.  The other 90+% are descended from Japheth—a Turkish people.  They are known as the Ashkenazi Jews.

What Should a New Christian Read?

Answers in Genesis:  “Just as a newborn baby grows physically, so now you need to grow spiritually.  Read your Bible, starting perhaps with the Gospel of John, reading at least one chapter a day.  Then read the first 11 chapters of the foundational Book of Genesispage 119.

Let’s look at a few passages from the book of John that Answers in Genesis instructed us to read for us to grow spiritually:

“Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death John 11:53.

Who were the people that were taken counsel together to put Jesus Christ to death?

Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples”  John 11:54.

Jesus would walk no more openly among the JEWS.  He went to the wilderness were he continued with his disciples.  Are the Jews and His people equal?

“Now both the chief priests and the Pharisees had given a commandment, that, if any man knew where he were, he should shew it, that they might take himJohn 11:57.

Both the chief priests and the Pharisees who were mainly Jews had given a commandment that if any man knew where Jesus Christ was, that he would show it to them that they might capture him.  Do you think that the Jews and His people are equal?

“Then said the Jews unto him, Thou [Jesus Christ] art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. Then took they up stones to cast at him:  but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by” John 8:57-59.

Who do these verses tell who was attempting to assassinate Jesus?  The Jews.  Are they equal with His covenant people?

“Then came the Jews round about him,…

Jesus answered them [the Jews]…

But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep; as I said unto you.

“…I lay down my life for the sheep.”

Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him” John 10:24, 25, 26, 15, 31.

Jesus got in another heated discussion with the Jews; and they attempted to stone him again. Doesn’t this chapter teach that Jesus Christ did not die for the jews.  Are the Jews equal with His covenant people?

John 17:9I [Jesus Christ] pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine.”

Jesus said that He was not praying for everyone.  In fact, He was praying only for those who were given to him.  What is the difference between the people who he is not praying for?  Are they equal with His covenant people?

“When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him [Jesus Christ], crucify him.  Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him:  for I find no fault in him” John 19:6.

It was the Jews who cried out to Pilate to crucify Jesus Christ.  Pilate admitted Jesus’ innocence and told them [the jews] to take Him and crucify Him yourselves.  It was the Jews who crucified Jesus.  Are the Jews equal with His covenant people?

“And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave.  He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus” John 19:38.

The uncle of Jesus went to Pilate and asked him for permission to take down the body of Jesus from off the tree.  But he went secretly.  Why?  For fear of the Jews.  Are the Jews equal with His covenant people?

I think that these 7 verses are enough.  There are many more in the Bible.  Do the Christians have an enemy?  Yes they do.  The Jews have been evicted from every Christian nation in Eastern Europe; some as many as three times.  The Bible identifies who they are.


Let’s look at a couple more of Answers in Genesis’ remarks in their book:

According to the Bible, all people on earth today descended from Noah and his wife, his three sons and their wives, and before that from Adam and Eve” page 51.

“So you can see how it is easily possible, beginning with two middle-brown parents, to get not only all the ‘colors,’ but also people groups with stable coloring” page 64.

Noah and his family were probably mid-brown, with genes for both dark and light skin, because a medium skin ‘color’ would seem to be the most generally suitable (dark enough to protect against skin cancer, yet light enough to allow vitamin D production).  As all the factors for skin ‘color’ were present in Adam and Eve, they would most likely have been mid-brown as well” page 67.

So, putting these three passages together we have a very strange belief.  Adam and Eve were most likely mid-brown in color as well as Noah and his family.  Mid-brown?  If Adam and Eve were they only people on the earth then there were no other people besides mid-brown people for the time up to the time of Noah.  All people on the earth are descended from mid-brown people.  There were no blacks, no Orientals, no Hispanics, no Whites in existence at all at this time.

This can be very easily proved a lie.  No Negroes, no Orientals, no Caucasians until at the most 4 ½ thousand years ago?  Any unbiased historian can easily disprove this.

What are they trying to do?  They then come to this conclusion:

“The Christian Church could greatly relieve the tensions over racism if only the leaders would teach that all people are descended from one man and woman and all people are equal before God.  Furthermore, all are sinners in need of salvation; all need to build their thinking on God’s Word and judge all their cultural aspects accordingly; all need to be one in Christ and put an end to their rebellion against their Creator” page 96.

This is strictly Judeo-Christianity theology.  The Bible teaches Israel to be a separate people.  Multi-Culturalism is a communist/Hindu/ jewish doctrine and is in no way Christian. 

Anwsers in Genesis:  “FALSE CLAIM:  NON-WHITE ‘RACES’ COME FROM ‘PRE-ADAMITES’” page 111.  They must not have seen the book “PreAdamites?” or if they did, they don’t believe it. Some of the preAdamies in this former college book are:

  •   Dravidian
  •   Mongoloid
  •   Negro
  •   Eskimo
  •   Hottentot
  •   Papuan
  •   Australian

This book was published in 1880 and was used in American colleges at the turn of the century. And who are the other races?  Negroes, Orientals and all of the mixed-breeds that are in the world, who are these people? 

There is even the Bible statement that no Ammonite or Moabite shall enter the assembly of the Lord; even to the tenth generation none belonging to them shall enter the assembly of the Lord forever.

The command wasn't, when you convert these heathen, and then you can marry them and bring them into your midst.  They could never, not ever, bring these foreigners into their midst!

If there had been Chinese in the surrounding area, you would see Chinese on the list.  If there had been Nubians in the surrounding area, you would see Nubians on the list. If there were Eskimos in the surrounding area, you would see Eskimos on the list.


Notice that God says these nations were greater and mightier than the Israelites.  Israel had about two million people (600,000 fighting men plus the women, children and elderly), that means that there were a lot of heathen for the Israelites to destroy.  On the flip side, that means that there were a lot of heathen to tempt the Israelites.

In verse three of Deuteronomy 7, God specifically tells the Israelites not to make marriages with these heathens.  Now, there are those, people whose world view is not God's world view, who will tell you that the only reason why God told the Israelites not to marry the heathens is because they "would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods."  (Verse 4)  These same people with their own world view will tell you that as long as the Israelites converted these heathens, then it was okay to marry them.

Can you find that in the Word of God?  Furthermore, then why was a sin in Nehemiah to have married these very same people?  Nehemiah expanded and applied the prohibition to preclude all forbidden foreigners (Nehemiah 13:1-30). 

The Prophet Hosea rebuked the House of Israel for going against the command of God and bearing strange children:

Hosea 5:7 “They have dealt treacherously against God:  for they have begotten strange children.” 

The word "strange" is from the Hebrew word "zuwr" and means a primary root; to turn aside (especially for lodging); hence, to be a foreign, strange, and profane.

Can God be any clearer?  God never intended His people, created in His image, to mix.  God calls this treachery against Him.

There is a lot more.  But this should be enough for you to understand the danger of “One Blood—The Biblical Answer to Racism.”  What do the enemies of Christendom say is politically correct:  Let us intermarry until we are all of the mid-brown mongrel race.  Then there will be no wars and disagreements over skin color. 

What does our God say about this plan?  God has chosen His people and made covenants with them.  He instructed them to be a separate people and not to integrate with any other people.  He will not permit this to happen.  Israel will not be totally destroyed.

Do you believe our God or man?

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Recommended follow-up reading:  A Few Answers to "Answers In Genesis"

Black Kali and White Devils

by Pastor Don Elmore

June 23, 2013

Scripture Reading:  Exodus 23:25-33

KaliThe modern religion books say that Hinduism has grown to become the world’s third largest religion, after  apostate (1) Judeo-universalism-Christianity and (2) Muslim Islam. But with 1,000,000,000 adherents to their religion, they vastly surpass true covenant Christianity.  It is the dominant religion in India, Nepal, and among the Tamils in Sri Lanka.  And it has become in recent years a major influence in both Christianity and among non-Christians in the United States and around the world.

Hinduism differs from Christianity and other monotheistic religions in that it does not have:

  • A single founder
  • A specific theological system
  • A single concept of deity
  • A single holy text
  • A single system of morality
  • A central religious authority
  • The concept of a prophet.

About all my knowledge of Hinduism was what I learned in school.  I learned that:

  1. The Hindus worshiped the cow.  If a cow decided to lie down in the middle of the highway, there would be a tie-up on the highway as the cars would have to wait until the cow would move off the road.  The Hindus were not allowed to move the cows on their own.  They had to wait until the cow(s) moved. It could last for hours.

  2. A Hindu is not allowed to slaughter the cow; they can’t even move it out of their house.  But they are allowed to use these five following items from the cow:  (1) milk, (2) curd, (3) cheese, (4) urine and (5) dung.

  3. Tragically, the people of India are dying of hunger.  Why is the low caste poor Hindus prohibited from eating beef?  Instead of taking care of the low caste peoples of India, they forbid them from eating the cheap meat which comes from the cow.

  4. Hinduism also teaches cow urine drinking.  Many Hindus are drinking cow’s urine as if it is a daily tonic.  No scientists have ever claimed that urine has any medicinal value.  On the contrary it is well known fact that urine is an unwanted organic substance that the body needs to discharge.
  6. Hindus believe that cow dung ash has medicinal value.  Hindus smear their homes with cow dung, expecting a special blessing.  In recent times, cow products made from dung and urine have seen an enormous boost in popularity.  You can get lotions, soft drinks, potions and pills, some of which are cure-alls that battle everything from constipation, to irregular periods, to hysteria, to cancer, and much more.  In addition to medicines, the products range from cow dung toothpaste, to detergents, a skin-whitening cream, baldness and obesity cures, soap and a cow/urine “antiseptic aftershave.”

  7. I also knew about the practice of Yoga.  Yoga classes have infiltrated into Christianity in the last couple of decades.  About ten years ago we threatened to go to a school board meeting if the local high school went through with their plans to start Yoga in their gym classes.  At the last moment, they decided not to do it.
  8. You cannot separate the devils from Yoga!  The only kind of meditation Christians are supposed to do is meditating on God’s Word.  Not clearing your mind out so a demon can come in!  Why do you think Yoga was NOT here for so many years?

    There are different types of Yoga.  It is a spiritual exercise to get the Hindu in union with Brahman (one of their many gods).  Yoga takes the Hindu to other realms of consciousness totally unrelated to his temporal world.  Through Yoga, Hindu experience the power of demonic spirits who guide them and give them psychic powers.  These demons are real and are not imaginary.  Yoga is an aid to eastern meditation.  It deals with the physical position of the body, breathing and renouncing all desires.

    Clearing your brain of everything so the demons can take over is the main purpose of Yoga.  It is designed to specifically induce a state of trance to get you yoked up with a demon.  Yoga is a means of withdrawal from the world of illusion to seek the “only true Reality” (the realm of foul spirits).  People may say, “It’s only exercise”.  No part of Yoga can be separated from the philosophy behind it.

  9. I was also familiar with Transcendental Meditation.  One school system that I was in had a leader in this “new” America way of life.  It dabbled in this psychological/Hindu method.  I was in a district-wide teachers’ meeting, when one of the school psychologists gave about a forty minute presentation of Transcendental Meditation.    He said in his introductory remarks that it wouldn’t be long until all businesses, students, and every teacher would start their day doing exercise like we were doing that day.  We closed our eyes and we let our minds into a state of emptiness, listening to what he was saying and the soft music that was being played. 

  10. I also knew that Hinduism was the “tolerant” religion.  It promotes unity between all denominations and faiths.   It has neither an official dogma nor headquarters like almost all other religions.   For example, Roman Catholics have their headquarters in the Vatican City; Jehovah Witnesses have their headquarters in Brooklyn, New York; Church of the Latter Day Saints have their headquarters in Salt Lake City, Utah; another branch of Mormonism has theirs in Independence, Missouri; etc.

  11. Another aspect of Hinduism is their belief in reincarnation.  It is a reward for good behavior to be immediately born in a higher state that what you were; such as a ruler or a rich man.   It is a curse to be immediately born in a lower state that what you were if you acted in a bad manner; i.e. a bug or lower caste of people, even a beggar.  In essence, a person rewards or punishes himself by his own acts in this life.
  12. Most acts that we consider “crimes” are looked upon by the people of India as simple “misconduct”.  Murderers are almost never executed because they might redeem themselves by good deeds if allowed to live.  It is no accident that both Europe has outlawed the death penalty and the United States sentences criminals to prison who would have been put to death in its earlier Christian days.

  13. Mantras are used in mediation.  The meaning of the words is not so important, rather it is the vibrations that they create that are the chief way of attracting “the deities” (demons).  The Bible calls this vain repetition.

    Matthew 6:7 “But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do:  for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.”

    They repeat the same words over and over in the language of their gods.  More important than understanding the meaning was to correctly articulate the sounds.  The gods come through the vibrations, not through your understanding of what you are saying.  That’s why it teaches its people mantras in different languages and doesn’t even tell them what the words mean.  It doesn’t matter.  People just go on like an ox to the slaughter not exercising any discernment.  Sounds like rock and roll music!

  14. I did not, nor did the schools in which I taught, know that most of Hinduism’s gods are black, while most Hindu devils were white.  The Hindus called their devils “white-devils.”  My question would be:  “Why was this information so hushed up by our media and education systems?”
  15. Malcolm X called whites, “white-devils.”  We also know that other Muslims call whites, “white-devils”. Chinese and Japanese also call whites, “white-devils”; as do Mexicans, American Indians, and Blacks – all call whites “white-devils”.   

    In the picture in the beginning of this article, “Kali” the Hindu black god of death stands on the dead body of a “white-devil” holding a severed head on one hand, a bloody sword in another, with serpents rising up from the body of the white –devil.  “White-devil” seems to be the universal name for whites in every land and every people except by Saxon-whites themselves.

Where Did the Serpent Go After it was Through Out of the Garden?

In reading a book (1 Adam and Eve) written before or about the time of Jesus Christ, it says in Chapter 18:7-9; the following important information:

“The Word of God came to the serpent and said unto it…

Be thou dumb; and speak no more, thou and thy race, because the ruin of my creatures happened through thee…

And a wind came to blow from heaven by command of God that carried away the serpent from Adam and Eve, threw it on the shore, and it [the serpent] landed in India. 

I read this in Richard Hoskins' monthly newsletter: “Hoskins Report; #440.”   India!  According to this book, the serpent went to India after he caused the problems in the Garden of Eden. 

India became the merchant’s trade center between the nations that were in the east and the ones in the west. Its widely scattered corporate trade centers have long collected trade profits and returned them to India, which is why many believe that India to this day contains the greatest stockpile of gold and silver in the world. 

The serpent of India is deception.  The gods of India each have his own serpent which represents the deception that he practices.  The prime enemy of these serpents and the prime target of their enmity is their ancient enemy – the “white devil.” 

God loves Jacob and He hates Esau.

Romans 9:13 “As it is written [Malachi 1:2, 3], JACOB HAVE I LOVED, BUT Esau have I hated.”

Ever since Jacob stole Esau’s blessing the Children of Esau have waged war against the Children of Jacob.  His primary weapon is “the serpent of deception”.  Esau means to destroy Jacob from the face of the earth so that a “good age” can be born and he can rule the world alone.

Esau’s missionaries, his “Dharmamatras”, have used education and money in western society to destroy Western people with false doctrines.  They have destroyed western medicine and Christianity by this process.  Hari-Hari; the god of integrationHari-Hari, is a half-black, half-white god, shown with a serpent of deception about his neck.  Hari-Hari has been exported to the West and is now disguised as Jesus Christ in many Judeo-Christian churches.

Hari-Hari, not Jesus Christ, has developed a devoted band of integrationist followers.  Music and sermons of racial integration usually replace His Word in His covenant peoples’ services.   Interracial married and dating couples in these churches are a sign of their Hindu deception.  Integration is a Hindu doctrine; Segregation is a Christian doctrine.  We are forbidden to have racial strangers in our midst and are not allowed to do business with them lest we learn their ways.

Exodus 23:32-33 “Thou shall make no covenant with them, nor with their gods. 

They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me.” 

Deuteronomy 7:2 “And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shall smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:”

There was a time when it was against the law for anyone except the king to own a corporation since Esau uses corporations to conceal his presence if he can.  With a corporation the king could own property and allow it to be used as Esau wished and no one was the wiser.  In other words, he could break God’s Law without arousing the people’s ire.

As time went on, the kings who displeased Esau were replaced with different kings who made corporate ownership open to virtually everyone.  Today, onlookers have no idea who controls big corporations.  Most corporate stock is voted by bank trust departments.  Large banks are usually owned by other banks which are owned by holding companies in this country and overseas.  It is virtually impossible to trace the control of the world’s large corporations.  

Large corporations control most of the property and monetary wealth of the world.  Media corporations in the West control Jacob’s minds while other corporations provide Jacob with jobs which put food on his table.  Pleasing conduct results in job advancement and increased wealth.  Conduct that displeases Esau’s corporation results in demotion and loss of jobs and income. 

This is true in religion, as well as in manufacturing and politics; the sons of Jacob who are obedient to Esau receive promotion and advancement.  Where once Israelites used to be obedient to the Law of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; the “love of money”, now forces them to be disobedient to their God and obedient to Esau’s lawlessness; i.e. they are serving another god.  They have to keep their mouths shut if they see the evil done and wish to tell others.

Have you noticed what organizations get “good press” and which ones get “bad press”?  In our area, Answers in Genesis, which is really not a church, but an organization that fights against evolution by having a museum and a park with Noah’s Ark and the Tower of Babel as the highlights?  They now have revealed that at their museum they will have the biggest and the most (25) zip-lines in the area, so that they will be a magnet for young people to go the museum.  They will charge $89 for the day to ride the zip-lines and an additional $10 to go to the museum.  Next will be roller-coasters!  They are being criticized, and I believe rightly so, for being an entertainment center more than a religious one. 

In religion, the church that I grew up in said that “the Law of God was nailed to the cross of Jesus Christ.”  It obviously did not teach the Law of God had to be obeyed by the members of the church; they confused the Law of God with His done away sacrificial laws.  I later found out that some of the financial giants in my church belong to the Freemasons!

Esau swore that he would kill his brother Jacob

Genesis 27:41 “And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him:  and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob.”

Esau’s missionaries have hired serpents to spread the poison of integration and multiculturalism causing Jacob’s children to mix with the people-of–the land and disappear; or to be massacred in their entirety.  The Armed Forces of the United States were one of the first; professional sports were next, then with the guns of the military leading the way the public schools became integrated.  Once the schools were integrated, the sports-world of the universities and high schools quickly also became integrated. 

This has also repeatedly happened in many of the countries of non-covenant peoples.  For example, the Gothic Spaniards who settled Mexico who didn’t interbreed with the Indians and Negro slaves as they were encouraged by their Spanish religion and political leaders were massacred.  Today, Mexicans who are white are largely the descendants of recent immigrants.  Most of the old descendants of the original sons of Jacob immigrants have been either killed or absorbed into the offspring of Esau.

This has happened in north-western China, in Iraq, Iran, northern India, practically the entire Middle East, Egypt, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, North Africa, Southern Spain, most of South and Central American most of South Africa, much of North America and Eastern Europe.

The War Between the States

Esau’s media-serpent has taught Americans the nonsense that the War Between the States was fought over slavery.  This War that was fought between 1861-1865, was when the King of England, acting for his Esau merchant masters, owned the slave trade monopoly.  He decreed that black slaves be sent to America to provide cheap labor to grow cheap tobacco and cotton that were required to be sold to England at rock bottom prices.  He forbade us to stop the slave trade or to return the blacks to Africa, even though there was an honest effort to do so

The reason for this War was land ownership. 

Exodus 19:3 “All the earth is mine.”

Joshua 14:5 “As the LORD commanded Moses, so the children of Israel did, and they divided the land.”

Numbers 26:53-55 “Unto these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names.  To many thou shalt give the more inheritance, and to few thou shalt give the less inheritance:  to every one shall his inheritance be given according to those that were numbered of him.  Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot:  according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.”

Leviticus 25:23 The land shall not be sold for ever:  for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourner with me.”

Leviticus 25:28 “But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that hath bought it until the year of jubilee:  and in the jubilee it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession.”

Israel was given the land.  They didn’t even have to buy it.  They were not taxed on their land. It was theirs forever; for it was the basis of their independence.  There was no property tax that Esau has now given us to steal our lands from us. 

In the Protocols of Zion it states:  “The aristocracy of the peoples, as a political force is dead…but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are serf-sufficing in the resources upon which they live.  It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land.”

Look what happened in the evil War Between the States:  The South was devastated, conquered, and occupied.  The men of the Confederacy were stripped of their right to vote which was given to Blacks, for the first time. 

Deuteronomy 17:5 “Thou mayest not set a stranger (racial alien) over thee, which is not thy brother.”

Jeremiah 30:21 “Their nobles shall be of themselves, and their governor shall proceed from the midst of them.”

Under the watchful eyes of the Federal troops, “Esau’s agents” instructed the newly elected Black rulers to tax the land that was owned by the whites.  The white owners had no money and no markets since during the War their tobacco trade had gone to Turkey and the cotton trade to India.  It would take years to re-establish the trade of tobacco and cotton.  Revolt was unthinkable since heavily armed occupation soldiers were everywhere and our masters in Washington were eager to loot, burn and destroy everything that was left in the South.   

The serpents of usury banks were established in every southern town that in prior years had almost no banks.  Whites went to these banks to borrow money to pay land-taxes that they had never paid before.  They found that they had no way to repay the loans and their land that had often been in their families for more than 200 years was auctioned to Esau’s agents for almost nothing.  There is no year of Jubilee in America!  Their land and way of life was lost.

Former land owners took their families and moved to cities to work for starvation wages in Esau’s newly built factories and millions upon millions of acres of their formerly self-sufficient farms fell into the hands of Esau’s corporation.  The same thing had already happened in the North in the 1830s & ‘40s and finished happening in the West in the 1980s.

The serpent that once lived in the Garden of Eden is in the midst of us.  Its deception is everywhere.  The media bans the WORD.  Every program on the television set has some Law violation.  Most follow the doctrine of three of the main Hindu’s gods.  They follow

  1. Siva’s promotion of illicit sex
  2. Kali’s promotion of violent death, and
  3. Hari-Hari’s promotion of racial-integration

This is what is being taught to Jacob’s children. 


So-called preachers dare not mention the Commandments of the WORD since wealthy law-violators sitting in his church may take offense and take their business and dollars to another church. 

Esau’s manufacturing business is gradually being sent to the lands of Esau leaving Jacob’s children destitute.  Esau’s political–agents refuse to deport the tens of millions of aliens in our midst who send billions of untaxed dollars back to their own countries thereby destroying Jacob’s monetary system.

Today Saxon-Israel land is overrun with aliens when the priests, politicians, and corporate managers cannot see because they are paid by them.  The college educators teach from Esau’s book because their college endowments come from Esau’s corporations and their promotions and salary increases come from obedience to the god of Esau.

Because these people are blind to God’s WORD; they are seen by their fellow Saxons as being Esau’s agents.  As in the past, many of our people are unemployed.  They stand having nothing to do and nothing to lose.  Taxes take the last bit of money and the king either works for Esau or is a son of Esau.  His acts prove him to be anti-Saxon.

In the midst of this dry kindling floats a spark that even now is touching here and there.  The spark lights a message that for thousands of years has been called The WORD.  The WORD is again calling for Saxon-man to obey the Commands of their God.

There are tens of thousands of Israelites who believe the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of the LORD.  Those who practice Christianity without God’s Law are practicing an alien religion that is completely acceptable to the international merchant’s religion called Christian-Hinduism.  Hinduism has no law but that of the king and the Hindu religion accepts all religions as a part of Hinduism.

This is why the cartel media ignored the Law of the WORD and viciously attacked anyone who did quote the WORD.  Obedience to one is disobedience to the other.  Hindus and their converts going under other names served a different master who had different Laws. 

Will America lose all of it lands to Esau?  Or will God’s calendar once again be restored to the land of His people?   

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Thanks to the Hoskin’s Report for some of the information in this article.

Communist America

by Pastor Don Elmore

April 28, 2013

Scripture Reading Psalms 55:15

Before I begin my message, as I promised you:  I will not forget about the Sandy Hook massacre which was a hoax.  Here is another hoax of the government’s misleading comments:

Natalie Hammond, the assistant principal in the Sandy Hook shooting that took place in December 14, 2012, was heaped praise at the Boston Bruins ice hockey game.  She was given the award of tossing the puck to begin the game.  It was only a ceremonial toss, but it was a gesture that honored her.  She walked out onto the ice and dropped the puck between the two opposing players.  After she did this, they both shook hands with her.  Then the game began after she walked off the ice.

But which story is correct?

  1. The gunman enters the school and Natalie is in a meeting with the principal, school psychologist and a parent of a school child.  The principal and school psychologist and Natalie leave the meeting and go to stop the shooter.  The principal and psychologist are instantly murdered while Natalie suffers a leg wound from a ricocheting bullet.  She crawls back into the room and calls 911.  Who was the parent?
  2. The gunman enters the school.  The two school officials are meeting with the parent in the office.  The principal and psychologist leave the meeting and are instantly murdered.  Nothing is said about Natalie.
  3. The gunman enters the school.  After murdering the principal and psychologist, Natalie goes into a room and puts a chair under the door knob.  The gunman tries to enter the room.  He fires through the door, striking Natalie on the left side several times.  Natalie keeps the gunman from entering her room and is eventually taken to the hospital and is recovering in a wheel-chair. 

Three different stories and now she is out of the wheel chair and walking just fine.  And now Mr. Pozner is criticizing his wife’s brother [Mr. Haller] for being their family’s spokesman.   They also criticized his setting up a trust for the four children:  they want the two eldest children dropped from the trust.  “The love of money”; maybe someone will eventually tell the truth.

And now a few words about another of the great hoaxes our government is trying to pull over the “sheep’s’ eyes.”  The Boston Marathon bombing is another of these experiences that are made for television.  Let us look a one little phase of this bombing. 

This is the picture that was shown in an article supporting the story provided to us by the government.  What is wrong with the picture?

What injuries does the man in the wheel chair have?  Do you see the man in the cowboy hat; is there any blood on him?  Does the person in the wheel chair look to be in severe pain? 

Here is the picture showing the entire situation.  If you lose both your legs from explosive trauma--half your blood is gone in one minute via the femoral arteries; you’re dead after two minutes.  Bleeding out is worse with blunt force trauma (like shrapnel) because flesh is torn rather than cut, exposing more arterial and vascular tissue. The human body holds 5 to 6 LITERS of blood.

If that really happened you would see blood EVERYWHERE, the guy would be drenched in it. You would also see what’s called arterial spurting from the injury. Most likely he would vomit after turning ghost white from shock, then turning delirious or passing out.   Does he look like he is in shock?

As for the “tourniquet”…it’s not even tied off, it’s suspended via gravity, which would literally do nothing to an arterial sever. There’s no pressure applied. There’s no knot with a turn stick for leverage.  You can clearly see a gap in the nonexistent wrap job on his left inner thigh. His hands have no blood on them.  There’s no blood on the ground.  The color in his hands and lips shows good circulation.

This is an actor. This is staged. The man in the cowboy hat was rewarded as being a great hero of the Boston Marathon bombings.  The person in the wheel chair did not have his two legs lost from the bomb in Boston; he lost them previously in Afghanistan. 

Why is he being taken in a wheel-chair?  If this was real he would be taken out on a stretcher.  The wheel-chair would allow more blood to be lost.  He would be dead!

In fact, did you see anyone being taken out on stretchers?  Did anyone see any of the dead bodies? 


Well, that is enough of the hoaxes; now the sermon:

Who were the Founding Fathers of Christian America?   I would answer the Protestant reformers!  The Pilgrims and many of the Puritans who fought against the rule of the Roman Catholic Church greatly influenced America’s Christianity.  What religious freedom America has, can be related to these religious men who suffered greatly for what they believed.

The Roman Catholic Church did not take their defeat without a fight, and they fought on with the creation of the Jesuits.  The world was in a transition phase with science and reason against the covenants that were made with our fathers:  Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their descendants.

By the time we arrive at the late 1700s the world was split into many different beliefs.  Many held to a version of contrarian beliefs—but very few really believed either by itself:  The truth of the Holy Bible verses man’s reasoning power. 

How anyone could not deny that Benjamin Franklin was not a Christian is amazing to me.  Franklin was a major Freemason who traveled from America to Europe and was the Master Mason of a Lodge in Europe.  He even is responsible in getting Marquis Lafayette of France [a Mason] to help fight [he was a general] in the Revolutionary War.  Many historians say that this was a deciding issue in the fight for America’s freedom, for he not only was a good general but he helped finance and give aid to the young America.

Even our first President, George Washington, was a Freemason.  He dressed up with their Masonic apron uniform when he laid the cornerstone to the Congressional Building.  At this ceremony, he joined with other Masonic members from the states of Virginia, Maryland and the newly built capital city; Washington, D. C.   He was even inaugurated with the Masonic Bible taken from his Lodge. 

Even the people in the Boston Tea Party and Paul Revere were Freemasons.  But what were the men who wrote the Constitution and who led our government in the early years—were they Christian or Freemasons or neither?  John Adams is considered by many to be a Christian.  But he belonged to the Universalist Church and said things like: “The government of the United States of America in not in any sense founded on the Christian religion”; Treaty of Peace and Friendship,Article XI.

Thomas Jefferson believed closer to atheism than Christianity.  John Jay, a justice of the Supreme Court, was a Freemason.  And many of the signers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were Freemasons.  And on it goes.

Close to the time of our Revolution was the French Revolution.  One of the purposes of the French Revolution was to destroy the monarchy and Christianity.  “Freemasonry aided in bringing about the French Revolution” wrote Albert Pike in his Freemasonic book, Morals and Dogma.  The Roman Catholic Jesuits also played a role in the French Revolution. 

This was a war against Christianity and many of its churches became closed.  Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels taught the importance of the French Revolution.  The French Revolution raised the Goddess of Reason, the unification of the fulfillment of evolution as its Goddess that they worshipped.

Today, statues of this illuminist goddess of reason are found throughout the United States of America.  Where do you ask?  One stands astride the United States Capitol Building in Washington, District of Columbia. 

Another is atop the dome of the Capitol Building in Austin, Texas. 

Statues of her have been erected in town squares and city parks all over America.  But the most majestic statue of this pagan lady, who bears the torch of light, who illuminates, uplifts and frees mankind, is found in New York’s harbor towering above the shimmering but polluted waters.  She holds in her outstretched hand a torch of fire and light.

It was a gift from the Masonic Order, the modern inheritors of the illuminati heritage, the Statue of Liberty.  It was sculptured by Frederic Bartholdi, a member of the Masonic Lodge of Alsace-Lorraine in Paris, France.  This statue is an esoteric idol of great significance to the secret societies plotting the New World Order.


The Jezebel spirit:


Plan A    
Plan B
Used from a position of weakness
Used from a position of strength
Female Male

The Jezebel spirit uses both plans.  She manipulates with her beauty and intimidates from her strength. 

Proverbs 7:25-27 “Let not thine heart decline to her ways, go not astray in her paths. For she hath cast down many wounded:  yea, many strong men have been slain by her; Her house is the way to hell, going down to the chambers of death.”

Jezebel seeks to replace legitimate authority with illegitimate authority; for Jezebel means “without cohabitation.”  She wants control more than anything else.  Look at what the real Jezebel did during the reign of her husband in the kingdom of Israel.

1 Kings 21:7-10 “And Jezebel his wife said unto him, Dost thou now govern the kingdom of Israel?  Arise, and eat bread, and let thine heart be merry:  I will give thee the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite. So she wrote letters in Ahab’s name, and sealed them with his seal, and sent the letters unto the elders and to the nobles that were in his city, dwelling with Naboth. And she wrote in the letters, saying, Proclaim a fast, and set Naboth on high among the people: And set two men, sons of Belial, before him, to bear witness against him saying, Thou dist blaspheme God and the king.  And then carry him out, and stone him, that he may die.”

She paralyzes people with fear and depression.  She controls and kills anyone who is in her way.

In Greece they worshipped Athena (another name for the Goddess of Reason).  They had by her side the owl, which is a nocturnal animal.  The owl can see what no one else can see.

The jewish people teach that Lilith was the original (first) wife of Adam.  In Genesis One it says that they (Adam and Lilith) were both created from the dust of the earth, thereby equal.  Lilith demanded to be on the top when they were having intimacy.  She refused to submit to the lower position and eventually left the Garden of Eden and went to live in a cave.  While there she became the mother to many demons. 

In 1966, Anton LaVey (born Howard Stanton Levey), head of the Satanic Church, said that at that time began the age of Satan or the age of Adam’s ex--Lilith.  It was the revolution of sex, drugs and rock & roll.  Shortly after this time, another Lilith appeared on a television comedy by the name of “Cheers.”  She was the ex-wife of psychologist Frazier. 

Incredible, but now this evil demon is thought of as being a noble goddess.  She is beautiful on the outside, but very evil on the inside.  She represents cross dressing, transgender, free sexual fornication, bestiality, homosexuality, abortion and many others.  

She gave birth to people known as “night creatures” or in modern terms:  “vampires.” In the past couple of years, vampires have been a major part of many television shows, books, magazines and movies.  They showed immorality of the flesh; which is not the same as resurrection of a spiritual body.   Aleister Crowley identified Lilith as Babylon.  And each year in the summer, many of the politicians and major corporation leaders meet at the Bohemian Grove in California and are seduced by the many owls and by Lilith. 

She is the seducer of men and the destroyer of children; especially little boys.  Little boys from their birth to the 8th day is vulnerable to her; and from 8th days old till 3 years old they don’t cut the boys hair so if she comes and looks at them in the bed maybe she will think that the “little boys” are girls. 

The French Revolution, which remember occurred just a few years after the American Revolution, was a war against the monarchy and the rule of the Roman Catholic Church, particularly its pope.  The temporal sovereignty of the Pope ended during the French Revolution when the French army captured Rome in 1798.  The French had demanded that the pope relinquish his temporal sovereignty and withdraw all of his edicts against the revolution since 1791, but he refused.  Because of this, the French had dethroned, exiled and imprisoned him.  The pope was taken to France where he died in exile. 

The Catholic Church was mortally wounded.  It began its revival when the Vatican was granted the power to be its own sovereign state ruled over by the pope in the year 1921.

Have you ever noticed that most Catholic Churches have their congregations facing the east?  The Temple of God had a door on the east, its people (Israelites) faced the west. 

Ezekiel 8:14-16 “Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD’s house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man?  Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abomination than these. And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD’s house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.”

So the Catholics turn their backs to the LORD, just like many of their ancestors did at Jerusalem, and worship the rising Sun.  And they, in their Mass, practice a reenactment over and over again of the crucifixion; that is to crucify Him over and over again.  His crucifixion is never over.

As said by Pope Pius X:  “The Holy Mass is a prayer itself, even the highest prayer that exists.  It is the sacrifice dedicated by our redeemer on the cross, and is repeated every day on the altar.” 

They claim to kill Jesus Christ every day through the ritual of Holy Communion or the Mass.  In their mass they have a circular wafer which again represents the sun.  Catholics are encouraged to worship it.  After it is held above the head of the priest, it is place in a Monstrance.  The Monstrance is a symbol of the bright sun.  The Solar and lunar imagery is at once recognized.  The sexual joining of the male and female gods is what is shown by the symbols.

That is why the Crucifix, the image of Jesus on the cross; is an image which is used by Catholics only.  They continually crucify Him.  Every time they celebrate the Mass, which is every day, they crucify Him again. 

The Roman Catholics use a Celtic cross: a quartered centered circle.  Many pagan mystics believe that this cross utilizes the power from the Goddess.  By using this cross, the Catholics are proclaiming the power and supremacy of their Goddess.

The Roman Catholics have a works-based religion, which is not of God.  Salvation comes by faith alone.  His salvation was completed and was successful.  There is no need for sacrificing His body and blood day after day; week after week, month after month, year after year; decade after decade; century after century; millennium after millennium. 

Works based religion leads to feelings of either pride or worthlessness and guilt.  There is also the Catholic idea of Purgatory; where a person spends time between heaven and hell paying for his own sins.  There is no biblical basis for this doctrine.  It is entirely Babylonian.

The Catholics also use a halo or a circle of light around the head.  The Virgin Mary also has a circle of stars (12) around her head in the shape of a halo.  This is also another Catholic doctrine which has no biblical basis.

“Vatis” is the Latin word that means “divining” and “can” means “serpent.”  The word “Vatican” means “the divining serpent.”  Isn’t that a great word for the headquarters of their Church?

“Celibacy” comes from the Goddess Cybele and has no biblical basis whatever. 

The letters “IHS” which many Catholics believe means “Jesus the Savior of Mankind” really is the first letter of each of the evil Egyptian trinity:  IHS: Isis, Horus and Set.  Notice that in all the symbols of the occult; there is a false, good reason and the right, evil reason. 

“It is interesting to note how often our church has availed herself of practices which were in common use among pagans…Thus it is true in a certain sense that some Catholic rites and ceremonies are a preproduction of those of Pagan creeds….”  Externals of the Catholic Church, John Sullivan.

“It has often been charged…that Catholicism is overlaid with many pagan incrustations.  Catholicism is ready to accept that accusation—and even to make it her boasts…The great God Pan is not really dead, he is baptized.”  The Story of Catholicism, page 37.

Cardinal Newman stated: “The use of Temples and these dedicated to particular saints, and ornamented on occasions with branches of trees; incense, lamps, and candlers, votive offerings on recovery from illness, holy water, asylums; holydays and season, use of calendars, processions, blessings on the fields, sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure, the ring in marriage,…, images at a later date, perhaps the ecclesiastical chant…, are all of pagan origin, and sanctified by their adoption into the church.”  Cardinal Newman.

“The penetration of the religion of Babylon became so general and well known that Rome was called the ‘new Babylon’”; Faith of Our Fathers, 1917.

“In order to attach to Christianity great attraction in the eyes of the nobility, the priests adopted the outer garments and adornments which were used in pagan cults; Life of Constantine, Eusabius, page 94.

“The twisted cross is a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican Two.  This was a bent or broken cross on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magician and sorcerers of the Middle Ages made up of to represent the biblical term “mark of the beast.”  Yet, not only Paul VI, but his successors the two John Paul’s, carried that object and held it up to be revered by crowds, who had not the slightest idea that it stood for anti-Christ”; The Broken Cross:  Hidden Hand in the Vatican”, Neville Spearman, 1981.

Thus, the twisted cross held in the hand of the Pope is a sign of the anti-Christ.

And the XP cross. The first two letters of the name of Jesus is said by Albert Pike in his book, Morals & Dogma“The active and passive principles of the universe, were commonly symbolized by the generative parts of man and women, the Indian lingam was the union of both, as were the boat and mast and the point within a circle; all of which expressed the same philosophical idea so the union of the two great causes of nature, which concur, one actively and the other passively, in the generation of all beings.” 

2 Kings 23:11 “And he [king Josiah] took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun, at the entering in of the house of the LORD, by the chamber of Nathan—melech the chamberlain, which was in the suburbs, and burned the chariots of the sun with fire.”

This pagan sun wheel is now on the ground of the plaza at the Vatican.  It is a symbol for Baal at the base of the Obelisk.   

Exodus 23:24 “Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works:  but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.”

Exodus 34:13 “But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves:”

Leviticus 26:1 “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it:  for I am the LORD your God.”

Deuteronomy 7:5 “But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.”

Deuteronomy 12:3 “And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.”

1 Kings 14:23 “For they also built them high places, and images [standing images or statues], and groves, on every high hill, and under every green tree.”

2 Kings 3:2 “And he [King Jehoram] wrought evil in the sight of the LORD; but not like his father, and like his mother; for he put away the image of Baal that his father had made.”

2 Kings 10:26-28 “And they [men of Jehu] brought forth the images out of the house of Baal, and burned them. And they brake down the image of Baal, and brake down the house of Baal, and made it a draught house unto this day. Thus Jehu destroyed Baal out of Israel.”

2 Chronicles 14:3-5 “For he [King Asa] took away the altars of the strange gods, and the high places, and brake down the images, and cut down the groves: And commanded Judah to seek the LORD God of their father, and to do the law and the commandment.” Also he took away out of all the cities of Judah the high places and the images:  and the kingdom was quiet before him.”

2 Chronicles 31:1 “Now when all this was finished [under King Hezekiah], all Israel that were present went out to the cities of Judah, and brake the images in pieces, and cut down the groves, and threw down the high places and the altars out of all Judah and Benjamin, in Ephraim also and Manasseh, until they had utterly destroyed them all.  Then all the children of Israel returned every man to his possession, into their own cities.”

2 Chronicles 34:4 “And they brake down the altars of Baalim in his [King Josiah] presence; and the [sun] images, that were on high above them, he cut down; and the groves, and the carved images, and the molten images, he brake in pieces, and made dust of them, and strowed it upon he graves of them that had sacrificed unto them.”

Isaiah 17:8 “And he shall not look to the altars, the work of his hands, neither shall respect that which his fingers have made, either the groves, or the [sun] images.”

Isaiah 27:9 “By this therefore shall the iniquity of Jacob be purged; and this is all the fruit to take away his sin; when he maketh all the stones of the altar as chalkstones that are beaten in sunder, the groves and [sun] images shall not stand up.”

Micah 5:13 “Thy graven images also will I cut off, and thy standing images [statues] out of the midst of thee; and thou shalt no more worship the work of thine hands.”

The obelisk in the Vatican is the largest of all the Egyptian obelisks.  It was brought to the Vatican Plaza from Egypt.  It was used in Egypt to worship the sun.  What would a Christian (?) organization do with it?  Worship the sun?

Revelation 17:4-6 “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication. And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. And I [John, the Apostle] saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus:  and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.”

What are the colors of the Roman Catholic Church?  The bishops is purple, the cardinals is scarlet and many of its vessels is gold!  What were the colors of Israel’s high priests?  Purple, scarlet, gold and blue.  What is the significance of the missing color:  blue:

Number 15:37-40 “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make then fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that t hey put upon  the fringe of their borders a ribband of BLUE; And it shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the LORD, and do them; and that ye seek not after your own heart and your own eyes, after which ye use to go a whoring. That ye may remember, and do all my commandments, and be holy unto your God.”

The church is called the bride of Christ.  Therefore a prostitute metaphorically represents a false church or religious system. Mary is known as the Queen of Heaven.  Also Coredemptrix which means that Mary is just as responsible for our redemption as Jesus was. 

Semiramus and Mary are both known as “Queen of Heaven”; “The Great Mother”; “The Virgin Mother”; “The Celestial Mother”; “The Mother of God”; and “The Eternal Virgin”

Jeremiah 7:18The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.”

Mary is said by the Catholic Church to be sinless.  Catholics are told to pray to Mary.  The Catholic Mary is deified.  She is the same as Ashtoreth.  The Catholics didn’t get rid of Ashtoreth, the simply called her by another name. 

The One Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church as led by the Bishop of Rome, successor to Peter, the first Pope, has always venerated the blessed Virgin Mary including her sinlessness; for the Church follows Scripture—especially the New Testament which She, Herself, compiled – as perfectly as She follows Her Tradition.

Are Roman Catholics Christians; or are they our enemy?  They from their beginning have lied about their Church, for example, that the Apostle Peter was their first leader.  He wasn’t even in Rome according to the Bible.  They are really referring to Simon Magus; the Roman Catholics real Simon Peter.

Mary was not sinless.  In the paragraph above, they capitalized the words “She, “Herself,” and “Her” showing the heresy that she is now a goddess. 

Babylonia is not a religion that is done away; but is alive and well.  Catholicism is the largest religion of the world and it is keeping alive the religion of Babylon.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

David's Family Life

by Pastor Don Elmore

October 6, 2013

Scripture Reading: Psalms 3:1-8

This Psalm was made when David was dethroned from being King of Israel by his own son--Absalom.  Absalom was David’s third son; so how did he get ahead of his brothers?  This story is all part of the bigger one—how David is different from all of the recent Presidents of our nation—the United States of America. 


In the beginning of my ministry, I gave messages which covered the entire Biblical career of David, the King of Israel.  These sermons lasted for about four or five years; intermingled along with other sermons.  After I preached about David, I spent a couple of years on the biblical history of Elijah.  Then I spent another couple of years preaching on Genesis 1-11.

As I was about half-way through giving these messages concerning King David, I thought of the following question:  Who would like to trade places with David?   In other words, who would like to live their life as David?

I surmised that anyone who was only a light reader of the Holy Scriptures or who was never a reader of the Bible would answer with a quick response:  “Yes.”   But for any Christian, who knew a little bit about King David’s life; I doubt that he would want to live his life as David; for he would have to suffer all of the consequences of David’s evil behavior as well as all of his rewards of his good behavior.  And David suffered some of the worst consequences for his wrong behavior.  But he was different from all of our Presidents—for he repented of his sins.

Despite all of the tremendous suffering that he endured, David was the best king Israel ever had.  He ruled over all the tribes of Israel for a short period at the end of his reign.  He was the hero of Israel:  the youth who killed a bear and a lion in guarding his father’s sheep became the nation’s hero when as a teenager he slew Goliath the giant, who challenged the entire army of Israel. 

He was anointed King of Israel, but first spent many years being made the imaginary enemy of King Saul.  He proved his loyalty when he murdered the man who claimed to David that he killed his greatest adversary—the prior king of Israel; King Saul. 

But later, David had murdered his loyal servant, Uriah, for the purpose that he could gain his wife, Bath-sheba, who he had already gotten pregnant.  And for that sin David would have much trouble in his family.  He was even replaced on the throne of Israel by one of his sons!  But the thing with David was that he always repented and returned to his God. 

God had made a covenant with David, the man who had faith in Him; the only son of Israel who stood against the giant Goliath and killed him with a small rock in his sling-shot; the anointed seed of Israel who repeatedly spared King Saul’s life; but David had given occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme:  “Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die” (2 Samuel 12:14). 

Therefore, rather than just kill David for his crime against Uriah, he made David to live and pass through one tremendous sorrow after another.  Yet we may also behold therein the faithfulness, wisdom, and grace of God toward His servant by using those very sorrows for the renewing of him in holiness; that this was accomplished appears blessedly in the sequel. 

David was now to prove the truth of “Thine own wickedness shall correct thee, and thy backslidings shall reprove thee:  know therefore and see that it is an evil thing and bitter that thou hast forsaken the LORD thy God, and that my fear is not in thee, saith the Lord God of hosts” (Jeremiah 2:19).  

It was through those nearest and dearest to himself that David was to experience what “an evil thing and bitter” it is to depart from the Lord.  “Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house” (2 Samuel 12:11) is the words that the LORD had declared.  What must have been the feelings of David with this dread threat hanging over his family! 

How often do we moralize upon the wisdom and mercy of God in withholding from us a knowledge of the future:  how it would spoil our present peace and comfort if we were acquainted with the trials and sorrows lying ahead of us; the more so if it were now revealed to us the evils which would yet overtake the members of our household. 

What if you knew that your spouse would die in a short time?  How would that affect you?  But the case was otherwise with David:  he knew that the sore judgments of God were about to fall within his family circle!

One can readily imagine which one of David’s children would be the first to fall?  The death of Bath-sheba’s infant was but the beginning of a fearful storm which was about to descend upon his loved ones.  It seems quite clear that David had been too easy-going with and indulgent toward his children.  The fact that David had several wives made it much more difficult to rule his offspring as duty required. 

Warning: how one wrong leads to another  

This is seen in David’s connection with his son’s rebellion against him, “his father had not displeased him at any time in saying, Why hast thou done so?” (1 Kings 1:6).  But David’s children had been preserved from open wickedness in their early years:  it was not until their father became guilty of aggravated crimes that the restraining hand of God was removed from them! 

Isn’t there a lesson for the parents of today:  If the parents forsake the paths of righteousness, there is good reason to believe that God will chasten them by suffering their offspring to do likewise?  Children in their youth naturally consider the evil example of their parents an excuse why they may follow in their steps; and grown up ones too are emboldened and confirmed in sin by the sinful conduct of fathers and mothers.

Judgment Given by Nathan

The judgment against David given him by the prophet Nathan was done in a way of natural consequence from David’s own transgressions.  He had yielded to his lust for another man’s wife; and now the women of his own household should be defiled.  He had become a man of blood in the butchery of Uriah, and now of blood his own family should be made to drink.  He had yielded to his lusts, and by that same baneful passion in others was he to be scourged for the rest of his days.  And though David was spared from the violent hand of the avenger, yet he was long made the spectacle of righteous suffering before the world.   

2 Samuel 13: 1-17

  1. “And it came to pass after this, that Absalom the son of David had a fair sister, whose name was Tamar, and Amnon the son of David loved her.”

    “After this” means after the birth of Solomon.  It is important if we know the ages of the people in the story: 

    1. David was about 53 years old.
    2. Amnon was 22 years old.
    3. Absalom was 20 years old.
    4. Tamar was 15 years old.
    5. Solomon was 2 years old.

  2. “And Amnon was so vexed that he fell sick for his sister Tamar; for she was a virgin; and Amnon thought it hard for him to do anything to her.” 

    Amnon had developed a violent lust for Tamar.  The Law of God had forbid sexual relationship with a close relative.  “The nakedness of thy father’s wife’s daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness” (Leviticus 18:11).  But Amnon had no way of making his feelings known for Tamar, for virgins were kept in close seclusion from the company of men, even though they were close relatives, not being permitted to see them without the presence of witnesses. 

    How to contact her was his brooding problem; so much so that Amnon became sick and sorely vexed daily in his great desire for her yet, he was held in check by a thought which made him doubt that it would be right to touch her.     

  3. But Amnon had a friend whose name was Jonadab, the son of Shimeah David’s brother:  and Jonadab was a very subtil man.

  4. And he said unto Amnon, Why are thou, being the king’s son, lean from day to day?  Wilt thou not tell me?  And Amnon said unto him, I love Tamar, my brother Absalom’s sister.

  5. And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed and make thyself sick:  and when thy father cometh to see thee, say unto him, I pray thee, let my sister Tamar come, and give me meat, and dress the meat in my sight, that I may see it, and eat it at her hand.”

    Only an evil and subtle man would give such advice to ruin the life of his friend as well as the innocent virgin who should be protected by her brother.   Amnon had determined to commit the fearful sin of incest against his half-sister, who was “fair” or beautiful. 

    Warning:  Ah, how many a young woman has grieved because she was not pretty: alas, good looks often prove to be a fatal snare, and those endowed with them need to be doubly cautious.   This was the cause of the lust of Amnon; his sister’s beauty.

    Warning:  Human sensual wisdom can only show one how to commit sin and satisfy the sensual and unlawful passions, but it is powerless to show him how to escape from sin and its effects.  It does not even look far enough into the future to see the results of sin, leaving to its own victims helpless and guilty before the avenger.  

    The most solemn features of this calamity may be seen in tracing the workings of God’s righteous retribution in it.

    1. We have the Spirit’s time mark in the opening words of Chapter 13; “and it came to pass after this.”  It was when David returned to Jerusalem—where his own fearful fall had taken place several years prior to what was going to happen!

    2. Amnon was the king’s oldest son (2 Samuel 3:2) and therefore the one in immediate line for the throne, and probably the one David loved the most.

    3. Amnon was at a loss to think of means for the gratification of his base desires, but there was at hand a cunning counselor who promptly devised a plot whereby he succeeded, and that man was a nephew of David’s.  

    4. The workings of Providence were such that David himself was made an unwilling accessory to his daughter’s ravishment.  When the king saw Amnon, who pretended to be sick, God not only withheld from him a discernment of his evil designs, but David was the one who sent for Tamar; as poor Uriah had been deceived by him, now he was deceived by his son!

    What a marvelous penalty for the sin of David.  It worked on him in a way that caused him to be humble and choose the correct way of repentance.

  6. So Amnon lay down, and made himself sick:  and when the king was come to see him, Amnon said unto the king, I pray thee, let Tamar my sister come and make me a couple of cakes in my sight, that I may eat at her hand.

  7. Then David sent home to Tamar, saying, Go now to thy brother Amnon’s house, and dress him meat [food].”
  8. Amnon took the advice of his cousin and posed as a very sick man to get David to permit Tamar to come and make cakes for him.  With men being present when he gave permission, David did not suspect any plot against Tamar; but when she came Amnon sent all the men away so as to take advantage of her.

    Tamar may have been flattered at having her older half-brother call for her in particular to prepare cakes for him when he was sick, so she gladly consented.

    Warning:  Be wary of being flattered.  Have discernment at whether it is flattery or an honest request.

  9. So Tamar went to her brother Amnon’s house; and he was laid down.  And she took flour, and kneeded it, and made cakes in his sight, and did bake the cakes.
  10. And she took a pan, and poured them out before him; but he refused to eat.  And Amnon said, Have out all men from me.  And they went out every man from him.
  11. And Amnon said unto Tamar, Bring the meat [food] into the chamber, that I may eat of thine hand.  And Tamar took the cakes which she had made, and brought them into the chamber to Amnon her brother. 
  12. And when she had brought them unto him to eat, he took hold of her, and said unto her, Come lie with me, my sister.
  13. And she answered him, Nay, my brother, do not force me; for no such thing ought to be done in Israel:  do not thou, this folly.
  14. And I, whither shall I cause my shame to go?  And as for thee, thou shalt be as one of the fools in Israel.  Now therefore, I pray thee, speak unto the king; for he will not withhold me from thee.
  15. Howbeit he would not hearken unto her voice; but, being stronger than she, forced her, and lay with her.”

    Amnon had lusted and longed for the opportunity many times.  He watched her like a cat waiting to spring upon its prey, but held himself until the cakes were done and brought before him.  Then, he refused to eat, and commanded all the men to leave his house, so he could be alone with Tamar.  He then took hold of her and declared his intentions. 

    Tamar had more righteousness at her age of 15 than her brother at the age of 22.  She made a most impressive plea for him not to commit sin as a fool, advising him to speak to his father. 

  16. Then Amnon hated her exceedingly; so that the hatred wherewith he hated her was greater than the love wherewith he had loved her.  And Amnon said unto her, Arise, be gone.
  17. And she said unto him, There is no cause:  this evil in sending me away is greater than the other that thou didst unto me.  But he would not hearken unto her.
  18. Then he called his servant that ministered unto him, and said, Put now this woman out from me, and bolt the door after her.”

    This hatred never would have been if Amnon had really loved Tamar instead of lusting after her like a beast.  Tamar again showed the better sense of the two in view of this depraved sin on the part of Amnon, contending that the evil of hating her and sending her away in disgrace was worse than the first crime. 

    God judgment is coming to pass on David.  After he returns to Jerusalem after his military victory, he suffers one calamitous grief after another. 

In this message we are just considering two of them and they are whoppers:

  1. One of David’s sons dishonors one of David’s daughters, i.e. he rapes one of his virgin daughters; one of his sons rapes his own half-sister.
  2. While another of David’s sons, after biding his time, revenged the outraged dishonor of his sister by murdering her seducer.  One of his sons murders his half-brother who raped his sister.

Thus, lust and fratricide now desolated the king’s own household:  one daughter is disgraced; one son is dead; and one son is a murderer who soon would dethrone David as the King of Israel!

After two full years, Absalom waited until the right moment.  His sister stayed in his house desolate.  But there was a sheepshearer’s event, where Absalom told his servants to kill Amnon after his heart was merry with wine.  And they did.  

Let’s observe how the righteous retribution of God appears in every detail of this incident.

  1. David’s murder of Uriah was not a sudden surprisal into evil, but a thing deliberately premeditated in cold blood, so Absalom’s removal of Amnon was callously planned beforehand. 
  2. The slaying of Uriah was a means to an end; that David might obtain Bath-sheba; so the murder of Amnon was but a preliminarily to Absalom’s design of obtaining the kingdom—by removing his oldest brother who was heir to the throne. 
  3. As David did not slay Uriah by his own hand, but made Joab an accomplice, so Absalom involved his servants in the guilt of the crime—instead of striking the fatal blow himself.
  4. As David made Uriah “drunk” before his death (11:13), so Amnon was struck down while “his heart was merry with wine”!  Who can fail to see the superintending government of God?

Do we see it in our own lives?


What should happen to a man who finds a virgin and lays hold on her and lies with her and his deed be discovered?   Does God’s Law say that the man should be killed? 

“Then the man that lay with her shall give  unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days” Deuteronomy 22:29. 

The fact that the man could not put her away all his days to me proves to me that this was not the common rule of all marriages.  What would the enforcement of this one Law of God be on the residents of the United States? 

What about our Presidents?  Woodrow Wilson had an affair and he was blackmailed over it; to America’s getting into World War I and America’s getting its first Jewish Supreme Court member. 

J. F. Kennedy had a host of ladies and his wife, Jackie, was known as a slut.  In fact, it was hard to keep John with Jackie. 

Clinton, both the President and his wife, had their hosts of affairs with others.  Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Lyndon Baines Johnson, Dwight David Eisenhower are just a few of the Presidents who were involved in affairs.    

Then there was a black reverend by the name of Martin Luther King who had a host of sexual affairs:  hookers, white prostitutes, black whores, etc.  He wasn’t murdered by the man that they said he was.  The same with J. F. K.  He was murdered not by the man that they claim.  In fact, if you went to the location of the assassination you would see how impossible it was to shoot from the sixth floor of the book depository and hit the President in the head and also have the bullet rickshaw to the front of the car and hit the governor. 

What do you think is going to happen?  Our nation is about completely dead.  There is only a small remnant that remembers what it was like to keep a small part of God’s Laws.  And that remnant is almost dead and gone. 

Does sin separate us from our God?  If the nations sins more and more will it suffer more and more?   What will be the result of all of the lies, fornication, false flags, deceit, etc. that has been going on; what will be the payment for the sin that was committed?

But if David had committed any of these crimes against us and violated God’s Law, what would he have done?  He would have repented and turned back to his God.  For after being exiled from the throne of Israel by his disobedient son, Absalom, we see this aged parent, driven from his home, humiliated before his subjects, stricken to the very depths of his heart by the murderous hatred of the son whom he had forgiven and honored, loving this worthless and devil-driven youth with an unchanged devotion, that sought to save him from his just and impending doom.  The two opposing forces set to battle; and what was the result?

“And Absalom rode upon a mule, and the mule went under the thick boughs of a great oak, and his head caught hold of the oak, and he was taken up between the heaven and the earth; and the mule that was under him went away” 2 Samuel 18:9.  

“And they took Absalom, and cast him into a great pit in the wood, and laid a very great heap of stone upon him:  and all Israel fled every one to his tent” 2 Samuel 18:17.

Absalom was hanged in a tree, an object of shame, filled with terror, incapable of delivering himself, unable to either fight or flee.  He remained in this direful situation for some considerable time, awaiting with horror his merited doom—death by three darts by David’s faithful man--Joab.

A more and melancholy and tragic spectacle can scarcely be imagined than Absalom dangling from the boughs of that tree.  Deserted by his fellows, for they had one and all lifted him to his fate; abandoned by God, now that the cup of his iniquity was filled; a prey to remorse, for though utterly heartless and conscienceless, his thoughts now must have been of the gloomiest nature.  Quite unable to free himself, he was compelled to wait, hour after hour, until someone came and put an end to his wretched life.  What an unspeakably solemn object lesson is this for the people in the office of the executive, or legislative or judiciary branches of our nation!

David was soon restored to being the King of Israel once again; a better and more humble king.  He accepted the chastening of the people as he lost the office of king; he waited for his God to be his salvation once again. 

“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, (isn’t that what David did?), then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land (isn’t that what God did?).  After a short wait, David was once again on the throne.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel. 

Fishbein vs Hoxsey

by Pastor Don Elmore

June 9, 2013

Scripture Reading:  Psalms 104:14-15 “He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man:  that he may bring forth food out of the earth; And wine that maketh glad the heart of man, and oil to make his face to shine, and bread which strengtheth man’s heart.”

I must have been asleep when this battle took place, as I was alive when a lot of it happened.  It lasted for over 25 years and I still was not aware of it occurring.  It began before I was born, and it fought on when I was in elementary, middle, and high school.  It was a major case, and I didn’t learn of it until a couple of months ago.

The two men who fought against each other, Fishbein and Hoxsey, were from different stock. Harry Hoxsey

Fishbein was a jew and Hoxsey an Israelite.  Fishbein flunked anatomy class in college, never completed his internship class and was never a doctor—he never had any patients whatsoever. 

Hoxsey only went to the eighth grade and then he dropped out of school.  He was a coal miner in Illinois, where his grandfather had been a farmer.  His grandfather had a stallion that was his favorite.  It got cancer in its right hoof, and the veterinarian said that it should be destroyed.  Instead, John Hoxsey, his grandfather, who was a Quaker, decided to let his favorite horse go into the pasture and enjoy his final days. 

The horse began to go into one area of the pasture and ate certain herbs that he never had eaten before.  And as he did so, he surprisingly got better and better.  Soon the horse recovered completely and the tumor sloughed away.

Grandfather Hoxsey began to take notes and when his horse was completely free of any cancer he began to mix these herbs for the other animals.  He used this information to develop a salve for animals, mostly horses, and saved their lives from the torture of cancer and other diseases. 

He kept the formula a secret; and, before his death, Hoxsey entrusted his secret formula to his son, also named John, who became a “country doctor.”  When his son (John Hoxsey, Jr.) was on his death bed, he told his son (Harry Hoxsey) about this salve and pills which he then used in his veterinarian practice and asked him if he wanted to be a veterinarian or a doctor too.  He explained to his son that he had begun to use it on people with great success.  So he asked his son, who was named Harry, if he wanted this secret formula.  And he answered, “Yes.” 

So his father gave him the formulas.  He had him write the formulas over and over for the liquid, the salve, and the powder till he had filled three notebooks. He had just the one night to finish learning them, for the next morning his father burned his papers and soon after, died.  Before he gave his son the formulas, he made his son promise that he would make this available to anyone, regardless of the cost

So, after his father died, Harry, in 1922, opened his first clinic in Taylorville, Illinois.  He was having success in curing cancer, but he was hounded and arrested many times for practicing medicine without a license.  But before we go on, let’s get some more background.

John D. Rockefeller

William Avery Rockefeller, the father of the more famous John Davidson Rockefeller, was quite a man.  He had eight children and three wives and after he was indicted for rape in 1849, he called himself “Dr. Bill Levingston, Celebrated Cancer Specialist;” besides being neither a doctor, or celebrated or a cancer specialist.  He was the best snake-oil salesman of the nineteenth century in America.   He sold his bottle of tonic for $25 a bottle; a mixture of a laxative and petroleum.  William A Rockefeller

$25 a bottle was two months’ salary for the average American at that time.   But “Dr. Bill” didn’t have to worry about the reaction of his customers because he didn’t stay in any one town very long.  He was known also as “Devil Bill,” and made his living out of lies and deceit. 

One of his sons, John, learned his lessons well from his father.  He used the lies and deceit with another “snake oil;”—not one to “cure” cancer, but petroleum.  John lied constantly to get the new “horseless carriages” (cars) to use gasoline, derived from petroleum.  Electricity and fermented vegetables were soon discarded from the use in the automobile—and eventually gasoline became the main choice of drivers. 

All civilized countries now used petroleum products in Big Agra for fertilizers, Big Pharma for drugs, Big Food for additives; Big Plastics for plastic goods and packaging, Big Tires for the multitude of billions of tires; besides Big Automobile plants that burn all of the gasoline in their cars and trucks.    All of the viable substitutes for oil have been suppressed by the snake oil salesmen by their Washington lobbyists. 

A consortium of General Motors, Firestone Tire, and Phillips Petroleum along with Rockefeller’s Standard Oil made up a joint company that bought up and dismantled the trolley cars in 45 American cities:  including, New York, Los Angeles, Detroit and St. Louis.  The automobile became king.  William Avery Rockefeller would no doubt approve of the lies and deceit of these modern snake oil salesmen.  They followed his tactics just like he did.

During his days as “Devil Bill,” he began to bottle the raw petroleum and palm it off under various names as a cure for the popular maladies of the day:  such as liver complaint, cholera, consumption and bronchitis, as well as cancer.    The bottle of snake-oil that they sold cost the druggist only 21 cents for a bottle and Standard Oil only 1/5 of a cent to make it.  What a profit!

It wasn’t until 1939 that the drug business began to assume the present gigantic proportion which today makes $10 billion a year business.  It didn’t matter to the Rockefellers that their father’s snake oil was discovered by physicians to be harmful as it robbed the body of the soluble vitamins and caused serious deficiency diseases.  It made them money, and that was all that counted; it didn’t matter that it hurt more people than it helped.

American Medical Association

The American Medical Association (AMA) was started in 1849.  Dr. George H. Simmons became the head of the AMA in 1899.  It was a weak organization with little money and little respect from the general public.  The AMA realized that competition was causing physicians’ incomes to dwindle, as the number of medical schools had increased from around 90 (in 1880) to over 150 (in 1903).  Chiropractic had just been introduced into the mainstream, homeopathy was thriving, herbalists were flourishing, and all the while regular doctors were unable to profit from their medical practices.

 Abraham FlexnerSimmons was shrewd enough to have the AMA establish a Council on Medical Education in 1904.  This Council devised a plan to rank medical schools that favored the allopathic schools and downgraded the homeopathic schools.  However by 1910, the AMA was out of money and didn’t have the funds to complete the project.  This is where Rockefeller and Carnegie joined with the AMA and provided them with the money to complete the job they had started.  

Simon Flexner, who was on the Board of Directors for the Rockefeller Institute, proposed that his brother, Abraham, who knew nothing about medicine, and who was on the staff of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, be put on the Board of Medical Education.  With practically unlimited funds it became predictable that  the homeopathic colleges, even the large and respected ones, would eventually be forced to stop teaching homeopathy or die.  And that’s exactly what happened.

It was what they (Rockefellers) did to the Christian religion, too.  They took over the seminaries and changed that religion so that today it is almost 180 degrees different from what it used to be.  They wrote books (Scofield Bibles, rapture books, universalism, etc.) and put money in the churches that taught what they wanted and fought against churches that they did not agree with [501 (c)3] .  In the same manner, they took over the medical schools.

Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced a major upgrade in medical education by financing only those medical schools that instructed in what they wanted taught.  In other words, they began to immediately shower hundreds of millions of dollars on these medical schools that were teaching “drug intensive” medicine. 

The purpose was to dominate the oil and chemical (pharmaceutical) markets, and the Flexner brothers report gave both of these tycoons the “ammunition” they needed to achieve that goal.  In the end, the Rockefeller/Carnegie plan was a smashing success.  Those medical schools that did not conform were denied the funds and the prestige that came with those funds, and were forced out of business. 

By 1925, over 10,000 herbalists were out of business.  By the time I was born, 1500 chiropractors would be prosecuted for practicing “quackery.”  The 22 homeopathic medical schools that flourished in 1900 dwindled to just 2 in 1923.  By the time I was 8 years old, all schools teaching homeopathy were closed.  In the end, if a physician did not graduate from a Flexner approved medical school, he couldn’t find a job. 

This is why today our doctors are so heavily biased toward synthetic drug therapy and know little about nutrition.   This is why today our doctors can perform surgeries, give out drugs or radiation; but know little of what our God gave to us—the herbs and other remedies for disease. 

And it doesn’t matter what the facts are.  The infamous Spanish flu that occurred in the United States in 1918-1919, the homeopathies lost only 0.7% of their patients while the allopathic lost 30% of theirs.  It doesn’t matter if you say that you can cure any disease—you are in competition with the allopathic doctors!


By 1924 one of the AMA directors became involved in a scandal and had to resign.  He appointed a man to take his place.  Who?  Morris Fishbein. Morris Fishbein

He took over as the control of the AMA and by 1934 he assumed dictatorial control of the state licensing boards and made it as difficult as he could for any doctor who did not join.  He, and the three doctors who formed the corporation, were little more than extortionists, who made millions by using the power of the state.  The AMA, which started out as a legitimate organization, became a crooked one.  And Morris Fishbein was the main cause.

Fishbein and the Standard Oil Company became impressed with the methods of the big packing houses which used, processed and sold every part of the hog but the squeal.  Homeopathic and allopathic were in a major battle in the early 1900’s.  Allopathic physicians would let blood, i.e. let the blood flow out of the person, perform surgeries, and began to formulate petroleum based drugs to give to their patients.  Homeopathic physicians gave herbs and other natural remedies to cure all health related problems. 

John D. Rockefeller  Andrew Carnegie 

Rockefeller wanted the petroleum drugs to win out; homeopathic doctors wanted their method to win; Fishbein used the AMA to manipulate the minds of the American people to think the way of the allopathic doctors and strictly prohibited the use of herbs and other natural remedies to cure all of America’s health problems.  Fishbein was also the head of the AMA’s Journal; the magazine of America’s doctors.  They published “facts” that weren’t facts at all and then false statistics to prove themselves correct. 

They were exposed only when the doctors and physicians from other parts of the world visited the United States and saw the true healthcare conditions that prevailed there.  They also found that the medicines prescribed by the physicians and which had the “Seal of Acceptance” by the Association, contained mercury poisoning.  The effect of the use of such highly toxic medicines could be seen as many people had sallow skin, sunken eyes and crooked teeth and jaws.  This is still done in vaccines and flu shots.

This propaganda of the Association still continues to be published through its Journal.  The medicine field of America has been flooded with the tsunami of criminal conspiracy.  The AMA passes all the drugs and medicines without testing them and put its “Seal of Acceptance” on receiving a good amount of money from the owners of the company.  They just publish things to manipulate the minds of people and prevent them from using natural herbs and remedies that will benefit their health at a very minimal price.

The AMA created the Department of Investigation to hunt down doctors still using natural remedies.  This department’s sole job was to shut down any healers who could threaten AMA profits.  The AMA’s thug department actually kept files on anyone who was cured of cancer. 

They also kept files on health foods, vitamins, acupuncture, and faith healings.  The head of the AMA was Morris Fishbein who was a criminal and an extortionist; and if you did not pay him large sums of money for the AMA “Seal of Acceptance,” you simply could not survive in the medical field.  Fishbein was the ultimate scam artist.  The AMA never even had any facilities to test any of the drugs on which they put their “Seal of Acceptance” on anyway, so it was all a huge scam.

The AMA Attempts to Buy Hoxsey's Formula

Fishbein also had attacks against other physicians who used other alternate methods to cure cancer and other ailments.  He had already begun to destroy Royal Raymond Rife and his healing methods.  As Fishbein was in the process of destroying Rife, Hoxsey gained an increasing amount of patients.  Hoxsey went from 300 patients a day in the late 1920’s to 12,000 patients a day in the late 1940’s. 

But it was in 1924 that Hoxsey meet with the head of the AMA and editor of the AMA’s Medical Journal, Morris Fishbein, to prove the efficacy of his treatment.  He was given access to a Chicago policeman, Sgt. Thomas Manix, whose cancer prognosis was terminal.  Using his ointment and tonic that was given him by his father, the policeman was completely cured.  This is a documented medical fact.  Manix lived another 10 years. 

Fishbein and his associates were impressed, and they offered to buy the formula from Hoxsey.  But Hoxsey disagreed with their terms.  The group of men, including Fishbein, would receive all the revenues for the first several years.  There was no guarantee that everyone would be able to have access to the formula, and Hoxsey would be completely out of the loop with no control.  Hoxsey refused to hand over the formula.  He had to have a proposal that would guarantee what he had promised his father on his death bed. This was the beginning of their war, as the medical establishment began their campaign to destroy Hoxsey if they could not own the formula their selves. 

In 1936, Hoxsey established the largest independent clinic in the country in Dallas, Texas.  There he was confronted with yet another enemy; The Assistant District Attorney, Al Templeton.  He arrested him 100 times in two years.  Each time Hoxsey bailed himself out with $10,000 in cash that he had made from his investment in oil wells.  But charges were always dropped as no one would testify against Hoxsey.  Too many patients were happy with the treatment they had received from him. 

A few times he let them keep him in jail.  After a couple of days the jail was surrounded by his patients singing hymns and carrying fried chicken and pies.  The jail couldn’t have this; it was too embarrassing, so they let him go.

Al Templeton continued harassing Hoxsey until his brother, Mike Templeton, was diagnosed as having incurable cancer by conventional allopathy doctors.  Mike sneaked into the clinic to receive Hoxsey’s treatments.  He was cured.  Al properly credited his brother’s cure to Hoxsey’s treatment, and he had a change of heart.  He then became Hoxsey’s lawyer, and soon he was elected as a district judge. 

Hoxsey Sues the AMA

In 1949, when I was 7 years old, Morris Fishbein wrote a piece on Hoxsey that was featured in the Hearst papers’ Sunday Magazine, available to 20 million readers.  The article was “Blood Money.” It was full of character assassination that Fishbein had spewed endlessly in the Journal of American Medical Association over the previous years.

Hoxsey fired back to the public on the radio, in films and with public demonstrations.  He also wrote a book, “You Don’t Have to Die”.  There were Senators and Representatives that had been cured by Hoxsey’s treatments, as well as a host of others.  It was a major battle.  The AMA used its power against the homeopathic, naturalists and chiropractic doctors that used herbs and other ointments to cure their patients of disease.  The AMA called all of these people, “Quacks”; no matter if they cured a disease or not.

Hoxsey was so irritated that he sued the Hearst Newspaper Empire, Morris Fishbein and the AMA Journal for slander and libel. The nation listened to the court case intently.  And Hoxsey won!

The ruling was that both Hearst and Fishbein were guilty of libel and slander.  Hoxsey had paraded over 50 cured cancer patients into the courtroom, along with testimony from other supporters.   

The Judge, W. I. Thorton said, “I am of the opinion and belief that Hoxsey has cured these people of Cancer.  Hoxsey has been done a great injustice and…articles and utterances by defendant Morris Fishbein were false, slanderous, and libelous.” 

Fishbein was embarrassed.  The trial revealed that he had flunked anatomy in college and that he had never practiced medicine!  Fishbein also admitted that the external salve Hoxsey used was actually effective in curing cancer.  These after years of propagandizing the salve as worthless and dangerous; it was proved a worthless, lying argument.

The Supreme Court also upheld the decision, ruling that the AMA had used restrictive trade techniques.  The ensuing publicity aroused a public outcry against the AMA in the early 1950’s.  The AMA was considered by many as nothing better than a trade union that would not tolerate competition.  Under Fishbein’s direction, the AMA used surgery, radiation and synthetic drugs along with a sprawling high-tech hospital system.  The competition of medicine throttled diversity; which they called quackery. 

In 1953 Congress determined that the Hoxsey treatment and twelve other alternative treatments were actively conspired against by organized medicine.  Morris Fishbein was forced to resign from his long tenure as head of the AMA. 


But the AMA was not going to quit.  They got another organization, the Food and Drug Association, to do their bidding.   The FDA pursued a long campaign of harassing not only Hoxsey, but also his patients.  Finally, the FDA closed and padlocked all 17 of Hoxsey’s clinics on the same day in 1960—the year of my graduation from high school.

FDA Warning Against Hoxsey Cancer Treatment

But Hoxsey came up with a plan.  He urged his head nurse, Mildred Nelson, who was once skeptical of his treatments, but who became a strong believer in them.  He asked her if she would run the new facility in Mexico.  She relocated his facility in Tiajuana, Mexico. 

The clinic is still there.  The name was changed to the Bio-Medical Center and still cures about 80% of the patients from cancer.  In 1960 the AMA also put an end to Rife’s cure for cancer.  He died an alcoholic. 

They pulled the licenses of all the doctors who supported Hoxsey and/or Rife.  We are 80 years behind where we should be, because of one despicable man, Morris Fishbein, who used the State to halt the advance of medicine, and to line his own pockets.    

The Caduceus AMA LogoAnd what is the insignia of the medical profession association?  Two snakes entwined on a staff.  It is the caduceus; the mythological symbol of the Roman god Mercury.  He was the patron of messengers, but he also had a somewhat unsavory reputation as the associate of outlaws, merchants and thieves.  In the ancient world, merchants were synonymous with the other two categories.

The University of Rochester, deciding that the two snakes were excessive, recently reduced the two snakes to one.  And that is it insignia today.

Modern AMA Logo


Senators, judges, lawyers and some doctors endorsed Hoxsey’s cancer treatments.  Along with hundreds of patient supporters, once seriously ill with cancer, testified that they owed their lives and continued health to him and his infamous treatments.  Hoxsey’s larger than life personality, unfortunately fit the stereotypical image of a quack, coupled with a confrontational style, set him head on to clash with the medical authorities for decades.  Perhaps being caught up in the swinging pendulum of the medical focus of the day is what began the swing away from herbal medicine to pharmaceuticals. 

After all the bitter opposition by the medical establishment of the day, and after all the invitations by Hoxsey, not one study on this formula was ever conducted by the AMA. 

There were 10 herbal ingredients listed on the label of his tonic:

  1. Red Clover
  2. Burdock Root
  3. Stillingia Root
  4. Barberry Root
  5. Licorice
  6. Poke Root
  7. Cascara Amarga
  8. Prickly Ash Bark
  9. Buckthorn Bark
  10. Potassium iodide

1 out of 20 people in America had cancer in the year 1900; by 1940 it had increased to 1 out of 16; by 1970 it had increased to 1 out of 10; now it is 1 out of 3 in the year 2000.  In that short time in history, 100 years, the amount of cancer has grown to almost seven times as much as it had been.  Over 500,000 Americans die from cancer each year.

Today, the modern doctors perform surgeries, radiate and rapidly give their patients petroleum/cancer pills.   They heal very few of their patients.  Some of their practices even give the patient cancer.

God’s plan for the healing of His covenant people is very seldom ever searched for.  Many so-called Christians don’t even know that He has one.  God provided herbs for the service of man; not petroleum drugs.  He also gave His covenant people wine, oil and bread for his health, as well as a lot of things that he could do to improve his immune system; not cut part of his body off to prevent the possibility of ever getting cancer, or burn it with radiation or poison it with a synthetic pill.  

Prayer and the anointing of oil by the church elders for sick members of the church, prayer made by God’s people daily for sick people that they know of, proper breast feeding and weaning, acceptable diet for His people to eat or not eat to prevent or heal His people and different things that they can do for a good and sound mind.  For example, Proverbs 17:22 “A merry heart doeth good like a medicine:  but a broken spirit drieth the bones.”

Proverbs 1:7  “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge:  but fools despise wisdom and instruction.”  May we have some of our people begin or continue to study and learn about what our God says about how to prevent illness from entering our bodies and to heal our bodies. 

But if we don’t keep God’s laws we will be sick and will contact ALL the diseases that Egypt had and that we feared; no matter what!

Deuteronomy 28:58-61

“If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD.

Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of the seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and long continuance.

Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of:  and they shall cleave unto thee.

Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the LORD bring upon thee, until thou be destroyed.”

Our God has in the past intervened and healed His people miraculously.  He has given a few of His people the knowledge of essential oils, like “Thieves” which have helped heal His people.  There are others who have been saved from their illnesses by prayer, anointing and simply by God power.  Anyway, God is the healer. 

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Four Hundred & Thirty Years

by Pastor Don Elmore

May 12, 2013

Scripture Reading:  Exodus 12:40-41

Have you ever wondered what these two verses mean in Exodus 12:40-41?  It seems that Israel was 430 years in Egypt; however, it took a while before I learned that Israel wasn't in Egypt that long.   Below is a table that will explain the timing.

How Long was Israel In Egypt?
Patriarch Age Years from Promise Years to Exodus Event Passage
Abraham 75 0 430 God makes the promise to Abraham and he leaves Haran Gen. 12:1-4
Abraham 86 10 420 Ishmael is born Gen. 16:3-4









Isaac is born


Gen. 21:5














Isaac is weaned and Ishmael mocks/persecutes Isaac



Gen. 21:8-9
Gal. 4:29










 Isaac marries Rebekah


Gen. 24:1-67
Gen. 25:20










Esau and Jacob are born


Gen. 25:26














Abraham dies



Gen. 25:7











 Joseph is born


Gen. 30:25














 Joseph is sold by his brothers and taken to Egypt



Gen. 37















 Isaac dies



Gen. 35:28-29











 Jacob meets Pharaoh


Gen. 45:4-6
Gen. 47:9









 Jacob dies


Gen. 47:28
Gen. 49:33
 110  286  144  Joseph dies Gen. 50:26
Only 64 years pass from the time Joseph dies to when Moses is born     
Moses  3 mos
 350  80  Moses is placed in a basket and adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter Exod. 2
Moses  80  430  0  Exodus from Egypt Exod. 7:7
Exod. 12:40-41
Gal. 3:16-17

Genesis 12:1-4 “Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee.

And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee:  and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

So Abram departed, as the LORD had spoken unto him; and Lot went with him:  and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.”

Genesis 16:3-4 “And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan; and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.

And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived:  and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.”

Genesis 21:5And Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born unto him.”

Genesis 21:8-9 “And the child grew, and was weaned:  and Abraham made a great feast the same day that Isaac was weaned.

And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian [Ishmael], which she had born unto Abraham, mocking.”

Galatians 4:29 “But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.”

Genesis 24:1, 3, 4 “And Abraham was old, and well stricken in age;…

And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell:  But thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac.”

Genesis 25:20 “And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.” 

Genesis 25:26 “And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob:  and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.”

Genesis 25:7 “And these are the days of the years of Abraham’s life which he lived, an hundred threescore and fifteen years [175 years].”

Genesis 37:1-2 “And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan.  These are the generations of Jacob.  Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren; and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father’s wives:  and Joseph brought  unto his father their evil report.”

Genesis 35:28-29 “And the days of Isaac were an hundred and fourscore years [180 years].  And Isaac gave up the ghost, and died, and was gathered unto his people, being old and full of days:  and his sons Esau and Jacob buried him.”

Genesis 45:4-6 “And Joseph said unto his brethren, Come near to me, I pray you.  And they came near:  And he said I am Joseph your brother, whom ye sold into Egypt.

Now therefore be not grieved, nor angry with yourselves, that ye sold me hither:  for God did send me before you to preserve life.

For these two years hath the famine been in the land:  and yet there are five years, in the which there shall neither be earing [plowing] or harvest.”

Genesis 47:9 “And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are an hundred and thirty years:  few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of  their pilgrimage.”

Genesis 47:28 “And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years:  so the whole age of Jacob was an hundred forty and seven years.”

Genesis 49:33 “And when Jacob had made an end of commanding his sons, he gathered up his feet into the bed, and yielded up the ghost, and was gathered unto his people.”

Genesis 50:26 “So Joseph died, being an hundred and ten years old:  and they embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin in Egypt.”

Exodus 7:7 “And Moses was fourscore [80] years old, and Aaron on fourscore and three years old, when they spake unto Pharaoh.”

The Septuagint differs from the King James Version on this verse by the addition of the words “and in the land of Canaan.”

Exodus 12:40-41 (KJV) “Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years [430].

And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred and thirty years [430], even the selfsame day it came to pass, that all the host of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt.”

Exodus 12:40-41 (Septuagint) “Now the sojourning of the Israelites which they and their fathers had sojourned in the land of Egypt and in the land of Chanaan was four hundred and thirty years.

And at the end of four hundred and thirty years all the host of the Lord came out of the land of Egypt.”

Genesis 15:13-17 “And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years [This dates back to the time when Isaac was weaned and confirmed as the covenant seed, and Ishmael was cast out; Genesis 21:12 and Galatians 4:30.  At that time Isaac was 5 years old];

And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge:  and afterward shall they come out with great substance.

And thou shalt go thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age.

But in the fourth generation [1. Levi, 2.  Kohath, 3.  Amran, 4.  Moses;]

1 Chronicles 6:1-3] they shall come hither again:  for the iniquity of the Amorites ....

  1. Homosexuality
  2. Incest
  3. Inordinate affection
  4. Adultery
  5. Idolatry
  6. Profanity
  7. Bestiality
  8. Witchcraft
  9. Whoredom
  10. Dishonor to parents
  11. Murder
  12. Stealing
  13. Lying

.... is not yet full.”

Notice that this was a main part of the sermon given by Christianity’s early martyr; Stephen:

Acts 7:6 “And God spake on this wise, That his seed should sojourn in a strange land; and that they should bring them into bondage, and entreat them evil four hundred [400] years.”

The 400 years Stephen refers to in his famous sermon are to be reckoned from the confirmation of Isaac as the seed when Ishmael was cast out. 

Galatians 3:16-18 “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made.  He saith not, And to seeds [8], as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed [‘Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children, but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called,’ Romans 9:7], which is Christ [the anointed seed; Isaac].

And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ [the anointed; the covenant people], the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after [the conditional marriage law], cannot disannul, that it should make the promise on none effect.

For if the inheritance be of the law [conditional marriage law], it is no more of promise:  but God gave it to Abraham by promise.”

The Apostle Paul is telling his listeners that the inheritance of Abraham was not by the law that Israel accepted when they were married in Mt. Sinai; for that law was a conditional law.  The house of Israel was divorced because of that law and had no hope.  There was nothing that they could do to put themselves back into the covenant promise.  But Paul tells them that the inheritance of Abraham was made by a covenant of promise, not the marriage law.  This unconditional promise was given 430 years before the marriage happened. 

God gave the inheritance to Abraham by promise, not by the marriage law; so God provided the salvation of His people.  It wasn’t by an animal sacrifice; but the voluntary sacrifice of His only Son.  It was by His blood that the House of Israel that was far off was made near.  The same was true for the more treacherous House of Judah.  Only one sacrifice was needed.  And it provided the penalty for all of our sins.  What a blessed Savior.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Hero or Villain?

Pastor Don Elmore

December 15, 2013

Scripture Reading: Joshua 9:3-15

The ancient jews of this story in Joshua 9 tells of how they deceived our forefathers as they were fighting the war over the land of Palestine.  Our God had instructed Israel A rendering of an archetype of a villain as a late 19th-century jewish kill every father, mother and child in the area; to make no covenant with any of the people.  But when the Gibeonites [close-by tribe] heard of what Israel’s God had done for them, they decided that they would disguise themselves  as being a people from a far-away land who had come to serve Israel.  The jews deceived Israel and got them to make a covenant with them. This action saved the lives of the Gibeonites but brought much difficulties to the Israelites.

How many people do you know that don’t like what President Obama/Sorento has done?  How about Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton?  How about Vernon Jordan, or….how about Nelson Mandela?  They all support or supported Communist’s ideals and strategies.  What’s up?

Nelson Mandela had something in common with Martin Luther King, Jr.  To the Israeli he was a hero and is called a “mensch” or “great man” because he helped to overthrow “racism.”  The leaders of Israeli lauded Mandela while overseeing the deportation and imprisonment of Israeli black immigrants, saying Mandela “led the fight against racism.”

From his first job with a jewish law firm, and throughout his career, jewish support was vital and forthcoming.  Mandela was a strong proponent of “Israeli’s right to exist” despite schmoozing with various Palestinian leaders.

Mandela submitted economic plans to Harry Oppenheimer for approval.  This super-wealthy jew had to approve austerity for the country to repay debt.  Mandela publicly mourned the death of Harry Oppenheimer in 2000.  Oppenheimer, while supporting the exclusive status of jews in the Israeli state, strongly disapproved of white rule in South Africa and was essentially a “sugar daddy” to Mandela’s African National Congress. 

South Africa was hit with a major foreign debt crisis in 1985, when a group of banks, led by jew-owned Chase Manhattan Bank, withdrew substantial credit lines.  The banks refused to roll over existing loans and called in many of the short-term loans.  As a result, the value of the rand dropped precipitously, and the government temporarily closed its financial and foreign-exchange markets. 

Unable to meet debt obligation so suddenly, the government declared a standstill on repayments of approximately $14 billion of South Africa’s $24 billion total external debt.  The Whites couldn’t keep paying on the debts and therefore had to be replaced by the jewish controlled Communist’s African National Congress (ANC).

Despite calls to renounce $24 billion in South African foreign debt as obtained for reasons “odious to the local population” and hence non-payable under international law, Mandela repaid the bankers with interest.  As the nation mourns Mandela as a hero, it is, at the same time, drowning in debt to the international jewish bankers. 

When Mandela was released from prison in 1990, his media saturation coverage was unprecedented and has not been matched by anyone since.  A clue is given by Fox New’s Bill O’Reilly who said “Mandela was a Communist, but he was a great man. I won’t say anything bad about him.” 

He has received the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom from the United States, the Lenin Peace Prize from the Soviet Union, and numerous other honors from countries, universities and institutions.  In a contrary video, Mandela and his comrades in the ANC are singing “Kill the Boer” meaning kill the white farmer. 

Even more chilling than the words of the murderous song is the near frenzied behavior it stirs up in many of the assembled mob members.  This is clearly incitement to genocide by the top members of South Africa’s ANC ruling regime, the same individuals who incessantly pose as peace advocates.

But didn’t President Ronald Reagan classify Mandela’s African National Congress as a terrorist group.  Reagan cited the ANC as one of the world’s “most notorious terrorist groups.”  Later, President George W. Bush took Mandela off of this list.  Which President do you believe?  Which one do you think correctly assessed the character of this man?

The ANC was murdering anyone who opposed them or anyone who was in the wrong place at the wrong time, including over 20,000 blacks. Mandela was a jewish puppet who reversed South Africa’s apartheid government!  No wonder he is being lauded as “the world’s most wonderful man.”  Another jewish puppet is being reward for his pro-jewish behavior.

Although Mr. Mandela is not a Zulu -- he is the son of a chief of the Thembus, who were long ago absorbed into the Xhosas.

Following the Sharpeville Massacre of 1960, the views of Mandela and a number of his colleagues hardened into a belief that only an armed struggle would suffice. On the 16th  of December 1961, the anniversary of the Battle of Blood River, a cataclysmic battle between the Boers and Zulus in 1838, a new military organization, Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation), was set up. Mandela was its commander-in-chief. Over the next two years they carried out over 200 attacks and sent some 300 people abroad for military training.

What a minute!  What was said about the battle of Blood River?  What happened on that day where tomorrow it will be 175 years ago?   The Boers had settled South Africa and then the British came and imposed civil rights for the blacks and whites.  They enforced an “all are equal” regime.  As a result, the Boers decided to leave and to go in covered wagons to the open land to the Northwest.  

They were met by the Zulus who were also coming into the land from the opposite direction.  After a couple of failed attempts of a treaty to unsure peace for both peoples, the Zulus’ began their total destruction of the Boers. 

The Boers had 468 settlers in covered wagons fighting against about 30,000 warriors of the tribe of Zulus.  What did the Boers do?  They made a covenant between them and their God.  This vow was written by an ancestor of the Visser's:

“My brothers and fellow citizens, here we stand in the presence of the Holy God, creator of heaven and earth, to make a vow unto Him, that if His protection shall be with us and He gives our enemy into our hand so that we might be victorious over him, that this day and date every year shall be spent as a memorial and a day of thanksgiving, just as a Sabbath is spent and that we shall erect a temple to his honor wherever it well be pleasing to Him and that we shall also instruct our children that they must also share in it, as well as for our generations yet to come.  Because the Honor of His name shall thereby be glorified and the glory and honor of the victory shall be given Him.”

The Voortrekkers won an outstanding battle or should I more correctly say that the God of the Voortrekkers defeated the Zulus.  No one of the Voortrekkers was killed; none suffered any major injuries; and there were thousands of Zulus who died.  So many Zulus were killed that the Ncome River was red with the blood of the slain Zulus.   

As Mark Downey said in his sermon on Blood River,

“The Afrikaners know their survival is completely dependent on divine intervention. Blood River has been called the mythical underpinnings of apartheid rule. The Christian Boers did not ascribe the military victory to their armaments; they interpreted the battle as a sign from God.  With the battle behind them, they believed even more strongly that White predominance over Blacks is the will of God. Indeed, it is their mandate; it is OUR mandate to take dominion of the earth. And to that, we should all say amen.  

December 16th is still observed by some Boers as a Sabbath called The Day of the Vow.  On that day their pioneer ancestors made a pledge to God, which He honored by ordering His angelic legions to assist in the battle between the forces of light and the powers of darkness.  South Africa is again facing fearful odds, who like their forefathers, will be forced to bend their knee and renew themselves as God’s covenant people. 

We in America are likewise under an oppressively dark antichrist adversary, because we have fallen away from being a Christian nation and have been whoring after strange gods.  Our Blood River is coming and we will lose the battle if the Lord of hosts is not our Commander in Chief.” 

Which is it Christian?  Was Blood River a victory by our God or was it not?  How 468 farmers could not suffer any serious injury and kill close to 15,000 Zulu warriors, because they made a vow with their God?  But their children failed to honor their vow, and therefore their punishment has come to pass.  So tomorrow, the Boers should celebrate “The Day of the Covenant,” but they will instead be celebrating “Reconciliation Day.”

What gods are we worshipping in America?  We also have bought into the lie of jewish multiculturalism just like most of the Israel nations have throughout the world.  America was once separate in its worship, what happened?

Boule LogoSecret Boule' Organization

The same as Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress, the blacks who are called the leaders of America’s blacks all are members of a black secret society that’s been closely associated with maintaining the grip of jewish supremacy on people of color. The same secret societies these house Negroes answer to, have a long history rooted in the physical and mental enslavement of Africans around the globe.

This black “secret society” is called the Boule’ a.k.a. Sigma Pi Phi Fraternity, incorporated, founded May 15, 1904 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  This was the first black fraternity in America and before the first black “college” fraternity, Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, incorporated, which was founded December 4, 1906.

The Boule’ is a black Greek secret society that is based on another secret society founded at Yale University called “Skull and Bones.” Cecil Rhodes and Rothschild (jew) and others helped start the organization.  “Skull and Bones” is an organization that derived from a German Secret freemasonic society that picks 15 men from Yale each year:  the Alumni has had an astounding three Presidents of the United States, a couple of Secretary of States, a bunch of Senators, Representatives, Governors, mayors, CEO’s, etc. Regional Map NE US

Map of New Haven; look how close it is to Sandy Hook, which is located east of Danbury.

The blacks had been through slavery, because of the jews; the War Between the States because of the jews; reconstruction because of the jews; and now they faced Marcus Garvey’s (a black man) push to have many of the blacks to go back to Africa; many to Liberia.   

Boule Founders

The Boule’s primary founder was Dr. Henry McKee Minton along with five others: 

  •   Dr. Eugene T. Hinson,
  •   Edwin Clarence Howard,
  •   Algernon Brashear Jackson,
  •   Robert Jones Abele and
  •   Richard John Warrick; all of Philadelphia. 

The founding member of the New York City chapter, WEB DuBois, said the Boule’ was created to “keep the black professional away from the ranks of Marcus Garvey,” who was a black.  It needs to be pointed out that just after a decade of the founding of the Boule’, Marcus Garvey’s “Back to Afrika” movement and his newspaper, the Negro World, were reaching a million-plus people without television or radio or internet. 

It was very important to steal the black professional away from Garvey because an Afro-centric organization that articulated and captured the black professional would not give the jews a safe haven in the black community. So the Boule’—the remaking of the house Negro—was necessary to build a group of Negroes who had an investment in protecting the jewish system. This was post reconstruction which took away the articulate Negro, now desiring to replace them with organized institutions to keep them away from self-improvement. 

So we find in the same time period as the founding of the Boule’, the founding of the four black male fraternities:

  • Alpha Phi Alpha
  • Kappa Alpha Psi
  • Omega Psi Phi
  • Phi Beta Sigma

And four black female sororities:

  • Alpha Kappa Alpha
  • Delta Sigma Theta
  • Zeta Phi Beta
  • Sigma Gamma Rho

Followed by the ninth member of the squares:

  •   The Boule’ Foundation; Sigma Pi Phi

We also find the founding of the NAACP (1909) and the Urban League (1910) and the Federal Reserve (1913) comes shortly after the Boule’.

The NAACP was headed by a jew and so was the jewish influence on the Urban League and other civil rights movements.  DuBois, of the Boule, was one of the strongest opponents of Garvey and helped stop one of the strongest grassroots movements of the last century.  Garvey’s plan was to take as many Africans from the America’s and start a settlement in the nation of Liberia and then help this new nation produce and control their own rubber crops and other industries in natural resources. 

Marcus Garvey’s plan was “if the oil of Afrika is good for Rockefeller’s interest; if iron is good for Carnegie trust; then these minerals are good for us.  Why should we allow Wall Street [jews] and capitalist group of America and other countries exploit our country when they refuse to give us a fair chance in the countries of our adoption?  Why should not Afrika give to the world its black Rockefeller, Rothschild and Henry Ford?”

What would have been the result of Garvey’s plan?  It would’ve meant no Goodyear, no U. S. steel, and no Standard Oil as we know it today, because it would have set a precedent that would’ve made all Africans aware of their land and mineral wealth.  This would have shattered the financial arm of jewry

DuBois and Alain Locke, the first black Cecil Rhodes scholar, publicly defiled Garvey by calling him a “gorilla” any chance they had.  Locke said:  “We hope the white man deliver’s cause we crushed a great black thing, but we know he’ll deliver or our people will attack and plague us forever more.”  DuBois and Locke were paid off by their jewish friends that they would receive a certain percentage of the wealth they stole from Africa. 

The Boule’ is a Greek term which means “advisers to the king.”  And the king that they receive direction from and protect is like their logo:  the sphinx.  They are the jewish secret societies responsible for world supremacy:  some of their names are:

  1. Phi Beta Kappa
  2. Illuminati
  3. Rhodes/Rothschild secret societies
  4. Skull and Bones
  5. The Freemasons
  6. Round Table Group
  7. The New World Order
  8. One World Government
  9. Carnegie
  10. And numerous other wealthy family organizations.

Now there are about 120 chapters in the world.  Anywhere there are professional blacks, the Boule’ coagulates.  The members of the Boule’ has wealth that cannot be matched by any other blacks anywhere in the world.  Some of the many blacks who are college graduates who are members of the Boule’ which was started in 1904.  They work for the New World Order and are/were paid generously.

VIP Members Boule Organization

Besides these seven members that are much more.  Some of them are:

  • Dr. Daniel Hale Williams (performed the first open heart surgery)
  • Ralph Bunche (former UN Ambassador)
  • Al Sharpton
  • Whitney Young (former President of the Urban League)
  • Martin Luther King, Jr. (civil rights leader)
  • Benjamin Mays
  • W.E.B. DuBois
  • Carter G. Woodson (Historian)
  • John H. Johnson (Publisher of Ebony and Jet magazines)
  • Maynard Jackson (former mayor of Atlanta)
  • Hank Aaron (MLB homerun king)
  • Elvin Big “E” Hayes (NBA Basketball great)
  • Lynn Swann (NFL Hall-of-Famer)
  • Tom Bradley (television personality)
  • Dennis Archor (former mayor of Detroit)
  • Douglass Wilder (former Governor of Virginia)
  • David Dinkins (former mayor of New York City)
  • And thousands more.

The Boule’ followed the tenets of the freemasonic order of the “Skull and Bones” of Yale University which was started very close to the time of our God’s great victory over the Zulus; 1832 compared to 1838.  It was incorporated for business purposes as Russell Trust and was established in 1776 at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.

The NAACP co-founder, Joel Spingarn (jew) was a known spy of the African community and also was very influential in the founding of the Boule’.  The NAACP who was supposed to defend the countless atrocities against black people on the contrary, they didn’t; they actually helped the jews who founded their organizations. 

It was the ADL of the B’nai B’rith who consisted of the leaders of jews. It was the same as the Gestapo who has reigned for over 100 years for the great conspiracy.  It started after the murder committed by Leo Frank (a jew) of a young girl who worked at the pencil factory, which he was the boss. After Leo’s sentence was lowered by the Governor from death to a life sentence, a day before he left his office, the local boys went to the jail, took Leo captive and lynched him over a tree that grew across the street from the house where Mary, the young girl he had murdered, lived.

The ADL controlled the actions of the NAACP and the Urban League.  They controlled Martin L. King, Jr., Stockley Carmichael, Jesse Jackson to name a few of the many of the others.    

The NAACP was begun on Abe Lincoln’s 100th birthday; February 12, 1909.  It was started by more leftists jews than blacks!  Rabbi Steven Wise and Jane Adams who both had direct links to a secret society called the Round Table Group that was formed in 1881 at Oxford University in Ruskin College, in England by Cecil Rhodes with the money gained from the colonization of Azania, South Africa.

Rabbi Wise also founded the American Jewish Congress which is a Zionist organization that supported the European jewish colonization of what was called Palestine.  The NAACP does not support Africans in America; that is their illusion.  They actually carry out the ideas and philosophy of the Round Table Group. 

The NAACP is most notably known for initiating the Anti-Lynch Bill during the 1910’s.  They called for the government to pass a bill prohibiting the lynching of Africans.  What many don’t know is that bill did not pass Congress unit 1959!  They only passed this Bill if they would receive in turn “Black Intelligence”.  This is how the Boule’ ties in; for every member of the Boule’ must be a lifetime member of the NAACP!

WEB DuBois was the first Negro to become involved with the NAACP and was Rabbi Wise’s choice for this organization due to the fact DuBois was a member of the first black Greek secret fraternity called Sigma Pi Phi or the Boule’, founded a few years before the NAACP. 

New Haven:  City of Nine SquaresNew Haven: City of Nine Squares

New Haven was founded in 1638 by English Puritans and a year later eight streets were laid out in a four-by-four grid, creating what is now commonly known as the “Nine Square Plan”.  New Haven is the home of the Ivy League school Yale University.  By 1640, the town’s theocratic government and nine-square grid plan were in place.  The colony was an intolerant theocracy that did not permit other churches to be established.   New Haven was the refuge for three of the judges who had signed the death warrant of Charles I of England who were later pursued by Charles II. 

Ezra Stiles was one of the earlier mayors of New Haven.  Stiles struck up a close friendship with Rabbi Haim Isaac Carigal (jew) during Stiles’ residence in Newport in 1773.  Stiles’ records note 28 meetings to discuss a wide variety of topics from the Kabbalah to the politics of the Holy Land.  Stiles included a portrait of Rabbi Carigal as one of his prized collections.

New Haven is the birthplace of former President George W. Bush, who was born when his father, former President George H. W. Bush was living in New Haven while a student at Yale.  In addition to being the site of the college educations of both Presidents, father and son Bush, New Haven was also the temporary home of former Presidents William Howard Taft, Gerald Ford and Bill Clinton.  Clinton met his wife. Hillary, while the two were students at Yale Law School.  John Kerry was also a member of “Skull and Bones” as was the three generations of Bushes and William Howard Taft. 

Roger Sherman, an inhabitant of New Haven, was the only person to sign all four basic documents of American independence:

  • Continental Association
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Articles of Confederation
  • United States Constitution

And there was Eli Whitney, the inventor of the cotton gin; Noah Webster, dictionary publisher; and a host of other people who are famous in America History who also lived in New Haven.

The magic square when you add them horizontally, vertically and diagonally always adds up to 15.  How many new members are added to “Skull and Bones” each year?  15!  New Haven which was founded by Puritans was named “New H[e]aven” in 1644. 


John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar and the father of it.”

Jesus Christ spoke these words to the jews (verses 31, 48, 52 and 57) who at the end of His message “took…up stones to cast at him….”

America has only one holiday for any person and it is for the jewish civil-rights leader, Michael King, Jr.  And now the whole world is going “gaga” over the former Communist and regime changer; Nelson Mandela or his real name; Rolihlahla.  Last week they even had a day of prayer for the dead Communist leader who was jewish backed. 

Were any of these two men Christians?  No, they were the enemy of Christian doctrine.  So why would any Christian honor these two anti christian men?

Harold Courlander sued Alex Haley for plagiarizing and won the $650,000 in the five-week trial. He wrote the book, The African, which was fiction.Alex Haley:  guilty of plagiarism

Did Alex Haley really write Roots?  It was written as a factual book; Alex Haley said that he was a seventh-generation descendant of Kunta-Kinte, the main character of the book.

It is just like what happened to Harold Courlander.  Courlander wrote seven novels, his most famous being The African,     published in 1967.  The novel was the story of a slave’s capture in Africa, his experiences on a slave ship, and his struggle to retain his native culture in a hostile new world.  This was a book of fiction.

In 1978, Alex Haley, the renowned author of Roots, came under fire in a plagiarism lawsuit launched by fellow author Harold Courlander.  Haley claimed he had spent a decade researching his heritage for his historical novel, which in 1977 was adapted as a wildly successful television miniseries.  That same year he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize and the Spingarn (Jew) Medal for the book.

Courlander filed suit in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charging that Alex Haley, the author of Roots, had copied 81 passages from his novel.  Courlander’s pre-trial memorandum in the copyright infringement lawsuit claimed:  “Defendant Haley had access to and substantially copied from ‘The African.’  Without ‘The African,’ ‘ Roots’ would have been a very different and less successful novel, and indeed it is doubtful that Mr. Haley could have written ‘Roots’ without ‘The African’….Mr. Haley copied language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

An English professor at Columbia University and an expert on plagiarism testified that Roots was “clear and irrefutable” and that the copying of passages was “significant and extensive.” 

Who won?  After a five-week trial in federal district court, Courlander and Haley settled the case with a financial settlement of $650,000, and a statement that “Alex Haley acknowledges and regrets that various materials from ‘The African’ by Harold Courlander found their way into his book, ‘Roots.’  In an interview with BBC Television, Judge Ward started, “Alex Haley perpetrated a hoax on the public.”

The media paid scant attention to the suit and even then failed to explore the real gist of the scandal: namely that the author of a nonfiction book plagiarized from a fictional one.  And if that wasn’t bad enough, that Murray Fisher, (a jew), onetime Playboy editor and Haley’s boss when he worked there, allegedly ghost wrote both the literary classic “The Autobiography of Malcolm X” and the award winning “Roots.”

Should we ASK COUNSEL OF THE LORD OUR GOD (Joshua 9:14). Should we not believe and follow anything that the people whom He called liars say? If we would do this, then why do we honor Communists and sodomites?  This week the people of the Ukraine toppled the statue of Lenin and chopped it up with huge hammers in protest of their government.

Let us not make the same mistake that our ancestors committed. Somehow I think the traitorous, brainwashing jew controlled media will neglect to say one good thing about any of these innocent White people suffering brutal deaths at the hands of South African blacks, while they go on and on and on about how great Nelson Mandela was.

Also, remember Mandela set off bombs to purposefully kill unsuspecting White people — exactly the kind of thing they now call “terrorism.” One man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter — it’s only a matter how the Jew controlled media portrays it.

Mandela once cheering, “‘Long live Comrade Fidel Castro!’” Mandela referred to Gaddafi as “‘my brother leader” and Arafat as “‘a comrade in arms.’” We have graphic images of the attrocities commited by these "freedom fighters", but have chosen to not display it on this website.  They include a woman who was bludgeoned to death, an entire family who was murdered while watching TV, a woman who was gang raped, hung upside down and gutted, another woman chopped to pieces.  Freedom fighters killing women and families??  And the media told you NOTHING about this when they were raving about Mandella upon his death!

The “Winnie Mandela necklace”  has nothing to do with jewelry, it is a cruel and gruesome way of executing people and was used during Apartheid by the ANC and others to murder their own black brothers & sisters who were suspected of being friendly to whites.  Winnie Mandela famously screamed to thousands at a large open-air rally in 1985/86: “with our matches and necklaces, we’ll liberate this country!”, implying that those who do not take the ANC’s side will be burnt alive. Such threats by Winnie Mandela could very well be considered terrorism against the very people she claimed to intend liberating.  Exiled members of the ANC were taught about necklacings and torture techniques at terror-training camps in places like Angola (eg. Camp Quatro) and Mozambique. 

Slogans such as “one rope, one sellout”, “one bullet, one white baby” and “kill the boer (white/farmer)” are still heard in SA today. In fact, a case of genocide has been made against 12 or 13 SA leaders, including the President (Jacob Zuma) and the ANC Youth League President, Julius Malema. According to the Rome Convention, incitement to commit genocide is also a punishable offence and the ANC has launched several appeals against court decisions that “kill the boer” is “hate speech” and “incitement to commit genocide”. The matter is being investigated by the ICC in The Hague. Shortly before the 2010 Soccer World Cup in South Africa, Winnie Mandela’s staff was in the news for threatening a gun-store owner, and saying: “July 12 all whites will be killed.”

Mandela once cheered, “‘Long live Comrade Fidel Castro!’” Mandela referred to Gaddafi as “‘my brother leader” and Arafat as “‘a comrade in arms.’”   The media and those who have honored Mandela at his recent funeral seemed to have forgotten or neglected to mention those acts of terrorism.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel

History Repeats

by Pastor Don Elmore

February 3, 2013

Scripture Reading: Exodus 1:1-7

Seventy people came into Egypt and in a short time, around two centuries, they were over two million in population.  The blessings that the Abrahamic covenant had outlined had been fulfilled right from the beginning.  But something happened that brought about the curses….

But let us leave the Israelites in Egypt and let us look at what is happening to their descendants over 3500 years later.  About six weeks ago we had a mass shooting at New Town, Connecticut Elementary School.  But did it actually happen the way that the government said it did?  There are many unanswered questions. 

  1. Adam Lanza: there is very little information on him.  His brother, Ryan, said that he hadn’t seen him in two years.   Yet, Adam had Ryan’s identification card on him when he was allegedly shot and the blame was first put on his brother.  We are not sure what school that he went to and whether or not he was homeschooled.  We’re not even sure that he murdered his mother.

    And we have the work of an investigative reporter who found that his death certificate said that he died on December 13th, one day before the mass murders!  This reporter asked the question:  How could Adam have gone to New Town Elementary School and murdered twenty school children if he was dead?  She wrote a letter to Senator Diane Feinstein asking for her resignation.  She based that on Diane’s remarks that she had been working on the anti-assault bill for over a year and she said that now that New Town Elementary School shooting has occurred why any American wouldn’t want the assault rifle banned?

  2. Three individuals from Adam’s father, Peter Lanza’s, work, General Electric, have been already prosecuted in the LIBOR investigations.  What was Peter’s relation in this case?

  3. Adam’s mother, Nancy Lanza, had a previous work relation with Chase Manhattan Bank; it was wrongly said that she was at present a kindergarten teacher at New Town Elementary who was killed at the school by her son; then it was changed that she was a frequent substitute teacher.  It ended up that there is no record of her being employed by the school system at all.

  4. There was the story that Adam had a dispute with four of the teachers and administrators at the school the day before.  Later, however, the police officer said that this dispute was untrue.  Lieutenant Vance, of the Connecticut State Police mentioned this at one of the press conferences that he held.

  5. What would Adam have looked like if he indeed carried in 2 or 3 hand guns and an AR-15 assault rifle plus thousands of rounds of ammunition?  He was dressed in camouflage and was wearing a mask.  Adam was 120 lbs.  He wouldn’t be able to do it.  And why would Adam wear a bullet-prove vest and a mask if he planned to kill himself?

  6. No pictures or videos of any of the weapons or murdered victims in the school; or of the crime scene; or of the entrance to the school.  There were cameras all over the school, just like it was in 9/11; but we did not get to see any of them.

  7. Front glass near the front door of the school was said to be busted out by rapid-fire shooting by Adam.  Adam was a small 120 lbs. youngster, with a touch of autism; all of the weapons and ammo…very illogical that it could be done by him.  No one from outside the school called 911; only one call from the school!

  8. No picture or video of the window being shot up.  No person could enter the school after the school began without being let in by a person in the office.  The story is that Adam used the assault rifle and blasted the window near the door.  After the glass broke, he was able to open the door and gain his entrance.

  9. Why the teachers didn’t put the children out the window instead of locking the door and having the children hiding under their desk or being put in a closet.  The shooter could have shot the door out, just like he supposedly did when he entered the front door.  A lot of the teachers put the students in the closet and/or read them stories.  One report of a teacher who was shot several times by the shooter who fired shots through the door.  And why were the children told to not look when they were not going to cross any of the murder-scene?  The story was all of the murders were in two classrooms and a hallway in the front of the school.

  10. It was reported by the Connecticut coroner that all the children were murdered by the AR-15.  This assault weapon was used to shoot one of the school pupil’s 11 times at close range—if this was the case there would be very little left of the child.  In other words, the child would be practically completely destroyed. 

  11. Adam allegedly changed magazines 8-10 times in order to fire all of the shots.  The coroner testified that all of the shots in the school were from the AR-15 and only the shots that he murdered himself were from his pistol.  Of course, there is a video of the officers taking the AR-15 out of the trunk of the car in the school parking lot.  So, we are to believe that Adam murdered all of the children, shot himself to death and then put the assault weapon in the truck of the car and then went back into the school and died for the second time.  Was Adam a zombie?

  12.  The responding officers said that they shot the windows out in the front entrance.  Why would they have to do this if Adam had already previously done this in order to gain entrance?

  13. The State of Connecticut has a state law against automatic weapons:  How could Nancy Lanza register an automatic weapon if it was illegal in her state?

  14. The first responders were at the school in seven minutes after the first shots were reported; AFT and FBI agents were there too.  There was a mock meeting at another school about 25 minutes from Sandy Hook.  How could there be AFT and FBI agents at New Town so quickly, unless it was planned in advance.   The officers of New Town got to the school too late and couldn’t even get in!  The district of New Town had a record of practically no crime at all. 

  15. One officer was assigned to stay at each of the victim’s families, 26 families for over a couple of months.  Twenty-six officers plus many others and if it was a 24-hour shift.  They have money problems—but no issue here.  Are the officers still there?

  16. All the evidence was destroyed; New Town Elementary is moved five miles away to a vacant middle school and they are now remaking New Town Elementary school.  There must be no money problems.  This is very similar to what happened at the movie theatre and the 9/11 situation—the fast destruction of the crime scene!

  17. At least two other shooters were captured; one was placed in handcuffs and the other was captured in the woods behind the school-- but police deny that this happened.

  18. One school official reported that she hid in a closet until 1 PM.  This contradicts the statement of the Connecticut Police that they search the entire school building to make sure there was no shooter anywhere. 

There is much more but this is enough.   On and on this goes…

It was like the shooting at the movie theater a couple of months before the shooting at the elementary school.  It was like the horrific 9/11 episode.  We could make a list of questions about the problems with what happened on 9/11 with no serious answers given by the government.  For example, how did a 47 story building come down in 7 seconds later in the afternoon on September 11, 2001?  Take a second and just think about this. 

This was the building where the mayor of NYC had his place of safety in case of an attack—it came down in 7 seconds.  And how did the 9/11 Commission Report tell about how this happened?   They didn’t mention it at all.  They said nothing about it.  So how can we believe that Report?

When 9/11 occurred I remember exactly where I was and what I was doing.  It was like when JFK was murdered.  I would guess that you could too.  

I believed everything that the government told me about what happened on 9/11.  Four airplanes were hijacked by Arabs carrying box-cutters.  Two crashed into the twin towers, one into the Pentagon and the last one crashed into a hole in Pennsylvania.  The fact that there was nothing (no parts of a crashed plane, no black boxes, no passengers, no luggage—nothing in Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon) didn’t seem to make any difference to the government as they later put up a memorial at the scenes of both crashes. 

But I had been “Sandy—Hooked” on 9/11; but not again.  America has been Sandy Hooked.  They have played the part of an audience watching a gargantuan theatrical production complete with fake actors, fake news coverage and a fake narrative.  I’m not saying nothing happened at Sandy Hook and that children weren’t killed; what I’m saying is that everything after the event was constructed as complete theater:  the selective publicizing of only those parents the media wants you to see, the refusal to release actual video footage from inside the school and outside the school, the rapid alteration of the official storyline to shift from handguns to the now-infamous “AR-15” that the media claims was used in the shooting.

But it not just Sandy Hook,  I’m using the term “Sandy Hooked” in a much larger sense to encompass  the recent fake inauguration of a President with a faked alias, an obviously faked birth certificate, his faked end of his law operations and his faked social security card.  The band was faked; the “live” singing was faked; the speech was teleprompter-driven; the news coverage was an orgy of fairyland wishes that have virtually no chance of ever coming true.

But it is not even just Obama -- George Bush masterminded the faked war on terror and the fake justifications for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, with all its fake authority but very real sexual molestation at the airports.

The federal government, whether under a Republican or a Democratic administration, operates with the arrogance of fake authority that was never granted to it under the Constitution and definitely not under God’s Law.  But  you are suckered into it thanks to the help of the fake mainstream media news running fake stories based on faked evidence—such as CDC ridiculously claiming flu shots are “62% effective.”

The FDA readily accepts faked medical studies as “scientific evidence.”  The psychiatric industry invents thousands of fake diseases and then claims the sole authority to diagnose and “treat” those fictitious conditions.  The junk food industry runs endless television ads creating false impressions about their products which are loaded with artificial (faked) ingredients. 

Yes, the blueberries in your blueberry muffins are faked.  The aroma of McDonald’s French fries is faked with chemicals.  The fresh pink color of the sliced ham that many Judeo-Christians bought and ate is also faked with sodium nitrite.

Mammograms generate 10 fake diagnoses of breast cancer for every real one. Chemotherapy is fake medicine (quackery) that actually causes cancer.  In fact, the entire breast cancer industry is right now running a massive hoax by faking like it’s “searching for the cure for cancer” – an absurd idea, given that such a cure would instantly put the multi-billion-dollar cancer industry out of business.

The entire gun control argument we’re all hearing right now is a complete hoax.  How will removing guns from the hands of law-abiding citizens magically cause criminals to turn them in?  It won’t.  The argument is a hoax based on nothing more than irrational emotional appeal.

The banking industry is a grand, global conspiracy of financial fakery, where they steal the value of your money by generating more free money for themselves.  The Federal Reserve isn’t federal; and it has no reserves.  It’s all been faked!

Elections are faked on a grand scale.   Nearly all online polls run by the mainstream media are completely faked – manipulated to show the results they want.  In the election of 2012 there are records at polling sites that more than 150% of the registered voters actually voted and in some polls there was a unanimous vote for Obama!

Internet website awards are completely faked; Google News is faked because they delete all the real news sources from their system and now run only conformist, mainstream news sources.  The TV news you see is completely faked because all the real stories are spiked while fake stories are scripted in order to show you only what they want you to see.

Government jobs numbers are faked and of course anytime a politician in Washington says they’re going to “cut spending” that’s always a complete fake (what they actually mean is they’re going to slightly reduce the growth in spending).

The federal tax code is complete fakery.  The government doesn’t need a dime from you to operate itself.  It can just create all the money it needs out of thin air just as we all witnessed with the bankster bailouts.  The government can even create these new trillion-dollar coins to get out of debt.  So if it can create trillion-dollar coins, why does it need any money from you and I?  It doesn’t.  The tax code exists solely as a form of social control.

The educating of our children in public school is largely faked:  faked history, fake science and faked social studies.  Public schools don’t teach children about reality, they teach children to conform to popular mythologies.   For example, have you heard of a public school teaching its students about the evil of usury banking?  About the evil of homosexuality?  About the evil of same-sex marriages?  About the evil of abortions? 

You’ve all been Sandy Hooked.  Not just from the actual Sandy Hook incident, but from birth.  You’re living in a world that is made of fantasies:  a world of corporations!  The birth certificates and social security cards all put us into the status of individual corporations. 

Your mind is used by manipulators for target practice.  You are a puppet of their machinations, and you’ve been taught that everything REAL – gold, guns, marriage and organic farming – is actually bad. If you want to be considered good, you must conform as an obedient order-taker who relishes his own enslavement.  (The previous 16 paragraphs were summarized from the website entitled:, by Mike Adams).

Rock and Roll is fakery.  This highly popular and addictive music came to America less than sixty years ago with the message that it (the new music) would change the world to immoral sex and life with drugs:  “Drugs, sex and rock and roll!”  Can the church stop this music?  No, it joins with it; it plays rock and roll in the church!

Why does all this really matter?

We are made up of a body, with a soul and with a spirit. 


Are our bodies better off with all of this fakery that is rampant in our land?  Most people my age are in a rest home or are already dead.  Many are in wheel chairs, paralyzed and/or deformed.  They have eaten ham, bacon, pork chops, shrimp, clams, catfish, lobsters and many other foods that God has instructed US that it is not good for US to eat these polluted foods.

And many of our peers have become drunk by drinking too much alcohol and have had their marriages ended by the related sin of alcoholism.  I didn’t drink alcohol but I drank gallons of soda-pop when I was a young adult.  These drinks which are only about 100 years old or younger – are probably one of the worse things on our diet:  phosphoric acid, sugar, fake sugar, artificial (fake) coloring, etc.  They do much harm to the body. 

And the tap water?  Most cities have added toxins in it—specifically the aluminum by- product--fluoride.  In most big city water supplies that are toxins that have come into the water sources from fertilizers and drugs that have been flushed down the toilet.

How many of us eat corn?  Corn is a food that our God has instructed us that we can eat.  But most of the corn in the USA is Genetically Modified Organism corn?  What is that doing to our bodies?  We are eating food from farmers that don’t follow God’s laws of farming:  our food lacks the natural nutrition that is full of artificial (faked) vitamins due to a poor soil environment. 

The CaduceusThe Caduceus

When a child is born he is almost immediately faced with approximately 30 shot vaccines!  And that is just the beginning.  We are about to be forced to use a medical system which has as its emblem two snakes squirming up a pole—the caduceus!

According to Wikipedia, The caduceus, the traditional symbol of Hermes featuring two snakes around an often winged staff, is often used as a symbol of medicine in the United States.  The two-snaked caduceus design has ancient and consistent associations with commerce, eloquence, trickery, gambling, liars, thievery and negotiation. 

Tangential association of the caduceus with medicine has occurred through the ages, where it was sometimes associated with alchemy and wisdom.  The modern use of the caduceus as a symbol of medicine became established in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century as a result of documented mistakes, misunderstandings and confusion.


Your soul is being stolen with every hoax, every faked event and every deception being played out in front of us.  When the insidious power brokers achieve such deep deceptions, they rob from you the opportunity to explore and express your true highest self during this short life experience.  Instead of being the amazing thinker, artist, innovator or leader you have the potential to be, you end up becoming a mind-controlled obedient conformist who is afraid to stand out.

The deceivers are stealing your LIFE from you, and they are turning a life that could have held value into an unremarkable life that serves no higher purpose.  Suicide is one of the highest forms of death among the young.


The fakery is an attempt to destroy our spirit!  This is the most damaging consequences of it all.

The fakery says that homosexuality is an alternate life-style; not an abomination of God.  What offspring does it produce if a woman marries a woman; or a man marries a man?  None.  They can adopt; but they can’t have their own children.  One of the main purposes of a marriage is to produce “like-seed” children.

The fakery says that mixed-marriages are an alternate life-style; not an abomination of God.  The Israelites were to be a separate people; forbidden to miscegenate with giants and with other different racial beings.  For that would forever destroy their seed from having the spirit of God?  Esau married into the wrong seed and even though he wept, his hybrid-offspring was forever out of the covenant and became the permanent enemy of Israel. 

This fakery says that women can do any job that man can do.  They are equal.  So, she is now, like she is in Israeli, available to fight in the front lines.  This is an abomination of God.  

Name the women who fought in the Revolutionary War?  The Spanish-America War?  The War of Northern Aggression?  World War I? World War II? Korean War? Desert Storm I?  Desert Storm II?  There were almost none.

Arguments against women in direct combat have nothing to do with courage, skill, patriotism or dedication.  Most women are equal to most men in all of these categories, and are superior to men in many other areas, as our educational graduation rates at every level indicate.  Women tend to excel as sharpshooters and pilots.  But ground combat is one area in which women, through quirks of biology and human nature, are not equal to men – a difference that should be celebrated rather than rationalized as incorrect. 

Did God’s Covenant People have women in their army?  Or did God command Israel that men were the ones who were to make up their army? 

Numbers 1:2, 3: “Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, after their families, by the house of their fathers, with the number of their names, every MALE by their polls;

From twenty years old and upward, all who are able to go forth to war in Israel:  thou and Aaron shall number them by their armies.”

The fakery says that all faiths are equal. This is an abomination of God.   What does it mean when we read of the Waldenes (500 years before the Protestant Reformation) that they did not worship with the Roman Catholics; they even were martyred.  They believed that as it says in The Churches of the Valley of Piemont, Item 9:  “…the Roman Church is the House of Confusion, Babylon, the whore, and the Synagogue of the Devil, contrary to the Faith?” 

Do all peoples worship the same God?  Are all of the elect people and the non-elect people of the world on the same status?  Are a Buddhist, Hindu, Jew, Catholic and a Judeo-Christian the same as a true Christian-identity believer?  Doesn’t the Bible tell us to worship only the God who brought our forefathers out of Egypt?

 Now let’s go back about 3500 years and see what Israel did in a similar time that we are in now,  Exodus 1:1-22; 2:23-25.

Exodus 1-7:  The small family of Jacob went to Egypt, but after 215 years they had grown with great increase after their immigration into Egypt.  The divine promise of the Abrahamic covenant was fulfilled in a short time—a couple of centuries (Genesis 15:5; 12:37).  “And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them.”

Exodus 8-10“Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who knew not Joseph. And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we. Come on, let us deal wisely with them, lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when war occurs, they join also unto our enemies and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.

The new king felt that the former rulers could unite with the large number of Israelites and attack Egypt; for the former rulers had been kind to the Israelites.

Exodus 11-14:  “Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens.  And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses. But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew.   And they were grieved because of the children of Israel. And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigor.  And they made their live bitter with hard bondage, in mortar, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field; all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigor.”

The Israelites had begun to forget the “the God of their fathers,” and to conform to the idolatry of the Egyptians.  All manner of service in the field… process of irrigating the land in the higher lands was very laborious.  But what was the cause of this evil treatment. 

The prophet Ezekiel records the fact of this apostasy; Ezekiel 20:8, “But they rebelled against me, and would not hearken unto me; they did not every man cast away the abominations of their eyes, neither did they forsake the idols of Egypt:  then I said, I will pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the midst of the land of Egypt.”

Howard Rand in his book, “Primogenesis” on page 138 says: 

“Thus, Ezekiel declared Israel suffered in Egypt because of their apostasy when they turned to idols instead of to the Lord.  Spiritual decadency is always followed by physical trouble and hardship:  there is no exception to this rule.  Israel came into a period of trouble and suffering because they had turned away from God.

There arose a new king over Egypt who was not acquainted with Joseph, or with his deeds in behalf of the Egyptian people.  He told the Egyptians that the children of Israel were more numerous and mightier than they, and that they must deal wisely with them, lest, in case of war, they join with the enemy. 

Taskmasters were placed over the Israelites and they were afflicted with heavy burdens.  Men of Israel were compelled to build the cities of Pithom and Raamses for Pharaoh.  But the more the Egyptians afflicted them the more Israel multiplied and grew in strength, even though their taskmaster became more and more exacting in the work and services required of them.  Every means as used by the Egyptians for the purpose of crushing the children of Israel.”

Exodus 15-22“And the king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah. And he said, When ye do the office to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him:  but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the male children alive. And the king of Egypt called for the midwives, and said unto them, Why have ye done this thing, and have saved the male children alive? And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are lively, and are delivered before the midwives come in unto them. Therefore God dealt well with the midwives; and the people multiplied, and became very mighty.

And it came to pass, because the midwives feared God, that he gave them families. And Pharaoh charged all his people, saying, Every son that is born ye shall cast into the river, and every daughter ye shall save alive.”

Why did the Egyptians want to eradicate only the boys and not the girls?  It was because of the prophecy that was known at this time.  It is told by Josephus in the Antiquities of the Jews, Book II, Chapter 10, Section3, page 58:  the “child, out of dread of whose nativity the Egyptians have doomed the Israelite children to destruction, shall be this child of thine, and shall be concealed from those who watch to destroy him:  and when he is brought up in a surprising way, he shall deliver the Hebrew nation from the distress they are under from the Egyptians.”

God made the Israelites have numerous families, because the midwives feared God.  The Egyptians had to deal wisely with Israelites, lest they multiply and become even more numerous.  As a result they attempted to do the following: 

  1. They took care to keep the Israelites poor, by charging them with heavy taxes.

  2. They made them slaves.  They had taskmasters set over them, directed to afflict them with their burdens.  They made them serve with rigor, so that their lives came bitter to them, intending hereby:

  3. They attempted to break their spirits.

  4. They tried to ruin their health and shorten their days, and so diminish their numbers.

  5. They tried to discourage them from marrying, since their children would be born in slavery.  And it is to be feared that the oppression they were under brought over many of them to join with the Egyptians in their idolatrous worship.  However they were kept a distinct body, unmingled with the Egyptians, and by their other customs separate from them, which was the Lord’s doing and marvelous. 

The more they afflicted them the more they multiplied, sorely to the grief and vexation of the Egyptians.  The blood of the martyrs was the seed of the church. 

The midwives were commanded to murder the new-born boys:  Pharaoh’s project was secretly to engage the midwives to murder the boy-child as soon as they were born, and then to lay it upon the difficulty of the birth, or some mischance common in that case. 

But they feared God:  regarded His law, and dreaded His wrath more than Pharaoh’s, and thereby saved the young boy’s lives. 

When this project did not take effect, Pharaoh gave public orders to all his people to drown all the male children of the Hebrews.

The murder of the young boys did not continue for very long.  When one Pharaoh died, another rose up in his place that was governed by these same maxims, and was as cruel to Israel as His predecessors.  They struggled to their deliverance at last; how did they achieve it? 

They cried.  They began to think of God under their troubles, and to return to Him from the idols they had served.  But before God unbound them He put it into their heart to cry unto him as it is explained, Numbers 20:16: “And when we cried unto the LORD, he heard our voice, and sent an angel, and hath brought us forth out of Egypt….” 

God heard.  God heard their groaning.  He knows the burdens they groan under and the blessings they groan after.

Exodus 2:23-25: “And it came to pass in process of time, that the king of Egypt died:  and the children of Israel sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up unto God by reason of the bondage. And God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob.

And God looked upon the children of Israel, and God knew their plight.”

God remembered the covenant that He had made with Abraham; the unconditional covenant:  Moses looked upon them and helped them.  God had a respect unto them, a favorable respect to them as His own. 


We are living in very similar times that our ancestors lived in Egypt.  We started off in a good condition; very little miscegenation, women and men serving in their Biblical roles, music, books, and entertainment mainly biblical, no legal abortions, no same-sex marriages, no open homosexuality, no open unwed marriages, Church operated charities and counseling, whites lived basically separate from all the races, no major-breaking of the weekly Sabbath and no drug medicine.  What a different world.

A new king arose in Egypt, and the Israelites began to follow other gods, and thus they had to endure the curses of breaking God’s Laws.  We have done the same thing:  we have a new (mullato) president and we have failed to follow practically all of God’s laws.  We are suffering God’s curses. 

Very few people ever consider the following:

Murders in the United States

Homicides 11,101
Suicides 19,766
Unintentional Shootings 851
Undetermined Intent       222
Total: murder using guns 31,943
Adverse Drug Reactions 106,000
Outpatients 199,000
Medical Errors 91,000
Other Medical Related 380,936
Total: medical deaths by errors 783,936

It is much more dangerous to face your doctor than it is to face an enemy with a gun.  In fact, there are more suicides than homicides and it is several thousands times more deadly to participate in the onslaught of drugs that it is to worry about being murder by a person shooting a gun!  Outlaw mainstream doctors and drugs?  It would be much more reasonable than outlawing guns.

Jeremiah 6:15-17“Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination?  Nay, they were not at all ashamed, nether could they blush:  therefore they shall fall among them that fall:  at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the Lord. 

Thus saith the Lord, Stand in the ways, and see, and ask, for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk in it, and ye shall find rest for your souls.  But they said, We will not walk therein

Also, I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet.  But they said, We will not hearken.”

Jeremiah told Israel that they were not ashamed that they had committed abominations.  We have committed these sins too.  He told them to see and ask for the old paths; but we too said that we will not walk therein!  America refuses to go back to the way things use to be. 

Jeremiah than said that the watchmen will sound the trumpet, but the people would say, we will not hearken.  We have answered the same way.

Jeremiah 6:19b: “…I will bring evil upon this people, even the fruit of their thoughts, because they have not hearkened unto my words, nor to my law, but rejected it.”

God then says that He would bring evil upon this people, His covenant people, because they failed to hearken to His words and Law, but rejected it.  Eventually, the Israelites were so oppressed that they finally cried out to their God and He remember the covenant.  Will the Israelites in America do the same?  Will history repeat?

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel. 

I Have a Nightmare

by Pastor Don Elmore

September 1, 2013

Scripture Reading:  2 Peter 2:1-6

It’s been quite a week:  Fires in eight Western States that are burning in an uncontrollable manner—the judgment of God against the  United States for no longer keeping the Laws of God; the President of the United States trying to figure out what lies he can tell to convince the America people so that he can have the Armed Forces provide a military strike in Syria—another judgment of God against the United States for no longer keeping the Laws of God; and then honoring the speech of Martin Luther King, Jr. with a ceremony remembering what happened in this nation exactly fifty years ago; another judgment of God against the United States for no longer keeping the Laws of God. 

I had another sermon prepared as I had a busy week, but I was so disgusted by the jewMedia that I had to comment on the event that happened fifty years ago.  The “Dream” speech given by the person who practically no one will call a Communist:  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Fifty years ago; I was 21 years old.  It was 1963. Michael King, Jr. went to Washington, D. C. and with the statue of Abraham Lincoln in the background gave the speech that many said changed the nation.  The majority now say that it changed the nation for good; but back then there were many who said that it changed it for evil. 

Last week, there were 250,000 people who went to the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial and down the National Mall on Saturday, commemorating the 50th anniversary of his famous speech and pledging that his dream includes equality for gays, Latinos, the poor and the disabled.  For whom?  Gays, whose behavior our God says is an abomination to Him, are equal with a straight person?  Equal to whom?

“This is not the time for nostalgic commemoration,” said Martin Luther King III, (who was five years old in 1963), the oldest son of the slain civil rights leader. “Nor is this the time for self-congratulatory celebration.  The task is not done. The journey is not complete.  We can and we must do more.”

Eric Holder, the nation’s first black Attorney General, said he would not be in office, nor would Barack Obama be President, without those who marched fifty years ago.  Is it a good thing that they are in office?  Deuteronomy 17:15b says that “Thou mayest not set a stranger [racial foreigner] over thee, who is not thy brother.”

“They marched in spite of animosity, oppression and brutality because they believed in the greatness of what this nation could become and despaired of the founding promises not kept,” Holder said.

Holder mentioned gays and Latinos, women and the disabled as those who had yet to fully realize Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream. Others in the crowd advocated organized labor, voting rights, revamping immigration policies and access to local post offices.

King studied Gandhi’s ideas of peaceful resistance extensively and even ended up taking a trip to India at one point. Upon returning he was convinced that non-violent resistance was the way to go.  Are you a fan of anti-Christian Gandhi?

Despite the fact that the speech is now iconic, it is not part of the public domain. In a 1999 court case, the King family won copyright rights to the speech. For that reason, it can be difficult to track down copies of “I Have a Dream” or teach it in schools since it’s going to cost money. USA Today learned that the hard way when it posted a large excerpt of the speech and was charged a $1,700 licensing fee.

The march was led by the Rev. Al Sharpton and Martin Luther King III. Some of those who marched in 1963 were in the crowd today.  There were a lot of speakers, with Martin being the final one.  The speaker right before he went on was a _______?  What do you think?  The next to last speaker was a rabbi.  After the rabbi spoke, Martin was told to keep it at around five minutes; he took seventeen minutes. 

He was born Michael King.  His name was changed when he was five years old by his father.  His father, who was also a “Baptist” preacher, changed his name to Martin Luther King, Sr. so he changed, at the same time, his son’s name to Marin Luther King, Jr.   He did not change his name legally, he just changed his name.  So really, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s name was still Michael King, Jr. the day he was murdered.

The famous speech that he spoke that day was actually plagiarized from a sermon by Archibald Carey, a popular black preacher in the 1950’s.  The speech became known by the title of “I Have A Dream.” 

One of Dr. Martin’s closest friends, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, wrote a book in 1989 in which he talked about King’s obsession with white prostitutes.  King would often use church donations to have drunken sex parties, where he would hire two to three white prostitutes.  This has also been reported by the FBI agents who monitored King.  King was married with four children.  But the FBI report was sealed.  It won’t be opened until everyone is dead who knew him then—it will be opened in 2027.

Although an ordained Baptist minister like his father, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Sr., Martin Luther King, Jr. did not believe in Jesus' virgin-birth or resurrection from the dead.  He considered these "myths". He believed Jesus was the "Son of God" in only the most metaphorical, non-literal, sense.

He didn’t believe in these important issues?  He denied His virgin birth and the fact that He rose from the dead and His deity?  Doesn’t the scripture say that anyone who denies the resurrection of Jesus Christ denies the faith?  Then how was Mr. King a Baptist preacher?  He was a false prophet!

King's “I Have A Dream” speech ended with:

“This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, ‘My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing.  Land where my father’s died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.’"

Did Martin Luther King’s fathers die fighting for this nation?  No.  The blacks were not allowed to be in the Armed Forces until World War II.  None of his fathers died in this manner.

Why does he mention the “land of the pilgrim’s pride?”  The Pilgrims were Protestants who were persecuted by the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church.  It was the Pilgrims who came here as a Protestant church who wrote and signed the Mayflower Compact.  They were all white.  The Pilgrim’s pride had nothing to do with the Roman Catholics!

King continued:  “And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi.  From every mountainside, let freedom ring.”

When will America be great?  When freedom rings out across the land; what is freedom?  Freedom refers to no usury (interest) loans being charged to you by your brother.  We are certainly a long way from this—but we had that for a long time when the jew was thrown out of our lands.

“When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, ‘Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!’

What are Christians thinking?  All of God’s children include black and white men (no mention of Asians, Mexicans, Polynesians, Latinos, Chinese, etc. and mullatos and women.)

Do all of God’s children include Jews and Gentiles?  Which Jews are these:  Ashkenazi or Sephardic? Does God love and die for those who told Pilate that “His blood be upon us and our children.”  And who are the Gentiles; everyone else?  Greeks, Romans, African savages, Incas, Eskimos, etc.? 

It is a false prophet who says what Scofield says:Describing in his notes about Genesis 12:3 found in the 1967 Bible, four years after Dr. King gave his speech: 

“This was a warning literally fulfilled in the history of Israel’s persecutions.   It has invariable fared ill with people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him.  For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment.”

In two sentences, the jew have used Scofield’s Bible to identified Israel with the Jews. It doesn’t matter that there were no jews at this time in history and that anti-Semitism is not what the jew says that it is!  But it is the politically correct view now.

What is lost is the historic Christian view: Jew and Gentile refer to the dividing of Israel into two separate kingdoms.    The House of Judah [Jews] and the House of Israel [Gentiles] are what is referred to over and over in the Scriptures.    

Protestants and Catholics?  Catholics are grouped with the Protestants as being God’s children?  The Catholics are Universalists; true Christians are what they have always been:  they worship the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob only. 

The Roman Catholics, who have mixed paganism with Christianity, have been guilty of murdering tens of thousands of Protestants and other people even before there was a Protestant Revolution. They murdered the members of churches that were started by the Apostles of Jesus Christ.  Why would they do this if they were the true church?  Foxe’s Book of Martyrs and the Martyr’s Mirror have been written many years ago.  The Catholics are part of the beast system.  How could you equate Catholics and Pilgrims?  The Pilgrims, who are descended from the House of Israel, are stirring in their graves being equated with the enemies of their people—the Roman Catholics.                 
The organizing genius behind the March on Washington, fifty years ago, was civil-rights veteran Bayard Rustin. What is less-known now, or then, is that he was gay. That might have not been known at all had Rustin not been arrested on what were then called morals charges (he was arrested in 1953 along with two other men in a parked car in Pasadena, California.)

King had kept Rustin at a distance under pressure from other black leaders. The late Rep. Adam Clayton Powell Jr. of Harlem had forced Rustin off of the board of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Roy Wilkins, head of the NAACP, didn't want Rustin running the 1963 march.

But Rustin's mentor, A. Philip Randolph, head of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, insisted.  It was Randolph's idea to have a March on Washington in 1941 to protest segregation—and it was called off only when President Roosevelt desegregated the defense industry.  So when the idea surfaced of a March on Washington in 1963, to demand justice on the 100th anniversary of the end of slavery, Randolph's word counted above all others. And it was Rustin who did much of the speaking that August day.

Senator Strom Thurmond denounced Rustin as a Communist and a sodomite in a floor statement, but the press didn't pick it up.  Rustin died in 1987 and President Obama will present him, posthumously, with the Medal of Freedom.

African American, Bayard Rustin is a former organizer for the Young Communist League. He spent 60 days in a California jail on a 1953 conviction for performing lewd homosexual acts in public. He also served 28 months in prison for draft evasion. Rustin was paid by Jewish organizations for use of his name as a "signer" of ads urging "Black-Jewish Unity."  He was King's secretary and advisor from 1956 to 1960.  During this period Rustin attended the National Convention of the Communist Party in 1957 as an "honored observer."  King called him "a brilliant, efficient, and dedicated organizer."  

It was Rustin who introduced King to a jewish Soviet spy named Stanley D. Levison. He was a New York Lawyer and vice-president of the N.Y. Council of the American Jewish Congress.  Levison's job was to launder the $1 million subsidy Soviet Russia gave to finance the U.S. Communist Party. Levison proved important financial, organizational and public relations services for King. After King's death his wife, Coretta Scott King described Levison's role as, "always working in the background, his contribution has been indispensable." Levison wrote an obituary for King and described America as a "nation tenaciously racist... sick with violence...and corrosive with alienation. The civil rights liberation struggle is the most positive and rewarding area of work anyone could experience."

The money which the Soviet Union funneled to Levison came from a Jew named Isidore G. Needleman.  He was a KGB secret police agent who fronted as an officer of AMTORG, the trading company in New York City which buys U.S. goods for shipment to Russia.  There are so many Jews in the Communist Party the FBI hired two Jewish brothers, Morris Childs and Jack Childs as spies planted inside the Communist Party.  For 30 years, Morris Childs was formerly a member of the National Committee of the Communist party and once served as editor of the Daily Worker.  Childs reported that after the death of the Jew William Weiner, who was treasurer of the Communist Party, it was Stanley Levison who took over this vital post.

A number of Communists who left the party have reported they were ordered to do all within their power to support King's activities.  A black woman, Julia Brown, was a Communist in Cleveland for nine years.  She said:

"We were told to promote King, to unite Negroes and Whites behind him, and to turn him into a sort of national hero. We were to look to King as the leader in this struggle, the Communists said, because he was on our side. While in the party I learned that King attended a Communist training school, that several of his aides were Communists and that he received funds from Communists and took directions from them. He was one of their biggest heroes."

The U. S. Congressional Record of March 30, 1965 quotes Karl Prussian, an FBI counterspy inside the Communist Party as swearing:

"At all of these (Communist Party) meetings Rev. Martin Luther King was always set forth as the individual to whom Communists should rally around... King has either been a member of, or willingly accepted support from over 60 Communist fronts... King accepted support from communist fronts, individuals and organizations which espouse Communist causes."  Martin Luther King, Jr. was a false prophet.

Coretta Scott-King, wife of the late Martin Luther King Jr., diligently promoted "rights" for homosexuals, in spite of the Bible's condemnation upon such wickedness.  Leviticus 20:13 says that “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination:  they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”   

Homosexuality is CONDEMNED in the Bible. But Jesus NEVER would have fought for the "rights" of homosexuals, because Leviticus 20:13 clearly proclaims the death penalty upon them.  Homosexuality is a horrible sin which brings the judgments of God, as do all sins. 

Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed as an EXAMPLE of what would happen to those who commit homosexuality and rebel against the Word of Jesus Christ.  There is NO way that Jesus or the Apostles would have embraced homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle!  These cities in the plain were destroyed directly by the God of the Bible. 

Yet, Satan is such a powerful deceiver that even many of today's so-called Christian churches are becoming gay-friendly!!!  This is a result of Christians not studying and standing upon the Word of God. Tragically, many professed "Christians" are NOT Christians at all. 

America just got over the Zimmerman—Martin murder case.  Zimmerman was found innocent of murdering Martin.  There were groups of protests arranged by Al Sharpton.  Fortunately, there were not a lot of deaths and riots as a result of his efforts.

But did you know that Trayvon Martin’s father, Tracy Martin, is a Grand Master Freemason who has been divorced from his first wife for fourteen years. He was divorced from his second wife for a couple of years. Trayvon was kicked out of his first mother’s house, because she couldn’t control him, to his father’s third finance’s house which was located 200 miles to the north of Miami.  Did you hear this on the National News?  The Local News?  Why didn’t you hear this?  This would have made a big difference in the case.

Tracy Martin in Mason Garb


The first Negro Greek Secret Society was formed in Philadelphia, by Dr. Henry Minton and five of his colleagues in 1904. The Boulé, (an acronym for Sigma Pi Phi and pronounced “boo-lay”), was formed to bring together a select group of educated Black men and women.

Fashioned after Yale’s Skull and Bones, (there have been three Presidents of the United States produced by this group) the Boulé historically takes pride in having provided leadership and service to Black Americans during the Great Depression, World Wars I and II, and the Civil Rights Movement.  What could the Boulé offer America’s Blacks in the early 20th century? Joining the exclusive secret society offered advancement and perks to select Blacks in return for loyalty to its objectives.

The Boulé recruits top Blacks in American Society into its ranks. Today, 5000+ Archons, (male Boulé members) and their wives, (Archousais), with 112 chapters, make up the wealthiest group of Black men and women on the planet.

But to whom does the Boulé really serve?  The Satanic (mostly jewish) global elite!  As long as the Black member conforms to the rules, the riches will be in abundance; if not, down comes the hatchet.  Blackmail is part of the deal.  This Masonic secret society has a pyramid style like all the rest. The lower ranks are kept from knowing what the upper ranks are doing.

The early 20th century was a period of reconstruction. Marcus Garvey’s “Back to Africa” Movement was in full swing. Garvey represented genuine Black leadership. W.E.B. Dubois, founding member of the NYC chapter of the Boulé said, “The Boulé was created to keep the black professional away from Marcus Garvey”.  The remaking of the House Negro was necessary to institute a group of Blacks who had a vested interest in protecting the Elite Jewish System.  It was about selling out brothers and sisters for power and money. The majority of Black lawyers, doctors, engineers and accountants were members of this secret club.

2 Members of the Boule: Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton

Two of the members of the Boulé; Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

President Obama and his wife are members of the BouleObama and his wife are also members of the Boulé. 

The Futurologist Steve Cokely, had this to say: “Anywhere there are prominent professional Blacks, chances are they’re in the Boulé”.  Martin Luther King and Jesse Jackson are reported to have been Boulé members, among many other high profile, successful and moneyed Blacks such as Barack Obama, Bill Cosby, Al Sharpton and Thurgood Marshall, Eric Holder, Adam Clayton Powell, Roy Wilkins, Andrew Young, Vernon Jordon, Hank Aaron, Denzel Washington, Oprah Winfrey, Jay-Z, Halle Berry, Arthur Ashe, Martin Luther King III, former United Nations Ambassador Ralph Bunche, etc.  

The members of the Boulé pose as Freedom Fighters or Civil Rights Activists on the surface. In truth, the elite members are operating for personal gain. The Boulé works in concert with their masters in maintaining the grip of Illuminati supremacy on their people.  The Boulé is another arm of the nefarious secret societies that recruit, indoctrinate and cull for the dark forces. Therein are perks galore, power and notoriety all lying in wait for the easily compromised soul? 

In the Greek system, the Boulé was the Lower House of Parliament; charged with organizing the affairs of the city for the King. This is an ancient story. The New World Order is The Old World Order.  The elite Blacks of the Boulé are culling and controlling their own for a slice of the elite jewish man’s pie.  Like other secret societies, the Boulé encourages homosexual trysts as initiation practices. This must be done to join the ranks.

These perversions are then cataloged and stored on record. Later, if needed, these abuses may be used as bargaining tools in the ULTIMATE GAME. What is the Ultimate Game?   Capturing human souls.  The enemy may appear to have a jewish face but it goes much deeper than that. This is a force cloaked within many facades, personals, fictions and governing powers.

DuBois emphasized, as Cokely stated, “the importance to steal the black professional away from Garvey because an Afrocentric organization that articulated and captured the black professional would give…no safe haven in the black community, so the Boulé — the remaking of the house negro was necessary to build a group of negroes who had an investment in protecting the jewish system as produced by jews having stolen this land…This is post reconstruction. Taking away the articulate negro, now desiring to replace them with organized institutions to keep them away from self improvement.  So we find in the same period, as the founding of the Boulé’, the founding of the 4 black male (Alpha Phi Alpha, Kappa Alpha Psi, Omega Psi Phi, and Phi Beta Sigma) and 4 black female (Alpha Kappa Alpha, Delta Sigma Theta, Zeta Phi Beta, and Sigma Gamma Rho) college-based fraternities and sororities…We also find the founding of the NAACP and Urban League.”


Fifty years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his “I Have a Dream” speech.  The leftist government officials and news executives have convinced almost all of the other people in the United States of how wonderful this speech was.  They fail to mention that he was a cheating college student, cheating husband, cheating Negro champion and cheating Christian.  The celebration of his speech has given me a “Nightmare.”

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Kol Nidre

by Pastor Don Elmore

March 17, 2013

Scripture Reading:  Hebrews 13:20

Kol Nidre is one of the major secrets of the Jewish religion.  On the evening service of the Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur, the jews all over the world gather in their synagogues and hear the prayer chanted three times.  It is an annual event for them. But let’s go to the Jewish Encyclopedia and see what it says about this prayer and how it is performed (emphases mine).

“Prayer recited in the synagogue at the beginning of the evening service on the Day of Atonement; the name is taken from the opening words. The ‘Kol Nidre’ has had a very eventful history, both in itself and in its influence on the legal status of the Jews. Introduced into the liturgy despite the opposition of rabbinic authorities, repeatedly attacked in the course of time by many halakists, and in the nineteenth century expunged from the prayer-book by many communities of western Europe, it has often been employed by Christians to support their assertion that the oath of a Jew can not be trusted.

Form of Prayer:

Before sunset on the eve of the Day of Atonement, when the congregation has gathered in the synagogue, the Ark is opened and two rabbis, or two leading men in the community, take from it two Torah-scrolls. Then they take their places, one on each side of the azzan, and the three recite in concert a formula beginning with the words, which runs as follows:

‘In the tribunal of heaven and the tribunal of earth, by the permission of God—blessed be He—and by the permission of this holy congregation, we hold it lawful to pray with the transgressors.’

Thereupon the cantor chants the Aramaic prayer beginning with the words ‘Kol Nidre,’ with its marvelously plaintive and touching melody, and, gradually increasing in volume from pianissimo to fortissimo, repeats three times the following words:

‘All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘onam,’ ‘onas,’ or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.’

The leader and the congregation then say together:

(Num. xv. 26).

“And it shall be forgiven all the congregation of the children of Israel, and the stranger that sojourneth among them, seeing all the people were in ignorance”

This also is repeated three times. The azzan then closes with the benediction,: “Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, King of the Universe, who hast preserved us and hast brought us to enjoy this season.” In many congregations Num. xiv. 19-20 is recited before this benediction. After it the Torah-scrolls are replaced,and the customary evening service begins.”

So once a year the jews in their synagogues repeatedly [3 times] recite this prayer that Christians have expressed throughout the ages that this is one reason the jews cannot be trusted.  To the Christian this is blasphemy.  For not only is there no repentance evidenced but forthright blatant disobedience; and a year in advance.   All the lies and false swearing of the year are to come to be annulled in advanced.


Adam Lanza, in the 2010 Newtown High School Yearbook, is missing his picture.  His name was written in the yearbook, but he didn’t have his picture taken because he was “camera shy”.  He graduated in 2010.  That is the official story.

But his name doesn’t seem to be right in the yearbook for the name after his was the name of a student who was murdered at Sandy Hook; Jesse Lewis, and the name before his was a student who was not at Sandy Hook High School.  And when his high school teacher was interviewed she said that Adam dropped out of school his junior year and went to the local university and got his GED.   He wasn’t a graduate of Newtown High School.

And some more strange things; we have not been shown a photograph in which Ryan and Adam are both in.  Nor does Adam’s father, Peter Lanza appear with both Adam and Ryan.  Nor does Adam’s mother, Nancy appear with Adam and Ryan.  Nor does all four (father, mother, and the two sons) appear in any photograph that we have seen.

In the year 2008; Nancy notified her husband Peter that she wanted a divorce.  In that year Adam would have been 16 years old.  Adam at the age of 16 severed all ties with his father at the time of the divorce. 

His mother, according to the divorce proceedings, was going to pay for his automobile insurance while his father had the responsibility of buying him a car. 

In the year 2009, Adam stated that he was going to move out on his own.  That would be exactly what the reporters said that they found out about him: nothing after 2009.  “He just fell off the face of the earth” was a phrase that they repeated.  Adam just “dropped under the radar.”  There were no transcripts, no records of any kind, no bank accounts, and no paper trail at all.  What happened to him?

Did after three years of absolutely no information from anywhere, Adam shot his mother four times in the head, completely destroyed his hard drive, drove Christopher Rodia's car to the Sandy Hook Elementary School, carried 20 pounds of guns, a rifle and ammunition into the school, shot his way through the bullet-proof glass in the entrance, entered the school and began shooting up to 10 changes of clips with great, never before done accuracy, and then shot himself with a pistol when the first arrivals came.  Quite an amazine story!



The White House Task Force on Gun Violence; From the maternal family of Noah Pozner; Initial Proposals in Response to the Sandy Hook Shooting;  (Emphases mine].

January 13, 2013


On December 14, 2012, our family tragically lost Noah Pozner in the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary.  Noah had just turned six years old.  He was a smart and dynamic little boy who loved his family more than anything else.

Noah’s young life ended in his first grade classroom when he was shot 11 times at close range.

It is impossible to describe how devastated we all are by Noah’s death.  The violent death of a young child’s suffering is that which no family should have to bear.  To know that the same intense pain is being felt by all of the other victims’ families only makes it much worse.

In Noah’s memory, we are determined to make a difference.  In this memorandum, the maternal family of Noah Pozner proposes a range of legislative reforms to help prevent another targeted school shooting.  The proposals include reforms that have not yet, to our knowledge, been discussed in the national media or at the White House.  They are based upon conversations within the family, consultations with school security experts, independent research related to prior school shootings, and discussions with legal professionals who focus on criminal law[They did this after the murder?]

We recognize that no single law or reform will prevent targeted school shootings.  However, by enacting a wide range of reforms, federal, state and local governments can make our children much safer in schools.  If our efforts help prevent even a single other family from losing a child to gun violence, we will have accomplished our goal.” 

This memorandum is authored by Alexis Haller, Noah Pozner’s uncle and a licensed attorney.  The whole essence of this written memorandum was nothing more than GUN CONTROL.  The memorandum is submitted on behalf of the following 12 family members of Noah Pozner:

  1.  Veronique Pozner (Noah’s mother) who’s first husband was Mr. Vabner who now lives in Washington, DC. He is the Vice President of Royal Bank of Scotland and is the Senior Director of Corporate Finance and is a director of Amtrak.

Veronique wrote on her website:  “If everyone gave just $1 to…we can cover Noah’s funeral.  Please help.  Thank you! #LoveForNoah”

In Veronique’s MeetUp Profile from April 7, 2012 there was no picture of Noah?  Why would there be no photo of Noah in her own family profile?  Shouldn’t you put the pictures of your children in your profile?

  1. Leonard Pozner (father) is the CEO of multiple Corporations and is now divorced from Noah’s mother.
  2. Danieller Vabner (step-sister) wrote on her website that “I’ve stopped even bothering with my mom.  All she wants to do is be with her boyfriend anyway.  #sad #noevenworthit”
  3. Michael Vabner (step-brother)
  4. Marie-Claude Duytschaever (grandmother) who wants a ban of assault rifles.  Works for the United Nations. She wrote:  “He [Noah] had the right to live, to have a job and a normal life.  I think that’s more important than to have a gun that can obliterate a whole room in seconds.”

She sold her home for $1,350,000 in 2006 and her Husband is the vice President of Arab Bank.

She was born in 1946.  Marie currently lives in Sandy Hook, Connecticut.  Before that, Marie lived in San Antonio, Texas from 1998 to 2010.  She is related to Dirk Duytschaever, who is 67 years old and lives in Sandy Hook, Ct.  She also is related to Stephen Haller, who is 44 year old and lives in Dublin, Ohio.

  1. Dirk Duytschaever (Step-grandfather)—Vice President of Arab Bank.
  2. Ivar Haller (grandfather)
  3. Natalie Cornaz (Partner of Noah’s grandfather)
  4. Stephan Haller (uncle)
  5. Patricia Haller (aunt)
  6. Alexis Haller (uncle) who wrote the Memorandum.
  7. Victoria Haller (aunt) who is a Social Media Goddess.  She graduated from San Francisco State University and is a Co-founder of a women’s multimedia company which produced blogs, radio shows, twitter and blog cameos.  She is available for speaking gigs, consulting, writing , editing, live tweeting, conference parties, 

She is better known as Vdog, and is the person behind a monthly online women’s magazine.  She also wrote on the internet that “If everyone gave just $1 to, we could cover Noah’s funeral.  Please help.  Thank you.”

Noah was shot 11 times by an AR-15.  The Chief Medical Examiner, and everyone can believe what he says, for he has a very corrupt record, claims to have personally performed an autopsy on Noah.  But his mother felt that Noah’s body had suffered too many indignities already; she was adamant that “he not be autopsied.”  And according to Connecticut State Law, all autopsies are mandated in cases of homicide.  But they also passed a law in 2011 that said that all autopsies of children are not to be made public!  So which is it?  Was Noah autopsied or not.  We will probably never know!

And what about the financial situation of the Pozners? 

Leonard and Veronique P Pozner:


  • Discover Bank
  • Sterling National Bank
  • M&I Bank FSB
  • FIA Card services—awarded $450
  • Newton Savings Bank—awarded $15,997.89
  • GE Money Bank
  • US National Assoc ND Financial
  • RSB Citizens
  • Razor Capital LLC
  • Target National Bank—awarded $3149.51
  • Newtown Septic

Their total Debt as of August, 2012 was $166,426.41 with three foreclosures. 

And their marriage was also in a state of dissolution at the end of 2012.  That is probably why we only saw Mrs. Posner on television and not the father.  The huge debt would certainly be a motive for the acting that she did. 

“The further a society drifts away from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”—George Orwell.


Camilee Kaplan and her husband played the role of Sandy Hook’s family of the murdered son, Dylan Hockley.  Camilee is the step-daughter of Canaanite jew David Rockefeller, Jr.   And David had two other grandchildren—Chase Kowalski and Noah Pozner who played as murdered students at Sandy Hook.  Also, Allison Rockefeller was Adam Lanza’s hairdresser. 

Noah Pozner’s real name is not Noah Pozner.  His parents are not Veronique and Leonard Ponzner.  What a strange world we live in.  Truth is stranger than fiction.


But this has been done many times before.  CNN news department had two reporters who were said to be in Saudi Arabia reporting on the Desert Storm news.  There was a loud explosion that occurred and reporter Charles Jaco put on his gas mask while the other reporter, Charles Rochelle, put on a helmet.  It was suppose to be a scud attack.

Well, they were talking to a reporter who was at the CNN studio in the United States.  But it was a big fake.  The two reporters were standing before a blue screen on the top of the roof of the studio in the United States.  Technology has so developed that they can put a reporter in front of a blue screen and the viewer will think that the reporter is where the picture on the blue scene is.  He can be viewed as being anywhere in the world, but in reality  just be in the studio. 

This happened with Anderson Cooper in the Sandy Hook massacre.  He was in front of a blue screen when he was interviewing Veronique and his nose disappeared several times.  

CNN have kept up these fake stories ever since the one that they did on Desert Storm.  In Sandy Hook, on the day that it happened, CNN showed the troops running into the school building saying that it was film from Sandy Hook.  But it wasn’t.  It was another fake.  It was from a previous drill at the elementary school a little more than  one mile from Sandy Hook Elementary.  They showed this drill over and over throughout the day.

Media giant CNN has now been caught airing what appears to be 'active-shooter drill footage' from another elementary school location and passing it off as the LIVE greaking news feed of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.  And they have the gall to call those who question the Sandy Hook official story as sick or crazy conspiracy theorists?


In Germany, after World War I, Marxists set up an Institute of Social Research.  It was set up in the Frankfurt School.  The Marxist of Frankfurt School recommended:

  1. The creation of racism offences.
  2. Continual change to create confusion.
  3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
  4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
  5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
  6. The promotion of excessive drinking.
  7. Emptying of churches.
  8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
  9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
  10. Control and dumbing down of media.
  11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

Erich Fromm was born in 1900 to Orthodox Canaanite/jewish parents.  When he was 30 years old he joined the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research and completed his psychoanalytical training. 

After the Nazi takeover of power in Germany, Fromm and the Frankfurt School moved to Columbia University in New York.  This was the same university that Barak Obama went as a student or something, like a CIA agent, since no one seems to remember seeing him.  The Institute was composed mainly of those of jewish background and they were Marxists or Communists.  The Institute quickly changed its name to the school at which it was located in Germany:  The Frankfurt School.

Central in Fromm’s world view was his interpretation of the Talmud, which he began studying as a young man under Rabbi J. Horowitz in Frankfurt.  Fromm continued in his Marxists beliefs when he came to America.

Fromm basically taught that man needed to be free from sexual repression.  This has lead to the changing of sodomites from being an abomination of God to a difference in life-styles.  If one follows these views taught by Fromm and the Frankfurt School he will be in a disastrous condition.   There is no mention of the LORD God or of following His Laws or Commandments.

After World War II, the Frankfurt School mainly stayed in the United States and spread their jewish/Marxist teachings throughout the nation of the United States.  Political correctness is Marxism.  Western culture has to be destroyed for Marxist culture to survive and take over.

Sex education was introduced to the children in the public schools.  The Frankfurt School would be the leader in determining what was politically correct.   Gradually the school changed its direction.  The Marxism it taught was actually different from the Marxism in the Soviet Union.  It changed to a culture revolution from an economic revolution.

In the 1960’s the Marxists’ school made the culture, not the economy the basis of their arguments.  They crossed Marx with Freud.  A social and cultural revolution; music became an important part in this revolution.  So did drugs.  Rock and Roll became the music of the revolution of the Frankfurt Marxists’ School.

The theory is to criticize every institution in western society:  gay studies, same-sex studies, women studies, divorce studies, etc.  Leftist David Horowitz was a part of these studies which ultimate purpose was the destruction of western societies.  Once it came to America, it began to focus its strategy in destroying the United States, instead of Germany.

Environmentalism was put into their economic strategy and victim groups became the new groups for revolution:  blacks and women were foremost in leading the movement.  Sexual revolution was promoted and guided by the Marxist School.  Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School called for sexual expression or pleasure which leads to sexual perversion.

Sexual repression of the 1960’s became the battle ground of the revolution.  Their goal was sexual liberation. Marcuse was the “spiritual father” of the school.

Radical multiculturalism is another of its communist teachings.  This leads to inter-racial dating and marriage which will completely destroy Israel and its Commandments of its God.


Barbara Lerner Spectre, former United States Congresswomen, is the founding director of a nondenominational organization, Paideia, Stockholm.  She is living in Sweden and says that the Jews are attempting to provide the means for Sweden to survive.

“I think there is a resurgent of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multi-cultural.  And I think that we are going to be the thralls of that transformation, which must take place

Europe is not going to be the monotheistic society that they once were in the last century.  Jews are going to be the center of that.  It a huge transformation for Europe to make, and they are not going into a multi-cultural mode and the Jews will be resented because of our leading role.  But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Europe will not survive if they do not become multi-cultural?  I believe that Barbara has it backwards—multiculturalism will be the defeat of Europe. 


In 1994 the lesbian, Canaanite/jewish Attorney General Janet Reno defined:

A cultist as one who has a strong belief:

  1. In the Bible and the
  2. Second Coming of Jesus Christ
  3. Who frequently attends Bible studies
  4. Who has a high level of financial giving to a Christian cause
  5. Who home schools his children
  6. Who has accumulated survival foods
  7. Has a strong belief in the second Amendment and
  8. Who distrusts big government?

She added:  “Any of these may qualify but certainly more than one would cause us to look at this person as a threat, and his family as being in a risk situation that qualified for government interference.”  

How many of these describe you?  Do you have at least 6 of these 8 terms; are you a member of a cult as Janet Reno describes as a threat?


The Department of Homeland Security said in 2004 that the following are dangerous to the federal government.:

  1. Veterans
  2. Bible reading Christians
  3. Constitution believers
  4. People who oppose abortion
  5. People who support gun rights

I think that the Department of Homeland Security is dangerous to us.  For we hold to anywhere from 3 to all 5 of these descriptions.


The Social Security Act was signed by President Roosevelt in 1935.  Taxes were collected for the first time in January of 1937.  Regular ongoing monthly benefits started in January 1940.

Social Security cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and Card were not to be used for identification purposes.  Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed permanently. 

When Social Security was begun, what it promised is a lot different from what it has become:

  1. That participation in Social Security would be completely voluntary. IT IS NO LONGER VOLUNTARY.
  2. That the participants would only   have to pay 1% of the first $1400 of their annual incomes into Social Security. IT IS NO LONGER 1%, BUT RATHER 7.65% ON THE FIRST $113,700.
  3. That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year. IT IS NO LONGER TAX DEDUCTIBLE.
  4. That the money the participants put in went to the independent “Trust Fund” rather than into the General Operating Fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program. IT NO LONGER IS PUT INTO A TRUST FUND, BUT IS PUT IN THE GENERAL FUND, AND ALL OF IT IS ALREADY SPENT.
  5. That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. UNDER PRESIDENT CLINTON, UP TO 85% OF YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CAN BE TAXED.

The plan for Social Security was defined by Colonel Mandell House, a man behind the establishment of our current day Federal Reserve Banking System.   He is attributed with a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people.  He stated, in a private meeting with President Woodward Wilson:

“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property [that’s you and your children] in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading [Birth Certificate] to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability [they are liars].

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.

Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office [presidency] of our dummy corporation [USA] to foment this plot against America.”  [Canaan was to serve Shem; not the way it is now].

Colonel Edward Mandell House was not a Colonel; he never served in the Military and House was not his real name.  His original name was Huis.  He was born to a Dutch Jewish family from Texas who became a Rothschild Agent and eventually ran the White House after the President began to lose his faculties. 

In other words, the Social Security System is 100% pure redistribution of the nation’s wealth, and fits Carl Marx’s definition of Communism!


Pastor Blanchard sent an email about a quote from a former professor at Yale University; C. A. L. Toten, who lived from 1851-1908: 

“I can never be too thankful to the Almighty that in my youth He used the late professor Wilson, to show me the difference between the two houses.  The very understanding of the difference is the key, by which almost the entire Bible became intelligible.

 And I cannot state too strongly that the man who has not yet seen that Israel of the Scripture is totally distinct from the Jewish people is yet in the very infancy the very alphabet of Biblical studies and that to this day the meaning of 7/8 of the Holy Scriptures is shut to his understanding.”

The Jewish world forgets all about God’s Word.  It is the Bible that gives us hope and gives us a view of how the world is being run by those who hate His laws.  It stands in defiance of the enslaving laws that are on the books now.

There is a thread of truth that runs through the Bible depicting God and Israel as being Husband and wife.  But who is depicted in Scripture as being the Shepherd and the Sheep?  The vast majority of Christians believe that the Shepherd is eventually Jesus Christ but who are the Sheep?  Are they representative of just Israel or are they anybody of any race in the world who accepts Jesus Christ in their heart?

When Israel was near the promised land of Canaan, Moses was told that he would not be the one who would lead the covenant people over the Jordan River.  Moses then asked God to appoint a man who would lead the congregation in his [Moses] place.  In Numbers 27:16-17

“Let the LORD, the God of the spirits of all flesh, set a man over the congregation. Which may go out before them, and which may go in before them, and which may lead them out, and which may bring them in; that the congregation of the LORD be not as sheep which have no shepherd. 

The context reveals that the congregation was Israel and the shepherd was Joshua.  Joshua was to be Israel’s shepherd as they entered the promised land of Canaan.

In Jeremiah 31:10 we get a second witness:  “Hear the word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock.”

The context reveals the flock as being those of the offspring of Jacob, the remnant of Israel (verse 7), and Ephraim in the isles afar off (verses 9-10).  The Shepherd is the LORD God and the flock or sheep are all the people of Israel.

The Psalms is another place that talks about the Shepherd and the sheep.  In Psalm 78 we have the story of the miraculous deliverance of Israel from their Egyptian bondage.  In verse 52 it says that He “…made His own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock.” 

Two Psalms later He said in verse one:  “Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, thou that leadest Joseph like a flock; thou that dwellest between the cherubims, shine forth.”

There is only one person who dwelt between the cherubims -- the LORD God of Israel.

Then there is the famous 23rd Psalm.  It begins with the words, “The LORD is my Shepherd; I shall not want.”  We (the Israelites) are the sheep.  The Psalm tells how my Shepherd makes me to “lie down in green pastures” and that he leadeth me “besides the still waters.”  The Shepherd “restoreth my soul”: and he leads me “in the path of righteousness.”  And where ever we may go, my Shepherd is “with me” and his “rod and his staff” comfort me.   The Shepherd “anoints my head with oil” and “I will dwell in his house forever.”   

The conclusion:  the identity of the sheep is Israel and the God of Israel is their Shepherd.  The next verse is an important passage for us to understand.   The Shepherd and the Sheep are again mentioned. 

John 10:14 “I am the good shepherd, and know My sheep, and am known of mine.”  The Shepherd is Jesus Christ and the sheep are both houses of Israel:  the House of Judah (mistranslated “Jews”) and the House of Israel (mistranslated “Gentiles”). 

“As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father:  and I lay down my life for the sheep.”  Here Jesus Christ put away all the previous animal sacrificial laws because He was the sacrifice for His people.  There is no more sacrifice needed; irregardless of the blasphemous Roman Catholic mass.  

Jesus Christ died for His covenant people only.  They are the ones who sins are forgiven by His Father and are the ones who are to go through the doors of the heavenly city marked by the names of the sons of Israel. 

In the book of Hebrews, in the New Testament, we have Jesus Christ described as being the “great shepherd of the sheep” and then ties it into the “blood of the everlasting covenant.”  Hebrews 13:20.  The sheep are the seed of Jacob/Israel; the covenant people of God.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Least of These My Brethren

by Pastor Don Elmore

October 27, 2013

Scripture Reading: Matthew 25:40

This verse is given as the verse which is used as the one which the Universalist uses to fleece our people into giving part of their money to them in order to think that they are doing this for Jesus Christ.  Look at these recent examples:

  • There was an article in the Cincinnati Enquirer about the Jesuit Xavier University professor who “Invites others to walk across the Color Line.”  He is a lifelong musician and a student of African-American history and spiritually and teaches theology and spiritually courses at Xavier University. He and his wife have two birth children and then adopted two Haitian orphans in 2010. “He states that it is not just black and white or just the multicultural face of humanity.  It’s about experiencing the multicultural face of God.  It about discovering God and joy in this life in places that I used to be afraid to go.  There are amazing joys and riches to be found” (Cincinnati Enquirer, Sunday, October 13, 2013 issue, cover page of the Good News section).
  • In the Tulsa World newspaper, in September, 2013 there was an article about a newlywed husband and wife who were both hired to be ministers of the First Christian Church in downtown Tulsa.   He is quoted as saying “that the churches around the world, are undergoing a major shift, something that happens about every 500 years in Christendom.”  Of course, his denomination, The Christian Church, is only 200 years old.  They taught that the church was gone (no true Christian church left in the world) in the early 1800’s and that it had to be restored.  So what does he mean that there is a major shift every 500 years in Christendom; when his denomination is only 200 years old? At the end of the article it says that “Both of them have studied African-American affairs and both have an interest in fostering a ‘a sense of unity that embraces diversity….’  That’s at the core of who we are as Disciples,” he (the husband) added. 

In the 200 years of his denomination’s existence, this was not the core of this church in its beginning.  In the early 1800’s the church did have other races as its members, but it was a long way from being its core. 

Unity embraces diversity?  Do you think that was what they were taught; the jewish lie.  They say that it is diversity that makes America strong!  No, it is the few remaining remnants of God’s Word and Law that make our nation strong; the few waning remnant of pure Israel blood and the even fewer righteous Israelites left. 

Other charities are much more in your face about the situation.  Here is an example:

“In November, we will be serving thousands of meals through our various ministries.  The homeless and hungry depend on Fairhaven to meet their physical and spiritual needs…many have no one else.  For many the mission is the only family they have.

As the Bible says in Matthew 25:40… ‘Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.’

As we count our blessings during this season, we are thankful for you – our friends – whose faithful prayers, caring and involvement make this ministry possible.

Rejoicing in His Blessings,
Rev. David E. Hammers
Executive Director

Enclosed in my Thanksgiving gift to feed and care for needy people:

__  $20.50 to help feed and care for 10 people

__  $30.75 to help feed and care for 15 people

__  $51.25 to help feed and care for 25 people

__ $102.50 to help feed and care for 50 people

__$205.00 to help feed and care for 100 people

$____to feed and care for as many as possible.


Another example is something that was sent to me in the mail two weeks ago.  It began with the following


For just $2.05 we can provide a complete thanksgiving meal.”

There was one Scripture verse used…Mathew 25:40:  “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” There is just one verse; no comment of the context, no view on what or who the pronouns represent. 

They help feed and care for all kinds of people—every kind of person that is in need.  But is that what this verse says?  Who are God’s brethren?  Whatever you do to the least of His brethren are you doing it unto Him?  Are His brethren all peoples; all races; all cultures?  Are all races, all human beings, all men, all women, all children of all cultures, all religions; every Negroid, every Asian, every Caucasian, every Polynesian, every Israelite, every jew…are all God’s brethren?


What is the context of Matthew 25:40?  It starts in verse 31 and ends with verse 46.  The time period of this parable begins after the Lord has returned to the earth.

Matthew 25:31-33

“When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

And before him shall be gathered all nationsand he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.”

Did you notice which side the sheep, who would inherit eternal life were placed—the right side?  And which side those who would be cast into eternal punishment were placed—the left side?   What side would you want to be one:  the right or left?  It seems the right side is the one to be one—now and then!

What side are the liberal Democrats on?  The left side.   What side are the Republicans on?  The majority are on the left side.

What side are the real conservative Christians on?  The right side! 

The Republican traitors in the House of Representatives have done exactly as Obama wanted; they have given him everything he wanted and more.  House Speaker Boehner and the other traitors completely funded Obama Care.

In addition they secretly agreed to charge seniors more for Medicare, increase Tricare healthcare costs for military retirees, and reduce Social Security benefits.  The intent is to eventually force seniors to switch from Medicare to Obama Care.

There is no major difference between most Republicans and Democrats; maybe a nickel’s difference.     No one gave the solution as being to get rid of the Federal Reserve System.  No usury banking should be allowed to the Anglo-Saxons, Germanic, Scandinavians, etc.  It is allowed because they fear the jews.

Rand Paul at the Wailing WallSenator Rand Paul and Senator Ted Cruz went over to Israeli to kiss up to the big-wigs there. Both of these hack politicians visited the Wailing Wall with a rabbi.  Now, Senator Rand admits he speaks to an official of the Jewish Lobby each and every day.  The AIPAC and ADL are proud of their newest recruits and the Jewish billionaires now fund and direct most of the pitifully helpless Tea Parties.  To the left is a picture of Senator Rand Paul in Jerusalem at the Wailing Wall praying.  Notice the Yakama on his head.

Scofield Version: 1909 Interpretation

The term “Son of Man”, clearly identifies Jesus Christ in His resurrected body; that is come to earth to reign as He himself repeatedly stated that He shall come in His Glory. 

What are being separated in these verses are nations, not individuals.  The basis of the judgment as to whether a nation survives or is destroyed is dependent upon how they treated the brethren of the Lord.  This is a key passage.  God’s people are to show charity first to their own kind.  Much of the missionary and governmental aide programs to other races use this verse to justify their existence. 

There is a missionary group called “Matthew 25 Ministry” in Cincinnati, Ohio. Since no major league ball player hit the sign where the Toyota truck was located (high above the right center field wall in Great American Ball Park) the Cincinnati Reds gave the truck to the charity this week.   Also this week, Cintas Corporation in Cincinnati also gave a new truck to this Ministry.

But this Ministry is unscriptural as to Matthew 25!  Every crisis events, from the disaster in Haiti to the floods in Colorado, Matthew 25 Ministry sends truck loads of materials for the victims.  It was started by the pastor who married Randa and I.  After our marriage, he soon quit the church he was at; my boyhood church, and started this local ministry.  Its main emphases are in serving Central America; but supplies emergency aid to disasters in the whole world.

Scofield Bible Interpretation

Now look how the Scofield Bible interprets these verses in Chapter 25 of Matthew. According to the 1909 Scofield Bible, there are three classes of people in the Matthew 25:31-46 parable: 

  • Sheep,
  • Goats and
  • God’s Brethren. 

It says that “This judgment is to be distinguished from the judgment of the great white throne.  Here there is no resurrection; the persons judged are living nations; no books are opened; three classes are present, sheep, goats, brethren; the time is at the return of Christ (v. 31); and the scene is on the earth…

The test in this judgment is the treatment accorded by the nations to those whom Christ here calls ‘my brethren.’  These ‘brethren’ are the Jewish Remnant who will have preached the Gospel of the kingdom to all nations during the tribulation.”

The 1909 version of the Scofield Bible says that God’s Brethren are the jewish remnant who will preach the gospel of the kingdom to all nations in the future.  

Scofield Bible: 1967 Version

In the 1967 Scofield Bible the meaning is changed and enlarged.  “The time of this judgment is ‘when the Son of man shall come in his glory,’ i.e. at the second coming of Christ after the tribulation.  The subjects of this judgment are ‘all nations,’ i.e. all Gentiles then living on earth.  Three classes of individuals are mentioned:

(1) Sheep, saved Gentiles;

(2) Goats, unsaved Gentiles; and

(3) Brethren, the people of Israel” [No longer is it the Jewish remnant].

“The scene is on earth; no books are opened; it deals with the living rather than with those translated or raised from the dead.  The test of this judgment is the treatment by individual Gentiles of those whom Christ calls ‘my brethren,’ living in the preceding tribulation period when Israel is fearfully persecuted

The good works mentioned are the proof but not the ground of faith and salvation.  The fact that the righteous and the unrighteous are still mingled and required separation after the establishment of Christ’s throne on earth makes evident that no rapture, i.e. translation of the saints, could have taken place at the time of Christ’s coming to the earth after the tribulation. 

In such a case the separation here described would have already occurred before the establishment of the throne.  The sheep are Gentiles saved on earth during the period between the rapture and Christ’s second coming to the earth.”

Did you notice how the Scofield Bible changed the interpretation of these verses?  They have these verses talking about a future event.  All three different types of people are in the future; not the present.

Other Views

Who are the sheep nations?  Who are the goat nations?  Who are the LORD’S brethren?  This is the main difference that confuses many people about this parable.  But all views that I looked at said that this was a judgment of NATIONS; not individuals.  So, that makes the use of Matthew 25:40 senseless in the letter that I received for donations for providing for Thanksgiving Dinners for the poor.

And that brings up the question which is missing in almost all of the interpretations of this parable:  Who are the lost sheep of the House of Israel?  Where are those nations that are the birthright nations?  Why are they not in this parable?

The Missing Sheep

My sheep wandered through all the mountains [countries] and upon every high hill [nation]: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them” (Ezekiel 34:6).  Two verses later the shepherds of Israel are criticized because   the “…shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock”.  Later Jesus Christ said to the Apostle Peter, “…Feed my sheep” (John 21:17).   Who was Peter to feed?  Was it the same nations that the shepherds did not search for and feed?   

Let us look into the Bible and see what it says about who the Apostle Peter was to feed.

In Genesis 35:10-11 God said, “Thy name shall not be called anymore Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name.

And God said unto him, Be fruitful and multiply, a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins.”     

Why have the two Scofield versions of the Bible [1909 and 1967] and other similar Commentaries missed the answer to these main emphases of the Bible?  Let us look.

What Does the Bible Say?

Now Jacob had twelve sons and the promise of national greatness was given to Joseph.  As Hebrews 11:21 says By faith, Jacob when he was dying, blessed both the sons of Joseph.”  Both of the sons of Joseph that were blessed by their grandfather, Jacob, are not specificiantly listed as being one of the three candidates by either of the Scofield Bibles and a large number of Commentaries.  Remember what the 1967 version of the Scofield Bible says:

  • Sheep, future saved gentiles.  Does not mention if the sheep are the descendants of Manasseh and Ephraim, the two sons of Joseph.
  • Goats, future unsaved gentiles.  Does not mention if the goats are the descendants of Manasseh and Ephraim, the two sons of Joseph.
  • God’s brethren:  future remnant of the jews which was changed to Israel.  Both imply the people who are called jews today, descendants of Edom and Khazaria.  They did not include the two blessed sons of Joseph.

The Scofield Bible totally ignores the destiny of the two sons of Joseph.  They totally ignore the Birthright of the inheritance of Abraham.  They totally ignore the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob which traces the God of the covenant.  They don’t mention the descendants of the birthright—let alone all of Israel! They totally ignore what the Scriptures say:

 In 1 Chronicles 5:2, “…the BIRTHRIGHT was Joseph’s.”  Is that important?  The birthright is related to an inheritance.  Remember that God promised Abraham several marvelous things but Abraham did not have any children.  But God said that, even though Abraham and his wife were close to a century in age they would be parents of a child.  And they became parents. 

They had a miracle birth of one child and God named him Isaac.  The Bible tells us that he was actually the 2nd of 8 sons that Abraham had, but the other 7 were with two other women:  Hagar and Keturah.  Isaac was given the inheritance of the covenant promises that were made to his father, Abraham and his mother Sarah. 

Isaac passed the inheritance on to his youngest twin-son Jacob.    Jacob had twelve sons; who would he pass the inheritance to?  Most Christians have NOT been told that the first-born of Jacob was Reuben, the son of Leah; the sister of Rachel.  But when Reuben was a mature man he “went and lay with Bilhah, his father’s concubine:  and Israel (Jacob) heard it…” (Genesis 35:22b). 

This incident is referred to by Jacob when he prophesied on his death bed.  He said to Reuben in Genesis 49:3-4:  “…thou are my first-born, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power. 

Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel, because thou wentest up to thy father’s bed; then defiledst thou it; he went up to my couch.”

In 1 Chronicles 5:1-2 tell us that “Now the sons of Reuben, the first-born of Israel (for he was the first-born; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father’s bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel, and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright;

For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the prince; but the birthright was Joseph’s);…”

Notice that Judah did not get the birthright but “…he was the chiefest of all the tribes according to Jacob’s prophecy, and because Christ should come of him” Genesis 49:8; Geneva Bible.  Neither Scofield Bibles (1909 or the 1967 version) have any footnotes of these important Scriptures in 1 Chronicles 5.

Jews and Israelites are two different, distinct people.  It is unscriptural to use the two words interchangeably.  The Jews of today claim to be descended from Judah, Benjamin or Levi, the kingdom of Judah; which is nothing but a big lie.  That is because of the promise of ruler ship that God made with this one son of Jacob. 

All of the kings of Europe are descended from Judah.  Jews do not claim the birthright.  But if the ten tribes have disappeared, the literal fulfillment of the prophecies would be impossible.  That is what the Scofield Bibles and many Commentaries are attempting to do.  But the lost ten tribes of Israel have not disappeared, they are found and the prophecies are coming to pass.

But the birthright went from Abraham, to his son Isaac, to his son Jacob, then to the two sons of Joseph.   This must be why, in the Bible, God identifies who He is the God of:  “I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.”  It never says that He is the God of Abraham, Ishmael and Edom, it always says the former.

Ishmael, the oldest son of Abraham who had a different mother, was told to leave the camp of Abraham. 

Genesis 17:19-20 “And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee:  Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation,

But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee [Abraham] at this set time in the next year.”

Isaac, when he was preparing to take Rebekah as his wife, the future multiplying offspring was a paramount factor:  “And they blessed Rebekah, and said unto her, Thou art our sister, be thou the mother of thousands of millions….” (Genesis 24:60a). 

Thousands of millions; that would be billions!  That should disprove that the Jews are God’s brethren, because they are today only about 17,000,000 people in the entire world. They have never been more than 20,000,000.  The jews have a regressive birth rate; their natural death rate surpasses their natural birth rate.  This is a sign of a curse:  barrenness.  The jew would be extinct if they didn’t marry other races of peoples.   

The Anglos, Saxons, Scandinavians, Celtic, Germanic, and Teutonic peoples are the thousands of millions of descendants of Rebekah!  They are the nations of Britain, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, France, Germany, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Finland, United States, Canada, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Switzerland, Russia, etc.

Esau, the oldest twin of Isaac, lost the birthright because he sold it to his brother for a bowl of soup. “’Selling the birthright for a mess of pottage’ has become a euphemism to describe those who are willing to give up their Christian inheritance for the pleasures of this world” (Jacob-Israel vs. Esau-Edom, page 51).

“Esau himself was NOT chosen of God to receive the covenantal birthright blessings, but his brother Jacob was chosen (Genesis 25:23).  In fact, Esau ‘despised’ his birthright as the oldest son and ‘sold his birthright to Jacob’ (Genesis 25:31-34).  Hebrews 12:16 describes Esau as an ‘immoral or godless person…who sold his own birthright for a single meal’” (Identifying Biblical Israel Today, Book Two; page 141). These two young grandsons of Jacob have set the future history of the world by what happened to them that day.

Reuben lost the birthright because he defiled his father’s bed.  God denied this first-born son of Israel and Leah the right of the first-born.  The birthright was then given to Joseph; the first-born son of Rachel.  He received a double portion; it went to his two sons. 

What Does the Birthright Mean?

But what difference does it make who received the birthright anyway?  That’s what most so-called Christians believe in today’s world.  Even their Bible Commentaries teach them the same belief.  Why did the Bible take the time to tell us who got the inheritance and who lost it?  The Scofield Bible and its followers don’t really think that it means anything, anyhow.  

But doesn’t the Bible say that God said to Abraham:  “I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless  thee and make  thy name great….And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee, and in thee [your descendants] shall all families of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 12:2-3).   

And as part of Abraham’s inheritance God told him:  “I will…multiply thee exceedingly…thou shalt be a father of many nations…and kings shall come out of thee” (Genesis 17:2-6).Who are the many nations that claim Abraham as being their father?  Do the Judeo-Christians think that it is important in today’s world? 

In Genesis 18:18 God said that “Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him” [his descendants]. 

This inheritance is promised in the birthright:  “And he blessed Joseph and said…let my name be named on them [i.e. Israel]…and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth…[Manasseh] shall become a people and he also shall be great, but truly his younger brother [Ephraim] shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations” (Genesis 48:15a, 16b, c, 19b).

In just the two BIRTHRIGHT sons of Joseph; two tribes of the nation of Israel, there is a great nation and a multitude of nations.  Then there are the other 11 tribes of Israel.  They all became nations.  Are these nations mentioned in Matthew 25:31-46?

These were some of “…the promises made unto the fathers” (Romans 15:8).  The fathers are defined in Acts 3:13 as being “The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers…”  This verse tells us that He is not the God of everyone; but just the God of the covenant seed of Abraham?

These are unconditional promises that were made to the fathers and have everything to do with the situation that we find ourselves in; in the year 2013.

Christ said, “Other sheep I have, that are not of this fold, them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice” (John 10:16).  Jesus said, “I am not sent but to the LOST sheep of the House of Israel” (Matthew 15:24).  Israel is a “scattered sheep” (Jeremiah 50:17). 

Christ told his disciples, “….go not in the way of the gentiles, and in the cities of the Samaritans enter not, but go ye rather to the lost sheep of the House of Israel” (Matthew 10:6).  This is the other fold “…because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers [because of their obedience to God]” (Deuteronomy 7:7-8).  It was an unconditional promise to help Abraham’s physical descendants [Caucasian] (Genesis 12:2-3; 22:17-18). 

The Apostle James obeyed Christ and wrote his epistle “…to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greetings” (James 1:1). Peter also obeyed Christ and wrote “…to the strangers [sojourners] scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia Minor, and Bithynia.  He wrote to the elect according the foreknowledge of God” (1 Peter 1:1-2). 

These are all areas of Turkey.  The Revised Standard Version says “To the exiles of the dispersion.”  Peter was the “…apostle to the circumcision” (Galatians 2:7).  Were the Romans circumcised?

These must have been areas of Israelite settlement; sheep among the nations of the world; the Assyrian captivity and deportation of Israel beginning in 745 B. C.  In 1 Peter 2:9-10, Peter applies the “kingdom of priests” and “holy nation” of Exodus 19:6 and the “Lo-ammi” and “sons of the Living God” of Hosea 1:9-10 – which all refer to Israelites – to the “strangers” of northern Turkey.  He calls them “a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people” (1 Peter 2:9).

Peter quotes from the prophet Hosea who called the House of Israel “unpitied” and “not my people” (1 Peter 1:6, 9) when he says, “Who in time past were not a people [divorced, scatter, or lost] but are now the people of God [found, redeemed] who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy” (1 Peter 2:10).  This proves that he was talking to the lost ten tribes--Israelites called gentiles in the New Testament.

Jesus Christ avoided Judea because he knew that the Jews wanted to murder Him.  “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee:  for he would not walk in Jewry [Judea], because the Jews sought to kill him” (John 7:1).  Jesus Christ also told this group of people that their father was the devil and not God!  (John 8:44).   Do you think that these people were equal to God’s brethren?  Are these murderers of Jesus Christ “sheep” or “goat” nations?


History is His story.  Who’s story?  It is our God’s story.  Our enemy is hiding the biblical birthright from it correct heirs.  The Abrahamic covenant and its blessings and promises were for the heirs of the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  They included a promise to be prosperous, rich in material wealth, to be a “great nation”, to be a “multitude of nations”, and that the heirs would have a right to “dominion” in the world. 

This blessing would have been bestowed upon Esau by birthright; but Esau sold that birthright to Jacob with all of its promises and blessings.  It is thus out of jealousy and revenge that Esau desires to see the destruction of Jacob’s blessings—his culture, civilization, government, industry and relationship with God.  Esau threw away the title to the Abrahamic covenant and is now trying his best to reclaim it by deceiving the whole world into believing that he is the chosen of God.

People are afraid to mention anything about this hatred that wants to destroy our heritage which builds Christendom; protect our families from rape, murder, assault and theft.  Our self-hatred (from decades of propaganda in the schools, churches and media) has caused Christendom’s destruction, by our turning from the true covenant faith to embrace multi-cultural, interfaith, transgender perverse paganism with a thin veneer of Christianity that only God and which Christ said He would spew out of His mouth. 

So, who were the sheep and goats nations who had access to God’s Brethren to treat them either good or bad?

“Many Judeo-Christian preachers today are telling their flocks that Christians in America should religiously, politically and financially support the counterfeit Israeli-Jews who are plundering and pillaging the Arabs and robbing them of their land in the Middle East.  By misapplying the promise that God gave to Abraham and his descendants in Genesis 12, these preachers insist that we are obligated to support and love the Jews, or else we will be cursed as a consequence. 

However, ask yourself:  ‘Since 1948, when the Jews appropriated the land of Palestine as their homeland and when Americans began blessing them with massive financial and military assistance, has America prospered or declined.’

If we assume that the Jews are the true Israelites, then based on God’s Word, we must expect God to bless America for aiding and abetting the Jews.  Instead, we find quite the opposite.  Rather than being blessed, America is being cursed!

Since 1948 America has been on the decline morally, spiritually, physically, financially and politically.  Why?  Because America’s Zionist Jews and Judeo-Christian preachers have misidentified the modern-day Israeli imposters as Israelites.  The Jews have continued to be a curse to the rest of the world; whereas the Celto-Saxons, for the most part have been and continued to be a blessing to the rest of the world….

The following national aspects of Israel…:

  • Israel was to continue as a nation before God forever.
  • Israel was to become a great and mighty nation.
  • Israel was to become a vast multitude of people.
  • Israel was to become a multitude of nations.
  • Israel was to rule over other nations.
  • Israel was to be feared by all nations.
  • Israel was to be a blessing to all nations of the earth.

The Celto-Saxons are the only people who fulfill all of these aspects and marks of true Israel” (God’s Covenant People; Yesterday, Today and Forever, pages 141-142); the jews are imposters.

Almost all commentaries, including the Scofield Bible, say that the Sheep nations are the saved non-Israelites in the future.  But the Bible says that it is the Sheep nations in the parable are told by the KING that they were to “…inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.”  The Sheep nations are the “Sheep” nations of Israel and Adam for whom the kingdom was prepared before the foundation of the world.  Only the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are referred to as being sheep.  They have God as their Shepherd; God’s brethren.  Who will inherit the kingdom?  The Bible tells us.  Which do you believe?

The Scofield Commentary of the Bible denies that it is Israel.  Remember, they said that it was:

  • Sheep; future saved gentiles.
  • Goats; future unsaved gentiles.
  • God’s brethren; future remnant of jews which was later changed to the people of Israeli.  Both imply the people who are called jews today, descendants of Edom and Khazaria.  They do not include the two blessed son of Joseph who received the Birthright of God. 

What difference did it make when the birthright and blessings went to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Esau, Jacob, Reuben, Joseph, Joseph’s two sons and Judah?  Who are the great nation and the multitude of nations that the descendants of Abraham were to become?  Who are the nation and the multitude of nations that the two sons of Joseph were to become?   Does the inheritance of God mean anything in today’s world?  It does to me.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel. 

Make Love Not War

by Pastor Don Elmore

April 7, 2013

Scripture Reading: Matthew 27:20-27

This week the Supreme Court held opinions on the issue about same-sex marriages.  There are nine (9) states out of fifty (50) so far that have made it legal; and the Supreme Court is to decide if this is constitutional and if the federal government can grant the national benefits of marriage to the sodomites.  

The Supreme Court consists of 6 Roman Catholics and 3 Jews; 6 men and 3 women.  What!  No Protestants!  No Bible believers! Some women?  Prior to our Constitution, every one of the 13 State Charters forbid all Roman Catholic and Jewish members from holding any office which would include any office in the Supreme Court or even voting in any election--only white Christian men, and not all of them!

Three of the Supreme Court Judges are women.  They couldn’t hold a state office or even vote after the Constitution was made valid; that is during the first 131 years of the nation's existence.  Women, in the United States, gained the right to vote in 1920; after many years of meetings, debates and struggles which finally led to an affirmative vote.  There has been more years in our country when women could not hold office or vote that when they could; 131 to 93!  What was the difference--we were more Christian back then and more jewish now.  We were free back then and are jewish Communists now.

Was that right or wrong?  Are the differences between men and women derived from the social skills that are needed or are they determined by our Almighty God.  Are men and women equal?  Are they interchangeable?  Or did our God give each one a different role in society?

This is the prevailing opinion in today’s world:  the marriage of two men or two women equals the marriage of a man and a woman.  What difference does it make?  There is only one big difference:  only one of these marriages has the ability to produce and raise godly children!  And there is only one of these marriages that is approved by Almighty God.

We now have, after six thousand years, women who are now allowed by our government to be front-line fighters in our Armed Forces.  We have women who are now CEO’s in major corporations; women who have run for the President of the United States; women who are now Senators and Representatives in both the federal and state governments; women who are now bishops and pastors of our churches.  And a couple of years ago, we have more women who were in college and universities that men!  Women used to drop out of high school in the eighth grade and most colleges were for men only, except for education and nursing.

How did all of this change:  from a Christian patriarchal society to a jewish matriarchal society?  In less than a hundred years, almost all of us do not have a clue what has hit us; but it has destroyed the largest group of human beings born in the same generation.  There is not ONE part of our lives that was not planned out for us in advance!

The women’s right to vote was already settled before I was born; but in my lifetime Playboy, Hustler, women’s liberation, sex, drugs, rock ‘n roll, new age therapies, lesbians, sodomy, same-sex marriages, criticizing of the church, schools, families, the flood of different race immigrants, the rise of tolerance, and the vast increase of debt on the American people are just a few of the revolutions that we have experienced and for the most part have lost!  Would you like to know who led our people, the sheep, over the cliff to immorality?

There was a collection of jews who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, which drew on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud and Weber.  This “cultural revolution” was something that had its roots in the past.

A freemason, who lived from 1753-1821 wrote:  “Until now nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion:  But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is?”

Immediately following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that the workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and then into the United States.  When this failed to happen, the Communists International began to consider what the reasons were that Communism did not spread into the other parts of the earth.  Vladimir Lenin initiated a meeting at Moscow.  It was organized at the Marx-Engels Institute.

At this meeting, there was a Hungarian aristocrat, the son of a banker, who had become a Communist in World War I.  His name was Georg Lukács.  He developed an instrument of destruction—not a new physical bomb—but a new cultural bomb; sexual instinct that would destroy Western Christian Society.  He soon had a program of sex-education in the kindergartens in Hungary.

Another person who was present at this meeting was Willi Munzenberg who proposed a solution that was to “organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink.  Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

This meeting was more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.  Two years after the meeting in Moscow, Lukács moved to Germany where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of an Institute that would lead to the destruction of America.  The Institute was funded by a jewish millionaire by the name of Felix Weil.

In 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control of the Institute and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the group’s research.  But the Nazi’s came to power, and the Institute had to close and its members fled to the United States. 

John Dewey persuaded many of the members to come to Columbia University in New York; others went to Brandeis University (named after the first jewish Supreme Court justice), Princeton University and California at Berkeley.  They were funded by another wealthy jew and the  American Jewish Committee. 

Now it is making some sense that Barak Obama went to Columbia University, the very same university that invited the jewish, Marxist Communists to come to America and settle there.  Who knows what he did there, because no student who was there at the time he was there, remembers him.  He did make a trip to the Middle East with a couple of his middle Eastern friends.  Did he work for the CIA?  He probably did.

Soon after the Frankfurt School moved, the Marxist jews set up at Columbia University; they put their emphases not on the destruction of Germany, but on the destruction of America.  One of these Marxist jews was Herbert Marcuse.  He was denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which "opens the way for license cloaked as liberty."  Other popular members of this group were Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, Jurgaen Haberman, Abraham Maslow, Bertrand Russell, Bill Ayers, Benjamin Spock, and Barak Obama, etc.

The Frankfurt School at Columbia University believed that as long as an individual did not have the beliefs of Christianity, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.  Their job, then, was as swiftly as possible to undermine Christianity from the people

To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to destabilize society and bring down what they saw as the "oppressive" order.  Their anti-God policies, they hoped, would spread like an evil virus.  And spread they did, till we had a epidemic that infected almost every city in the nation.  Some of their plans that they advocated for the future destruction of the United States:

  1. The creation of racial offenses.  Flood the country with an invasion of third-world non-Israelite people for the main purpose of destroying their identity.  Integrate all of their institutions; schools, sports, businesses, neighborhoods and churches.  And even personal relationships; have them commit miscegenation.  Promote civil rights; even start new groups like the NAACP with jewish presidents.  Advocate affirmative action for minorities.

  2. The need for continual change in order to create confusion.  Keep the changes coming so that the public will be completely confused.  Don't give them time to rest in peace and think things through.  Don't give them the time to read the Bible.

  3. The teaching of homosexuality:  sodomy, lesbianism and trans gender to children; even to kindergartners.  Sex education will start being taught in the Chicago schools in kindergarten next year.  Teach that it is not a sin; but a life-style; the individual has no choice about these evil practices, he is born into them.  Kick God out of the school, so what He said is not mentioned.  Equate these sins with civil rights. 

  4. The undermining of schools', teachers' and parents' authority.  They advocated "no spanking" allowed of children.  Take away all authority of the father; make the children free to decide their morals and life choices.   The elimination of discipline from the children has made this generation the most violent of all.

  5. The promotion of the sin of drunkenness and drugs.  Make this the normal and not what it really is:  the practice of sorcery.  How many lives have been destroyed by these two sins? 

  6. Destroying Christianity; making their churches wind up empty--that means have no members.  Make new Bibles which will change the meaning of the scriptures.  Eliminate all anti-jewish statements; promote universalism.  Destroy the gospel that relates to the covenant that God made with fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel.  Eliminate the most segregated hour on Sundays; integrate the churches.

  7. Make the legal system both unreliable and having a bias against the victims of crime; especially for the White Christian culture.  Make the laws jewish instead of Christian.  Ohio Case Law is now found in 34 volumes, while the Talmud is 37 volumes.  They both are very similar.

  8. Large increase of people who are dependent on State and Federal benefitsPeople who received Social Security benefits, unemployment benefits, food stamps, welfare benefits, housing benefits, educational benefits, job training benefits, transportation benefits, etc. include almost half of all the people in the United States.  Who do you think these people who receive these benefits will be voting for in the upcoming elections?

  9. All forms of media; including television, Hollywood (movies), radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. will be controlled and owned by people who are jewish.  This ownership will help promote "political correctness."

  10. Encouraging the breakdown of the family by divorce, matriarchy, confusing the traditional and Biblical roles of men and women and eliminating the basic candidates for marriage.  Propose transferring American culture into a female-dominate one.  They change the desire for girls from looking for a good husband; instead they are looking for a good career.

  11. Encourage the nation to be heavily in usury debt; swamp the mailboxes with a host of credit cards.  As a result they steal the people's money.  They have banks which will supply the nation with fiat money; ignoring what both the Constitution and God says about this economic problem.  Does God want His people in insurmountable usury debt; and to have most of them unable to ever get out of debt?

These eleven goals are also found in the New World Order's goals for the destruction of America.  They supported the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the difference between the sexes; the overthrowing of of Biblical relationships between men and women.

To achieve these goals they would:

  1. Attack the authority of the father and deny the specific roles of the father and mother.  They would wrest away from families as being the primary educators of their children; emphasizing public education as being superior.

  2. Abolish differences in the education of boys and girls.  They all will take the same classes in the public schools; for example: no more home economic classes just for girls and wood-working classes just for boys.

  3. Abolish all forms of Biblical male dominance; including the inclusion of women in the front lines of the Armed Forces.  Women now, for the first time, are preachers, high school principals, college presidents, CEO's of major companies, Chairman of boards of companies, Senators, Representatives, Mayors, Presidential candidates and will be the major bread-winner of many families as they are now graduating more than men in colleges and universities.  Is this the way our God told us how to behave?

  4. Declared women to be an "oppressed class" and men as "oppressors."  This is unbiblical.  God cursed the women for their sin in the Garden by "greatly multiply[ing] thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shall bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee" Genesis 3:16b.

Communist's jews Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem and Bella Azbug were the leaders in this agenda in my generation.  They painted our fathers as oppressors, who were decent hard-working men who respected their wives and cared for their families; and our mothers as being oppressed, because they stayed home to raise their children and to be a wife to her husband.  This changed the way it was done for several thousands of years. 

Today, most women have neglected to prepare for their job as being a wife by not having any skills that a wife should have--they can't sew, can't cook, can't shop for groceries, can't home-school their children, can't have dinner ready for her husband, can't clean their home, etc.  Instead, she is trained for a career.  And now, she is trapped.  She must work in order to keep the family afloat financially.  The children are put in a Child Care Center from daylight to dark.

Betty Friedan (Betty Naomi Goldstein) would not have sold five million copies of her book, "The Feminine Mystique" if her Communist background was known.  She advocated "class equality" but it was just a smoke-screen for a diabolical crusade to destroy the institution of the family.  She made the nuclear family the cornerstone of women's oppression, instead of the foundation of Western Civilization. 

As the Marxist's School declared, "We will make the West so corrupt, that it stinks."  Shortly after the School came to America, they changed their emphases:  from a economic revolution to a cultural revolution.  They saw it as a long-term revolution which would destroy the Western Christian society of America from within.  They set their focus on how to destroy the family, education, media, sex, popular culture and all the institutions of the West. 

Some Prominent Graduates

Benjamin Spock, graduate of Columbia University in 1929, was a major influence to families across the country on family life.  His views were against family discipline; he even advocated the elimination of spanking.  This even crept into the public schools--most, if not all, public schools today have totally eliminating all spanking for about 30 years or more.  He taught that parents should not teach their children their religion, but instead should leave the children to decide what religion they should believe for themselves. His views took a bad turn when his own son committed suicide.

Abby Hoffman and the hippies; Jerry Rubin and the Chicago Seven were radicals of Brandeis University who studied under a professor who help found the Frankfurt School--Herbert Marcuse.  They were activists against many of the American institutions and godly morals.

Alan Ginsberg was also a graduate of Columbia University.  He railed against Christianity and nationalism.

Many Columbia professors wrote an article in 1966 that calls for their plans for destroying America.  One of these plans was to swell the poverty funds so that the nation will become eventually bankrupt.

Bill Ayers, a friend of Obama, earned a doctorate from Columbia University.  Bill was infamous for his bombing of different America institutions.

Angela Davis was a member of the Communist Party.  She was in favor of feminism and was a member of Jim Jones' church.  She worked for the destruction of the family.

Abraham Maslow taught teachers that they should not teach but should facilitate.  Teachers were to become amateur group therapists.  The teachers were designed to convince children that they (not the God of Israel) were the sole authority in their own lives.  

Bertrand Russell: Some people have held that Bertrand Russell was one of the most evil men in modern history.  He was well connected with many people:  like John Maynard Keynes and Eleanor Roosevelt.  He was related to many Russell's who were Freemasons who were deeply involved with the occult and the Rothschild bankers

He was related to Charles Taze Russell, founder of the Jehovah's Witnesses; William Huntington Russell who co-founded the Order of the Skull and Bones at Yale University, Isaac Russell a prominent early Mormon missionary to Great Britain in 1837 and many others.  Their original name was from a jewish name:  Roessel.  They changed their name to Russell after they moved from Germany to Scotland in the 17th century. 

Lord Bertrand Russell joined with the Frankfurt School and wrote books that dealt with mass social engineering.  The importance of mass psychology has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda; one of the most influential is called "education."  For this to succeed the influence of the home must be destroyed.  Not much can be done  unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten and that music is very effective if the lyrics are repeatedly used.

Theodor Adorno stated that classical music was produced different from the new popular music known as rock 'n roll.  The importance of popular music was that it was repeated constantly and taught messages that were in line with the destruction of American society.  Rock 'n roll brought into America illegal drugs and immoral sex.  It has destroyed many, many  families in America and elsewhere in the world. 

The courses in Psychology and Sociology along with multiculturalism and Political Correctness are totally Communistic and jewish ideas.  I thought there had to be a separation in public school between religion and curriculums.  How can they then teach the jewish-influenced courses on psychology and sociology?  How do these reward their teachings on political correctness and multiculturalism?

The connection between the Frankfurt School and the student rebellion of the 1960s was made primarily by a key Frankfurt School member, Herbert Marcuse--the man who in the '50s coined the phrase, "Make love, not war."  Marcuse's book "Eros and Civilization" argued that the tools with which to destroy Western culture were, in effect; sex, drugs and rock 'n roll.  He popularized the Frankfurt Schools' ideas in ways the '60 student radicals could understand and absorb, and now we know his work is called Political Correctness

The educational and media world is very leftist in its view.  College graduates came to believe in what the colleges and universities taught:  multiculturalism

Bullinger was very good friends with Theordor Hertzel, the international Zionist.  His Bible notes are full of the views of Zionism.  The jews also paid degenerate Cyrus Scofield to "write" his Scofield Bible.  His Bible, which is a little more that one hundred years old, is required reading for many evangelical churches.  His notes, which also expound Zionism, have done much to destroy Christianity.

How did the Frankfurt School in America change America by means of "Political Correctness"?  Patriarchy, Sabbaths, Feast  Days, Jubilees, Sexual behavior limited as to who and when, Separatism, Marriage, Diet, Counseling, Discipline and Welfare are thrown away by the churches of Jesus Christ and most of them have been taken over by the State.

America does not read and does not know the Bible.  The preachers don't preach what it says.  They believed the new Bibles that were translated by jews and most are just plain ignorant. 

They forgot and no longer understand what the Bible says about them and their ancestors:

  1. God made certain unconditional covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel that also extended to their physical descendants.

  2. Their physical descendants were comprised of thirteen tribes and called Israel and the elect.

  3. God delivered Israel out of Egyptian bondage and made a conditional covenant with them through Moses.  It was a marriage covenant between God and Israel.

  4. The conditional covenant provided that if Israel obeyed the laws of God that they would be God's "Kingdom," His "holy nation," His "own possession" and be blessed.  

  5. If Israel did not obey God's laws, they would be cursed.

  6. One of those curses was that God would scatter or disperse them into exile and captivity "among the nations."

  7. Many years after God made a conditional covenant with Israel, the nation of Israel was divided into the House of Israel (ten tribes in the north) and the House of Judah (two tribes in the south) with the Levites scattered throughout all twelve tribes.

  8. Both houses continually rebelled and disobeyed God.

  9. God finally pronounced His judgment on the House of Israel and scattered them "among the nations," exiling them into captivity by the nation of Assyria.  God also sent 46 fortified cities of Judah into captivity to Assyria.

  10. By this judgment, God also divorced the House of Israel so that they were no longer His covenant people.  However, He did not divorce the House of Judah.

  11. Later, God also sent the rest of the House of Judah into captivity into Babylon, but only for 70 years and then a remnant returned to the land of Judea and Jerusalem.

  12. God prophesied through Jeremiah that He was going to make a New Covenant with the House of Israel and the House of Judah.  He was not going to make a New Covenant with all the peoples of the world.

  13. Through this New Covenant, God would reconcile both Houses to Himself and to each other.

  14. This New Covenant was accomplished and ratified by the shed blood of Jesus Christ and by His death on the cross for the sins or transgressions of all the people of Israel which were committed under the first or Old Covenant.

  15. The Apostles Paul and Peter testified that the House of Israel was "the Gentiles" and the "scattered" or those dispersed "among the nations."  

  16. Those from the House of Judah who returned to Judea from the Babylonian captivity were commonly known as "Judeans," often translated as "Jews."  This designation by the English Bible translators continued in the New Covenant Scriptures.

  17. The name translated as "Jews" never referred to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob or the ten northern tribes of the House of Israel.  It only referred to Judeans of the House of Judah or tribe of Judah or those living in the land of Judea.

So, if the foregoing conclusions and documented facts listed above about what the Bible says is true, why is it that almost every pastor, church and Bible scholar doesn't know or believe it?  How can intelligent people, who believe they know what the Bible says and means, say that:

  1. Abraham was a Jew;

  2. God made a New Covenant with every person on the planet;

  3. The Gentiles are everybody on the planet who is not a Jew?
--Pastor Blanchard, Discover the Story of Your Biblical Heritage, pages 103, 104, 106, 107.

Maybe it is because we forgot the first commandment that our God gave to us:  "I am the LORD thy God, who have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.  Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

We believed the lie that His Laws were nailed to the cross of Jesus Christ--that we no longer had to keep them.  So whose laws would we then keep? 

Just ask our enemies:  We will give them "Political Correctness;" Let them "make love, not war." 

On today's campuses we have Marcuse's concept of "repressive toleration":the tolerance for movements from the left, but intolerance for movements from the right--enforced by the students of the Frankfurt School.  By 1992, the heresy of Marcuse and Adorno now completely dominate the universities, teaching their own students to replace reason with "Politically Correctness" ritual exercises.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

Miracles of Plymouth

by Pastor Don Elmore

November 17, 2013

Scripture Reading: Isaiah 41:8-10

It was over twenty years ago while I was teaching high school math; when one of my math students asked me a question.  It was during lunch time and we were both in my math room munching on the lunch they we brought from home.  She asked:  “Have you read Peter Marshall’s book, “The Light and the Glory.” I knew a Peter and Catherine Marshall; Peter was the Senate Chaplain and his wife was a best-selling author.  But this was co-authored by their son.  I answered, “No.  I was not aware of the book.  What is it about?”  She answered:  “Well, we are using this book in Sunday School class.  It tells about the Pilgrims and how God performed all the miracles for them.”

That piqued my interest.  I hadn’t heard of “all these miracles” that God performed for the Pilgrims in the early days of our nation.  So, after I went home I bought the book.  I read it and was fascinated. 

That fall we had our Thanksgiving meal at our house.  I mean the church’s first Thanksgiving meal; which is, of course, around two weeks before the real Thanksgiving Day celebrated by our nation.  We started celebrating it because why noted a lack of the correct motives in celebrating it with family and friends.  It wasn’t supposed to be a social event and a sports day, but a religious service.  God was to be thanked for His kindness and goodness towards us in giving us a good harvest.

The women fixed the turkeys and all the food that went with it.  We must have had around 40+ people at the meal.  We had tables and chairs all throughout our house.  Before the meal, I gave the sermon which told of the miracles that God performed for this small group of His people—the Pilgrims, less than several hundred!  And I began the practice of putting “5 kernels of corn on the empty plate” of each person before we feasted on our meal.  I did this for ten years.  I know that I talked too long, as it was difficult to keep all of the food warm; but I think my audience was just as intrigued with the message as I was.

Every year the congregation eagerly awaited the sermon that would tell how God provided His great miracles to the Pilgrims so they could survive.  It is the realization of how much God’s hand had played a part not only in America’s founding, but, indeed, in its very discovery. 

It has been quite a few years since I brought my sermon about this Day, but today I will bring you an update message of the miracles shown to the Pilgrims almost 400 years ago.

The Miracles

The Pilgrims saw themselves as called into their new Promised Land in order to found a new Israel, which would be a light to the whole world. They were actually the inheritors of Joseph’s birthright.  They received the most beautiful land that was full of all the natural resources necessary to provide for a wonderful life:  coal, oil, gas, petroleum, natural gas, fertile soil, numerous waterways, forests, gold, silver, copper, venison, fish, bison, wild turkeys, iron-ore, etc.

There were only about 1,000 Pilgrims in the entire world when the majority of them had escaped to Holland from England.  Only a thousand, but they changed the world.  They had been hounded, bullied, forced to pay assessments to the Church of England, put into prison on trumped-up charges, and driven underground.  They met in private homes, to which they came at staggered intervals and by different routes, because they were constantly being spied upon.  In the little town of Scooby, persecution finally reached the point where the congregation to which William Bradford belonged elected to follow those other Separatists (Pilgrims) who had already sought religious asylum in Holland. 

After being in Leyden, Holland for about 12 years, these Separatists were ready to move again.  The hard 11–15 hour working days in low paying jobs had aged them more than normal.  They had to get the large sum of money for the trip and many of them were ready to go.  They believed that they would be a “city set on a hill.”  Here are a few of God’s miracles that were showered on the Pilgrims:

  1. The Separatists came to believe that America was the place to which God intended them to go, despite the horrors of Virginia’s “starving time.”  They needed a lot of cash to go on this trans-Atlantic voyage.  All the families that were going on this trans-Atlantic journey sold their homes and all their immovable possessions, in order to give their agent cash with which to purchase shares in the plantation venture.

    Their first application was with the Virginia Company.  They were the main corporate enterprise in the business of backing such ventures to America. But at this time the Virginia Company was on the brink of bankruptcy and the Pilgrims were spared from all those entanglements. 

    They were then paid an unexpected visit by a London merchant by the name of Thomas Weston.  He promised them he had a group of investors who could help them.  The Pilgrims decided with some misgivings to enter into an agreement with Weston to be their agent.  It was an agreement that proved to later be a huge mistake that would eventually violate some of God’s Laws.

    The agreement started out that each adult, sixteen years and older, would have one share (worth about fourteen hundred modern dollars), and another, if he outfitted and equipped himself.  Those with extra funds could buy more shares. 

    They would all continue in joint partnership for seven years (the standard period of Biblical indenture service), at the end of which time, all land and profits would be divided up according to the number of shares.  Personal property, such as houses, home lots and gardens, would remain wholly the property of the planters and would not be divided up.  The planters were also to be given two days a week of their own.  It struck them as an eminently fair agreement.   

    The Separatists sent two of their number to London, to represent them:  John Carver and Robert Cushman. Carver was a proven man with stability and maturity about him.  Cushman, on the other hand, had a quick mind and a gift for eloquence, but was immature and had difficulty accepting correction.  While Carver was out of London gathering supplies for the upcoming voyage, pressure was applied to Cushman to agree to certain changes in their contract.  He agreed to the changes.

    This agreement to changes in the contact that was made by Robert Cushman was shown to the Pilgrims to sign right before they were to set sail on the Mayflower.  But they didn’t sign.  They owed sixty pounds which was paid off by selling their only food surplus—butter.  They then wrote a letter to London that if large profits didn’t arise with seven years, that they would continue with them for a longer period.

    When the Speedwell failed to make the journey, Robert Cushman decided not to go with the Pilgrims on the initial journey.  He joined them over a year later, traveling on the Fortune.  After arriving in the new land, Cushman convinced the Pilgrims that it was in their best interests to sign the contract…so they signed the agreement—thereby entering into bondage to the Adventurers which would see them struggle for more than twenty years to get out from under the debt that they amassed.

    The Pilgrims were mercilessly taken advantage of, at times having to borrow money at interest rates of 30 and 50 percent.  Some of the unscrupulous Adventurers added on bogus claims that the Pilgrims paid at a fearful cost.  It took twenty-five years and 20,000 pounds to retire a debt of 1800!  And to accomplish this, Bradford had to sell a large farm, Alden and Standish, three hundred acres a piece, and Winslow and Prence, their homes.  Sound familiar?Map of Plymouth Colony 1620-1691

    And what of the man who pressured Cushman to make changes in the agreement?  Thomas Weston.  Weston acting independently of the other Adventures set up his own fishing enterprise, just a few miles up the coast from Plymouth at Wessagusset (now Weymouth).  When the other Adventurers found out what he was doing, they expelled him from their group.   

    Things were going so poorly for Weston, that in order to escape his creditors he disguised himself as a fisherman and sailed for his fishing station at Wessagusset.  But when he arrived there, he found that it no longer existed. 

    He had sent a bunch of roughnecks who had consumed a year’s supply of food in four months and had sold their equipment to the Indians for food and were mainly interested in getting and staying drunk all day long.  In addition, they had provoked the Indians that the Indians were considering a general attack on the settlers; a war was about to break out if these men were not gotten under control. 

    Finally, Standish and a few men had been forced to give Weston’s rowdies an ultimatum:  They were to go home on the next boat.  They sailed within the hour and peace was restored.

    When Weston arrived at Charlestown, he could not believe what he had been told about his fishing station, and with another man he hired a ship to go see his station.  But on the way there, the ship sunk and he lost all of his belongings.  Knowing nowhere else to go, he made for Plymouth on foot.  When he finally arrived, he presented a very sorry sight!

    He begged for their mercy and for a loan of beaver skins, to get him back on his feet.  He promised them that he would repay them in supplies as soon as the transaction was completed.  The Pilgrims gave Weston the beaver skins and Weston did eventually repay them—with scorn and vicious slander; not a penny in recompense!  What a fake Christian! 

  2. The plan was to leave Delftshaven (Holland) to go to Southampton (England) on the Speedwell.  There they would join a larger merchant ship, the Mayflower.  But only 200 out of 600 Pilgrims would go.  They left on July 22, 1620.  On the dock their pastor, John Robinson, slowly knelt, and all the others followed his lead.  As he solemnly invoked God’s blessing on their undertaking, tears came to all of their eyes, and even the young men wept unabashedly.  Quickly they boarded the ship and the crew cast off.

    They arrived at Southampton where the two men who were representing the Pilgrims--Carver and Cushman--rejoined the Pilgrims. It was at Southampton, when the two ships were just about ready to sail, then Weston chose to present his revived contract for the Pilgrims to sign.  He thought that they would knuckle under, but they didn’t. 

    When they refused to sign, Weston stormed off to London.  And the two boats left for the New World on August 5, 1620.  But after just three days on the Atlantic, it became obvious that the Speedwell was in trouble.  Her seams were letting in the Ocean water, so that it had to turn back to the nearby port of Dartmouth.  One week later, they tried it again, only to encounter the same problem.  This time they sailed to Plymouth. While there they made the difficult decision to sell the Speedwell and combine her passengers and cargo with those on board the Mayflower. 

    The MayflowerBut like what happened to Gideon’s army, although not as drastic, the number of Pilgrims had been almost cut in half.  There were only 102 Pilgrims who made the journey to America.  They had to stay under the deck of the Mayflower, with the exception of the women with small children who stayed in the Captain’s quarters.  The Mayflower was a small ship, as Randa and I saw when we went to Boston over 20 years ago.  We drove down to Plymouth where there is a replica of the Mayflower stationed in the Bay and we even saw Plymouth Rock. 

    There were almost as many “strangers” as Pilgrims.  Among the strangers were a boot smith, his wife and two children; a cooper that each ship was required to have, and the crew and captain.  Robert Cushman was also a casualty of the Speedwell’s demise.  He decided to delay his trip to the New World for over a year. 

  3. Now we come to one of the most miraculous stories in the book, in my opinion.   It tells of the seven-week ship ride full of many difficulties.  In addition to the many hardships, there was the harassment from the sailors.  Several of the crew had taken to mocking them unmercifully, and their self-appointed leader had taken such a dislike to the Pilgrims that he would gloat at their seasickness and in telling them how much he looked forward to casting their dead body over the boat when they died.  He favorite cry was calling them “psalm-singing puke-stockings.”  We would say that he was a   great bully; one of the greatest bullies of all time.

    Shortly after passing the half-way point to America, the Mayflower ran into a violent storm.  The huge cross-beam supporting the main mast had cracked and was sagging alarmingly.  The crew couldn’t budge it.  But the Pilgrims did what the crew didn’t do:  they prayed to their God!

    After saying their prayers, they then remembered the great iron screw of the printing press that they had brought. And why did they bring a printing press?   They printed the books that they found worthy of their beliefs.  Remember it was 1620 and the printing press was a relatively new invention.

    They found the giant screw and cranked it up till the beam was back into its original position.  The Mayflower was saved from destruction.  For once, the sailors joined the Pilgrims in praising God.  The ship could have sunk and everyone drown in the Atlantic Ocean.  What a joyous occasion that was!

  4. The area where the Pilgrims landed was the land where the Patuxets, a large white-man murderous tribe of Indians lived.  In 1616, a mysterious plague broke out killing every man, woman and child—it completely wiped out this Indian tribe.  So complete was the destruction that the neighboring tribes had shunned the area ever since, convinced that some great super-natural spirit had destroyed the Patuxets.

    But one of these Patuxets, Squanto, had been captured by an English sailor in 1605 and taken to England.  It was there that he and the other prisoners were taught English.  He returned to America in 1614 by helping an English sailor with the translations with the Indian tribes along the Northeastern coast of the future United States. 

    But while he was living in the land where the Pilgrims would come in six years, he was recaptured.  He was taken and sold as a slave in Spain.  Squanto was purchased by a Roman Catholic Spanish monastery.  Later he left the monastery and went to England.  After a short stay, he returned to his homeland, the present Massachusetts, in 1619, by being a guide and translator to an English fisherman. 

    But when he returned to where he was born, he discovered that all of his tribe were dead; mother, father, grandfather, grandmother, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins, neighbors, friends, enemies--all.  As a result he was staying with another tribe 50 miles away from where the Pilgrims were dwelling.  When he heard of their arrival, he was anxious to see them.  He heard of them from another Indian from another tribe who also spoke English.  His name was Samoset who was from an Indian tribe in Maine. 

    His, Samoset’s, first words to the settlers were, “Welcome!” 

    And after he heard the same response from the Pilgrims, he added:  “Have you got any beer?”

    The Pilgrims brought him some brandy, and a biscuit with butter and cheese, and then some pudding and a piece of roast duck.  He cleaned his plate.  Where did an Indian learn to like English food and where did he learn to speak English?  Samoset explained and it was from him that they learned of what happened to the land that they now dwelt; the former territory of the Patauxets.  He told them that the corn that they had found hidden under the brush was corn that was grown and harvested by the Patauxets before they died.  He explained and the Pilgrims knew it was God’s providence in giving them a vacant land, instead of a land of the most white-man hating Indians in North America.

    Samoset left the next morning and returned a few days later with another Indian.  He too spoke English!  It was an Indian from the tribe where they now livedSquanto took that it was his job to help the English settlers succeed.  And help them he did.  Without Squanto’s help in farming and fishing and trading with the other Indian tribes, Plymouth would have failed.

    One thing that Squanto showed his Pilgrim friends was to eventually save every one of their lives:  he showed them how to plant corn the Indian way.  Hoeing six-foot squares in toward the center, putting down four or five kernels, and then fertilizing the corn with fish.  At that, the Pilgrims just shook their heads; in four months they had caught exactly one cod.  No problem, for in four days Squanto said the creeks would be overflowing with fish.

    Squanto instructed the young men in how they would make the nets to catch the soon arriving fish.  The men obeyed what Squanto told them and in four days the Pilgrims would catch an enormous amount of fish as the fish were making their spring run.   

    But there was another problem that had to be considered—the wolves; for they would attempt to steal the fish that was buried in the ground as fertilizer.  The Pilgrims would have to guard the corn for two weeks until the fish had a chance to decompose.  The Pilgrims followed Squanto’s words and as a result they had a wonderful harvest.

    God granted them a helper from a tribe of the Indians that would have slaughtered the Pilgrims as soon as they sent their foot on the land, if they would not have been killed by the mysterious plague.  Their helper had been captured as a prisoner twice; and had lived in England and the second time lived in both Spain and England.  I wonder if Squanto had heard about the bad treatment that the Pilgrims had received in England while he was living there

  5. The second crop of 1623 experienced a great drought of 12 consecutive weeks; almost 3 months of no rain.  No rain for 3 months, have you ever experienced such a time?  The crops were within one day of dying; and if they died, Plymouth would die of starvation. 

  6. But the Pilgrims turned to their God.  They went to the church building and began their prayer session.  They prayed all morning and all afternoon.  In the late afternoon, they heard the pitter-patter of a light rain fall.  It was the beginning of the greatest turn-around in weather; from one of the worst droughts to a time of intermittent rain and sunshine.  It provided for a great harvest.  The Indians had never seen anything like what happened.  They too were in awe of the marvelous weather that occurred after the major drought.  The God of the Pilgrims had given them mercy to keep them alive

    William BradfordThey had gone from almost starving to death to a time of a great surplus as a result of their wonderful harvest. In the fall of 1623, they celebrated Thanksgiving along with the wedding service of William Bradford.  The Governor, Bradford, placed 5 kernels of corn on each empty plate of the receptionists.  He did this before they received any of their soon festive amounts of food.  He did this, so that they might not forget the recent history of rationing their food during the severe draught that had suffered through.

    This occurred after another ship, Fortune, arrived that brought more settlers to Plymouth. It came one year after the first Pilgrims arrived in Plymouth; but they brought no food supplies for the colony, as well as no clothing, no tools, and no bedding.  They entered their own starving time that winter and were ultimately reduced to a daily ration of five kernels of corn per person.

    It is almost inconceivable how life could be supported on this small amount of food; but they had a choice:  either to give in to bitterness or to go into a deeper relationship with their God.  They chose the latter and they survived in a most marvelous way. 

    Unexpectedly, a ship put into their harbor on its way back to England from Virginia.  While the captain had no extra food, he did have beads, knives, trinkets, etc., which the Pilgrims could trade for corn.  The captain would buy pelts from the Pilgrims; thus they thanked their God for seeing them through that winter.  Their God saved their lives from starvation again.

  7. The first winter there was a time of “General Sickness.”  The Pilgrims started dying.  They lost 47 people, nearly half their original number.  The children fared the best; none of the seven daughters died and only three of the thirteen sons.  And the colony, which was young to begin with, was even younger now. 

    And through it all, their hearts remained soft towards God.  Whether they knew that they were being tested, as Bradford later suspected, the high point of their week remained Sunday worship; when the beat of a field drum would summon them to the morning and afternoon service. 

    The service was held in the blockhouse at the top of the hill.  Inside, on rough-hewn log benches, the men would sit on the left, the women on the right.  William Brewster would preach, and he had a gift for teaching “both powerfully and profitably, to the great contentment of the hearers, and their comfortable edification, yea, many were brought to God by his ministry.”   

    Many who lost a spouse, remarried at Plymouth Plantation.  The Governor lost his wife when she fell over the side of the Mayflower and drowned.  In May, 1621 they had their first wedding at the Plantation:  Edward Winslow and Susanna White had both lost their spouses.  They were married by Governor Bradford. 

    In the fall of that year, 1623, they held their first Thanksgiving Service.  It lasted three days and the Indians were invited to be with them. The Pilgrims and Indians competed in shooting contests with gun and bow.  There was also competition in foot races and wrestling. 

    But the highlight of the Thanksgiving Day was at its beginning.  It was William Brewster’s prayer that the Pilgrim’s remembered the most.  He said that they had so much for which to thank God; for providing all their needs, even when their faith had not been up to believing that He would do so; for the lives of the departed and for taking them home to be with Him; for their friendship with the Indians; so extraordinary when settlers to the south of them had experienced the opposite; for all His remarkable providences in bringing them to this place and sustaining them. 

  8. What did the Pilgrims believe?  They disagreed with the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church and said that they had strayed beyond Christ’s teachings, and had established religious rituals and church hierarchies, that went against the teachings of the Bible.  This put them is difficulty with church officials who tried to have them arrested and thrown in jail for refusing to participate in church rituals. 

    While in Holland, the Pilgrims strictly honored the Sabbath Day by not performing any labor on Sunday.  They studied the writings of earlier Protestants and Separatists, such as Martin Luther and John Calvin.

    The Pilgrims believed that before the foundation of the world, God predestined to make the world, man, and all things.  He also predestined, at that time, who would be saved, and who would be damned.  Only those God elected would receive God’s grace, and would have faith.  There was nothing an individual could do during their life that would cause them to be saved or damned, since God had already decided who was going to be saved before the creation of the world.  However, God would not have chosen a blatant sinner to be His elect; and therefore those who were godly were likely to be ones that God had elected to be saved.

    This is what is known as Calvinism.  This is what John Calvin and Martin Luther taught.  It is wrong.  But God looks on the hearts of His elect people.  They had come, and at a great price, away from the anti-Christian Roman Catholic (universal) Church and the Church of England but they failed to go far enough. 

    They missed the jump to Covenant Theology.  They were the people who inherited the covenant that was made with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  They were their descendants.  That is one reason we are told in the New Testament to “look to Abraham.” 

    We have had the advantage of seeing all of the mistakes and false doctrines that have been put out by Protestants and Catholics alike.  It is the covenant doctrine that will hold to be the truth and faithful doctrine that will unite our people.  We are living 400 years closer to the end.

  9. What do you think happened?  What would you do if you were a Pilgrim, hearing these vicious, verbal, torturous outbursts?  At the peak of this tormenting, this same crewman suddenly took gravely ill of an unknown fever and died within a single day!  No one else caught this mysterious disease, and he was the first to go over the side of the boat.  No more mocking from the crew!  What a great deliverance from an unnecessary nuisance.  And no Pilgrim died on the voyage to the New World.

There are many more “miracles” to look at:

  • The Pilgrims were suppose to land in Virginia, but were prevented from going there by a vicious storm.

  • The Pilgrims decided to live in Plymouth, which is located in Massachusetts.  They were free from any Charter, so they had to establish their own government.  At this time of year, 393 years ago, they wrote and signed the “Mayflower Compact.”

  • The Pilgrims did not wear the dark clothes that are worn in plays in schools, but wore clothes of modest, but different colors.  It was their religious cousins, the Puritans, who were to shortly follow the Pilgrims to America who had these restrictions on dress.

  • Squanto, when he was about to die, asked Governor Bradford if he would pray for him so that he could go to the Englishman’s God in Heaven when he died.  He also asked Bradford to give various things as gifts to his English friends back at Plymouth. Within a few days, Squanto was dead.  I can guess what the Governor answered Squanto, for he was a Calvinist; but this was their big error. If Bradford was of the Christian Identity belief I know what he would have told Squanto!   

  • The Pilgrims were a people who read their Geneva Bibles and discovered that the Church in their nation was wrong.  What should they do?  They separated and came out of the antichristian church and started their own churches.  What a good thought…may we learn from their lesson!

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

My Mother's Fatal Song

by Pastor Don Elmore

September 15, 2013

Scripture Reading: Psalms 139:19-24

The Song My Mother Sang

I was born in 1942; my mother in 1913.  She would have turned 100 years old this year.  The Federal Reserve System went into effect in the last days of the year in which she came into this world.  What a sinful disaster this banking system has been!  But there was something else that happened the year that she was born and I want to tell you about it today. 

All through the time that my mother was alive, I remember a long song that she would break out and sing.  The lyrics of the song seemed difficult to understand the real meaning and she didn’t know all of the song; only about one-fourth of it.  We (I and my brother and sister) would ask:  “Mother, what does that song mean?”  

She would always just laugh and say that she really didn’t know.  It was just about a little girl who was murdered in a pencil factory.  “Murdered in a pencil factory?”  I would answer.  “What does that have to do with anything?”

As the years rolled on, I gradually learned a little bit more.  So this past Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009; I was excited when I saw that there was a movie about what mother used to sing about.  I read the explanation of what the main points of the movie that was going to broadcast on MONDAY!  Monday, I thought; today is Tuesday.  I missed it.  It was being televised on cable.

But that was the break that I needed.  I “googled” and “dogpiled” the topic and I was SHOCKED at what I learned.  It took almost 67 years but I finally learned what the song was about and that it played a major part in American History.  Situations and events that I had taken part in and visited over my lifetime began to be put together into the right view of what really happened.  I worked the rest of the week on the message that I was excited to bring to you on Sunday.

It is now four years later.  I went rummaging through my past sermons and found this one that I gave.  My last sermon I talked about what happened in America 50 years ago; so it seems fitting that today I would speak about what happened in America 100 years ago.

Our mother was a singer.  She sang with her sisters all over Northern Kentucky in church after church.  They also sang on WLW 700 AM radio.  Music just flowed out of her as she did her daily chores.  But there was one song that mother did not know what it meant.  She only knew about one-fourth of the verses of this long song.   

Here are all the verses from the song that my mother used to sing:

“Little Mary Phagan
went to town one day,
And went to the pencil factory;
To see the big parade.

She left home at eleven,
And kissed her mother goodbye,
Not one time did the poor child think;
That she was going to die.

Leo Frank met her,
With a brutal heart we know,
He smiled and said, ‘Little Mary,
Now you will go home no more.’

He sneaked along behind her,
Till she reached the metal room,
He laughed and said, ‘Little Mary,
You have met your fatal doom.’

She fell upon her knees,
And to Leo Frank she pled,
He took this stick from the trash pile
And hit her across the head.

The tears rolled down her rosy cheeks,
While the blood flowed down her back,
But still she remembered telling her mother
What time she would be back.

He killed little Mary Phagan
It was on a holiday
And he called on Jim Conley
To take her body away.

He took her to the basement,
She was bound hand and feet,
And down in the basement
Little Mary lay asleep.

Newt Lee was the watchman;
He went to wind his key;
Away down in the basement
Was nothing he could see.

They phoned for the officers;
Their names I do not know;
They came to the pencil factory,
Says to Newt, “You must go.”

They took him to the jail house;
They bound him in his cell;
The poor old innocent negro
Had nothing he could tell.

Mother sits a-weeping;
She weeps and mourns all day
And hopes to meet her darling
In a better land some day.

Come, all ye good people,
Wherever you may be.
Suppose that ‘Little Mary’
Belonged to you or me.

I have an idea in my mind
When Frankie comes to die
And stands for an examination
In the courthouse in the sky.

He’ll be so astonished
To what the angels say
And how he killed little Mary
Upon that holiday.

Judge Roan passed a sentence;
He passes it very well;
The Christian doers of heaven
Sent Leo Frank to hell.”

What a strange song.  Did you notice the last two lines? 

“The Christian doers of heaven
Sent Leo Frank to hell.”  

How did they do that?  Who were the Christian doers of heaven?  And why and how did they send Leo Frank to hell?

The Meaning of the Song

After almost 67 years, I finally learned the meaning of this song.  Before I give the explanation, let’s look at a couple of Scriptures:

John 7:1 “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not walk in Judaea, because the JEWS sought to kill him.” 

Notice who it says wanted to kill Jesus.  It doesn’t say the Muslims, or Hindus or Buddhists or anyone else, but it says JEWS.  Jesus would not go to Judaea because the JEWS sought to kill him.

John 7:13 Later, at the feast of Tabernacles, it said that “Howbeit no man spoke openly of him [Jesus], for fear of the JEWS.”

Here it says that no man spoke openly of Him because they feared the JEWS.  They didn’t fear the people of any other religion, but they feared the JEWS.

In the next chapter, we find Jesus had a strong confrontation with these same people.  Jesus said to them:

John 8:40-44 “But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth….

Ye do the deeds of your father….

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me, for I proceeded forth and came from God….

Why do ye not understand my speech?  Even because ye [jews]cannot hear my word.

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

Doesn’t this teach, along with many other verses, that these people cannot be HEARERS OF THE TRUTH?  They have a different father; they are antichrists!  They are vipers and not sheep.  And you cannot change a viper into a sheep!

The Story of Mary Phagan

Mary PhaganMary was 12 years old.  She looked like she was 18.  She was born in Marietta, Georgia and had moved recently to Atlanta.  Her father had passed away and her mom had remarried.  The step-father had a decent job.  But this was 1913….and times were different.

Mary Phagan was 12 years old when she was murdered in Atlanta Georgia by the President of the B’nai B’rith:  Leo Frank.

There were no televisions, computers, calculators, iPods, cell phones, etc.  There were telephones but they were line-phones and there was a switchboard operator.  Public schools were different.  Mary was informed by her school that she couldn’t go until the next semester when they would have enough seats.  So, Mary went to work at the pencil factory.

National Pencil Co. Atlanta, GAAt the pencil factory, her boss was Leo Frank.  He was born in Texas and moved to Brooklyn for his school years.  He graduated from Cornell University.  He married a girl who was descended from a strong Jewish family that had been instrumental in building the first synagogue in Atlanta, Georgia.  It was there that they eventually moved, when Leo accepted a job supervising the pencil factory.  It was owned by her uncle, who had served in the Confederate army. 

The National Pencil Co., in Atlanta, Georgia; where Leo Frank was the supervisor and where Mary Phagan, a young worker, was murdered; it happened 100 years ago.

Leo Frank was Jewish and a perverted bisexual.  He was President of the Atlanta B’nai B’rith.  What?  He was President of the B’nai B’rith?  The B’nai B’rith is the Jewish lodge of the Freemasons.  And he also was a frequent guest at the local whore house.  And it was not uncommon for him to take advantage of both boys and girls in his pencil factory office.  All this came out in court.

It was said that he would station Jim Conley (a Negro) outside his door and signal him to lock and unlock the door whenever he would get a boy or girl inside his office to molest.  This was the situation when on April 26; Mary came to the pencil factory office to get her pay check.

Mary had only worked one day that week — Monday.  She was off the rest of the week because the metal that she put onto the pencil was not in stock.  Later in the week, this was 1913, it was told the workers that they would be paid on Friday and not Saturday because Saturday was a holiday — Confederate Memorial Holiday. The pencil factory and most of the stores was closed; but Leo Frank would be in the office and available for those who were not there on Friday.

Mary took the trolley from her home to the pencil factory; it took only about 10 minutes.  She told her friends that after she got her check she would join them for the parade.  At noon Mary went to the second floor office of Mr. Frank to get her check.  Her pay for one day’s work was $1.20!  My, how inflation has changed our lives. 

Her check was given to her by Mr. Frank.  This much was held to be true by both sides in the courtroom.  But after this...there were some major differences. 

The case went to court from July 28 till August 14, 1913.  It became a major national story.  Newspapers were well represented and they ran stories from both sides.  There were two major detective agencies involved.

It became the case of the century...North vs. South; Jew vs. Christian; Black vs. Jew; Country vs. City; Wealth vs. Low Income; Boss vs. Worker; etc.  It reminds me of the O. J. Simpson case in my lifetime—with